Busi 755literature Review Instructionstopic Executive Coaching As A S ✓ Solved

BUSI 755 Literature Review Instructions Topic: Executive Coaching as a Strategy In Developing Human Capital. Using executive coaching to develop human capital and how to execute these strategies in line with business goals to best benefit the organization. You will research and write a literature review on a topic relevant to this course. You will have approximately 6 weeks to research and write the paper. At the beginning of Module 3/Week 3, You will submit a proposed topic in the assignment folder for your Literature Review paper which is due in week 8.

Once your topic is approved you should begin working on this final assignment. Do not “recycle†any work from any previous courses you have taken (you may use previously used sources and journals). Your research paper will be a comprehensive thematic review of the scholarly literature related to your topic. What is a literature review? “A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period.

A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.†How is a literature review different from an academic research paper?

“The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper will contain a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions.†The academic research paper also covers a range of sources, but it is usually a select number of sources, because the emphasis is on the argument. Likewise, a literature review can also have an “argument,†but it is not as important as covering a number of sources. In short, an academic research paper and a literature review contain some of the same elements.

In fact, many academic research papers will contain a literature review section. But it is the aspect of the study (the argument or the sources) that is emphasized that determines what type of document it is. Why write literature reviews? “Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone.

For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.†What is the format for literature reviews? “Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper. · Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern. · Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized thematically. · Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far.

Where might the discussion proceed?†What is a thematic literature review? “Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time.â€v “Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider: · Current Situation : Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review. · History : The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology. · Methods and/or Standards : The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information.

For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals. · Questions for Further Research : What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?â€vi · Important Points to Consider The paper is to be written in strict conformance to current APA standards, and must contain at least 20 pages of content (excluding the title page, abstract, and references), utilizing at least 12 scholarly references. The paper is to be submitted through SafeAssign at the end of Module 4/Week 8. It is highly recommended that you download and read the instructions to avoid any stress created by issues that are the result of waiting until the last minute. · A SafeAssign draft check will be provided for you to use to improve your Originality Score prior to your final submission.

Three levels of current APA headings must be used throughout the paper, as this is a graduate-level research paper. Some students do not fully understand the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words. When you paraphrase, you must still give the author’s name, date, title of the source, the scholarly journal where it came from, and the exact website address or book. However, when you directly quote a source, it must have quotation marks around the quote, or (if 40 words or more) it must be set in block quotation format.

You must also give detailed information of where you acquired the quote. For the purpose of this academic paper, adhere to the follow rules when quoting or using a source: · Do not directly quote more than 120 words from any one source. · If the source is 2,000 words or less, do not directly quote more than 50 words from any one source. · Do not use the same source more than a total of 3 times within the whole document for quoting or paraphrasing. · Quotes must contain the section (if provided) and paragraph or page numbers of the quote, and this information must be placed in the reference. · In all instances, use current APA guidelines for citations and references. The paper must not be a series of quotations. Ibid WAL_SOCW6200_03_A_EN-CC.mp4

Paper for above instructions


Introduction


In an increasingly competitive business environment, organizations strive to leverage their human capital to achieve strategic objectives. One effective method for fostering employee and leadership capabilities is executive coaching. This literature review examines the existing body of research on executive coaching as a strategic approach to developing human capital, and how these strategies align with organizational goals. The review will consider the definition, processes, and outcomes of executive coaching, showcasing its relevance in today’s corporate landscape.

Definition and Objectives of Executive Coaching


Executive coaching is defined as a personalized and confidential form of development aimed at enhancing leadership skills, performance, and overall effectiveness in a professional setting (Grant, 2017). According to Grover and Furnham (2016), the primary objectives of executive coaching are to encourage self-reflection, foster capability building, frame the developmental journey in the context of organizational goals, and facilitate change in behavior. This personalized approach is designed to meet the unique needs of executives, making it a powerful tool for human capital development (Cox et al., 2018).

The Process of Executive Coaching


The executive coaching process typically involves several structured phases, including goal-setting, assessment, feedback, and ongoing support. According to Hargrove (2008), effective coaching begins with establishing clear objectives aligned with the individual's workplace performance and career trajectory. Recognizing the importance of mutual understanding, the coach and coachee collaboratively identify goals that correlate with the organization’s strategic aims (O'Neill, 2007).
In addition to goal action plans, assessments often utilize various psychological tools, such as personality tests and 360-degree feedback surveys. These instruments help pinpoint areas for development and provide a framework for measuring growth (Herman, 2015). Feedback plays a crucial role; coaches guide coachees through a reflective process that encourages deeper insights and reinforces commitment to change (Stelter, 2014).
Ongoing support and accountability form an integral aspect of executive coaching. As the coaching relationship evolves, regular follow-ups, progress reviews, and modifications to the development plan become necessary to ensure lasting impact (Whitmore, 2021).

