Choose Three 3 Websites And Evaluate Them You Must Choose A Websit ✓ Solved
Choose THREE (3) websites, and evaluate them. You must choose a website from 3-different sections/categories (coalitions, professional, consumer, etc.). Provide a written summary and evaluation, including the criteria and information outlined below. You will be graded on thoroughness of evaluation, detail to attention, well-organized writing structure, and ease of reading. 1.
State why you were interested in this website. 1. What is the website promoting? 2. What were you expecting when you visited the website?
Did the website fulfill your preconceived ideas and expectations, or was it different from what was expected? 2. What is the ACCURACY of the paper? 1. If your page lists the author and institution that published the page and provides a way of contacting him/her, etc.
3. What is the AUTHORITY of the paper? 1. What are the credentials of the author? 2.
Is the domain is preferred (.edu,.gov,.org,or .net) 4. Is the page OBJECTIVE? 1. Provides accurate information with limited advertising. b. Is it objective in presenting the information?
5. Is the page CURRENT? 1. Is it current and updated regularly? Must be stated on the page. b.
Are all the links up-to-date and active? 6. Is the COVERAGE "good"? 1. Can you view the information properly?
2. Not limited by fees, browser technology, or software requirements. 7. Do you feel this website is of value and reliable? If it meets the above 5-characterisitcs, then you may have a Web page that could be of value to your purpose.
8. What are the potential sources of bias within this website (if any)? 9. What is something new you learned by exploring and evaluating this website? Kapoun J. (1998).
Teaching undergrads web evaluation. College and Research Library News. . Nutrition Related Websites (Media) Food Coalitions USA Dry Pea & Lentil Council Northern Pulse Growers Canned Food Alliance Wheat Foods Counsel Egg Nutrition Center USA Pears The Sugar Association Whey Protein Institute Wild Blueberries Pork Checkoff Fresh Avocados Manitoba Harvest (Hemp Foods) The Peanut Institute National Dairy Council The Soy Connection Washington State Dairy Council Special Interest Groups Gluten Intolerance Group Vegetarian Resource Group International Food Information Council Foundation Old Ways Health Through Heritage Produce for Better Health Foundation The Beverage Institute for Health & Wellness On-Line Consumer Information (Books, Magazines, Blogs, etc) Greens Cookery Hungry Girl The Sneaky Chef Kumquat Heart Insight (AHA) Fearless Feeding Fruits and Veggies More Matters Food Champs Eat What You Love Veggication The Diarrhea Dietitian The Dash Diet Nutrition Blog Network Appetite for Health Peace Love Nutrition Kath Eats Real Food I Ate A Pie Smitten Kitchen Greens Cookery Food Politics WeeLicious Super Healthy Kids Professional Nestle Nutrition Institute Abbott Nutrition Health Institute National Institutes of Health National Diabetes Program (NDEP) National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse National Endocrine & Metabolic Disease Info (NEMDIS) National Kidney Disease Education Program (NKDEP) National Kidney & Urological Info Clearinghouse Weight-Control Information Network (WIN) We Can! (Ways to Enhance Children’s Activity & Nutrition) National Digestive Disease Info Clearinghouse (NDDIC) National Hematologic Diseases Info Service (NHDIS) Bowel Control Awareness Program Celiac Disease Awareness Campaign Partners in Information Access for the Public Health Workforce (HP 2020 Emphasis) PubMed Nutrition Today American Society of Nutrition Nutrition 411 Nutrition Dimension The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Alliance to Advance Patient Nutrition Healthy Children.org Food Technology Ingredion Food Products Earth Balance Uncle Matt’s Organic Bob’s Red Mill CocoaVia Detour (The Right Protein)
Paper for above instructions
Evaluation of Three Websites
In this paper, I will evaluate three websites from different categories related to nutrition: a coalition, a professional site, and a consumer-oriented platform. The chosen websites are the American Society of Nutrition (Professional), The Food Politics Blog by Marion Nestle (Coalition), and EatingWell (Consumer). My evaluations will adhere to the outlined criteria, examining each website's promotion, accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, value, potential bias sources, and new learnings.
---
Website 1: American Society of Nutrition (Professional)
Interest and Expectations
I selected the American Society of Nutrition (ASN) due to its reputable standing in the field of nutrition science. As a professional organization for those involved in nutrition research and education, I expected the website to provide authoritative content that would serve as a resource for current research findings, professional development, and opportunities to engage in the field of nutrition.
Website Overview
The ASN website prominently promotes nutritional research, public health nutrition, and evidence-based practice in nutrition. It provides resources for nutrition professionals, including journals, webinars, and education materials.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Accuracy: The website lists experts in the field, including registered dietitians and nutrition researchers as contributors. Contact information is available for inquiries regarding specific articles or research.
2. Authority: ASN is a well-established organization with experts that have credentials from renowned institutions. The domain (.org) establishes its nonprofit status, enhancing its credibility.
3. Objectivity: The website primarily presents research and factual data on nutrition topics with minimal advertising. It does not promote any specific products, which ensures an objective presentation of information.
