Advocacy Through Legislationidentify A Problem Or Concern In Your Stat ✓ Solved

Advocacy Through Legislation Identify a problem or concern in your state, community, or organization that has the capacity to be advocated through legislation. Research the issue and complete the sections below. For each topic that requires the listing of criteria, a minimum of two criteria should be identified and discussed. Add more rows as is appropriate for the topic/proposal. Problem In no more than 250 words, describe the problem, who is affected, and the current ramifications.

Explain the consequences if the issue continues. Idea for Addressing Solution In no more than 250 words, outline your idea for addressing the issue and explain why legislation is the best course for advocacy. Research the Issue Perform research and compile information for your idea. Present substantive evidence-based findings that support your idea for addressing the problem (studies, research, and reports). Include any similar legislation introduced or passed in other states.

Evidence 1 Evidence 2 Stakeholder Support Discuss the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and explain why they would be in support. Stakeholder(s) Supporting 1 Stakeholder(s) Supporting 2 Stakeholder Opposition Discuss the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea. Explain why they would be in opposition and how you would prepare to debate or converse about these considerations. Stakeholder(s) Opposed 1 Stakeholder(s) Opposed 2 Financial Incentives/Costs In no more than 250 words, summarize the financial impact for the issue and the idea (added costs, cost savings, increased revenue, etc.). Provided support.

Legislature: Information Needed and Process for Proposal Discuss the how to advocate for your proposal using legislation. Include the following: Provide the name and complete contact information for the legislator. Describe the steps for how you would present this to your legislator. Outline the process if your legislator chooses to introduce your idea as a bill to congress. Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy In no more than 250 words, discuss how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias.

Be specific as to how these principles help advocate for inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations, including those more vulnerable, without regard to gender, sexual orientation, culture, race, religion/belief, etc. © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. 2 Rubic_Print_Format Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points NRS-440VN NRS-440VN-O502 Advocacy Through Legislation 155.0 Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (89.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned Content 100.0% Problem, Those Affected, Current Ramifications, and Consequences if Problem Continues 15.0% A description of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is omitted.

A partial or vague discussion of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. Why the problem would be best addressed through legislation is unclear. A summary of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. There are some omissions and inaccuracies. Rationale is needed.

A discussion of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. Some rationale is needed. A well-develop discussion of the problem, those affected, current ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is presented. Strong and compelling rationale is provided. Insight into the problem and consequences is demonstrated.

Idea for Addressing Solution 10.0% Idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is omitted. Idea for addressing the issue is vague. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is unclear. There are major omissions. Idea for addressing the issue is generally outlined.

Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is summarized. There are some minor omissions. Rationale is needed. Idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is generally explained.

Some rationale is needed. A logical and well-developed idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is thoroughly explained. Strong and compelling rationale is provided. Research Supporting Solution for Problem 15.0% Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are omitted.

Some support for the idea and its effectiveness in addressing the problem is presented. Findings presented are not substantiated, or do not provide evidence-based support for the idea. Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are generally presented. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies.

Idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is generally explained. Some rationale is needed. Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are presented. There are minor inaccuracies.

Some detail is needed. Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are presented and demonstrate strong and compiling support for the idea. Stakeholder Support 10.0% Stakeholders in support the proposed idea are omitted. At least one stakeholder in support of the proposed idea is presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.

Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other states, are generally presented. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies.General stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are presented. It is unclear why they are in support of the idea. More information is needed.

Key stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are presented. It is generally clear why they are in support of the idea. Some detail or rationale is needed. All significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are presented and a well-supported explanation of why they are in support of the idea are provided. Stakeholder Opposition 10.0% Stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are omitted.

At least one stakeholder in support of the proposed idea is presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.At least one stakeholder in opposition to the proposed idea is presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete. General stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are presented. Explanation for why they are opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing stakeholders is vague.

Key stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are presented. A general explanation for why they are opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing stakeholders is presented. All significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are presented. A well-supported explanation for why they are opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing stakeholders is presented. Financial Incentives and Costs 10.0% The financial impact for the issue and idea is omitted.

The financial impact for the issue and idea is only partially presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete. The financial impact for the issue and idea is outlined. More information or support is needed for claims. The financial impact for the issue and idea is summarized.

Support for claims is generally supported. The financial impact for the issue and idea is clearly summarized. Strong rationale and support for claims is provided. Legislature Process and Information for Proposal 10.0% Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are omitted. Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are largely incomplete.

Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are generally outlined.There are some inaccuracies or omissions. The financial impact for the issue and idea is summarized. Support for claims is generally supported.Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are presented. Information or detail is needed in some areas for accuracy or clarity. Legislative information needed and process to advocate for proposal are clearly and logically presented.

The legislative process is clearly understood and insight into legislative advocacy is demonstrated. Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy 10.0% A discussion of how Christian principles supporting unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is omitted. A discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is incomplete. It is unclear how the principles support positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all populations. A summary of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is presented.

Some rationale or information is needed to demonstrate how the principles support positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all populations. A discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is presented. The discussion generally demonstrates how the principles support positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all populations. Some detail or information is needed for clarity. A well-developed discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is presented.

The discussion demonstrates an ability to act impartially and in the interest of promoting inclusive patient care without regard to gender, sexual orientation, culture, race, religion, or belief. Research 5.0% No outside sources were used to support the assignment. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. Research is adequate.

Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness. Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 2.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Weightage 100%

Paper for above instructions

Advocacy Through Legislation: Addressing Food Insecurity in [Your State]
Problem Description
Food insecurity is a pressing issue in [Your State], affecting approximately [insert percentage] of households, according to recent state health department statistics (U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], 2023). This concern impacts diverse demographics, particularly low-income families, single-parent households, and minority communities. The ramifications of this problem manifest in increased health risks, diminished academic performance among children, and elevated costs for healthcare systems due to nutrition-related diseases (Tarasuk, 2021).
If left unaddressed, the continued prevalence of food insecurity will exacerbate health disparities and strain public health resources, potentially leading to a public health crisis (Befort et al., 2021). Children from food-insecure households exhibit higher rates of obesity and diabetes, while adults experience a decline in mental health (Gundersen & Ziliak, 2018). The social fabric of our communities will also weaken as individuals face stress and anxiety stemming from their inability to provide basic necessities for their families (Feeding America, 2022).
Idea for Addressing the Solution
To tackle food insecurity in [Your State], I propose legislation that establishes a statewide fund to support community food banks and nutrition education programs. This act would allocate necessary funding to bolster existing food assistance initiatives, expand access to fresh produce, and provide educational workshops on healthy eating and budgeting. Legislation as a form of advocacy is essential here, as it would legitimize the urgency of the issue and help secure long-term funding from the state budget.
Research has shown that similar legislation in states like California, which instituted "California's Assembly Bill 221," led to a notable increase in food pantry services and community outreach (CA Assembly, 2022). Moreover, the CDC supports initiatives encouraging public-private partnerships to enhance food distribution networks (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2021). Given the trend toward increasing food insecurity as reported by the USDA and supported by various studies, legislative advocacy is the best approach to secure comprehensive, lasting solutions.
Research the Issue
Evidence detailing the widespread prevalence and consequences of food insecurity includes:
1. Evidence 1: A study by the Food Research & Action Center (FRAC) (2022) emphasizes that food-insecure households are more likely to suffer from chronic illnesses, resulting in higher emergency room visits and hospitalization rates.
2. Evidence 2: According to the USDA (2023), children living in food-insecure households are at a higher risk of experiencing developmental delays and poor academic performance compared to their food-secure peers. Furthermore, the negative psychological effects can persist long into adulthood, significantly impacting community productivity and quality of life.
Stakeholder Support
Key stakeholders who would likely support this legislative proposal include:
1. Local Food Bank Associations: Organizations such as [Local Food Bank Name] would support legislative efforts to secure funding for food distribution as it aligns with their mission to alleviate hunger.
2. Healthcare Providers: Health organizations such as [Local Hospital or Health System] recognize that addressing food insecurity can substantially reduce health complications and associated costs.
Stakeholder Opposition
Conversely, opposition may come from the following stakeholders:
1. Farmers' Associations: Some agricultural stakeholders may view the funded food banks as competition, arguing that direct aid could affect the market for local produce.
2. Taxpayer Advocacy Groups: Organizations opposed to increased taxation may resist new funding initiatives, arguing for the transfer of funds rather than additional revenue generation.
To address these concerns effectively, open forums and discussions could be organized to educate stakeholders on the mutual benefits of increased support for community food programs, underscoring that enhanced access to food can lead to a healthier population, ultimately benefitting the entire community and economy (Feeding America, 2023).
Financial Incentives/Costs
Addressing the issue of food insecurity through legislated funding may prompt initial costs. However, assessments indicate that investing in food security initiatives would yield long-term savings in healthcare and social services (Befort et al., 2021). By reducing health care costs associated with diet-related diseases, it can lead to significant savings for taxpayers. Additionally, employing local farmers for food banks can create economic stimulus through their increased sales, promoting growth for local agriculture (USDA, 2021).
Legislature: Information Needed and Process for Proposal
The process for proposing this legislation would begin by identifying and gaining support from a suitable legislator, such as [Name and Contact Information of Legislator]. My initial steps would involve scheduling a meeting to discuss the proposal, presenting evidence of the need and potential impact of the proposed law, and soliciting their feedback.
If the legislator agrees to sponsor the bill, the next steps would include drafting the bill, presenting it to the appropriate committee for review, advocating for its passage through public testimonies, and interacting with advocacy groups to mobilize support from community members.
Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy
The advocacy for food security aligns closely with Christian principles emphasizing care for the vulnerable, inclusivity, and community well-being. For example, proverbs such as "Whoever is generous to the poor lends to the Lord, and he will repay him for his deed" (Proverbs 19:17, ESV) reflect the moral imperative of caring for those in need. This commitment to helping others translates into healthcare advocacy by promoting equitable access to nutritious food.
From a nursing perspective, the responsibility of healthcare professionals includes addressing social determinants of health, such as access to proper nutrition. Understanding that inclusive policies improve health outcomes for all populations - regardless of gender, sexual orientation, race, or religion - is vital in fulfilling the Christian calling to serve the marginalized (McNair et al., 2019). Thus, legislative advocacy is not only a practical approach to improving food security, but also a moral one, embodying the values of compassion, inclusivity, and justice in healthcare.
References
1. Befort, C. et al. (2021). Health outcomes associated with food insecurity. Journal of Community Health.
2. California Assembly. (2022). Assembly Bill 221 - Food Security in California.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Food Insecurity and Health.
4. Feeding America. (2022). The Impact of Food Insecurity on Health.
5. Feeding America. (2023). Food Security Legislation Review.
6. Gundersen, C., & Ziliak, J. P. (2018). Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Affairs.
7. McNair, R., et al. (2019). Christian principles in nursing advocacy. Journal of Nursing Ethics.
8. Tarasuk, V. (2021). The impact of food insecurity on health. Canadian Medical Association Journal.
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2023). Economic Research Service: Food Security Report.
10. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2021). Costs and Benefits of Food Security Programs.
By addressing food insecurity through legislation, we can take important steps toward healing the social and health disparities faced by many in [Your State].