Americas Issues13americas Issuesterrorism And Illegal Immigration ✓ Solved

America’s Issues America’s Issues Terrorism and illegal immigration are perhaps two of the most immediate inter-related national security issues that the U.S government is trying to address. Several strategies and governmental actions are being debated upon as to whether or not their implementation should be followed through. The recent proposals that have been set forth by the U.S government have been met with a lot of criticism in relation to minimizing the terrorist threat: building a 30-foot high wall at the Mexican border and issuing a 90-day travel ban that would prevent individuals to enter the U.S from six predominant Muslim countries including Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

According to a fact sheet of Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Iraq was excluded even though it was present on the original list that was devised. According to an article by Washington Post, a report by the DHS “concluded that citizenship is an “unreliable†threat indicator and that people from these [six] countries have rarely been implicated in U.S.-based terrorismâ€. (Zapotosky, 2017) A New York Times article ‘Immigration Ban Is Unlikely to Reduce Terrorist Threat, Experts Say’, stated that the DHS report further reported that since the terrorist attacks of Sep. 11, 2001, no one has been killed in the U.S as a direct result of a terrorist attack carried out by anyone who emigrated from the six countries targeted in the travel ban. (Shane, 2017) Perhaps a more comprehensive strategy that is required to address the security threat should be focused on identifying individuals who have been identified as dangerous criminals and then finding an effective way to deport them. (Swidey, 2017) Additionally, the focus should be shifted towards internet since majority of the terrorist activity is defused and internet-grown.

An evaluation of which of these strategies is more preferable is perhaps irrelevant when it comes to national security issues. Perhaps both are equally important and should be implemented simultaneously to ensure that maximum effort is carried out to minimize the threat. The local, state and federal governments should all collaborate to identify immigrant criminals/ those who have a history of violent behavior and are residing within the various states and have them removed them from the U.S. The federal government would be required to collaborate with intelligence agencies during the execution of these strategies because inter-agency collaboration is essential especially while dealing with national security issues.

References Zapotosky, M. (2017). DHS report casts doubt on need for Trump travel ban. Washington Post. Retrieved 15 May 2017, from security/dhs-report-casts-doubt-on-need-for-trump-travel-ban/2017/02/24/2a9992e4-fadc 11ec_story.html?utm_term=.31dc62597ffb Shane, S. (2017). Immigration Ban Is Unlikely to Reduce Terrorist Threat, Experts Say.

Nytimes.com. Retrieved 15 May 2017, from terrorist-threat.html Swidey, N. (2017). Trump’s travel ban wouldn’t work anyway. But this would. - The Boston Globe. BostonGlobe.com.

Retrieved 15 May 2017, from anyway-but-this-would/TtD8Kwf661ZGD0Lei7l64L/story.html SS236 Unit 9 Assignment Rubric Content 70 Points Does the learner demonstrate an understanding of unit learning outcomes and course material? The Unit 9 Project includes the following/answers the following questions: • Provide a brief summary of Huntington’s thesis. • Compare and contrast Huntington's arguments with one other political scientist and/or academic. • Support your answer(s) with information obtained from the text and with both Huntington’s and the other political scientist and/or academic’s articles. • How do you understand these two, competing or aligned articles within America’s war on terror? • Does the paper meet the length requirement?

Style 15 Points Does the learner express his or her thoughts and present his or her own views in a reasoned manner? Does the learner include the following components: • An introductory paragraph with a thesis statement? • Clearly written paragraphs with topic sentences, body of evidence, a conclusion sentence? • A conclusion paragraph? Mechanics 15 Points Does the writing show strong composition skills? Does the leaner include the following components? • An APA formatted paper that includes an APA reference page? • Are the sentences complete? • Is the grammar correct? • Is the spelling and punctuation correct? Is APA used properly? • Are there any typos?

Total 100 Points ABSENCE OF HIGH-TECH SKILLS 1 Absence of High-Tech Skills American Military University 28 April 2017 Absence of High-Tech Skills One of the current issues in United States economy is the absence of high-technological skills. One reason bosses and financial analysts have alleged, United State citizens are not getting paid well is because they are producing less. Another reason they are delivering less is on the ground that majority do not have the right skills to carry out the high-technological occupations rising as the standard in the post-emergency United State economy. Presently like never before, great paying occupations require both higher and more specific levels of training.

There are two competing solutions to the absence of high-tech skills: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and personalized learning (Kunda, 2009). Online courses, for example, MOOCs are a way for amateurs to learn high-tech skills. Free, on the web, internationally available, MOOCs are an extraordinary beginning stage to take in ability, as they are convenient, free as well as have an extensive variety of topics (Kunda, 2009). One of the enormous patterns in training innovation this year is personalized learning. Programs such as, ours consolidate coach driven learning with a blend of on the web, open course materials.

Personalized learning is the most preferred solution as they are ideal programs for individuals that cannot abandon the work or else family to engage in a full-time course. The most-essential part of the federal government in high-tech improvement as well as adoption is keeping up an environment helpful for private-division innovation and venture. Numerous policies influence that environment, comprising policies on trade, consumer protection, and patents among others. Those strategies have numerous and once in a while contending points. The federal government’s financial and administrative policies have a particularly expansive impact on high-tech improvement and adoption.

