3102020 Appraisal Of Proposals Scoring Guidehttpscourseroomccape ✓ Solved
3/10/2020 Appraisal of Proposals Scoring Guide 1/2 Appraisal of Proposals Scoring Guide Due Date: Unit 9 Percentage of Course Grade: 25%. CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Design a program proposal utilizing a nonprofit organization model. 16% Does not present a program proposal that is appropriate for a nonprofit organization model. Describes a program that a nonprofit organization may implement, but does not clearly link this proposal to a nonprofit organization model. Designs a program proposal utilizing a nonprofit organization model.
Designs a program proposal utilizing a nonprofit organization model that emphasizes the organization's mission or outreach. Design a program proposal utilizing a for-profit business model. 16% Does not present a program proposal that is appropriate for a for-profit business model. Describes a program that a for-profit business may implement, but does not clearly link this proposal to a for-profit business model. Designs a program proposal utilizing a for-profit business model.
Develops a program proposal utilizing a for- profit business model that emphasizes the business' social responsibility as a corporate citizen or social entrepreneurship. Differentiate what the significant pieces of a community needs assessment are in each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 13% Does not present the community needs assessment as part of either program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. Discusses community needs assessment information for one, but not both types of entities, or misses identifying significant pieces of the assessment. Differentiates what the significant pieces of a community needs assessment are in each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business.
Integrates significant pieces of a community needs assessment into each of the program design proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. Integrate accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 13% Does not present accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. Discusses information on diversity and inclusion through approaches that are culturally sensitive or accessible for one, but not both program design proposals. Integrates accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business.
Critiques how well each program design integrates accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for a nonprofit organization and a for-profit business. Explain what ethical issues arise in conducting program development for both proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 13% Does not present ethical issues related to program development that are specific for each of the proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. States but does not explain information on ethics regarding program development, or lacks information for one of the programs. Explains what ethical issues arise in conducting program development for both proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business.
Critiques how program development proposals address ethical issues that may impact government funding or contracting. 3/10/2020 Appraisal of Proposals Scoring Guide 2/2 CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Determine an appropriate program evaluation approach for each design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 16% Does not present a program evaluation for both proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. Identifies a program evaluation for one, but not both programs, or the evaluation approach lacks important aspects to assess the program. Determines an appropriate program evaluation approach for each design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business.
Proposes an appropriate evaluation for each design for a nonprofit organization and a for- profit business. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. 13% Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. Communicates with persistent writing errors that impede the message or includes language the is not respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.
Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, is consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession, and is supported with reputable sources.
Paper for above instructions
Introduction
In today’s socio-economic climate, organizations must evolve and adapt their approaches to address community needs effectively. Nonprofit and for-profit organizations present unique opportunities for program development. This proposal outlines a community-based program aimed at enhancing mental health awareness and support, developed specifically for both a nonprofit and a for-profit business model.
Program Proposal for Nonprofit Organization: “MindCare Initiative”
Proposed Program Overview
The "MindCare Initiative" is designed to support mental health awareness, provide resources for mental wellness, and create safe spaces for open discussions around mental health challenges. The program will offer workshops, support groups, and outreach activities aimed at educating the community about mental health and destigmatizing mental illness.
Emphasis on the Organization's Mission
The nonprofit's mission is to promote wellness and empower individuals through education and community support. The MindCare Initiative aligns directly with this mission by providing essential mental health resources and fostering community engagement around mental health issues.
Community Needs Assessment
A community needs assessment will identify significant challenges and gaps in mental health support services within the community. Key components of this assessment include:
- Demographics: Understanding the age, ethnicity, and socio-economic status of the community.
- Current Services: Analyzing existing mental health services and gaps.
- Surveys and Focus Groups: Engaging community members to gather insights on their experiences and needs regarding mental health.
Data will be gathered from local health departments, community organizations, and direct surveys to drive the assessment (Bennett & O’Brian, 2016).
Accessible and Culturally Sensitive Approaches
To ensure inclusivity, the program will:
- Multilingual Resources: Provide materials and workshops in multiple languages to cater to the diverse community (Cheng et al., 2018).
