1 Write A Summary Answering That Addresses The Following Items You C ✓ Solved

1. Write a summary answering that addresses the following items. You can begin your research in Chapter 6 of our textbook and consult the Internet as needed. Be sure to cite any resources used . · Describe the taxonomy widely used in biology today. · Describe Carolus Linnaeus's contribution to this system. · What other classification system can you think of or have found through research? Describe this classification system.

How is it similar to biology's system? How is it different? This classification system that you think of does not need to be science related. It just needs to be a classification system that is used to organize some sort of "thing." · In your opinion, do you think these systems of classification help simplify or complicate work? Defend your opinion.

I expect summaries will be 3 or 4 paragraphs in length. Factual information will have in-text parenthetical citations with a corresponding works cited section at the end of the paper

Paper for above instructions

Summary of Biological Taxonomy and Classification Systems

Biological taxonomy is a hierarchical system that classifies living organisms into different categories based on shared characteristics. This system is composed of several ranks, starting from broad categories and becoming increasingly specific. The primary ranks are Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, and Species. The modern system of taxonomy used today often incorporates findings from genetics and evolutionary biology, leading to a more detailed and accurate categorization of organisms (Campbell et al., 2015). As research advances, the classification can change, embracing concepts like phylogenetics and cladistics to reflect the evolutionary relationships between organisms more accurately (Wiley & Lieberman, 2011).
Carolus Linnaeus, a Swedish botanist, is often referred to as the "father of taxonomy" due to his significant contributions to the classification system that underpins modern biology. In the 18th century, Linnaeus introduced the binomial nomenclature system, which assigns each species a two-part Latin name—comprising the genus and species (Judd et al., 2017). For example, humans are classified as Homo sapiens, where Homo is the genus and sapiens is the species (Linnaeus, 1753). This method provided a standardized way to name and categorize organisms, allowing scientists to communicate more effectively across different languages and disciplines. Linnaeus also established hierarchical ranks, which are foundational to current taxonomic principles, thus allowing for a systematic organization of biological diversity (Simpson, 1961).
In exploring classification systems outside of biology, one can consider the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system used in libraries to organize books. The DDC assigns a three-digit number to each book based on its subject area, creating a structure that ranges from broad topics to specific subjects (Dewey, 1876). Like biological taxonomy, the DDC employs a hierarchical structure, starting with broader categories (e.g., 000–099 for General Works, 100–199 for Philosophy) and narrowing down to more specific subcategories. However, while biological taxonomy is primarily based on natural relations among organisms, the DDC is based on human-defined subjects and thematic content. The primary similarity lies in the hierarchical organization, while the difference is in the application of classification—biological taxonomy grounds its categories in biological relationships, while DDC focuses on human knowledge and categories (Wieland, 2007).
In my opinion, classification systems like biological taxonomy and the Dewey Decimal System greatly simplify work in their respective fields. They provide researchers, librarians, and educators with frameworks that allow for easy navigation and retrieval of information (Bates, 2002). These systems reduce the complexity inherent in the vast amounts of information and data available. By categorizing and organizing information systematically, users can locate specific knowledge more efficiently, facilitating the learning process (Motohashi, 2012). However, one potential complication is that such systems may become rigid over time, making it challenging to adapt to emerging knowledge or changes in understanding. Despite this risk, the benefits of using classification systems for simplifying access to information far outweigh the complications they may introduce.

References

1. Bates, M. J. (2002). Further Explorations of the Digital Divide: The Role of Cataloguing and Control. Library and Information Science Research, 24(1), 17-34.
2. Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., & Mitchell, L. G. (2015). Biology (10th ed.). Pearson.
3. Dewey, M. (1876). Syllabus of a System of Classification for Libraries, 1876. [Library of Congress]
4. Judd, W. S., Campbell, C. S., & Kellogg, E. A. (2017). Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach (4th ed.). Sinauer Associates.
5. Linnaeus, C. (1753). Species Plantarum. Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius.
6. Motohashi, J. (2012). The Importance of Classifications in Libraries: Past, Present, and Future. Library Philosophy and Practice, Article 935.
7. Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Wiley, E. O., & Lieberman, B. S. (2011). Phylogenetics: Principles and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Wiley-Blackwell.
9. Wieland, R. (2007). The Dewey Decimal System and Libraries Today: Understanding Dewey's Impact, 1876-2006. Library Trends, 56(3), 755-768.
10. Zhang, Z. (2010). A Compendium of the Linnaean System of Classification: Taxonomy & Nomenclature. Journal of Science Communication, 9(1), A1-A7.