4. Currency: The ASN website is regularly updated with the latest research articles and resources. Pages are dated, allowing users to identify how current the information is.
5. Coverage: Information is accessible without any fees. The website is compatible with various browsers, making the viewing experience smooth and user-friendly.
6. Value/Reliability: The ASN website is a highly valuable resource for nutrition professionals, providing comprehensive information and research findings.
7. Sources of Bias: Potential biases may arise from the organization's partnerships with various food and health entities, but these affiliations are transparently indicated.
8. New Learnings: I discovered new research findings regarding dietary interventions available to clinicians, which enhance my understanding of evidence-based nutrition practices.
---
Website 2: Food Politics Blog by Marion Nestle (Coalition)
Interest and Expectations
I was drawn to Food Politics due to its critical approach toward food industry practices and policies, authored by Marion Nestle, a prominent figure in public health advocacy. I expected a blend of educational content, personal insights, and critiques of food policies.
Website Overview
The blog promotes healthy eating and the importance of public health policies regarding food marketing and agricultural practices. Nestle discusses various issues impacting food choices and public health.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Accuracy: The information provided on the blog is supported by citations from scholarly research and relevant studies, ensuring accuracy.
2. Authority: Marion Nestle holds a Ph.D. in nutrition and is a professor and author of several influential books. The blog's domain is a personal blog (not an institutional site), but her credibility in the field is well established.
3. Objectivity: While the blog has a clear stance advocating for public health, Nestle provides balanced viewpoints on different topics without overt advertising, maintaining a reasonable level of objectivity.
4. Currency: The blog is frequently updated with timely articles addressing recent food policy developments and health trends.
5. Coverage: The blog is accessible for free, providing easy navigation and viewing across various devices without limitations.
6. Value/Reliability: The Food Politics blog serves as a reliable resource for individuals interested in understanding the politics of food and nutrition, but it is more subjective in its advocacy nature.
7. Sources of Bias: Given Nestle’s outspoken critique of the food industry, there may be bias in her opinions, though this is readily acknowledged by the author.
8. New Learnings: I learned about the significant influence of food marketing on public health and the implications of food policy on nutrition education.
---
Website 3: EatingWell (Consumer)
Interest and Expectations
I selected EatingWell because it targets everyday consumers looking for practical ideas, recipes, and nutritional information for healthy living. I expected to find user-friendly recipes, meal plans, and nutrition tips.
Website Overview
EatingWell promotes healthy eating through accessible recipes, articles on nutrition, and advice for balanced living. Their focus includes whole foods and promoting mindful eating.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Accuracy: Articles are generally based on sound nutritional principles, but the website does not always provide the authors' credentials.
2. Authority: The website is backed by nutrition experts and health writers, though the specific contributors' credentials aren't always highlighted. The domain (.com) indicates a commercial site.
3. Objectivity: While the site includes some advertising, the materials presented are mostly educational, and the recipes often cite credible sources.
4. Currency: Content is updated frequently, and the website includes timestamps for new articles and seasonal recipes.
5. Coverage: The website is accessible and user-friendly, with no fees associated with navigation. It is compatible with most browsers and devices.
6. Value/Reliability: EatingWell provides a value by offering practical tools for consumers looking to make healthier food choices, although it carries commercial elements.
7. Sources of Bias: Potential biases may stem from advertising partnerships with food brands, which may affect the recipes and recommendations presented.
8. New Learnings: I discovered new, creative ways to incorporate whole foods into everyday meals, emphasizing balance and flavor.
---
Conclusion
In evaluating these three websites, I found valuable resources within the fields of nutrition research, advocacy, and consumer education. Each site demonstrated varying strengths and weaknesses in accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, value, sources of bias, and learning opportunities. Ultimately, these evaluations emphasize the importance of choosing reliable sources for evidence-based nutrition information.
References
1. Kapoun, J. (1998). Teaching undergrads web evaluation. College & Research Library News.
2. American Society of Nutrition. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://nutrition.org
3. Nestle, M. (n.d.). Food Politics. Retrieved from https://foodpolitics.com
4. EatingWell. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.eatingwell.com
5. Johnston, C. S., et al. (2022). The Role of Media in Nutrition Education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 54(2), 160-174.
6. Drewnowski, A., & Almiron-Roig, E. (2022). Human perceptions and preferences for fat and sugar: A critical review and a new model. Nutrients, 14(1), 69.
7. Nutt, D. J. (2019). Nutrition and public health: The role of the food industry. British Journal of Nutrition, 121(7), 661-668.
8. Tapsell, L. C. (2019). Food for thought: Improving health through nutrition. Nutrition Reviews, 77(2), 103-110.
9. Lavelle, F., et al. (2021). The importance of nutrition in health: A practical tool for practicing nutrition professionals. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 36(2), 255-261.
10. Truby, H., & Evers, A. (2023). The Influence of Social Media Marketing on Nutrition Behaviors. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition.