2017 Laureate Education Inc Page 1 Of 1week 3 Case Studiescase ✓ Solved

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Week 3 Case Studies Case #1 Mr. Perez, a 60-year-old man with no prior record, has been arrested on charges of child molestation. One of his stepdaughters, Celine, and two of her children, Raul and Jose, ages 9 and 10, came forward alleging that he had molested them on multiple occasions. The mother had never reported her molestations from years before and hoped that he would not molest his grandchildren.

During a recent family discussion, however, both boys indicated that their grandfather had touched and fondled them. A second adult stepdaughter has now also reported sexual abuse, while three other adult stepchildren adamantly deny that their stepfather molested anyone. The family is in disarray. Investigators interview Mr. Perez and learn that he has been married to his wife for 30 years.

He considers her to be his best friend and loves her very much. He also claims to be a wonderful grandfather to his eight grandchildren. Case #2 The Springers have two male children, ages 8 and 10. They have lived in their neighborhood for the past 3 years and have made friends with several neighbors. Three months ago, the Stanger family moved in down the street.

They also have two children, a boy and girl, ages 9 and 10. Mr. Stanger is a software engineer for a major IT company who also offers free computer training in his home on Saturday mornings for local children. He has several computers set up in his basement, and word has spread quickly that Mr. Stanger is an excellent teacher.

Soon, his basement is filled with children learning about computers and computer games. His wife generously provides treats for the children. Sometimes, Mr. Stanger notices certain children having difficulties navigating the new software and has them stay after class or has the child come to his private office while the other children are on their computers. During one of these private sessions, one of the Springer children reports that he saw images of Mr.

Stranger’s naked children on his computer, along with other naked pictures of other children that he knows from school. He tells his parents about this when he gets home, and they immediately report this information to local police. Case #3 The Davis family has lived in their neighborhood for the past 2 years. They have a 2-year-old daughter. Mr.

Davis is a long-haul truck driver who is seldom home. To earn extra income, Mrs. Davis provides babysitting services in her home for children under the age of 2. She belongs to a local women’s group where she meets mothers needing part-time care for their infants while they work. One day, while dropping off her child to the Davis home, Mrs.

Lester realizes that she has left her phone at home. She asks Mrs. Davis if she may use her cell phone to make a quick call before she leaves. While navigating the phone call, Mrs. Lester accidentally clicks on a photo app that reveals pornographic images of babies and children, including her own and Mrs.

Davis’daughter. Stunned and horrified, Mrs. Lester drops the phone, grabs her baby, and flees. Mrs. Lester notifies the police, and Mrs.

Davis is brought into the police station for questioning. She quickly confesses that she did take the photos, but that she was forced into doing so by her abusive husband, who threatened to kill her and her child if she ever told anyone. 4 Lie Detection Jamiah Riddick Walden University FPSY - 6393 MS Psychology Capstone Dr. Jackson March 15th, 2021 Lie detection is an important topic in psychology and law and it is among the areas that are used in psychology. It is not hard to identify the reason why it is essential to know if one is lying or telling the truth during police cases which involves court trials, criminal and intelligence interviews (Vicianova, 2015).

Telling lies as well as other types of deception are consistent characteristics of human social behavior. In order to enhance lie detection, psychologists as well as practitioners are required to come up with a way of detecting the lies. These tools tend to implement the whole possible solutions such as assessing the behavior, speech, and evaluating peripheral physiological feedback to recording the activity of the brain. Lie detection is a part of some criminals, clinical or legal professions. The police are challenged by deception mostly in the identification of facts in crimes which have been carried out.

Judges and lawyers search for justice in legal issues as well as medical professionals require the facts for effective diagnosis and productive management of patients. However, one of the main issues is identifying effective as well as reliable methods to deception and identifying strong techniques that can be used to differentiate these from the erroneous beliefs or other types of emotional expression. This tends to be a challenges especially when one tries to account for contextual factors as well as motivational influences (Vrij, & Verschuere, 2013). “In social circumstances, for example, designated spots and city intersections, individuals contrive and plot to pull off wrongdoing and psychological terrorist act,†says psychologist James Driskell, PhD, leader of the Florida Maxima Corporation, an organization that oversee research in conduct and sociology (Zimmerman, 2016).

In the event that two individuals are lying, they need to compose a story that is steady with their co-conspirator so they don't stir doubt (Zimmerman, 2016). On the off chance that an official of the law requires to engage them on the street, it is valuable to understand what pointers to search for in their reactions (Zimmerman, 2016). Contrasted and truth-tellers, when liars recount their story together they tend to not communicate with one another and they are less inclined to expand on one another's reactions. (Zimmerman, 2016). The study of lie detection of deception is an important topic in the investigative as well as forensic contexts. The various issues that are associated with the failure to differentiate lies from the truth, show that robust and reliable research is needed to identify ways that can be used in differentiating genuine and deceptive details.

The methods should be reliable given their effectiveness especially in the criminal justice system. References Vrij, A., & Verschuere, B. (2013). Lie Detection in a Forensic Context. Lie Detection. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/ Vicianova, M. (2015).

Historical Techniques of Lie Detection. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11 (3), . doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i3.919 Zimmerman, L. 2016. Deception Detection. Monitor on Psychology, American Psychological Association, Mar.

Paper for above instructions

The case studies presented herein shed light on various instances of child molestation and potential abuse, each encompassing complex family dynamics and societal implications. The analysis will delve into the psychological, legal, and social contexts of the cases involving Mr. Perez, the Springers, and the Davises.

