360o Simulation Caring For A Septic Patientmr Jerry Smith 59 Yo Ma ✓ Solved
360o Simulation: Caring for a Septic Patient Mr. Jerry Smith, 59 y/o male, arrives via ambulance to the emergency department. He reportedly has a fever. EMS inserted a 22 g IV to the left hand and Normal Saline is infusing. Hx- Paraplegia, HTN EMS Vital Signs: BP 140/80 HR 110 RR 16 SpO2 98% Room Air Patient is met by the ED team.
He reports a fever since the morning, staff gave him one ES Tylenol and he says “I think it helped a littleâ€. Currently the patient denies pain. He has an indwelling urinary catheter. He reports that his paraplegia starts at the level of his umbilicus. What are the initial assessment findings by the nurse?
Doctor Barker? Are you concerned about this patient upon arrival to the ED? Please explain your rationale. The nurse is attempting to insert an IV, but the patient has poor vascular access. After a couple attempts, the nurse was able to obtain some of the blood for labs.
What problems can this lead to? Mr. Smith has reported that he was hospitalized for a UTI about one year ago. He has had the indwelling urinary catheter in place since his accident about 5 years ago. His current catheter has been in place for one month.
How often should a urinary catheter be changed? How do you obtain a urine sample from the catheter? Dr. Barker states the patient has SIRS criteria and has ordered the following: CBC CMP Lactate Blood cultures Urinalysis and urine culture Chest X-ray What would you expect to find that is consistent with infection? Since this is a small hospital, they utilize eICU nursing.
The patient is started on Zosyn 3.375 Gm for the UTI and previous history of pseudomonas. They added Vancomycin one gram for antibiotic coverage for the sacral wound. Staff still have not been able to obtain additional IV access, so Dr. Barker places an intraosseous line in the left humerus. The patient is given IV fluids at 30 mL/kg.
The patient weighs 100kg. How much IV fluid should he receive? Over what period of time? While monitoring the patient, the eICU nurse alerts the staff to a change in the patient’s mental status. After his IV fluids have infused his BP remains low.
Dr. Barker has ordered the patient to be transferred to the larger hospital. Additionally ordered Norepinephrine 4 mcg/min, and to titrate to keep the MAP > 65 mmHg. Calculate the infusion rate for the Norepinephrine 4 mcg/min. Available is 8mg in 250 mL % Dextrose.
Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage Fifth Edition Chapter 2 The Organizational Context: Strategy, Structure, and Culture If this PowerPoint presentation contains mathematical equations, you may need to check that your computer has the following installed: 1) MathType Plugin 2) Math Player (free versions available) 3) NVDA Reader (free versions available) 1 Learning Objectives (1 of 2) 2.1 Understand how effective project management contributes to achieving strategic objectives. 2.2 Recognize three components of the corporate strategy model: formulation, implementation, and evaluation. 2.3 See the importance of identifying critical project stakeholders and managing them within the context of project development.
2.4 Recognize the strengths and weaknesses of three basic forms of organizational structure and their implications for managing projects. Learning Objectives (2 of 2) 2.5 Identify the characteristics of three forms of a project management office (P M O). 2.6 Understand key concepts of corporate culture and how cultures are formed. P M B o K Core Concepts Project Management Body of Knowledge (P M B o K) covered in this chapter includes: Project Procurement Management (P M B o K 12) Identify Stakeholders (P M B o K 13.1) Plan Stakeholder Management (P M B o K 13.2) Manage Stakeholder Engagement (P M B o K 13.3) Organizational Influences on Project Management (P M B o K 2.1) Organizational Structures (P M B o K 2.1.3) Organizational Cultures and Styles (P M B o K 2.1.1) Enterprise Environmental Factors (P M B o K 2.1.5) Projects and Organizational Strategy Strategic management—the science of formulating, implementing, and evaluating cross-functional decisions that enable an organization to achieve its objectives.
