A Textbook Case Of Charityby Wendy Gelman Jd Llmyou Are The Ceo ✓ Solved

A Textbook Case of Charity By Wendy Gelman, J.D., L.L.M. You are the CEO of Eastlane, Inc., a publicly traded, multinational publisher of educational textbooks for use in colleges and universities throughout the world. Eastlane’s most popular and profitable textbook is Great American Literature, written by Dr. C.R. Breach, the preeminent authority in modern American writings.

This text is used in universities across the nation in heavily attended English literature survey courses. The text sells new for 0 a copy and is only sold through university book stores. Eastlane has a corporate policy to prohibit reselling of used texts and has thus far avoided selling on Amazon and other online book retailers, in an effort to prop up the price of their text. It has come to your attention, that three professors at Humongous State University (HSU) have established a program to assist financially strapped students. Upset about the high cost and limited availability of Great American Literature, these professors have scanned the entire text and have set up a website where they have posted the copied text.

Before allowing a student access to the website, the student must demonstrate to the professors’ satisfaction their inability to pay full price for the text. The professors charge each student 5 for access to the website. HSU, the 3 professors and against all students who have accessed their website. Your management team has consulted with Dr. Breach and he is in favor of bringing the suit.

Your approval is needed to initiate the lawsuit. Instructions: 1) Identify the ethical dilemmas 2) Evaluate how stakeholders would be affected by various solutions to your dilemma(s). 3) Discuss the pros and cons of alternative courses of action. 4) Recommend a decision. 5) Make sure to provide the rationale for your decision.

OL-125 Module Three Welcome You’re in the Manager’s Seat Communication in Action New Management Sarah is a manager at a local restaurant that has recently been purchased by new owners. Wait Staff training The new owners have worked extensively with Sarah in illustrating their concept and how they want customers to be treated, and Sarah has shared this same messaging with the wait staff, but they do not seem to be getting the message as she intended it. Bad waiter, good waiter Some are giving customers lackluster service, while others are giving good service but spending too much time with each table and neglecting other customers. Trouble at the restaurant The owners are getting frustrated with Sarah for her seeming lack of ability to change the behavior of the servers, customers are getting frustrated with the inconsistent service, and the wait staff is complaining about lower-than-average tips.

All day Workshop Sarah has been given a final chance to turn the behavior of the wait staff around and has scheduled a full-day workshop for them that she will deliver. Discussion: Communications in Action After reviewing Module Three and the results of your communication and problem=solving skills assessments, describe how you would design and construct the workshop for the wait staff. Please go to the discussion board to participate in this conversation with your classmates. OL - 125 Module Three Welcome You’re in the Manager’s Seat Communication in Action New Management Sarah is a manager at a local restaurant that has recently been purchased by new owners. Wait Staff training The new owners have worked extensively with Sarah in illustrating their concept and how they want customers to be treated, and Sarah has shared this same messaging with the wait staff, but they do not seem to be getting the message as she intended it.

Bad waiter, good waiter Some are giving customers lack luster service, while others are giving good service but spending too much time with each table and neglecting other customers. Trouble at the restaurant The owners are getting frustrated with Sarah for her seeming lack of ability to change the behavior of the servers, customers are getting frustrated with the inconsistent service, and the wait staff is complaining about lower - than - average tips. OL-125 Module Three Welcome You’re in the Manager’s Seat Communication in Action New Management Sarah is a manager at a local restaurant that has recently been purchased by new owners. Wait Staff training The new owners have worked extensively with Sarah in illustrating their concept and how they want customers to be treated, and Sarah has shared this same messaging with the wait staff, but they do not seem to be getting the message as she intended it.

Bad waiter, good waiter Some are giving customers lackluster service, while others are giving good service but spending too much time with each table and neglecting other customers. Trouble at the restaurant The owners are getting frustrated with Sarah for her seeming lack of ability to change the behavior of the servers, customers are getting frustrated with the inconsistent service, and the wait staff is complaining about lower-than-average tips. P a g e | 1 Wanda M. Ramirez A Textbook Case of Charity 1. Identify the ethical dilemmas. of the Great American Literature textbook (written by Dr.

C.R. Breach) made by three illegal, and unethical because it refers to the reproduction, display, and distribution of a product that does not belong to the individuals infringing it. Eastlane, Inc. had a corporate policy to prohibit the resale of used textbooks and avoidance of the resale of the book to online retailers. ï‚· The second dilemma: It is less obvious but still of great significance. How can the accused professors be able to commit this tortious act in plain sight of university management? What safeguards did the university had put in place to prevent or even monitor this type of misconduct?