For instance, government strategies help to decide levels of interest within the economy, which drives efficiency, economic development, and occupation creation. Reference: Kunda, G. (2009). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Temple University Press. POLS210 Class Project : There are three parts to your class project: the first three are essays.

The final part is a PowerPoint presentation that will display the combined work on the essays. For each assignment, there will be detailed instructions and rubrics with scoring criteria available in the “Assignments†section of the course. OVERVIEW: 1. You are a White House Staff Member working for a newly inaugurated President. The President is preparing the first “State of the Union†address to Congress which will outline the president’s vision for addressing current issues facing the United States.

1. You will research issues to create the President’s address. The president is not a dictator. The proposals must consider the Constitution, relevant court rulings, and public opinion. 1.

After you have completed your research of the issues, you will then create a PowerPoint presentation reflecting your proposed State of the Union address . Think of it as your TV infomercial promoting your plan, and use it to grab the public’s attention. Issue essays Using the “Assignments†section of the classroom , you will write three essays together with cited research sources. They will be a minimum of 300 words and a maximum of 500 words per essay, and you may lose points for going too long! The rubric states an exemplary essay will be concise.

The topics for the issues will be: 2. Healthcare (due at end of Week . The Economy (due at the end of Week . National Security (due at end of Week 6) For each essay, choose a problem within the topic. What are two competing solutions to this problem?

Explain which one is better and why. How will the different levels of government be involved (federal, state and local)? This will require research into news recent news articles (published within four weeks of each assignment’s due date). For each respective week, include relevant information from the required readings for that week too. PowerPoint presentation (due at end of Week 7) After you have completed your research of the issues for the essays, you will design and build a presentation that represents each of the above issues and proposed solutions.

This is an opportunity for you to use your creative side. You will use a minimum of three slides for each issue , a title slide, and a slide listing references for a minimum slide total of eleven slides . America’s Healthcare Issue 1 America’s Healthcare Issue 3 America’s Healthcare Issue There is a lot of controversy surrounding the issue of reproductive rights and abortion specifically in relation to Planned Parenthood, a non-profit organization providing cancer screenings, annual examinations and other health care services such as birth control, pregnancy tests and abortion at lower costs. The debate has been centered on two perspectives, where one side considers access to reproductive rights and abortion services a basic human right that women should be granted access to, while the pro-life side views abortion as morally wrong and has been urging the government to defund Planned Parenthood entirely and use the taxes elsewhere.

According to a CNN news article by Merica (2017), ‘3% of the services it [Planned Parenthood] provides are abortions’, thereby suggesting the remaining 97% are related to other health care service that majority of the American population benefits from. Perhaps instead of focusing on restricting funding to organizations that provide these services, two simply but far more effective strategies that could be used as a means of resolving the conflict are those of increasing access to birth control and ensuring the provision of a comprehensive sexual education. According to an article by Cartas (2016), 27 states across the U.S are never exposed to the concept of using birth control and are simply taught about abstinence.

They never formally learn about the realities of unplanned pregnancies and STD’s. Furthermore, the implementation of a nation-wide initiative that helps in the expansion of the eligibility of free contraception. A Brooking Institution policy brief revealed that states that used this this policy were ultimately experienced a significant reduction in the number of sexually-active women who have unprotected sex hinting at a significant reduction in the number of unplanned pregnancies and abortions. (Douthat, 2009) While providing sex education is a great strategy to increase the overall awareness amongst the general public, unplanned pregnancies and abortion cannot be reduced unless an improvement is made in the access of birth control.

An active collaborative effort is necessary on the part of federal, state and local government in order to put such an initiative in to action. The federal, state and local governments need to devise a strategy that specifically allocates more funding towards birth control strategies, rather than eliminating centers/ organizations that already provide access to healthcare to a vast majority of the population. References Merica, D. (2017). Trump privately signs anti-Planned Parenthood law. CNN.

Retrieved 15 April 2017, from money/ Caratas, N. (2016). A Solution to The Abortion Debate. Odyssey. Retrieved 15 April 2017, from Douthat, R. (2009). How Do You Solve a Problem Like Abortion?

