CHANGE 3 Lua Shanks Walden University EDDD-8002 ✓ Solved

Education standards have both negative and positive implications on students. Given that there are general students, special education, English language learners, and gifted learners, there is a need to carefully analyze education standards before adopting them. Standards are generally a clear roadmap for education that enables learners to organize themselves and make concerted efforts towards success. They provide consistency and coherence in education thus providing learners with clear targets for achievement.

However, adopting new standards for education may sometimes lead to controversy. For instance, only education experts should develop the standards so that they undertake appropriate research to understand the needs of students and their teachers. Without this, critical issues arise concerning the process of adopting standards, the content of the education standards, and how the gaps in adopting standards will be addressed. More importantly, the controversy around the adoption of standards focuses on the issue of assessment especially in high-stakes assessment, and how they will positively impact learners.

The State Department of Education aims at establishing a single set of education for K-12 learners. As a reform movement, standards will significantly transform the state education landscape. With education standards, the State Department of Education will be eligible for more federal funding, a situation that will benefit state schools. Education standards emphasize critical thinking, problem-solving and effective communication among learners. Research also shows that it will sufficiently prepare learners for higher education hence they have received immense support. This immense support is also partly due to the vocal support from the federal government.

Despite this support, school administrators, parents, teachers, and more importantly learners have not fully supported the adoption of education standards. Although the goals of education standards are potent, their implementation has resulted in serious frustration. First, there is a feeling that the State Department of Education adopted the standards to access federal funding. Although funding has greatly benefited schools and learners, the standards are hurting the quality of education. Also, given that there was no trial period to test for the effectiveness of education standards, it is difficult to confirm whether standards will benefit learners or not.

Teachers are also concerned that the education standards do not encourage professional development. Therefore, there is a need for the State Department of Education to rethink education standards so that they can benefit learners and teachers.

Education specialists are equipped through a professional degree to provide knowledge and theory in education. With advanced proficiency in areas such as curriculum development and special education, they are in a better position to guide the departments of education on how to adopt and implement education standards in a way that can benefit learners, teachers, and parents. Education specialists can therefore provide appropriate recommendations after a careful evaluation of the education system on how to improve curriculum planning, teaching methods, and individual lessons.

They have a role to play in the current controversy surrounding the adoption and implementation of education standards. Education specialists should serve as instructional champions to the departments of education before the adoption of education standards so that they can establish the actual needs of K-12 learners. Through this, they can identify an appropriate mechanism of implementing the education standards in a way that benefits learners. Learners should feature at the heart of education standards, although in most cases their needs are not prioritized. For instance, learners differ in their learning and comprehension abilities yet the education standards tend to overlook these.

Education specialists can embark on extensive research to understand the most important needs of different types of students so that they can be captured in the creation, adoption, and implementation of education standards.

Teachers are directly affected by the adoption of education standards and thus they have strong opinions about their effects on learners. They interact with learners daily and therefore have a deeper understanding of their educational needs. For instance, the teachers understand the implications of narrowing or expanding the curriculum. This means that they have a role to voice their concerns about the standards so that the Federal and State Departments of Education can see and understand the contentious issues in the implementation of education standards.

They are the implementers of the No Child Left Behind Act that seeks to improve the performance of every child. However, they cannot realize much when the education standards are controversial and lack an effective framework that guarantees success.

The education standards tend to be most severe on low-performing schools and students who have to give up certain aspects of the curriculum such as arts to focus on more important aspects such as Math.

In conclusion, the audience determines the type of message, vocabulary, and how to structure the information. Audiences vary in terms of age and education and thus there is a need to adjust information to suit their comprehension capabilities. Appropriate communication with different stakeholders is critical for effective implementation of educational reforms.

Paper For Above Instructions

Education standards are essential tools within the educational framework, serving not only to outline expectations for student achievement but also to guide teachers and administrators in educational practices. In this paper, I will delve deeper into the implementation of educational standards, considering the diverse perspectives and impacts they have on students, teachers, and educational leaders.

The importance of education standards cannot be overstated; they provide a pathway toward more coherent and consistent educational experiences for all students. However, not all stakeholders view these standards through the same lens. I will discuss the viewpoints of various stakeholders including education specialists, teachers, school administrators, and the State Department of Education, as they each play a pivotal role in this discourse.

The primary function of education standards is to set high expectations for what students need to learn. For instance, the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) aimed at ensuring that students are college and career-ready by establishing rigorous benchmarks. While supporters argue that such standards foster academic growth and prepare students for future success, critics contend that they may unnecessarily narrow the curriculum and detract from important subjects such as art and physical education (Gilday, 2020).

Furthermore, the implementation of educational standards can often lead to contention among stakeholders, particularly teachers and education specialists. Teachers who are on the front lines of educational reform may feel that these standards do not adequately represent the diverse learning needs of their students (Pak et al., 2020). They voice concerns regarding professional development opportunities being stifled by a narrow focus on standardized testing and compliance rather than learning and growth.

Education specialists, on the other hand, advocate for a more flexible approach to standards that consider the unique needs of different learners, including English language learners and students with special needs (Juarsa, Sasongko, & Mashuri, 2021). Their expertise in curriculum development and educational theories positions them as valuable assets in the ongoing conversation about educational reforms.

Moreover, strong leadership is imperative to the successful implementation of education standards. Leadership in education is characterized by the ability to inspire change, rally support, and engage all members of the educational community in collaboration (Whitney, 2017). Effective leaders leverage the influence they hold to foster a culture of continuous improvement, thus ensuring that educational standards are met without compromising the quality of education.

Additionally, the role of students as active participants in their learning cannot be overlooked. Engaging students in discussions about educational standards promotes ownership of their educational journeys and enhances engagement. This participatory approach is instrumental in addressing resistance to change, as students are central to the success of any educational reform (Whitney, 2017).

In light of these varying perspectives, it is crucial for educational leaders to communicate effectively with all stakeholders. This involves not only articulating the rationale behind the adoption of education standards but also considering the feedback from those who are directly impacted. Educational leaders must ask: How do we ensure that educational reforms meet the diverse needs of our student populations? Who can we collaborate with to develop effective implementation plans?

In conclusion, the implementation of education standards is a complex and multifaceted process that requires careful consideration of the views and needs of all stakeholders. As educational leaders, the responsibility lies in forging a path toward inclusive and effective standards that ultimately lead to enhanced educational outcomes for all students. This endeavor not only prepares students for future success but also fosters an environment where teachers and specialists can collaborate, innovate, and thrive.

References

• Gilday, C. L. (2020). Controversy and the Common Core. A Book Review of Common Core: National Education Standards and the Threat to Democracy. Democracy and Education, 28(1), 12.
• Juarsa, O., Sasongko, R. N., & Mashuri, N. (2021). Analysis of the Application of National Standards of Education in Elementary Schools. In International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020) (pp. ). Atlantis Press.
• Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Saldàvar Garcàa, E. (2020). The Adaptive Challenges of Curriculum Implementation: Insights for Educational Leaders Driving Standards-Based Reform. AERA Open, 6(2).
• Whitney, A. E. (2017). Keeping it real: Valuing authenticity in the writing classroom. English Journal, 16-21.