Choose a title for your presentation. Include your name, the ✓ Solved

1. Fiscal Policy: Examine the fiscal policies in place at the start of your chosen decade. Provide details on the policies and examine their relation to macroeconomic issues at the time. Highlight key points on your slides and add explanatory details in your speaker notes. Include scholarly research on specific fiscal policies, preferably searching by President rather than by years, starting with the following resources: Congressional Budget Office, White House website, Economic Report of the President (available from FRASER), and National Bureau of Economic Research.

2. Fiscal Policy Actions: Examine the fiscal policy initiatives that responded to the changing economic landscape. Specify the intent of these actions, such as decreasing unemployment. Use macroeconomic principles and models, like the AD-AS model or Keynesian consumption function, to explain why the action would lead to the desired government outcome. Maintain main points and graphs on slides, with comprehensive explanations in speaker notes. Scholarly research is required and may overlap with previous findings.

3. Fiscal Policy Impact: Assess if government actions achieved their goals by evaluating macroeconomic data. For instance, analyze how President Johnson's "War on Poverty" aimed to reduce poverty and create a stronger economy, leading to increased consumption and growth rates. Compare observed macroeconomic data post-policy implementation with the objectives and consider individual household and business impacts of policy decisions.

4. References: Provide references in APA style. Include in-text citations and formulate a comprehensive reference list.

Each question should be answered in at least 75 words.

5. Pick a company whose sales you want to model and predict by looking up sales information for two years. Create a linear equation to predict sales two years from now, showing all calculations, and provide sources for the information.

6. Discuss which equations or inequalities you enjoyed solving and the challenges encountered. Include real-world examples, explaining why they are interesting, and reference specific equations.

7. Analyze rideshare or cab company rates, presenting an equation representing costs in your area. Determine if this is a function and calculate pricing for specific locations. Discuss transformations of the parent equations used.

8. Create a personalized degree-two polynomial equation for baseball projectile motion, finding zeros and vertices, and discussing height and speed differences.

9. Explore a real-world example of a rational function in budgeting, such as a mobile phone plan. Research device costs, creating a monthly cost function, and discussing average costs based on usage.

10. Investigate an important mathematical constant, excluding pi or e, detailing its history, facts, and applications, along with references for further research.

Paper For Above Instructions

Fiscal policy plays a critical role in managing a nation's economy. It encompasses government spending and taxation policies, influencing economic growth, inflation, and employment levels. This paper will focus on exploring fiscal policies in place at the start of a specific decade, the subsequent actions taken to adjust these policies, and the impact of these adjustments on individuals and businesses.

Beginning our examination, consider the fiscal policies instituted in the early 2000s, primarily under President George W. Bush. During this time, significant tax cuts were enacted, particularly through the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. This policy aimed to stimulate the economy post-dot-com bubble burst by reducing the tax burden on individuals and businesses. The overarching goal was to increase disposable income, little did they know the economic landscape was going to shift dramatically after the events of September 2001.

The rationale behind these tax cuts was rooted in Keynesian principles, aiming to boost consumption by providing individuals with more disposable income. According to the Keynesian consumption function, an increase in individual income typically leads to increased consumption and, consequently, economic growth (Mankiw, 2016). Graphing this scenario within the Aggregate Demand-Aggregate Supply (AD-AS) model would illustrate the intended rightward shift in the demand curve, indicating growth in real GDP (Mankiw, 2016). However, macroeconomic analysis would show that while consumption rose initially, the effectiveness of these cuts in sustaining economic growth remained contentious.

Moving forward to the latter half of the decade, fiscal policies transitioned to address the emerging housing market crisis. The fiscal initiatives included significant government spending aimed at stabilizing an ailing economy. For instance, the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was implemented in 2008 to purchase toxic assets and bolster banks. The intent was clear: prevent further financial system collapse and restore confidence. However, using macroeconomic principles, we can analyze that the stimulus could lead to inflationary pressures if not matched with productive capacity, reflected in the Phillips Curve model (Mankiw, 2016).

The efficacy of these actions can be measured against certain macroeconomic indicators. For example, while the unemployment rate surged in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 policy implementation, eventually it would decrease as the economy stabilized. Observational data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicate a gradual decline in unemployment rates following the implementation of TARP and other stimuli, suggesting that government interventions had a positive impact on the job market (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020).

Moreover, individual households and businesses were profoundly affected by these fiscal decisions. Tax cuts in the early 2000s did increase consumption temporarily; however, the unintended consequences were felt during the housing crisis, where businesses faced foreclosures, affecting overall consumer confidence (Zandi, 2016). For an instance, tax relief did not translate into higher savings or investments, causing an increase in household debt instead—all of which are reflected in aggregate demand shifts. The paradox of thrift illustrates the unintended consequences of fiscal actions; as individuals looked to save more during economic uncertainty, collective demand fell, leading to deeper recessions (Gale & Orszag, 2008).

Examining the overall impact, we must consider the legacy of fiscal policies like tax cuts and stimulus spending on the economy. While these policies aimed at stabilizing and growing the economy, the inflationary pressures, shifts in consumer behavior, and economic inequalities that ensued question the effectiveness of such measures. The benefits were not uniformly experienced, with wealthier individuals often benefiting the most from tax cuts, increasing income inequality (Piketty, 2014).

In summary, examining fiscal policies from a given decade requires a multi-faceted analysis. Such analysis must include initial intents, macroeconomic principles, and real-world impacts on individuals and businesses. The interplay between government actions and economic responses is complex, necessitating a careful evaluation to understand not just the apparent outcomes but also the broader implications of economic policies.

References

  • Gale, W. G., & Orszag, P. R. (2008). The economic effects of expanding access to health care coverage. American Economic Review, 98(2), 323-328.

  • Mankiw, N. G. (2016). Principles of Economics. Cengage Learning.

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/

  • Zandi, M. (2016). The economic and fiscal effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Moody’s Analytics.

  • Congressional Budget Office. (2001). The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2002 to 2011.

  • National Bureau of Economic Research. (2008). Business Cycle Dating Committee, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • White House. (2001). Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.

  • Economic Report of the President. (2009). Annual Report on Economic Policies and Proposals.

  • FRASER. (n.d.). Economic Report of the President. Retrieved from https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/