Does HSU have any documentation to prove that the professors in question attended an Ethical Training at the university? was one of the topics covered on the training presentation? ï‚· Third dilemma: An implied yet dubious fact is that if these professors were trying to aid impoverished students, why selling the book half-price? If their intentions were legitimate, why were the professors obtaining a profit? Why not place the book online for free? ï‚· Fourth dilemma: The suggestion of the establishment of a lawsuit against all the students who have accessed the professors’ website may not be suitable in court. How can the plaintiff demonstrate that those students accessing the website knew these three professors could have been acting with the support of the Fair Use Exception.

Without previous knowledge, some individuals may see the selling of the book half-priced as a generous gesture but may not see it as unethical. ï‚· Fifth dilemma: The textbook is heavily used by students that attended English literature survey courses and was sold at 0 each copy. The book is only sold through university stores and used textbooks cannot be resold or bought online. As stated in the case, the publisher enforced these practices to sustain the price of the textbook. In my opinion, the publisher has created a monopoly with the product and I believe that is morally and ethically wrong to impose this hardship in individuals that are still studying to obtain a degree. 2.

Evaluate how stakeholders would be affected by various solutions to your dilemma (s). ï‚· On the first dilemma: Property rights were granted by federal statute were violated. It was clearly stated in the case that the publisher forbidden the reselling of used books and avoided the online retail selling. In that regard, it can be assumed that the damages or perhaps may face criminal penalties. It may be considered as actual or P a g e | 2 Wanda M. Ramirez statutory damages which are imposed at the court’s discretion (even criminal proceedings for willful violations may be placed).

The statutory damages are capped at 0,000. The court may grant an immediate injunction against the infringers (Business Law Today, 11th Edition, Ch. 6, Pg. 151). If a clause in the contract made with Eastlane, Inc., included the forbiddance of reselling used textbooks or selling to online retailers, not only the three professors will be in jeopardy of a lawsuit but also the university may face criminal charges.

The publisher may claim that HSU breached the contract. The publisher, as well as the book writer may be affected with financial repercussions from the fewer book sales. This may affect Eastlane, Inc. profits as well as, Dr. C.R. Breach’s royalties.

Nowadays, new technology allows individuals to save documents on a device or online; therefore, augmenting possibilities of a third-party reproduction of a textbook. A third-party piracy may be subject to another set of individuals reproducing the textbook. These acts would be unethical for those individuals that play a role in obtaining the textbook (either online or printed). ï‚· In the second dilemma: Since it would be nearly impossible to determine if faculty staff is unethical or committing a tort without the help of a whistleblower, it is of great importance to have systems in place to establish preventing measures. HSU must prove that faculty staff received training on ethical behavior. The university may need to provide sign-in sheets that evidence that the three professors attended an Ethical Training.

Moreover, HSU will need to provide a copy of PowerPoint presentation or discussed at the presentation. ï‚· In the third dilemma: If sued, the three professors may contend that there was not an textbook was intended to assist students in financial need. However, by making a profit, it placed the professors in a questionable situation. These professors may face legal charges against them, and a remedy may be imprisonment or a fine. ï‚· In the fourth dilemma: This may be brought up as a Class-Action Lawsuit. As dictionary defines it, a Class-Action Lawsuit occurs when a group of people is sued for an specific tort. In this case, the students accessing the website and/or buying the online textbook may have legal charges against them, and as a remedy they may face imprisonment or a fine. ï‚· In the fifth dilemma: Social Media had become convenient and efficient because it is viewed as the fastest way of communicating news.

Due to the high-priced books, both the Eastlane, Inc., and Dr. C.R. Breach may be victims of the proliferation of bad propaganda. 3. Discuss the pros and cons of alternative courses of action. ï‚· First Dilemma: One of the cons is that if the publisher sues the professors, the defense no longer has the right to control the distribution of that copy (Business Law Today, P a g e | 3 Wanda M.

Ramirez 11th Edition, Ch. 6, Pg. 153). Unless a contract with university and Eastlane, Inc., clearly states the banning of the reselling of the book and the online sale, it is possible that professors. ï‚· Second dilemma: One of the cons is that if the university do not have any proof of trainings on ethical behavior, the court may infer that poor management practices hand, having proof of ethical trainings may give the university some relieve of criminal charges. ï‚· Third dilemma: One of the cons is that the professors may be accused of malicious intent or willful violation to obtain illegal earnings. In other words, more than “a textbook of charity†may be misconstrued as “a textbook of profit.† Fourth dilemma: One of the pros is that it may be difficult to proof that students knew may claim that they believed this access was totally permitted by the publisher; therefore, malicious intend in the students’ part would be difficult to proof. ï‚· Fifth dilemma: Students may access their social media applications and tell the world about their side of their story.

