Bus 225 Project Four Templatepress Releasereplace The Bracketed Text ✓ Solved

BUS 225 Project Four Template Press Release (Replace the bracketed text with your responses. Remove this note before submitting to your instructor.) [INSERT ATTENTION GRABBING HEADLINE IN ALL CAPS.] [Insert strong lead sentence.] [Address the key points appropriate for external audiences.] [Summarize the diversification decision.] [Explain why the decision was made.] [Explain where in the marketplace the new products are launching.] [Identify who benefits from this product in both the company and the community.] [Insert closing paragraph incorporating the who, what, when, where, and why.] [your name] Sales Department Manager Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content Name: NURS_6501_Module5_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. Points: Points Range: 28 (28%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The response describes the patient symptoms. The response includes accurate, explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 24 (24%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. The response includes explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 22 (22%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. The response does not include explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. Feedback: Explain how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient. Points: Points Range: 28 (28%) - 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 24 (24%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 22 (22%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

Feedback: Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: Show Descriptions Show Feedback Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 28 (28%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Good 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The response describes the patient symptoms. The response includes accurate, explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Fair 23 (23%) - 24 (24%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. The response includes explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. Poor 0 (0%) - 22 (22%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.

The response does not include explanations of both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. Feedback: Explain how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 28 (28%) - 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Good 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Fair 23 (23%) - 24 (24%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research. Poor 0 (0%) - 22 (22%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research. Feedback: Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.

Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

Fair 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6501_Module5_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric Scenario 2: Patient is a 24-year-old female administrative assistant who comes to the emergency department with a chief complaint of severe right-sided headache. She states that this is the sixth time in the last 2 months she has had this headache. She says the headaches last 2–3 days and have impacted her ability to concentrate at work.

She complains of nausea and has vomited three times in the last 3 hours. She states, “the light hurts my eyes.†She rates her pain as a 10/10 at this time. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen ease her symptoms somewhat but do not totally relieve them. No other current complaints. Scenario 2 : Patient is a 24 - year - old female administrative assistant who comes to the emergency department with a chief complaint of severe right - sided headache.

She states that this is the sixth time in the last 2 months she has had this headache. She says the headac hes last 2 – 3 days and have impacted her ability to concentrate at work. She complains of nausea and has vomited three times in the last 3 hours. She states, “the light hurts my eyes.†She rates her pain as a 10/10 at this time. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen ease her symptoms somewhat but do not totally relieve them.

No other current complaints . Competency In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency: · Communicate professionally to diverse internal and external audiences Scenario Your presentation to stakeholders was wildly successful and the company has determined that it is in their best interest to move forward with the diversification strategy you recommended. Since you did so well with the presentation, you have been asked by company leadership to prepare a draft of the press release that will go out to announce this new strategy. Your press release is meant for the external audience that was not represented at the all-stakeholder meeting: a group that includes customers, vendors, suppliers, and the general community.

Directions Using the template provided in the supporting materials section below, draft a press release that reflects your company’s new venture and how it affects the general external audience. Your press release should address the following rubric criteria : · Address the key points appropriate for external audiences. · Summarize the diversification decision. · Explain why the decision was made. · Explain where in the marketplace the new products are launching. · Identify who benefits from this product in both the company and the community. What to Submit To complete this project, you must submit your completed press release template of 1 to 2 pages. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Supporting Materials The following resources support your work on the project: Project Four Template Project Four Rubric Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Construct an External Press Release Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Constructs an external press release that addresses the key points appropriate for external audiences Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include inappropriately addressing external audiences Does not attempt criterion 30 What the Decision Was Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Summarizes the decision appropriately for external audiences Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include summary that is incomplete or is not appropriate for external audiences Does not attempt criterion 15 Why the Decision Was Made Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Summarizes why the decision was made in a manner appropriate for external audiences Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include summary that does not address key decision details or is not appropriate for external audiences Does not attempt criterion 15 Where in the Marketspace the New Products Are Launching Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Summarizes where in the marketplace the new products are launching for external audiences Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include summary that is missing key elements of the new market space or is not appropriate for external audiences Does not attempt criterion 15 Who Benefits From This Product in Both the Company and the Community Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Summarizes who benefits from this new product in both the company and the community appropriately for external audiences Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include summary that does not include benefit to the company or the community or is not appropriate for external audiences Does not attempt criterion 15 Articulation of Response Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas 5 Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution 5 Total: 100%

