4tbusn311 Week 5 Writing Assignmentresearch Paper Outline Gradedco ✓ Solved
4 tBUSN311 WEEK 5 WRITING ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH PAPER OUTLINE (Graded) Complete and submit to Week 5 Assignment dropbox. This Assignment will assist you in preparing your Week 7 Assignment Research Paper. Student Name __Tiffani Duncan____ Date ___________________ STOP! FIRST READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS Instructions: · Go to the Week 7 Assignment for the Course Project and read the instructions thoroughly. Then complete each item below by answering each question in the space provided. · Save this as a WORD Document using your Name and Assignment.
Example: JonesWk5ResearchOutline.docx. · Answer on this document. It is in "Word," and spacing will adjust for your replies. · Submit your completed paper to the Week 5 Assignment Dropbox by Sunday night of Week 5 (11:59 pm ET) . · The maximum point value for each item is stated in parentheses. Actual points will be awarded by your instructor with feedback. **** 1. (5 pts) Identify your case study company. For the Week 7 Assignment, choose your case study from one of three companies: Ford, Boeing, or Purdue Pharmaceutical. State here the name of the company you have selected for your Week 7 Research Paper.
ANSWER : Ford. 2. (10 pts) Statement of an ethical dilemma. The company you have chosen to write about (no. 1 above) made a business decision – i.e., chose a course of action – which adversely affected others and the company. In making this decision, the company was faced with an ethical dilemma.
As you have learned, an ethical dilemma is a conflict between alternatives where neither alternative is desirable. Choosing either one will compromise something. Each choice will have its downside: it could compromise ethics, cause ethical and legal problems, cause harm, raise difficult questions, or otherwise lead to an undesirable situation. Ideally, the decision-maker would do both acts or neither, but he cannot. He has to choose and can only select one.
The dilemma is being confronted with these undesirable choices and having to choose one. (For examples of ethical dilemmas, see Bucaro, (2017). Required Reading, Week 5 Lesson). · In a single, well-crafted sentence, state the ethical dilemma presented in your chosen company's situation. ANSWER: As it presented the Ford Pinto Car model, which was likely to cause deaths, Ford faced an ethical dilemma of whether to recall the already manufactured vehicles and modify them for safety or pay off victims of accidents whenever it would happen and save money. 3. (10 pts) Ethical frameworks: · Identify and briefly define the ethical framework illustrated by your chosen company’s decision. (See Weeks 5 and 6 Lessons and Required Readings.) ANSWER: The Company illustrated the egoistic framework whereby much focus was made on the company’s profits.
The framework allows for an individual (in this case, the company) to maximize the amount of sound the outcome would do to them. This is exactly what Ford did so that it would not have to spend a lot of money to save people's lives but rather save it by paying just a little after the damage has been done. · Identify and briefly define the ethical framework that you will argue your chosen company should have utilized to reach a different result in the situation. ANSWER: The Company should have utilized the utilitarian framework. In this framework, every decision should be the one that produces the least amount of pain and distress. For Ford, that decision could be to recall the Pinto and save people's lives even if it would mean spending so much money.
That way, there would be less pain and distress. 4. (5 pts) Recommendation. Identify at least one business practice as a lesson business management can learn from this case study. ANSWER: Ford management should learn to involve low-level employees in the making of particular decisions. The decision not to recall the deadly vehicle model was made only at the management level that no one cared to value the lives of people who would die in explosion crashes.
If lower-level employees of the company were involved, some would have recommended the recalling of the death-trap vehicles, and lives would have been saved. 5. (70 pts) References . APA help source You are starting on the next page under the heading, References , list in an APA7 formatted citations list at least seven (7) credible sources you will use to support your Week 7 Course Project. Go to the next page . References De Los Reyes Jr, G., Scholz, M., & Smith, N.
C. (2017). Beyond the "Win-Win," creating shared value requires ethical frameworks. California Management Review , 59 (2), . Haghighattalab, S., Chen, A., Fan, Y., & Mohammadi, R. (2019). Engineering ethics within accident analysis models.
Accident Analysis & Prevention , 129 , . Kaptein, M. (2017). When organizations are too good: Applying Aristotle's doctrine of the mean to the corporate ethical virtues model. Business Ethics: A European Review , 26 (3), . Scharding, T. (2018).
This is Business Ethics: An Introduction . John Wiley & Sons. Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Business ethics: An ethical decision-making approach .
John Wiley & Sons. Strother, S. (2018). When Making Money is More Important Than Saving Lives: Revisiting the Ford Pinto Case. Journal of International & Interdisciplinary Business Research , 5 (1), . Tura, N., Kerà¤nen, J., & Patala, S. (2019).
The darker side of sustainability: Tensions from sustainable business practices in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management , 77 , . BUSN311.Wk5.LA Assignment 2021 © 2021 American Public University Systems *********All this from the semantic scholar site Bonds, R.L. (2018). SBAR Tool Implementation to Advance Communication, Teamwork, and the Perception of Patient Safety Culture. Creative Nursing, 24, .
Lotz, A. (2019). Use of a Communication Tool to Improve the Perception of Continuity of Care. Samimi, S. (2018). Enhance Nurse-Physician Communication. Stewart, K. (2016).
SBAR, communication, and patient safety: an integrated literature review. Cooper, D., & Clark, P. (2020). Preliminary Psychometrics of the Knowledge and Attitudes Toward SBAR Instrument (KA-SBAR). Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice, 13, . Lazzara, E., Riss, R., Patzer, B.S., Smith, D., Chan, Y.R., Keebler, J., Fouquet, S.D., & Palmer, E.M. (2016).