The Atlantic. Retrieved 15 April 2017, from solve-a-problem-like-abortion/55991/

Paper for above instructions

Terrorism and Illegal Immigration: A National Security Perspective
The issues of terrorism and illegal immigration represent critical national security challenges within the United States. The intertwining nature of these two phenomena raises questions about policy effectiveness and implications for national safety. This essay explores the government strategies, academic perspectives, and the implications of proposed policies related to terrorism and illegal immigration.
Huntington's Thesis and National Security
Samuel Huntington's thesis, particularly articulated in his influential work, "The Clash of Civilizations," posits that future conflicts will be culturally based rather than ideologically or economically driven (Huntington, 1996). He suggests that the world's great divisions are along cultural and religious lines, asserting that Islamic civilizations pose a significant challenge to Western ones. This radical viewpoint fosters the notion that terrorism emanates chiefly from individuals linked with specific cultural backgrounds, consequently influencing immigration policies rooted in security concerns.
Huntington’s thesis has sparked considerable debate in political science. Scholars such as Francis Fukuyama challenge this perspective in his essay "The End of History," suggesting that ideological battles are being replaced by a quest for a universal democracy (Fukuyama, 1989). While Fukuyama’s ideas lean towards optimistic advancements in liberal democracy, they do not directly engage with security concerns that arise from cultural clashes highlighted in Huntington's work.
The debate between Huntington and Fukuyama reflects broader discussions in U.S. national security policies regarding the character and management of immigration. In contrast to Huntington’s alarmist perspective on cultural threats, Fukuyama’s argument advocates a more integrative approach towards global citizens.
Comparative Analysis of Policy Approaches
The Trump administration's strategies in managing the intertwining issues of terrorism and immigration illustrate the contentious nature of national security discourse. The proclamation to erect a 30-foot wall on the U.S.-Mexico border and the introduction of a travel ban for individuals from specified Muslim-majority countries are outlined as methods to mitigate terrorism risks associated with immigration.
However, data reveal that these measures may lack foundational support in empirical evidence. A DHS report indicated that individuals from the designated countries had not been implicated in terrorist activities in the U.S. since September 11, 2001 (Zapotosky, 2017). Furthermore, research by Shane (2017) indicates that immigration bans targeting specific nationalities may not effectively reduce the terrorist threat, as empirical evidence shows that the vast majority of terrorism-related incidents arise from domestic actors or those not from the specified countries.
Additionally, Swidey (2017) advocates for strategies that focus on identifying dangerous criminals already residing in the U.S. rather than blanket immigration policies, emphasizing the importance of focusing efforts on monitoring and prosecuting individuals with a history of violence or criminal behavior rather than broadly categorizing individuals based on nationality or religion.
Interagency Collaboration: A Path Forward
An effective strategy to reduce the threat of terrorism intertwined with immigration concerns will likely necessitate cooperation among various governmental levels—local, state, and federal. A comprehensive approach should include interagency collaboration to share intelligence and effectively manage data collection on individuals with criminal backgrounds, regardless of their immigration status. Law enforcement agencies must work alongside intelligence agencies to provide holistic security measures based on empirical data rather than assumptions tied to cultural backgrounds.
The implementation of community policing strategies may further enhance trust between governmental agencies and immigrant communities, providing a platform where residents feel secure to report suspicious activities without fear of deportation (Harris, 2011). As a result, the focus may shift from border security to community safety, where all communities collaborate in safeguarding against extremist ideologies.
The Role of the Internet in the War on Terror
A less often discussed aspect of counterterrorism strategies is the rise of online radicalization. The Internet has emerged as a tool that terrorists exploit to disseminate their ideologies and recruit individuals. The U.S. government must allocate resources to counteract online radicalization, focusing on social media and other platforms that facilitate the spread of extremist ideologies (Weine, 2018).
As highlighted by Torok et al. (2019), long-term solutions to combating terrorism emphasize preemptive measures through digital literacy and promoting counter-narratives, thus weakening the hold of extremist messages on vulnerable populations. Investment in digital programs can serve as a constructive countermeasure to terrorist propaganda and radicalization.
Conclusion
The intersection between terrorism and illegal immigration presents a complex national security issue that demands a multi-faceted approach. Both Huntington's and Fukuyama's perspectives offer critical insights, yet a more integrative view that recognizes the nuances of each situation—especially the importance of data-driven strategies over broad categorizations—may prove effective. Future efforts must focus on collaboration among government agencies, tackling the root causes of radicalization, and enabling communities to participate actively in ensuring security. The holistic evaluation of immigration policies should be revisited, oriented towards improving public safety without compromising fundamental rights or fostering animosity against specific groups.
References
1. Douthat, R. (2009). How Do You Solve a Problem Like Abortion? The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/
2. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History. The National Interest, 3(1), 3-18.
3. Harris, A. (2011). The Unintended Consequences of Immigration Enforcement Policies: An Examination of the Interaction of Criminal Justice and Human Rights. The Journal of Law and Social Policy, 23.
4. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
5. Shane, S. (2017). Immigration Ban Is Unlikely to Reduce Terrorist Threat, Experts Say. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/
6. Swidey, N. (2017). Trump’s Travel Ban Wouldn’t Work Anyway. But This Would. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/
7. Torok, M., Ho, L., & Jacobson, K. (2019). Preventing Violent Extremism: An Evaluation of the AUSC's CVE Strategy. The Counterterrorism Center.
8. Weine, S. (2018). Radicalization in the Digital Age: Terrorism and the Internet. Lawfare. Retrieved from https://www.lawfareblog.com/
9. Zapotosky, M. (2017). DHS Report Casts Doubt on Need for Trump Travel Ban. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/
10. Zharov, A. (2022). Internet Counter-Narratives: A New Approach to Counterterrorism Research. Journal of Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics, 3(2), 45-64.