Consists of: Developing vision and mission statements Formulating, implementing, and evaluating Making cross-functional decisions Achieving objectives Table 2.1 Projects Reflect Strategy Strategy Project Technical or operating initiatives (such as new distribution strategies or decentralized plant operations) Construction of new plants or modernization of facilities Development of products for greater market penetration and acceptance New product development projects New business processes for greater streamlining and efficiency Reengineering projects Changes in strategic direction or product portfolio reconfiguration New product lines Creation of new strategic alliances Negotiation with supply chain members (including suppliers and distributors) Matching or improving on competitors’ products and services Reverse engineering projects Improvement of cross-organizational communication and efficiency in supply chain relationships Enterprise I T efforts Promotion of cross-functional interaction, streamlining of new product or service introduction, and improvement of departmental coordination Concurrent engineering projects Figure 2.2 T O W S Matrix Stakeholder Management Stakeholder analysis is a useful tool for demonstrating some of the seemingly irresolvable conflicts that occur through the planned creation and introduction of new projects.
Project stakeholders are defined as all individuals or groups who have an active stake in the project and can potentially impact, either positively or negatively, its development. Identifying Project Stakeholders Internal Stakeholders Top management Accountant Other functional managers Project team members External Stakeholders Clients Competitors Suppliers Environmental, political, consumer, and other intervener groups Figure 2.3 Project Stakeholder Relationships Managing Stakeholders Assess the environment. Identify the goals of the principal actors. Assess your own capabilities. Define the problem.
Develop solutions. Test and refine the solutions. Organizational Structure Consists of three key elements: Designates formal reporting relationships number of levels in the hierarchy span of control Identifies groupings of individuals into departments departments into the total organization Design of systems to ensure effective communication coordination integration across departments Forms of Organization Structure Functional organizations—group people performing similar activities into departments Project organizations—group people into project teams on temporary assignments Matrix organizations—create a dual hierarchy in which functions and projects have equal prominence Figure 2.4 Example of a Functional Organizational Structure Table 2.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Functional Structures Strengths for Project Management Weaknesses for Project Management 1.
Projects developed within basic functional structure require no disruption or change to firm’s design. 1. Functional siloing makes it difficult to achieve cross-functional cooperation. 2. Enables development of in-depth knowledge and intellectual capital.
2. Lack of customer focus. 3. Allows for standard career paths. 3.
Longer time to complete projects. Blank 4. Varying interest or commitment. Figure 2.6 Example of a Project Organizational Structure Table 2.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Project Structures Strengths for Project Management Weaknesses for Project Management 1. Project manager sole authority 1.
Expensive to set up and maintain teams 2. Improved communication 2. Chance of loyalty to the project rather than the firm 3. Effective decision making 3. Difficult to maintain a pooled supply of intellectual capital 4.
Creation of project management experts 4. Team member concern about future once project ends 5. Rapid response to market opportunities Blank Figure 2.7 Example of a Matrix Organizational Structure Table 2.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Matrix Structures Strengths for Project Management Weaknesses for Project Management 1. Suited to dynamic environments 1. Dual hierarchies mean two bosses 2.
Equal emphasis on project management and functional efficiency 2. Negotiation required in order to share resources 3. Promotes coordination across functional units 3. Workers caught between competing project and functional demands 4. Maximizes scarce resources Blank Heavyweight Project Organizations Organizations can sometimes gain tremendous benefit from creating a fully dedicated project organization.