Directly Comparing Handoff Protocols for Pediatric Hospitalists. Hospital pediatrics, 6 12, . Gisick, L.M., Webster, K., Keebler, J., Lazzara, E., Fouquet, S.D., Fletcher, K.A., Fagerlund, A., Lew, V., & Chan, R. (2018). Measuring shared mental models in healthcare. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 23, .
Wickersham, A., Johnson, K.M., Kamath, A.S., & Kaboli, P. (2018). Novel use of communication technology to improve nurse-physician communication, teamwork, and care coordination during bedside rounds*. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 11, . Deerhake, A., & O'Brien, T. (2020). A Quality Improvement Project Using Online Communities of Practice in the Intensive Care Unit.
McFarland, D., Shen, M.J., & Holcombe, R. (2017). Predictors of Satisfaction With Doctor and Nurse Communication: A National Study. Health Communication, 32, . Gausvik, C., Lautar, A., Miller, L., Pallerla, H., & Schlaudecker, J.D. (2015). Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plan and teamwork as well as job satisfaction.
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 8, . Wickersham, A., Zavodnick, J., Thum, A., Robertson, B., & Ackermann, L. (2020). Making Room at the Bedside: Improving Communication Alongside Medical Education Through Interdisciplinary Rounds. American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality, . Teamstepps Clapper, T.C., & Kong, M. (2012).
TeamSTEPPS®: The Patient Safety Tool That Needs to Be Implemented. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8. Schentrup, D.M., Whalen, K., Black, E., Blue, A., & Chacko, L. (2018). Building interprofessional team effectiveness in a nurse-led rural health center. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, 12, 86-90.
Paper for above instructions
Tiffani Duncan
1. Case Study Company
Ford Motor Company
2. Statement of Ethical Dilemma
The Ford Motor Company faced an ethical dilemma concerning the Ford Pinto model, deciding between recalling the vehicles to modify them for safety or opting to pay for accidents that might occur due to their known safety failures, risking human lives for financial savings.
3. Ethical Frameworks
A. Ethical Framework Illustrated by the Company’s Decision
The ethical framework that Ford illustrated with its decision was the egoistic framework. Egoism prioritizes one's own interests and benefits above the welfare of others (Schwartz, 2017). In this instance, Ford's focus was solely on its profit margins and minimizing costs associated with recalls or product modifications. Instead of ensuring the safety of its consumers, the company’s leadership chose a path that would enable them to save money at the cost of human lives. Ford's calculation demonstrated a willingness to exploit customers' safety to maintain financial profitability (Strother, 2018).
B. Recommended Ethical Framework for a Different Outcome
The company should have adopted a utilitarian ethical framework. Utilitarianism evaluates actions based upon the consequences they produce for the majority (De Los Reyes Jr, Scholz, & Smith, 2017). In Ford’s situation, the utilitarian approach would have advocated for recalling the Pinto models to prevent potential loss of life and injuries, placing public welfare above profit. This framework teaches us that the right course of action is one that maximizes overall benefit and minimizes suffering (Kaptein, 2017). Had Ford implemented this approach, they could have saved lives and potentially preserved their reputation and customer trust in the long run.
4. Recommendations
Ford management should learn to include lower-level employees in decision-making processes, especially those that have serious implications on product safety and public welfare. The decision not to recall the Pinto vehicles was made solely at the executive level, where management may have lacked insight into the on-the-ground realities and concerns of consumers. As suggested by the concept of participatory leadership, involving diverse perspectives can yield more ethical outcomes and more robust solutions to difficult dilemmas (Tura, Keränen, & Patala, 2019). If lower-level employees were engaged in discussions surrounding the Pinto’s safety issues, they might have advised recalling it, although it may carry significant costs associated with safety.
5. References
1. De Los Reyes Jr., G., Scholz, M., & Smith, N.C. (2017). Beyond the "Win-Win," creating shared value requires ethical frameworks. California Management Review, 59(2), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617701990
2. Haghighattalab, S., Chen, A., Fan, Y., & Mohammadi, R. (2019). Engineering ethics within accident analysis models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 129, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.007
3. Kaptein, M. (2017). When organizations are too good: Applying Aristotle's doctrine of the mean to the corporate ethical virtues model. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12139
4. Scharding, T. (2018). This is Business Ethics: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
5. Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Business ethics: An ethical decision-making approach. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Strother, S. (2018). When making money is more important than saving lives: Revisiting the Ford Pinto case. Journal of International & Interdisciplinary Business Research, 5(1), 90-101. https://journals.axisjournal.org/index.php/jibra/article/view/373
7. Tura, N., Keränen, J., & Patala, S. (2019). The darker side of sustainability: Tensions from sustainable business practices in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.09.007
8. Bonds, R.L. (2018). SBAR Tool Implementation to Advance Communication, Teamwork, and the Perception of Patient Safety Culture. Creative Nursing, 24(3), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.24.3.189
9. Lotz, A. (2019). Use of a Communication Tool to Improve the Perception of Continuity of Care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(5), 550-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1607620
10. Lazzara, E., Riss, R., Patzer, B.S., Smith, D., Chan, Y.R., Keebler, J., Fouquet, S.D., & Palmer, E.M. (2016). Directly Comparing Handoff Protocols for Pediatric Hospitalists. Hospital Pediatrics, 6(12), 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2016-0379
Conclusion
Through this ethical analysis of Ford Motor Company's decision regarding the Pinto, it is evident that ethical dilemmas can profoundly affect both the public and the institutions involved. Understanding and applying ethical frameworks can lead organizations to make decisions that prioritize human welfare and prevent foreseeable tragedies, reflecting an overall commitment to ethical responsibilities. Advocating for an inclusive culture within corporate governance might also enhance moral decision-making, ultimately benefiting both companies and society.