They may portray themselves as victims and describing everyone else, including the publisher and author of the textbook, as villains. In this era, many firms and individual’s live have been destroyed due to the creation of bad reputation. In a blink of an eye, Word-to-Mouth information can do much damage and if the word is out that the publisher customarily imposes high prices on textbooks, the aftermath can be devasting. 4. Recommend a decision.

Rationale for the decision. ï‚· To avoid disputes over ethical violations, the university should first create a written ethical code that is expressed in clear and understanding language. The code should include established and specific procedures that employees can follow if they have questions or complaints. A well-written code might also include examples to clarify what the company considers to be acceptable and unacceptable conduct copy (Business Law Today, 11th Edition, Ch. 9, Pg. 230).

Also, university management should provide trainings on ethical behavior not only to faculty staff but also to their pupils. At the end of the trainings, both faculty staff and pupils should sign a Code of Ethics Contract. This contract should specify all the actions that a university staff and a student may find as unethical. ï‚· I recommend that Eastlane, Inc., follows through with the advice of their general counsel and gives the approval for a lawsuit against the three professors who sue and given the circumstances, it may win. In my opinion these professors, committed an intentional tort and acted out of malicious intent to obtain illegal profits. More than being enraged for the high prices of the textbooks, I believe these professors saw that situation as an opportunity to make a buck.

A precedence needs P a g e | 4 Wanda M. Ramirez to be established that when someone uses piracy (specially to obtain profits) will need to receive the consequences. What kind of example were these professors setting? To me, it is embarrassing. I would have expected this type of behavior from high school students but never from these type of professionals.

The court should have an injunction on the infringement. Requesting that the website be shutdown immediately. These professors should go to court and a fine should be given for this Ethical Dilemma Rubric will be used to evaluate your responses to the ethics assignments. Criteria Unacceptable Up to 12 points Acceptable 13 to 17 points Outstanding 18 to 20 points Score Identifies Dilemma(s) Has no idea or only a vague idea of the ethical dilemma(s). Identifies the ethical dilemma or dilemmas.

Describes the dilemma(s) in detail, including most or all pertinent facts. Clarifies why it is an ethical dilemma. Evaluate Stakeholders Is unsure about who the stakeholders are or does not identify any stakeholders. Accurately identifies at least one important stakeholder who would be affected by the decision. Accurately identifies several important stakeholders who would be affected by the decision and describes how they would be affected.

Analyzes Alternatives and Consequences and impact on stakeholders Does not identify alternatives and consequences or suggests alternatives that are not reasonable. Identifies at least one reasonable alternative and its possible consequences. Identifies at least two reasonable alternatives and their possible consequences. Analysis of ethical schools of thought Has no idea or only a vague idea of the ethical schools of thought Has some idea of the ethical schools of thought Explains thoroughly the ethical schools of thought and its application to the scenario. Recommends a decision Provides a rationale for the decision Does not recommend a decision or recommends a decision that does not reflect careful thought.

Provides no rationale or an inadequate rationale for the decision. Recommends a decision that demonstrates some careful thought. Provides an adequate rationale for the decision. Recommends a well thought out, coherent, logical decision. Provides a strong rationale for the decision. Total Points Total Points Overall Evaluation 0-69 Unacceptable 70-79 Acceptable 80-89 Good 90-100 Outstanding

Paper for above instructions

A Textbook Case of Charity: Ethical Dilemmas and Stakeholder Analysis
Wendy Gelman’s "A Textbook Case of Charity" presents an intricate ethical conundrum involving intellectual property rights, access to educational resources, and the implications of profit-driven actions by educators. As the CEO of Eastlane, Inc., one faces significant dilemmas following the actions of professors at Humongous State University. This analysis identifies ethical issues, evaluates stakeholder impacts, discusses potential solutions, and ultimately recommends an actionable course.

Identifying Ethical Dilemmas

First, the blatant infringement of copyright laws poses a significant ethical dilemma. The three professors’ initiative to scan and distribute "Great American Literature" online, despite their claimed altruism, constitutes active copyright violation, undermining Eastlane’s business model (Gelman, n.d.). The textbook, with a retail price of 0, reflects a commercial investment by Eastlane and its author, Dr. C.R. Breach. This scenario raises questions regarding the legitimacy of the professors’ actions in the name of charity.
Secondly, the motive behind the professors’ actions warrants scrutiny. If their intent was to aid financially strapped students, why are they charging 5 for access? Certain ethical theories, such as virtue ethics, suggest that genuine charitable acts should not involve profit motives (Hursthouse, 1999). This paradox indicates a potential inconsistency between professed motives and actual practices.
A third ethical consideration involves the institutional responsibility of Humongous State University. What systems are in place to prevent such misconduct among its faculty? This dimension examines the broader ethical climate within educational institutions, questioning whether adequate training and policies are implemented to uphold ethical standards (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2013).

