600 Wordsapa1 Biblical Integrationtopic Foundation Of Us Health Car ✓ Solved

600 words APA 1 biblical integration Topic : Foundation of U.S. Health Care Delivery Thread : What purpose does an understanding of the history of health care delivery serve? Which factor or factors have been predominant in shaping U.S. health care? Is EBM a worthy goal for U.S. health care delivery? Why or why not?

Create a thread using the topic to respond to the prompt. Response should be at least 600 words with at least 2 peer-reviewed sources citations, in addition to the course textbook, in current APA format, and integration of at least 1 biblical principle.

Paper for above instructions

Foundation of U.S. Health Care Delivery: Understanding the History and Its Impact
The history of health care delivery in the United States is a tapestry woven from diverse threads—socioeconomic, political, technological, and cultural influences—that have collectively molded today's health care system. An understanding of this history is not only beneficial but essential for appreciating the complexities of contemporary health care delivery. By examining pivotal factors shaped through time, we can gain insight into how policies, practices, and paradigms continue to evolve.
One of the main factors that have shaped U.S. health care is the evolution of medical technology. From the advent of vaccines in the 18th century (Bennett, 2020) to the contemporary use of telemedicine and artificial intelligence in diagnostics, technological advancements have profoundly influenced health care delivery practices. Historically, the ability to improve diagnostics and treatment options has shifted the focus away from purely reactive medicine to a more preventive and holistic approach. Moreover, advances in medical technology have often been linked to economic interests, influencing the accessibility of these advancements (Blumenthal & Sonnenstuhl, 2015).
Economic factors are another powerful influence on the health care landscape. The U.S. health care system, described by some as a "market-driven" model, is predicated on the principles of consumer choice and competition (Hoffman, 2021). This has resulted in a fragmented delivery system where health care is often treated as a commodity rather than a universal right. The historical development of Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960s signified a turning point in addressing insurance deficits and access disparities for certain vulnerable populations. However, the struggle against rising costs, inequities, and the uninsured population persists to this day (Sparer, 2019).
Government regulations and policies have also been shaped by historical context and prevailing ideologies. For instance, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 aimed to mobilize the market forces to expand insurance coverage while emphasizing preventive care. The ACA can be seen as a culmination of decades of attempts to reform health care delivery, balancing between the need for universal access and the influence of private interests (Zuraw, 2020). The interplay of these economic and regulatory factors underscores the complex historical landscape that informs current discussions about U.S. health care delivery.
Another significant aspect of the U.S. health care delivery system is the evolving role of evidence-based medicine (EBM). EBM emerged in the late 20th century with the intention of integrating clinical expertise, patient values, and the best research evidence into the decision-making process for patient care (Sackett, 1996). Yet, while EBM stands as an ideal goal for U.S. health care delivery, it faces various challenges, including disparities in access to research and implementation science, variability in practitioner engagement, and the integration of patient-centered care.
While many argue that EBM can enhance the quality of care provided, pushback regarding its feasibility and application in practice arises. Critics contend that focusing on evidence, while important, may overlook the unique contexts surrounding individual patients and the socio-cultural factors influencing their care (Greenhalgh et al., 2014). This calls for a balanced approach where quantifiable evidence coexists alongside qualitative understanding of individual health preferences and circumstances.
From a biblical perspective, understanding our history in health care ties into the scriptural call for stewardship and promoting health as a holistic concept (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). The biblical principle of loving one’s neighbor (Mark 12:31) encapsulates the ethical dimensions of health care delivery, demanding both compassion and equity in our reflections on past practices and future policies. By prioritizing care that is not only evidence-based but also rooted in equitable access, we heed the call to fulfill a broader moral obligation.
In conclusion, the history of health care delivery in the United States provides vital insights into the prevailing factors influencing contemporary practices. Economic considerations, technological advancements, and governmental policies remain predominant forces shaping health care. While EBM stands as a commendable goal, careful attention must be focused on integrating holistic care with equitable access to resources and technologies. The biblical emphasis on love and stewardship ought to inspire ongoing dialogue and reform to ensure the U.S. health care delivery system manifests compassion, equity, and service to its diverse populations.
References
Bennett, J. (2020). The Role of Technological Advancements in Health Care History: A Modern Perspective. Journal of Health Care Technology, 15(2), 56-67.
Blumenthal, D., & Sonnenstuhl, W. J. (2015). Narrowing the Quality Gap: The Effect of Economic Factors on Health Care Delivery Systems. Health Affairs, 34(3), 328-335.
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence Based Medicine: A Movement in Crisis? BMJ, 348, g3725.
Hoffman, C. (2021). The Market-driven Health Care System: Challenges and Implications. American Journal of Public Health, 111(8), 1374-1378.
Sackett, D. L. (1996). Evidence-based Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72.
Sparer, M. (2019). The Politics of Health Care Reform in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 380, 2233-2236.
Zuraw, L. (2020). The Affordable Care Act: A Historical Examination. American Journal of Public Health, 110(3), 334-338.