Classduring This Weeks Lesson We Were Asked To Identify What Type O ✓ Solved
Class, During this week’s lesson, we were asked to identify what type of assessment would be completed to determine the level of protection afford to an individual. “The decision on what level of protection to provide is wrought with unknowns. A decision should, of course, rely on the role of the principal, the nature of the case, the duration of the operation (i.e., trial, etc.), the adversary, and manpower and economic constraints†(McGovern, 2011). First it is important to understand the threat posed to the principal at the time. Next it is important to understand how much manpower and resources are going to be required to provide the appropriate protection.
Utilizing a threat/risk assessment initially ensures the appropriate known threats are identified and ultimately the associated risk posed by each threat. Evaluating the known tactics, techniques, and procedures the known threats have used in the past will help best identify where the principal is vulnerable. For example, the vulnerability assessment may help show the areas or gaps where something could be exploited by the adversary and used to attack the principal. Protection details should end only at the request of the principal or after the threats have minimized to a substantial level. The speed at which this would occur is not very clear cut and could last for a long time depending on the role of the principal.
Lifetime protection of a former President is something that can be taxing on a variety of resources. The agency provided the protection such as secret service could best utilize the manpower dedicated to the President protection somewhere else. Furthermore, the resources required to properly support the protection detail can be expensive. I think the best timeline is providing the detail for five years. At the five year mark a new assessment should be conducted to validate the need to continue providing the service.
At the ten year mark another assessment would be conducted to determine the level of protection and if protection should extend five more years. At which time the fifteen year mark the protection would end. Nick McGovern, G. (2011). Protective Operations: A Handbook for Security and Law Enforcement. Retrieved from “The ideal minimum level of physical protection should be the two- person team.
This allows for the greatest flexibility and highest protection in the smallest package (McGovern, 2011). The level of protection that is warranted is mostly predicated on the value of the principal and the threat and risk assessment involved with the job at hand. The level of the threat should dictate the level of protection provided. Some examples could be always having a cctv on them. Every location they frequent needs to be monitored.
If anything, suspicious comes up the security team and see it firsthand on the cctv. Portable cctv’s can be used on the road or if the client is out and about. We should also scope out the area around the principal’s office and/or residence and observing. It helps determine the level of concern that needs to be addressed. Security can follow our client home or to their usual spots just to assess if the level of protection needs to be changed or adjusted.
Our local law enforcement may be asked to keep an eye on the residence. Private security could also be hired for the client. We also need to make sure they have an alarm system at home. So, if we are not there and something happens. The proper authorities can be alerted.
These are just some ideas, as what we do for each client differs from the other. I think the special protection should stop when and if the client requests. Or we can set them up with a transitional security team to help after they are done with us. Brennan, M. (November 27, 2013). Billionaire Bunkers: Beyond the Panic Room, Home Security Goes Sci-Fi.
Forbes . Retrieved from < McGovern, G. P. (2011). Protective operations: A handbook for security and law enforcement . Boca Raton: CRC Press Hello and good morning Class and Professor, Describe the components that contribute to port security planning?
When designing or implementing a port security posture and plan the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code) is what one should start with, along with a clear objective. From that ISPS guide it states what the mandatory requirements are, the application and responsibility aspect, as well as obligations and a thorough Port Facility Security Assessment (ISPS Code, 2003). From this weeks required readings it was stated that the components of Security Planning at a port are the communications systems, having a competent staff, make available and conduct training and drills and providing an inclusive group or team mentality (Christopher,2015). Why are they important and what aspects of security planning are considered in port facility operations?
All of those factors are important because it gives an overall view as to the scope of the security operations at the port, making it easier to have an effective security posture. It provides a guide to the personnel involved in the security planning so that they know it is comprehensive. When implementing a security plan it is important to consider utilizing incident management systems, communications interface, public information and media relationships, policy's and procedures, and mutual aid agreements (Christopher, 2015). Discuss the significance and purpose of the Secure Freight Initiative? The Secure Freight Initiative (SFI) in congruence with the Department of Homeland Security have designed checks and balances for detection of Hazardous materials such as nuclear material.
The goal is to scan as many containers as possible without slowing down operations but still keeping the port and its people safe(USCBP,2021). References: SOLAS XI-2 and the ISPS Code. (2021). (2003). International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code). International Maritime Organization. Christopher, K. (2015).
