Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible ✓ Solved

The Christian view of the nature of human persons is fundamentally rooted in the belief that each individual is created in the image and likeness of God, commonly referred to by the Latin term "Imago Dei." This doctrine emphasizes the inherent dignity and value of every human being, irrespective of their abilities, health status, or circumstances (White, 2020). The Christian perspective posits that all humans possess intrinsic worth, which commands respect and moral consideration from conception until natural death. This view aligns closely with the "Theory Based on Human Properties," which recognizes the intrinsic value of human beings apart from their external attributes or utility (White, 2020). In this context, the ethical implications of decisions surrounding life, particularly in cases of fetal abnormality, are profound, as they underscore the sanctity of life as ordained by divine will.

Within the parameters of this case study involving Jessica and Marcos, a couple presented with the prospect of raising a child he/she may suffer from severe disabilities, the theories employed by the involved parties offer a nuanced understanding of the moral status of the fetus. Jessica grapples with the realities of her socioeconomic circumstances and the potential quality of life for her child, while her husband Marcos views the situation through a pragmatic lens that weighs financial implications heavily. Their discussions with Dr. Wilson, who employs "The Theory Based on Sentience," provide insight into the evolutionary spectrum of moral reasoning applied to determine the fetus’s worth and future life quality. His gentle and informed counseling reflects an understanding of the potential suffering the child may endure, hinting at a complex interplay of ethical views that influence their ultimate decision.

Aunt Maria's unwavering stance, rooted in "The Theory Based on Human Properties," speaks to a belief in the divine plan for all lives, irrespective of their potential or quality, emphasizing that every life has value bestowed by God. This illustrates a divergence in moral reasoning, where the religious perspective focuses on the sanctity of life, while the pragmatic concerns of Jessica and Marcos reflect a debate between moral obligations and practical realities of living with disability.

In addressing the overarching question, "Which moral theory do I align with?" it becomes clear that while both cognitive and human properties theories provide valid frameworks, my inclination leans towards the cognitive properties theory in this contemporary context. The financial stability and readiness to undertake the responsibilities of parenthood are not trivial considerations. The stress and possible mental anguish associated with raising a child with severe disabilities, compounded by financial burdens, necessitate a thorough deliberation of all factors (Grand Canyon University (GCU), 2020). The choice of termination for medical reasons, as challenging as it may be, can be viewed through the lens of responsible parenthood and maintaining the well-being of the existing family unit. It calls upon the ethical tenet of utilizing one's cognitive abilities to make informed decisions regarding reproductive health and family dynamics.

Moreover, while I appreciate the spiritual underpinnings of valuing every life, the ability to recognize the potential challenges ahead may allow for a more balanced perspective on the moral implications of choosing to end a pregnancy under stressful circumstances. The theories presented align within a spectrum of moral reasoning that must consider both the sanctity of life and the quality of that life, an imperative discussion as parenthood involves not just emotional resilience but also practical readiness and support (Bogue & Hogan, 2020; GCU, 2020). In addition, the choice not to proceed with a pregnancy can be seen not as an end to life, but rather a valiant effort to preserve dignity and provide for existing family dynamics.

In sum, the convergence of ethical, spiritual, and personal considerations involved in this case study illustrates the complexity surrounding fetal abnormalities and moral statuses. The Christian perspective lends weight to discussions about dignity, yet practical realities must also inform decision-making, supporting the view that while life is indeed sacred, the choices about that life must be considered wisely and compassionately. Through this contemplation, one can recognize that the tools for raising a child are not merely found in religious texts but also in the lived realities that parents must navigate each day, seeking the best outcomes achievable for their families.

Paper For Above Instructions

In contemplating the Christian view of the nature of human persons and its correlation with moral status, it becomes clear that this paradigm primarily asserts the sanctity and intrinsic value of life. The inherent worth of human beings, rooted in the creation narrative that portrays humanity as "Imago Dei," serves as a cornerstone for ethical deliberations in health care contexts and beyond. This understanding fosters a worldview where every person, from conception to natural death, deserves respect and consideration. As seen in the case study involving Jessica and Marco, their struggle to make a deeply personal decision reflects the tension between moral ideals and the harsh realities of life choices in contemporary society.

The "Theory Based on Human Properties" aligns with a belief in the inherent dignity bestowed by the divine. Jessica’s discussions with family and medical professionals highlight the ideological divide surrounding the moral status of the fetus. While Dr. Wilson leans toward the "Theory Based on Sentience," recognizing the potential suffering of the unborn, Maria's perspective firmly believes that each life is part of God’s divine plan. This conflict illustrates the broader societal discourse on abortion and disability, challenging us to reconcile compassionate action with moral frameworks that demand preservation of life.

Jessica's internal conflict showcases the emotional toll such situations can take, revealing the multifaceted layers of moral reasoning at play. She must balance her values concerning the sanctity of life with practical considerations related to her family's socioeconomic stability and quality of life. Here, the cognitive properties theory resonates, advocating for a reflective and informed approach to decision-making that considers the potential impact of raising a child with disabilities on the entire family unit. While some may argue that choosing to terminate a pregnancy undermines the value of the fetus, it may also reflect a commitment to responsible parenting, acknowledging that one's abilities must also come into play regarding ethical considerations.

Ultimately, Jessica’s and Marco’s circumstances thrust them into an introspective landscape where they must weigh their beliefs against their realities. The choice they face is agonizing, with potential implications that extend beyond individual morality into broader ethical discussions relevant to public policy and health care frameworks. Their story emphasizes that the moral fabric of society is woven with diverse threads that encompass differing beliefs about the value of life, the roles of duty and compassion, and the balance between spiritual convictions and earthly responsibilities.

References

• Bogue, D., & Hogan, M. (2020). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making in Health Care. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), Foundational Issues in Christian Spirituality and Ethics.
• Grand Canyon University (GCU). (2020). Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.
• White, N. (2020). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making in Health Care. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), God, Humanity, and Human Dignity.