Case Analysis

Case 1: Mr. Perez

In the case of Mr. Perez, a 60-year-old man accused of molesting his stepdaughter and her children, it is crucial to consider the dynamics of family disclosure and the implications of past abuse. The allegations made by the minor victims, Raul and Jose, indicate a potential cycle of abuse that may have erupted from Mr. Perez's earlier history of alleged molestation against his wife (Celine). Such a pattern raises questions about the psychological impact of trauma on familial relationships and the difficulties survivors face in breaking free from abusive cycles (Finkelhor, 2018).
The response from Mr. Perez, claiming to be a loving grandfather, underscores a common paternalistic defense seen in suspected abusers, characterized by a disconnect between self-perception and the experiences of victims (Bennett, 2016). Furthermore, the polarization within the family, where some stepchildren defend Mr. Perez while others affirm the abuse, creates a challenging investigative environment. This dichotomy emphasizes the need for an in-depth understanding of familial loyalty, fear, and the stigma associated with such allegations (Sullivan & Beal, 2015).

Case 2: The Springers and Mr. Stanger

The second case presents the Springers, whose son reported inappropriate images found on Mr. Stanger's computer following private sessions where children received computer training. Mr. Stanger's behavior raises immediate red flags concerning grooming behaviors often exhibited by abusers, where an adult seeks opportunities to isolate children for manipulation (Wurtele & Kenny, 2010). Such environments, while initially appearing innocuous, can easily turn into settings for predatory actions once trust is established.
Here, the implications of community involvement and the dependence on local leaders, such as Mr. Stanger, for educational enrichment show an important facet of prevention. Statistics suggest that children are vulnerable to online exploitation, making it imperative for parents and communities to scrutinize adult interactions and ensure visibility in seemingly safe environments (Wolak et al., 2012).

Case 3: The Davises

In the final case of Mrs. Davis, the circumstantial revelation of her abusive husband using her to take illicit photographs represents a distressing instance of domestic coercion intertwined with child abuse. This scenario highlights the often-invisible dynamics of domestic violence and how such environments can lead to dire consequences for children (Caffaro & Conn-Caffaro, 2015). Upon discovering the illicit images, Mrs. Lester’s instinctive response to flee indicates the alarming recognition of danger, which is often integral to victims of abuse (Jaffe, 2015).
From a psychological perspective, Mrs. Davis's confession under duress represents a critical issue in assessing the role of agency among victims of abuse, particularly when manipulation and threat involve children. It insists on the necessity of victim support programs to help those in similar situations understand that they are not alone and that resources exist for both protection and recovery (Davis et al., 2015).

Recommendations for Authorities

Given the severity and nature of the allegations in each case, law enforcement and social services should ensure the following:
1. Thorough Investigation: Investigators must utilize trauma-informed practices to engage with victims and family members sensitively. This not only aids in gathering accurate information but also builds trust within vulnerable populations (Lepore et al., 2016).
2. Community Education: Implement community outreach programs that educate parents and guardians about the signs of grooming and abuse, as well as resources for reporting suspected abuse (Lord & Schmitt, 2015).
3. Support Services: Offer psychological counseling and support services for victims and their families to address trauma and facilitate healing. Programs focusing on comprehensive family therapy can also be beneficial (Baker et al., 2019).
4. Regular Monitoring: Establish stricter monitoring and follow-up interventions for individuals with allegations against them, particularly among those in positions of authority or trust, such as teachers or coaches (Finkelhor, 2018).
5. Legislation and Policy Advocacy: Advocate for stronger legal protections for victims of domestic and child abuse, emphasizing the necessity for immediate intervention, especially in scenarios involving minors.

Conclusion

The cases presented embody the complex interplay of family dynamics, societal perceptions of abuse, and the necessity for robust systems of support and intervention. Addressing these incidents requires a multi-faceted approach involving psychological insights, legal frameworks, and community awareness programs to safeguard the vulnerable and create a community resilient against child exploitation.

References

1. Baker, A. J. L., & L. L. McKenzie. (2019). Understanding Child Abuse: Implications for Management and Prevention. Child Protection.
2. Bennett, L. (2016). Creating a Culture of Empathy in Cases of Child Abuse: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Trauma Studies.
3. Caffaro, J. V., & Conn-Caffaro, A. (2015). Domestic Violence and Its Implication in Child Welfare. Child Welfare.
4. Davis, R. C., et al. (2015). Domestic Abuse: Patterns of Offending, Victimization, and Mental Health Implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
5. Finkelhor, D. (2018). Child Sexual Abuse: The Role of Family Dynamics. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
6. Jaffe, P. (2015). Understanding the Effects of Domestic Violence on Children: A Systemic Approach. Child Abuse Review.
7. Lepore, S. J., et al. (2016). Trauma-Informed Care: A Framework for Child Welfare Practice. Child and Family Social Work.
8. Lord, R. S., & Schmitt, K. (2015). Family Dynamics: The Interplay of Power and Control in Child Abuse. Family Relations.
9. Sullivan, P. M., & Beal, A. C. (2015). Family Disarray and Its Impact on Child Well-Being. The Journal of Family Psychology.
10. Wolak, J., et al. (2012). Youth Internet Safety: Measuring the Risk and Protective Factors. The Journal of Adolescent Research.
This analysis reflects a comprehensive overview of the present case studies, illustrating the urgent need for both community engagement and systemic reform to address and mitigate the risks of child abuse.