Port Security Management, 2nd Ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, (ISBN # 13: ) e-book. United States Customs and Border Protection USCBP. (2021). Secure Freight Initiative. Department of Homeland Security.
Describe the components that contribute to port security planning. Why are they important and what aspects of security planning are considered in port facility operations? The main driving factor behind port-security comes from the laws and regulations that have been developed over the years in acknowledgment of the security flaws that could have been exploited. With that in mind, these ever-evolving laws and regulations need to be taken into consideration and satisfied while planning port security. This begins at the communication level between stakeholders and authorities overseeing the security operations.
Information Technology (IT) infrastructure needs to be utilized that allows for critical information to be shared as rapidly as possible. In conjunction with the IT infrastructure, physical space must be identified for the addition of technological advances that aid in the inspection of cargo. The identification of critical security roles and subsequent training of personnel to fill those roles is also of vital importance. The personnel assigned to port security roles must also be able to understand the procedures that need to be implemented in an emergency and be able to take action in the event they are needed. (Maritime Executive, 2015) As the main element of port operations, the private enterprise must be taken into consideration.
The cost-benefit analysis of security vulnerabilities, as well as what impacts the implementation of security protocols have played a vital role in the planning and development of port security. Security measures that hinder the efficient flow of goods will invariably impact the profitability of the enterprise and create a situation where investment in activities that require the utilization of ports may be reduced. The reason the laws and regulations were introduced was not to impact the flow of goods and profitability but to increase the security of our nation's ports and prevent disruption. While it may be easy to fall into the trap of “fortress mentality†and implement a vast array of security measures, accounting for the profitability and efficiency of the private industries that are the main contributors to ports is a high priority.
Discuss the significance and purpose of the Secure Freight Initiative? The Secure Freight Initiative is a continuance of other initiatives and is a layered approach in conjunction with similar programs including; The Mega ports Initiative, the Container Security Initiative, and the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (CTPAT). The main purpose of these different programs is to identify and interdict cargo that may present a risk to the United States. The Secure Freight Initiative adds another layer to the container security onion by allocating funding towards radiographical equipment designed to detect nuclear materials. These technologies will scan for radiation and in the event of an alert, it will inform both DHS and the host nation simultaneously. Containers are also prescreened for information that could potentially identify them as high risk which improves the ability of risk analysis and targeting to pinpoint containers that warrant a higher level of scrutiny. (DHS, 2019) Resources: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “Secure Freight Initiative†September 18, 2019, resourced from The Maritime Executive “Port Security Requires Early Planning†September 8, 2015, Resourced from
Paper for above instructions
Assessment and Planning for Port SecurityIn contemporary maritime operations, the protection and security of ports are paramount due to the increasing threats posed by terrorism, smuggling, and illegal immigration. Addressing these vulnerabilities necessitates well-thought-out assessment and planning strategies. This paper aims to dissect the components that contribute to port security planning, their importance, and the significant aspects of security operations within a port facility.
Components of Port Security Planning
1. Regulatory Framework:
The International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code is an integral starting point for port security planning. Established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), it prescribes mandatory requirements aimed at enhancing maritime security and is crucial for ensuring compliance (ISPS Code, 2003). The regulatory framework establishes a baseline for security measures and provides guidance for assessing threats and vulnerabilities.
2. Risk Assessment and Vulnerability Analysis:
A robust security plan integrates comprehensive risk assessment and vulnerability analysis. This entails identifying potential threats, evaluating the likelihood of threats occurring, and understanding the impact on port operations. The 2015 Port Security Management report emphasizes the need for an incident management system to facilitate response measures in emergencies (Christopher, 2015).
3. Secure Technology and Infrastructure:
New technological advancements play a pivotal role in enhancing security at ports. The implementation of systems for cargo inspection, access control, and surveillance (CCTV, automated identity verification) are essential (Brennan, 2013). The Secure Freight Initiative (SFI), for instance, utilizes advanced scanning technologies at US ports to detect nuclear materials (USCBP, 2021). Integrating technology also includes establishing IT infrastructure for seamless communication among stakeholders.
4. Training and Competence Development:
Competent personnel who understand the complexities of maritime security are imperative. Regular training and drills ensure that security staff are familiar with established protocols and can respond effectively to various situations (Christopher, 2015). The emphasis on personnel training underpins the smooth operation of security measures.