Lockheed Corporation’s “Skunkworks†Project manager authority expanded Functional alignment abandoned in favor of market opportunism Focus on external customer Figure 2.8 Managers’ Perceptions of Effectiveness of Various Structures on Project Success Project Management Offices Centralized units that oversee or improve the management of projects Resource centers for: Technical details Expertise Repository Center for excellence Figure 2.9 Alternative Levels of Project Offices Forms of P M O s and Control Three forms of P M O s, varying with degrees of control and influence include: Supportive—low control; consultative and provide P M resources and training Controlling—moderate control; requires compliance to adopted P M standards/processes Directive—high control; directly manages projects Models of P M O s In addition to the forms of P M O and varying levels of control, there are models of P M O s with various purposes for companies: Weather station—monitoring and tracking Control tower—project management is a skill to be protected and supported Resource pool—maintain and provide a cadre of skilled project professionals P M O Control Tower Performs four functions: Establishes standards for managing projects Consults on how to follow these standards Enforces the standards Improves the standards Organizational Culture Unwritten Rules of behavior Held by some subset of the organization Taught to all new members Key Factors That Affect Culture Development Technology Environment Geographical location Reward systems Rules and procedures Key organizational members Critical incidents Organizational Culture: Effects on Project Management Departmental interaction Employee commitment to goals Project planning Performance evaluation Summary (1 of 2) Understand how effective project management contributes to achieving strategic objectives.
Recognize three components of the corporate strategy model: formulation, implementation, and evaluation. See the importance of identifying critical project stakeholders and managing them within the context of project development. Recognize the strengths and weaknesses of three basic forms of organizational structure and their implications for managing projects. Summary (2 of 2) Identify the characteristics of three forms of a project management office (P M O). Understand key concepts of corporate culture and how cultures are formed.
Paper for above instructions
Caring for a Septic Patient: A Case Study on Mr. Jerry SmithIntroduction
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection (Singer et al., 2016). It is critical for healthcare providers, particularly nurses and emergency staff, to recognize the signs and symptoms of sepsis promptly to facilitate timely intervention. This case study focuses on Mr. Jerry Smith, a 59-year-old male presenting to the emergency department (ED) with possible sepsis.
Initial Assessment Findings by the Nurse
Upon arrival at the ED, Mr. Smith's initial vital signs indicate a heart rate of 110 beats per minute (tachycardia), normal blood pressure (140/80 mmHg), a respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and an oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 98% on room air. Though he reports a fever, a more thorough assessment could reveal additional complications indicative of sepsis.
Given Mr. Smith's medical history of paraplegia and hypertension, an initial assessment should include evaluating the indwelling urinary catheter and possible urinary tract infection (UTI), which may have precipitated the septic response. Mr. Smith's catheter history is also concerning; he has had it in place for one month, and he had a previous UTI hospitalization (Reignier et al., 2014).
Signs such as altered mental status or decreased responsiveness may not be directly noted but should be monitored closely for subtle changes. Since he denies any pain, evaluating for potential sites of infection, such as wounds or abscesses especially given his history of paraplegia, is critical (Calandra et al., 2016).
Concerns for the Attending Physician, Dr. Barker
Dr. Barker should indeed be concerned upon Mr. Smith's arrival. Several reasons inform this concern:
1. History of Indwelling Catheter: Prolonged use of a catheter increases the risk of UTIs manifesting as sepsis (Cruz et al., 2018).
2. Tachycardia with Fever: The combination of a fever and elevated heart rate may be indicative of an underlying infection or systemic response to infection, leading to SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) (Garnacho-Montero et al., 2016).
3. Paraplegia: This condition entails limited mobility, which, combined with a history of catheterization, raises the risk of infections, particularly in the urinary tract and skin (Friedman et al., 2017).
Challenges Related to Vascular Access
Obtainable vascular access is challenging in Mr. Smith’s case, given the noted poor venous access. Difficulties in establishing IV access can delay treatment and diagnostic measures essential for managing sepsis (Cohen et al., 2019).
Complications from inadequate vascular access can include:
- Delayed administration of antibiotics: Timely broad-spectrum antibiotics are crucial in managing sepsis (Rhodes et al., 2017).
- Increased stress and discomfort for the patient: Multiple attempts at venipuncture can lead to distress for the patient, which may complicate their mental state.
