Cjus 520discussion Board Forum Instructionsanswer All Of The Question ✓ Solved

CJUS 520 Discussion Board Forum Instructions · Answer all of the questions listed in each case study. · Incorporate 2 scholarly sources in your original threads, using proper APA formatting. · Submit one thread of 500 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Wednesday of the module/week in which the forum is assigned. · Submit at least two replies of 150 words each by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the same module/week of the forum. Responding to a classmate’s post requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order to move the conversation forward . Thus, the response post is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon initial posts to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced in the initial posts.

As such, reply posts that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous post(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions. This course utilizes the Post-First feature in all Discussion Board Forums. This means you will only be able to read and interact with your classmates’ threads after you have submitted your thread in response to the provided prompt. For additional information on Post-First, click here for a tutorial. THE PURPOSE: Knowledge: After completing this assignment, you will understand: 1) How casual explanations of behavior made by the average person compare to those made by psychologists.

2) How psychological principles can be used to explain human behavior. Skills: After completing this assignment, you will be able to: 1) Adopt the mindset of a psychologist and form specific, functional connections between the course material (i.e., the science of human behavior) and your own personal experience. 2) Use the information you have learned in this course (i.e., psychological terminology, principles, concepts, and/or theories) to explain behavior you observe in the real world. YOUR TASK: You will need to recruit a friend or acquaintance to assist you with this assignment. This individual should be a person who has no formal training in psychology (i.e., has not taken a psychology course or received some other form of training on the topic).

Ideally, this person will have the opportunity to make a behavioral observation along with you. That way, you are both witnessing the behavior in real time, under the same conditions and circumstances. Be sure to explain this assignment to your friend ahead of time and get permission to use her/his input in your write-up (see below). Over the next few days, your task is to pay attention to your behavior and the behavior of others around you. You are looking for situations and interactions that you and a friend can collectively observe and then discuss, interpret, and analyze together.

Your friend will provide the perspective of the “casual observer†(i.e., the average person). You will provide the perspective of the “social scientist†and use the information you have learned in this course (i.e., psychological terminology, principles, concepts, and/or theories) to explain what you have witnessed. For these reasons, you should focus on observations you can link to any of the topics covered in the course thus far in the semester. Your behavior observation will be referred to as your “case study.†Once you and your friend have completed the observation, you will construct a “case study write-up†that includes the following information: 1) Date of the behavioral observation (i.e., case study).

2) Location of the case study. 3) Brief Case Description. This description should include any and all details needed to provide a complete description of the event/observation for someone who did not witness it first-hand. Avoid specific personal identifying details, such as names, to protect the privacy of the people you observe but be sure to provide a comprehensive description of the event itself and the behavior of the persons involved. 4) Casual Explanation.

This explanation will be provided by your friend/acquaintance. Ask your friend to The Case Study Assignment PSYCH : Introductory Psychology describe what she/he observed and to provide an explanation for, or interpretation of, the behavior. How does the “average person†view the behavior(s) observed? What explanation does she/he give for those behaviors? 5) Psychological Application.

This application will be provided by you (the social scientist). In doing so, you will seek to analyze/explain/interpret the behavior(s) you observed using what you have learned in this course. You will provide functional connections between your observations and relevant course material (i.e., a specific psychological concept, principle, or theory). Be sure to discuss your case study using appropriate psychological terminology. You must also incorporate information from ONE academic source into your analysis (this CANNOT be your textbook).

Be sure to cite that source both in text and in a Reference list at the end of your assignment using APA editorial style. You should avoid internet sources, with the exception of electronic versions of articles from peer-reviewed journals. 6) Compare/Contrast. Compare and contrast the explanations provided by your friend (the casual observer) and you (the social scientist). Were the explanations similar or different?

In what ways? Did you focus on different aspects of behavior when trying to explain it? If you focus on different factors/variables when trying to explain the behavior? What did you learn from this exercise about casual, everyday explanations of behavior and those provided by the scientific study of behavior? 7) Reference list.

Provide a complete reference entry for any source cited in your psychological application discussion. The APA tutorial from Assignment 1 covers citation and APA format for journal article references. You are encouraged to use the APA resources posted in Blackboard for help with APA format. THE CRITERIA: Review the grading criteria for this assignment on the attached grading rubric (see page 3) to understand what you need to address in your case study to earn points on this assignment. Your Completed Assignment MUST Include: 1) ONE behavioral observation of events in your own life.

2) A 2-3 page write-up (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced and 1 inch margins) in which you summarize and then compare/contrast the two perspectives/explanations specified in this assignment (i.e., a causal/everyday explanation [provided by a third party] and the explanation based on scientific investigation). 3) Full in-text and Reference list citation for the research sources used to complete the assignment (in APA editorial format). 4) A copy of the grading rubric (found at the end of this assignment). Be sure to complete and sign the academic integrity statement before submitting your assignment. REMEMBER: Your write-up should consist of complete, understandable sentences with proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Clearly label your work following the example given above. Carefully proof-read your paper before submitting it to avoid losing points. The grading rubric below will be used to evaluate this assignment. Addressing each element of the rubric well will ensure that you have included all critical aspects of the assignment. “I, ______________________________________________, verify that this assignment is my original work.†Your Signature: _______________________________________________________________ THE GRADING RUBRIC MECHANICS & STYLE (25% ) 1) Are there 3 or more errors in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation?