Outcomes of Executive Coaching


Numerous studies have examined the outcomes of executive coaching, with findings demonstrating its efficacy in enhancing individual and organizational performance. A meta-analysis conducted by Theeboom et al. (2014) revealed that executive coaching had positive effects on various outcome measures, including self-perception, self-efficacy, and organizational commitment. These positive influences on individual performance subsequently lead to enhanced engagement and productivity within organizations (McGovern et al., 2001).
Furthermore, executive coaching is instrumental in fostering leadership development. According to Kauffman and Coutu (2009), effective executive coaching enhances competencies essential for leadership, including emotional intelligence, decision-making, and adaptability. Such leaders are not only more effective in their roles but also inspire their teams to enhance performance—creating a ripple effect throughout the organization (Ellinger & Bostrom, 2016).

Alignment with Organizational Goals


The successful integration of executive coaching into an organization should align with its strategic goals and culture (Grant, 2017). By aligning coaching efforts with organizational objectives, businesses can maximize the return on investment in coaching programs. The alignment also helps create a coaching culture that encourages continuous learning and adaptation, leading to sustained competitive advantage (Hughes & Proust, 2020).
Furthermore, organizations that embed coaching as a core skill for leaders contribute to a culture of accountability and open communication. Such an environment fosters trust and collaboration, enabling executives to harness individual potential for collective success (Hunt & Ellinger, 2019).

Challenges and Limitations of Executive Coaching


Despite its numerous benefits, executive coaching is not without challenges. Critically, there is a lack of standardization in coaching practices, which can result in variability in coaching effectiveness (Greif, 2007). Moreover, establishing the ROI of coaching is complex due to the difficulties in quantifying behavioral changes and their impact on organizational outcomes (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006).
Furthermore, power dynamics in the coaching relationship can complicate the process. Coaches must navigate sensitive issues without overstepping boundaries or compromising trust (O'Neill, 2013). Addressing these challenges requires a solid foundation of ethical practices and a commitment to ongoing professional development among coaches to ensure optimal outcomes.

Current Trends in Executive Coaching


The field of executive coaching is evolving rapidly in response to changes in the corporate landscape. Emerging trends include a growing focus on diversity and inclusion, with coaching programs designed to enhance cultural competency and support underrepresented groups within organizations (Reynolds, 2021). Additionally, technology is playing an increasingly prominent role in coaching delivery, with virtual coaching platforms and AI-driven tools gaining traction (Ellinger & Bostrom, 2016).

Conclusion and Future Research


Executive coaching serves as a robust strategy for developing human capital, providing tailored support to enhance individual and organizational effectiveness. As the interplay between coaching and organizational goals strengthens, a holistic approach to integrating coaching into workplace culture is essential to maximize its impact.
Future research should further explore the mechanisms through which executive coaching translates into positive organizational outcomes, particularly in diverse and complex environments. Additionally, the development of standardized practices may enhance the effectiveness and legitimacy of executive coaching across various sectors.

References


1. Cox, E., Bachkirova, T., & Clutterbuck, D. (2018). The Complete Handbook of Coaching. Sage Publications.
2. Ellinger, A. D., & Bostrom, R. P. (2016). The Role of Coaching in Human Resource Development. International Journal of Training and Development, 20(3), 176-187.
3. Goleman, D. (2017). Emotional Intelligence 2.0. TalentSmart.
4. Grant, A. M. (2017). The Third Generation of Workplace Coaching: Creating a Culture of Innovation and Collaboration. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(2), 110-124.
5. Greif, S. (2007). Coach Training and Development in Corporate and Professional Settings. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(2), 214–224.
6. Hargrove, R. (2008). Masterful Coaching. Jossey-Bass.
7. Herman, J. (2015). The Use of 360-Degree Feedback in Executive Coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(2), 168-176.
8. Hunt, J. M., & Ellinger, A. D. (2019). A Framework for Understanding Executive Coaching Work. Journal of Management Development, 38(5), 373–388.
9. Kauffman, C., & Coutu, D. (2009). The Coaching Effect. Harvard Business Review, 87(1), 44-50.
10. McGovern, J., Lindemann, M., McGhee, R., & McGhee, R. (2001). Maximizing the Impact of Executive Coaching: Lessons Learned from the Coaching Clients. Performance Improvement, 40(4), 20-29.