Stakeholder Evaluation

Addressing the ethical dilemmas necessitates understanding how key stakeholders are affected.
1. Eastlane Inc. and Dr. Breach: The infringement directly impacts their earnings. If this illegality persists, it could facilitate further pirated material, undermining their monetary returns and intellectual property rights (Khan, 2021).
2. Students: The affected students, while ostensibly benefiting from cheaper access to the text, may encounter long-term complications. If Eastlane proceeds with legal actions, students accessing the site could unintentionally become embroiled in litigation, facing penalties for copyright infringement (Stoian, 2021).
3. Humongous State University: The institution faces reputational risks and potential legal ramifications for condoning or failing to prevent faculty misconduct. If the university cannot demonstrate effective ethical training and policies, it may result in loss of credibility (Koller, 2020).
4. The Professors: The action places the professors in a precarious position. Should they be held legally accountable, they may face severe reputational damage and financial penalties, thereby compromising their careers.
5. Broader Community: The incident reflects on educational practices and societal attitudes toward access to knowledge. The community grapples with the tension between maintaining educational accessibility and respecting intellectual property (Baudry, 2020).

Analyzing Alternatives and Consequences

Multiple courses of action exist to address these ethical dilemmas:
1. Litigation Against the Professors: This legal route can reaffirm Eastlane and Dr. Breach’s rights, providing a precedent against further subdivisions of copyrighted material. However, it may come at a substantial public relations cost. The perception of being adversarial towards educators can adversely affect Eastlane’s reputation among its core clientele: students and instructors (Wheeler, 2021).
2. Engaging Professors in Dialogue: A collaborative approach might yield solutions beneficial to students without infringing on copyrights. Eastlane could engage the professors in dialogue to explore alternative methods of ensuring access to literature without compromising intellectual property. Such initiatives can uphold educational missions while respecting copyright laws (Bennett, 2018).
3. Developing Open Access Resources: Eastlane may consider allocating resources to develop open-access educational materials that cater to pricing concerns while maintaining copyright protections. This can proactively address the financial obstacles faced by students and the potential ethical question of obsolescence (Hope, 2022).

Recommendation and Rationale

After thorough analysis, it is recommended that Eastlane adopts a two-pronged approach combining litigation with open dialogue. While commencing legal proceedings against the professors is necessary to protect intellectual property rights, initiating discussions could foster an environment for collaboration. This dual strategy would serve not only to protect Eastlane’s interests but also to potentially align with the educational values shared by the professors.
Eastlane should firmly notify Humongous State University of the violations while expressing openness to constructive solutions that support student access to educational materials. This course aligns with ethics, legal obligations, and societal perspectives on educational accessibility (Bennett, 2018). Moreover, working collaboratively could position Eastlane as a proactive entity committed to innovation and educational support.

Conclusion

The ethical dilemmas stemming from the actions of the professors highlight fundamental issues regarding copyright, educational accessibility, and institutional accountability. By adopting a dual approach of litigation and dialogue, Eastlane can protect its rights while fostering a more collaborative educational environment. This strategy not only preserves the integrity of Dr. Breach’s work and Eastlane’s business model but also promotes fair access to educational resources, aligning with broader societal interests.

References

1. Baudry, V. (2020). Intellectual Property Right and Accessibility in Education. International Journal of Education Law and Policy.
2. Bennett, V. (2018). Ethical Considerations in Higher Education Publishing. Journal of Business Ethics.
3. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2013). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
4. Hope, T. (2022). The Future of Textbook Accessibility: Open Resources vs. Traditional Texts. Educational Technology.
5. Hursthouse, R. (1999). Virtue Ethics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
6. Khan, S. (2021). Copyright Law and Education: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Intellectual Property Law.
7. Koller, M. (2020). Institutional Accountability: Assessing Ethics in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management.
8. Stoian, D. (2021). The Consequences of Digital Piracy on the Educational Landscape. Journal of Education Policy.
9. Wheeler, M. (2021). The Ethics of Publishing in Higher Education: A Legal Perspective. Higher Education Review.
10. Gelman, W. (n.d.). A Textbook Case of Charity.
This comprehensive examination of the ethical dilemmas and stakeholder impact serves as a guide for Eastlane, Inc. in navigating this complex situation while maintaining its core values and ensuring respect for intellectual property.