If so, 2) Are sentences logically related to one another? If not … 3) Is the paper’s overall organization consistent and logical? If not . . . - APA FORMAT (20% ) 1) Are the in-text citations in APA Format? Only 1-2 errors 3 or more errors 2) Are the references on Reference page in APA format? Only 1-2 errors 3 or more errors - NOTE: Failure to include citations for references in your assignment is considered plagiarism so please be sure to cite all resources you use.

CONTENT (60% ) 1) Does the write up include a detailed description of an event involving the behavior of one or more individuals under “real world†conditions†Does the description provide sufficient details of all behaviors observed (including verbal and nonverbal) so that someone who has not witnessed it would still have a clear understanding of what had occurred? 2) Does the write-up provide a critical analysis that compares and contrasts two potential explanations or interpretations of the behavior, including: a) one everyday, casual explanation provided by a third party [i.e., a friend] and b) another explanation that uses a psychological principle/theory/concept to explain the behavior(s)? Was the assignment late? _________ FINAL GRADE (Mechanics/Style + Format + Content minus any late deductions): _______ Overall Comments:

Paper for above instructions

Case Study: Observing Public Behavior in a Coffee Shop
Date of Observation: October 1, 2023
Location: Local Coffee Shop
Brief Case Description:
On a Saturday morning at a bustling local coffee shop, I observed a diverse group of customers engaging in various social interactions. The coffee shop was moderately crowded, with customers standing in line to order while others were seated at tables. The atmosphere was warm and inviting, filled with the rich aroma of freshly brewed coffee and the soft background sounds of conversation and clinking dishes. During this observation, I noticed three specific interactions: a mother with her young daughter sharing a snack, two friends having a lively discussion at a table, and a solitary man working on his laptop while occasionally glancing around. The mother and daughter were engaged in a loving exchange, laughing and sharing stories, while the friends appeared animated, discussing a recent event. The solitary man, on the other hand, seemed absorbed in his work, occasionally pausing to take notes or sip his coffee.
Casual Explanation:
My friend, who accompanied me during this observation, commented on the interactions they witnessed and described the mother-daughter duo as “just having a good time.” They believed it was normal for a mother to engage her child in conversation while enjoying a snack. Regarding the two friends, my friend perceived their loudness as typical of friends catching up, suggesting that they were simply excited to share experiences. However, my friend did not offer any deeper analysis but noted that the solitary man seemed “lost in his own world” and wondered if he was working or just avoiding social interactions.
Psychological Application:
From a psychological perspective, the observed behaviors can be analyzed through various lenses. The interactions among the mother and daughter can be interpreted through Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory, which emphasizes the role of social interaction in cognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978). The warm engagement between them supports the premise that children learn and develop social skills through interactions with caregivers. The nurturing environment likely enhances the child’s emotional and social competence.
For the two friends, their animated discussion can be understood through the lens of Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). This theory posits that group membership, such as friendship, influences individual behaviors and interactions. Their excitement and emotional expressions resonate with the notion of in-group dynamics, whereby individuals share experiences that reinforce their bond and collective identity. The emotional contagion phenomenon, where one person's feelings can influence others’ emotional states, might also explain the liveliness of their interaction (Hatfield et al., 1994).
As for the solitary man, his behavior can be analyzed through the lens of introversion and solitary working. The concept of self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) could apply here, suggesting that individuals who are internally motivated may prefer working alone, thus optimizing their cognitive resources in a less distracting environment. His alternating gaze around the coffee shop could indicate restlessness or a fleeting desire for social connection, even while he appeared engrossed in his work.
Compare/Contrast:
The casual explanation offered by my friend focused primarily on observable behavior without delving into underlying psychological constructs. For instance, while my friend characterized the interactions as typical social behavior, I explored the cognitive and emotional developments involved in those behaviors. The contrast is significant; my analysis included theoretical insights, whereas my friend offered observations based primarily on experiential understanding.
My friend’s descriptions overlooked the developmental aspects inherent in the mother-daughter interaction, such as how these interactions foster learning. Similarly, they did not recognize the interplay of social identity and emotional contagion that influenced the lively exchange between the two friends. In their observation of the solitary man, my friend speculated without considering broader psychological implications like motivation and personality traits.
From this exercise, I learned that casual explanations, while valid in everyday contexts, often lack the depth that psychological analysis provides. Observers may miss how behavior is rooted in broader cognitive, emotional, and social theories, limiting their understanding of human interactions. The findings underscore the importance of applying psychological principles when analyzing behavior, allowing for a more nuanced understanding that moves beyond surface-level observations.
References
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
The integration of psychological theories not only enriches the understanding of observed behaviors but also highlights the complexity of human interactions that often go unnoticed in casual observations. This exercise fosters a deeper appreciation for bridging everyday experiences with scholarly insights in psychology.