Urinary Catheter Management
For patients like Mr. Smith, urinary catheters should ideally be changed every 30 days or sooner if there are signs of infection or blockages (Berglund et al., 2020). Given Mr. Smith's catheter has been in place for one month, it is critical to assess its patency and signs of infection.
To obtain a urine sample from an indwelling catheter:
1. Use a sterile technique to ensure the sample is uncontaminated.
2. Clamp the catheter for a brief period to increase urine volume in the catheter.
3. Clean the sampling port with an antiseptic wipe before attaching a syringe to draw the sample.
Assessment Results and Laboratory Expectations
The ordered labs indicate suspicion of infection. Expected findings consistent with infection may include:
- CBC: An increased white blood cell count (leukocytosis).
- CMP: Altered levels reflecting renal function or electrolyte imbalances.
- Lactate: Elevated levels indicative of tissue hypoperfusion.
- Blood cultures: Possible growth of pathogens relevant to sepsis.
- Urinalysis and culture: Detection of pathogens and inflammatory markers in the urine.
- Chest X-ray: Possible signs of pneumonia or other pulmonary infections (Rangel et al., 2018).
Fluid Resuscitation Calculation
Mr. Smith weighs 100kg and is to receive IV fluids at 30 mL/kg. The total volume of IV fluids prescribed would be:
\[ 100 \text{ kg} \times 30 \text{ mL/kg} = 3000 \text{ mL} \]
The rate of administration would depend on the time allotted for bolus administration, but typically resuscitation fluids are given over 30 minutes to an hour in septic cases.
Norepinephrine Infusion Calculation
Norepinephrine is prescribed at a rate of 4 mcg/min. To calculate the infusion rate from the provided concentration, we first convert the total dose into micrograms:
\[ 8 \text{ mg} = 8000 \text{ mcg} \text{ in 250 mL} \]
To find mcg/mL:
\[ \frac{8000 \text{ mcg}}{250 \text{ mL}} = 32 \text{ mcg/mL} \]
Now we calculate the infusion rate to achieve 4 mcg/min:
1. Required mL/min = Required dose (4 mcg/min) / Concentration (32 mcg/mL) = 0.125 mL/min.
2. Finally, to express in mL/hour for ease of infusion pump settings:
\[ 0.125 \text{ mL/min} \times 60 = 7.5 \text{ mL/hour} \]
Conclusion
Caring for Mr. Smith requires attentive monitoring and rapid intervention due to his complicated medical history and presentation suggestive of sepsis. By adhering to established protocols for managing sepsis, including fluid resuscitation, antibiotic administration, and thorough laboratory assessments, we can enhance the patient's chances of recovery. Effective communication among healthcare team members and family is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.
References
1. Berglund, A., Möller, K., & Olsson, M. (2020). Catheter care and the risk of urinary tract infection: A review of clinical guidelines. Nursing Standards, 35(3), 48-55.
2. Calandra, T., & Carratala, J. (2016). Guidelines on the management of sepsis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 22, S1-S22.
3. Cohen, J., et al. (2019). Sepsis: a global perspective on the challenge of managing sepsis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 25(4), 236-244.
4. Cruz, M., et al. (2018). The association of indwelling urinary catheters and urinary tract infections in critically ill patients. BMC Infectious Diseases, 18, 250.
5. Friedman, L. A., et al. (2017). Risk of infections in paraplegics: An overview. Spinal Cord, 55, 211-217.
6. Garnacho-Montero, J., et al. (2016). Treatment of sepsis: a model and a systematic review. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 22(6), 1-5.
7. Rangel, L. B., et al. (2018). Evaluation of diagnostic concepts of sepsis: An evidence-based approach. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 56(9).
8. Rhodes, A., et al. (2017). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Critical Care Medicine, 45(3), 486-552.
9. Singer, M., et al. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801-810.
10. Van der Poll, T., & van de Veerdonk, F. L. (2017). Sepsis and the immune system. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(15), 1470-1471.