Paper for above instructions

PRESS RELEASE
[INSERT ATTENTION GRABBING HEADLINE IN ALL CAPS]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
[INSERT STRONG LEAD SENTENCE.]
City, State - [Date] – [Company Name], a leader in [Industry], is excited to announce its decision to diversify its product offerings through the launch of [New Product Line]. This strategic move is aimed at capturing a wider audience and addressing the evolving needs of consumers across the marketplace.
This diversification decision reflects our commitment to innovation and growth, with a focus on [specific objectives such as sustainability, health, technology, etc.]. With the competitive landscape constantly changing, we believe that by introducing [Product Description], we not only expand our product portfolio but also reinforce our position as a market leader.
The decision to diversify was made after careful analysis of market trends and consumer feedback. Our research indicated a significant demand for [specific products], particularly among our target demographics. By leveraging our existing resources while innovating new solutions, we expect to tap into emerging market segments and increase overall revenue. Furthermore, the recent market research report by [Author or Organization] indicates that [statistical evidence supporting product demand] (Author, Year).
The new products are set to launch in [specific markets or locations], targeting regions that have shown promising growth potential. By entering these markets, we aim to enhance accessibility and meet consumer demands more effectively, ultimately benefiting both our customers and our brand identity.
Benefits of this new product line extend beyond financial gains; both the company and the community stand to gain significantly. From a company standpoint, the diversification is expected to generate new revenue streams that will provide opportunities for reinvestment into community initiatives and sustainability projects. In addition, the local economy will benefit from job creation associated with the new production and distribution processes, thereby fostering economic development.
In conclusion, [Company Name] is thrilled to embark on this new journey toward diversification. Our commitment remains to provide top-quality products while positively impacting our community. The launch of [New Product Line] is just the beginning of our ambitious plans for the future. For additional information on our diversifying endeavors, please join us on [date and time] for a virtual meeting, where we will share further details on this exciting launch.
Contact:
[Your Name]
Sales Department Manager
[Company Name]
[Phone Number]
[Email Address]
About [Company Name]:
[Company Name] has been at the forefront of [Industry] for over [X years], specializing in [specific product offerings]. We are committed to innovation, quality, and excellence in all our products and services. Our mission is to enhance consumer experiences while fostering community growth and sustainability.
---
References
(Note: Include real references and relevant academic citations according to APA formatting; below is a fabricated set of references for your example)
1. Author, A. A. (Year). Title of Book. Publisher.
2. Author, B. B. (Year). Title of Article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page Range. URL
3. Author, C. C. (Year). Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3926-2
4. Author, D. D. (Year). Market Dynamics and Consumer Preferences. Marketing Insights Quarterly, 47(3), 200-215.
5. Author, E. E. (Year). The Future of Product Diversification. Business Strategy Review, 12(4), 150-162.
6. Author, F. F. (Year). Consumer Behavior in Emerging Markets. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00745.x
7. Author, G. G. (Year). Assessing Market Trends: The Need for Diversification. Journal of Business Research, 87(1), 121-130.
8. Author, H. H. (Year). Impact of New Product Development on Market Leadership. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 305-321.
9. Author, I. I. (Year). The Role of Community Engagement in Business Strategy. Business Horizons, 61(6), 897-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.07.001
10. Author, J. J. (Year). Global Trends in Manufacturing and Sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 1-12.
---
This press release has been structured according to the requirements of the assignment, effectively targeting an external audience while outlining essential information regarding the company's diversification strategy. Make sure you insert real data in all brackets and ensure references are credible and appropriately cited in your final document.