- Collaborations with Local Groups: Work with culturally specific organizations to understand unique community challenges and incorporate culturally relevant practices into workshops.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical issues arise such as ensuring confidentiality in group settings and maintaining the integrity of information shared during workshops. It is crucial to establish clear guidelines and maintain a focus on ethical considerations while working with vulnerable populations (McCoy & Theeke, 2019).
Program Evaluation Approach
The evaluation will adopt a mixed-methods approach:
- Quantitative Metrics: Measuring attendance, surveys pre-and post-program participation to quantify changes in knowledge and stigma.
- Qualitative Feedback: Collecting participant testimonials and case studies to gain in-depth insights into the impacts of the program (Smith et al., 2021).
---
Program Proposal for For-Profit Business: “MindCare Workplace Program”
Proposed Program Overview
The "MindCare Workplace Program" aims to offer mental health resources and wellness support tailored for employees within the organization. This initiative includes mental health days, workshops, and access to mental health professionals.
Emphasis on Social Responsibility
For-profit organizations have a corporate social responsibility (CSR) to contribute positively to employee well-being. The MindCare Workplace Program enhances employee satisfaction and productivity, aligning with corporate values of social responsibility. Research shows that healthy employees are more engaged and productive in their roles (Conger, 2020).
Community Needs Assessment
The community assessment for the workplace will focus on:
- Employee Demographics: Understanding employee composition, cultural backgrounds, and specific challenges faced within the workplace setting.
- Workplace Culture: Analyzing the current organizational support for mental health and identifying existing barriers to seeking help.
- Anonymous Surveys: Implementing an employee survey to gather data on perceived mental health needs within the company.
Accessible and Culturally Sensitive Approaches
The MindCare Workplace Program will incorporate:
- Employee Resource Groups (ERGs): Forming groups focused on diverse employee backgrounds to ensure representation and dialogue tailored to various cultures.
- Flexible Resources: Providing digital content that allows employees to access mental health resources at their convenience (Taylor, 2017).
Ethical Considerations
For-profit organizations must navigate ethical dilemmas regarding employee privacy and the implications of promoting mental health at work. Ensuring policies are in place for confidentiality when employees seek assistance is crucial (Roberts et al., 2022).
Program Evaluation Approach
The evaluation will focus on both quantitative and qualitative metrics by:
- Employee Surveys: Measuring changes in employees’ perceptions of mental health support before and after program implementation.
- Focus Groups: Engaging employees to discuss their experiences, satisfaction, and any areas for improvement (Jones, 2018).
---
Comparison of Community Needs Assessments
Both proposals emphasize community engagement, data-driven assessments, and cultural competency. However, the nonprofit assessment focuses on a broader community perspective, while the for-profit assessment is tailored to employees and the organizational culture.
Conclusion
The development of both the "MindCare Initiative" and the "MindCare Workplace Program" highlights the importance of tailored interventions, ethical considerations, and community needs assessments. By adopting accessible and culturally sensitive approaches, both models can address mental health needs while supporting their respective missions and business strategies.
References
1. Bennett, L., & O’Brian, K. (2016). Community needs assessments: Bridging the gap in service delivery. Journal of Community Practice, 24(4), 323-335.
2. Cheng, J., Yang, K., & Smith, J. (2018). Language and cultural nuances in community mental health services. Cultural Psychiatry, 25(1), 55-67.
3. Conger, J. (2020). The impact of mental health programs on employee productivity and satisfaction. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 123-135.
4. Jones, L. (2018). Measuring the effectiveness of workplace mental health initiatives: A systematic review. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 33(1), 61-80.
5. McCoy, J., & Theeke, L. (2019). Navigating ethical obligations in nonprofit mental health initiatives. Social Work Ethics, 18(1), 103-115.
6. Roberts, S., Green, C., & Bennett, A. (2022). Ethical challenges of mental health support in corporate environments. Business Ethics Quarterly, 32(3), 405-426.
7. Smith, R., Garcia, K., & Nelson, A. (2021). Evaluating community-based programs: Methodological approaches and lessons learned. Evaluation and Program Planning, 85, 101885.
8. Taylor, H. (2017). The use of technology in promoting mental health programs at work. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(5), 1129-1139.
9. Adams, B., & King, T. (2019). Reducing stigma around mental health: An evidence-based intervention. American Journal of Public Health, 109(6), 789-796.
10. Weberg, D. (2020). Innovations in community health programming to support mental health: A review. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 47(2), 233-250.