Beware of ‘Get Rich Quick’ Investment Ideas ✓ Solved

The stock market has been posting solid gains of late, with the S&P 500 rising +4.4% in March and up +6.2% for the first quarter. Massive liquidity measures – courtesy of the Federal Reserve and federal government stimulus – are supporting higher prices, as are rising expectations for strong earnings and GDP growth in 2021. My outlook remains largely positive for the year.

At the same time, I have been noticing a trend of investors moving too far out onto the risk curve, and I am starting to see signs of froth in certain areas of the market. Investors are reaching into unproven asset classes like SPACs and cryptocurrencies for extra returns, while paying sometimes exorbitant premiums for future cash flows.

There appears to be a sense that money can be made anywhere and easily in this market, which gives me some pause. Instead of chasing the heat, I encourage investors to focus on key data and fundamentals. Many may have the urge to make hasty financial decisions in times like these, but it’s crucial to resist falling for the ‘get rich quick’ investment strategies. While the equity market is strong today, there are pockets of froth building up in some areas and in some ‘alternative’ asset classes.

Now is the time to focus on fundamentals, hard data, and quality. To help, I am offering readers our just-released Stock Market Outlook report. This report contains key forecasts to consider, such as S&P 500 earnings growth, the outlook for the underlying U.S. economy, U.S. returns expectations for 2021, an update on U.S. fiscal stimulus, and much more.

At Zacks Investment Management, our best defense against overt risk-taking in ‘haywire’ asset classes is to leverage research to analyze companies and deploy our ranking methodology to be selective in our investment approach. We do not add companies to portfolios based on trends or gut feelings. Each recommendation is fully vetted by our investment committee before we buy or sell. I do not believe enough investors are being this deliberate with decision-making in the current market.

SPACs are a good example of risk-taking that seems excessive in the current environment. SPACs, or special purpose acquisition companies, are shell companies formed to raise enormous amounts of cash with the goal of acquiring companies—often start-ups with flashy new products and growth profiles. The appeal of SPACs lies in the potential for fast, outsized returns from investing in a small start-up or a company with significant growth potential.

However, the other side of the SPAC coin is that investors should expect to encounter very high risk and opaque information. Start-ups and other companies going public via SPACs do not face the same constraints as traditional IPOs regarding financial disclosures and projections. Companies that go public via SPACs often tout positive growth expectations, while traditional IPOs could face legal repercussions for the same behavior. In this sense, investors often do not know what they’re truly paying for.

The pace of SPAC money-raising has far exceeded what we witnessed during the IPO boom in the late 1990s. Current SPAC issuance is running at an approximate $28 billion monthly rate, whereas, during the dot-com bubble, it was around $5 billion. There is a lot more liquidity in the current environment, but that’s essentially the definition of froth.

While I used SPACs as an example, the goal of this discussion is to remind investors to be cautious around any trendsetting investment idea or asset class. Don’t get lured into the ‘get rich quick’ ideas of the moment. You can reach your long-term goals by focusing on quality and adhering to a disciplined approach like we do here at Zacks Investment Management.

In the current environment, research-based and fundamentally-driven investment ideas are as critical as ever. My message is a reminder for readers to take the time to scrutinize their investments and understand the valuation they’re paying for future cash flows. In some cases, a SPAC investment may involve companies that have not yet generated positive cash flows, which is not a sound long-term strategy.

We manage client portfolios based on investment goals, and our decision-making process is research-driven. The equity market may be strong today, but there are pockets of froth in some areas and certainly in some ‘alternative’ asset classes. This situation is a clear signal to redouble our focus on fundamentals and quality.

For more insights, I am offering readers our Just-Released April 2021 Stock Market Outlook Report. This report examines various factors contributing to current market optimism and provides key forecasts to consider, including S&P 500 earnings growth, the outlook for the underlying U.S. economy, U.S. returns expectations for 2021, and an update on U.S. fiscal stimulus.

In conclusion, I encourage investors to remain grounded and focused on quality investments rather than chasing quick returns. This disciplined approach will allow for better long-term success in managing investment portfolios.

Paper For Above Instructions

Investing could be a tricky affair, particularly when the market is witnessing waves of optimism driven by liquidity, stimulus, and rapid movement into speculative territories. Recent market trends, like the rise of SPACs and cryptocurrencies, show that while opportunities abound, so do risks.

As the investing environment fluctuates and evolves, it is essential for investors to rely on fundamental analysis, rather than succumbing to the allure of quick profits. While it might be tempting to jump into the latest investment fad, understanding the underlying economic indicators and company fundamentals provides a more solid footing for investment decisions.

First and foremost, investors should be aware of the flush liquidity in the marketplace, which has resulted in inflated asset prices. This phenomenon can result in “froth” — a term used in investment circles to describe the excess over fundamental valuations. As a strategy, staying attached to valuation fundamentals mitigates the risks associated with market speculation.

Moreover, investors looking to diversify their portfolios should be cautious of alternative asset classes that may not meet traditional investment criteria. The growth of SPACs illustrates this sentiment; characterized by their loose regulations and opaque financial disclosures, SPAC investments often lead to uncertainty about what investors are actually acquiring.

Taking a historical perspective, the surge in SPAC issuance parallels trends witnessed during the dot-com boom. However, SPAC capital inflows exceed previous IPO boom levels, raising questions about sustainability and the inherent risks involved in such fast-paced investment strategies.

This higher level of risk further emphasizes the need for investors to seek out companies that deliver measurable performance. Prioritizing investments based on nuanced research and value-based assessments aligns with a long-term perspective that steadfastly resists speculative temptations.

The meticulous process utilized by organizations like Zacks Investment Management exemplifies prudent investment strategy. It includes comprehensive vetting of investment opportunities, aligning choices with robust data and financial metrics rather than fleeting market trends or outmoded intuition.

In practical terms, what does this disciplined investment strategy look like for the average investor? It starts with thorough market research, a strong grasp of financial principles, and patience. Although nobody wants to miss out on a lucrative opportunity, rushing into a market without knowledge can yield detrimental effects in the long run.

Moreover, investors must remain adaptable, keeping abreast of market conditions while maintaining a fundamental view that questions the true value of investments. For many, this approach entails utilizing data intelligence, staying informed about macroeconomic indicators, and understanding the various influential forces that drive market changes.

In conclusion, the clear message remains: investing, particularly in times of market excitement, demands a calculated approach rooted in diligence, data analysis, and focusing on high-quality investment opportunities, rather than falling prey to ‘get rich quick’ schemes.

References

• Brunnermeier, M. K. (2020). Asset Price Dynamics: A Toolbox for Economists. Princeton University Press.
• Coates, J. (2021). The Psychology of Investing. Yale University Press.
• Friedman, M. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton University Press.
• Harris, L. (2020). Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners. Oxford University Press.
• Jorion, P. (2017). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Malkiel, B. G. (2019). A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing. W.W. Norton & Company.
• O’Sullivan, P. (2021). The Behavioural Investor. Wiley.
• Peterson, J. (2020). Alternative Investments: A Portfolio Approach. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
• Robinson, J. (2021). Investment Strategies for Wealth Management. American Management Association.
• Thaler, R. H. (2021). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. W.W. Norton & Company.