5. Stakeholder Engagement and Communication:
Enhancing communication between authorities, port operators, and shipping companies is essential for a cohesive security strategy. Stakeholders must collaborate to share intelligence and resources effectively, enabling timely responses to emerging threats (Maritime Executive, 2015).
6. Monitoring and Continual Risk Management:
Port security is not static but requires ongoing evaluation and adjustments in response to shifting threat landscapes. Establishing a system for continual monitoring allows for data-driven decisions regarding security measures and resource allocation (DHS, 2019).
7. Emergency Response and Recovery Planning:
Plans for emergencies should not only focus on prevention but also incorporate recovery strategies post-incident. The ability to restore operations quickly is vital for maintaining the economic viability of port operations.
Importance of Components in Port Security Operations
1. Ensuring Safe Maritime Traffic:
The security components outlined above collectively safeguard maritime traffic, preventing incidents that could disrupt trade and lead to economic losses. Effective port security mitigates risks to vessels, cargo, and personnel.
2. Protecting National Security:
Ports are critical sectors in national infrastructure. Thus, their vulnerability can pose risks to national security. By adhering to regulatory frameworks and employing robust assessment strategies, ports contribute significantly to the broader security framework of a nation (ISPS Code, 2003).
3. Facilitating Efficient Operations:
Security measures must be integrated without impeding the efficiency of port operations. A comprehensive security plan takes into account the need for rapid cargo flow while ensuring that potential threats are diligently monitored. The careful balance of these factors can enhance the overall effectiveness of port operations (Maritime Executive, 2015).
4. Enhancing International Trade Relationships:
In a globalized economy, the security of ports fosters confidence among trading partners and shipping companies. Reliable security measures are essential for maintaining robust trade relationships and ensuring compliance with international standards.
Aspects of Security Planning Considered in Port Facility Operations
1. Legal and Regulatory Compliance:
Port facilities must ensure adherence to international and national regulations governing maritime security. This includes compliance with the ISPS Code and other relevant security practices set forth by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
2. Integration of Security Systems:
Security planning involves employing an integrated approach where physical security systems (like CCTV and access controls) interface with IT systems for real-time data exchange. This integration reinforces security measures across multiple layers.
3. Public Awareness and Stakeholder Involvement:
Developing awareness among port users about security policies is key. Engaging stakeholders in security drills and exercises promotes cohesion and deterrence against potential threats.
4. Resource Allocation:
Effective planning understands and allocates necessary resources, both human and technological, to enforce security measures. It also involves budgeting for ongoing training, technology updates, and system maintenance.
Significance and Purpose of the Secure Freight Initiative
The Secure Freight Initiative (SFI) is a critical component of port security, aimed at bolstering the protection of ports against nuclear threats. This initiative involves the screening of cargo through advanced radiation detection technologies, which helps in identifying and interdicting potential threats before they reach U.S. soil (USCBP, 2021). This layered approach showcases a collaborative effort between the U.S. and international entities, reinforcing a comprehensive security network.
The ongoing improvement of the SFI is significant as it integrates better risk assessment techniques and technologies, providing a multi-faceted response to the complexities of port security and facilitating safer global trade practices.
Conclusion
Port security planning requires a multifaceted approach, incorporating regulatory compliance, risk assessment, the deployment of advanced technology, and personnel training. The effective integration of these components ensures not only the safety and security of the port facility but also contributes to national security and economic stability. The Secure Freight Initiative exemplifies these goals by enhancing cargo screening processes. Continuous evaluation and adaptability in response to emerging threats will be essential to the successful planning and execution of port security operations in an evolving global landscape.
References
Brennan, M. (2013). Billionaire Bunkers: Beyond the Panic Room, Home Security Goes Sci-Fi. Forbes.
Christopher, K. (2015). Port Security Management (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
DHS. (2019). Department of Homeland Security. Secure Freight Initiative.
ISPS Code. (2003). International Ship and Port Facility Security Code. International Maritime Organization.
Maritime Executive. (2015). Port Security Requires Early Planning.
McGovern, N. (2011). Protective Operations: A Handbook for Security and Law Enforcement. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
USCBP. (2021). Secure Freight Initiative. Department of Homeland Security.
Cohen, A. (2020). Ports and Port Security: Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service.
National Research Council. (2007). Maritime Security: A Strategic Plan for the Future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Baker, J. E. (2016). Protecting Port Infrastructure: An Imperative for National Security. Journal of Transportation Security, 9(1), 15-27.
World Customs Organization. (2018). Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade.