Comm3420individual Presentationdr Aronisdear Studentsplease Choose O ✓ Solved

COMM3420 Individual Presentation Dr. Aronis Dear Students, Please choose one out of the two options for your individual presentation, which will be recorded and uploaded to Canvas to the relevant Module and will not be longer than 10 min (preferably 5-7 min). There is an option to present it synchronously, at least to me, so please let me know if that is your preference. See in the following two options for your presentation (you should choose one): 1. Presenting your own case study The case study should reflect the current subject we are learning and be relevant to our course.

Please choose a case that is socially and/or culturally common, important and known. A case that studying it would help us understand wide phenomena, significant values and alike. The presentation should include the relevancy of the case to the course and current subject, description of it by using learned terms from in-class discussions and readings, and two new insights/understandings that derive from studying the case (or regarding the subject through the case). I will explain more in class and/or individually. 2.

Presenting a new academic article (from one of the recommended journals (see on Canvas, in Modules, week 2) The presentation should explain why the article is relevant to the course and current subject, and include a description of it by using the article’s language along with the learned terms from in-class discussions and readings. The presentation should include one new insight/understanding of the subject through the article. I will explain more in class/or individually. These presentations (both options) prepare you for your assignments and exam, check your involvement, understanding, and ability to use the course material in studying out-of-the-class case studies and/or other gender and communication scholarship.

While you are encouraged to consult with Dr. Aronis about your presentation, you are required for three things: 1. Receive comments on your presentation by Dr. Aronis –at least TWO DAYS BEFORE the presentation’s due date. Please use my OFFICE HOURS.

2. Submit a final version to Canvas by 6 pm, the night before your presentation is due. 3. Be prepared to respond to the class’ feedback and questions • Failing to address one of these requirements will result a lower grade. By Monday, February 14th at 10 am - please sign up for your presentation.

Write your name next to a date and subject that you are interested in presenting about. I allow a presentation with a classmate if you would like to reach out to one another, or leave a message on the google sheet Please see the schedule in the following Google Sheet on Canvas: f4eKaZfWSpPig/edit?usp=sharing See in the following pages the rationale of the individual presentation and the rubrics scores that will be used to evaluate your work. Both will help you achieve a high grade on this assignment. Individual presentations: rationale and expectations Almost each presentation that makes its way to class is a result of a process of a hard and creative work of the student, including one-on-one interaction with Dr.

Aronis. It is one of the course teaching-learning methods. Instead of only listen to your instructor, which never has the whole “truth†and “knowledge†(even though sometimes it looks like this) – the idea is to make you, the students, actively and significantly contribute to the contents of the course and give your own input and understanding. You are expected to present for 5-10 minutes a well-done presentation, that your audience would be excited about. At the first slide please mention the title.

At the following slides present the case or article and the main argument/analysis. The last one-two slides will include insights and a further understanding of the case regarding our course and certain subject. At the last slide please include *all* your references and sources. You are expected to present insights. Also in your essays and other assignments.

What are they? By the dictionary, they are the acts or results of apprehending the inner nature of things. In practice, these are certain understandings that derive from your analysis. Insights evolve as a result of a reflection on your work and its broader meanings. Insights evolve usually by answering questions as ‘what does this analysis mean, or could teach us about gender in society?

About gender identity? About gender roles or power relationships?,’ ‘how can we culturally/socially understand masculinity, femininity, feminism, etc. from this analysis?.’ Hence, the insights are not the analysis itself, but something that we can understand from the analysis, or from the article we are presenting (not merely its clear argument). The insights, as the work itself, are not meant to reflect self or individual expression or understanding of a personal aspect– but cultural and social understanding. Students are expected to be respectful to all presenters, to ask questions or add suggestions/comments as a feedback to their peers’ presentation.

Paper for above instructions

Introduction

The emergence of social media platforms has transformed the way we communicate and share experiences, especially regarding sensitive subjects such as sexual harassment and gender inequality. A case study that exemplifies the impact of social media on gender communication is the #MeToo movement. Launched in 2006 by activist Tarana Burke, this movement gained global momentum in 2017 when celebrities began sharing their stories of sexual harassment. This presentation aims to analyze the #MeToo movement within the framework of gender communication theories and to extract valuable insights that reveal the broader implications for society.

Relevance of the Case to Course and Current Subject

The #MeToo movement is not only a powerful social phenomenon; it is also intimately tied to the themes of gender, power dynamics, and identity politics explored in COMM3420. The movement has encouraged open dialogue about sexual harassment, highlighting the pervasive nature of such experiences among women and marginalized groups. Communication plays a crucial role in the dissemination of these experiences, and social media provides a platform for victims to share their stories, which can collectively create a significant cultural shift.

Theoretical Framework

In terms of theoretical frameworks, we can apply Fisher’s narrative paradigm, which posits that human communication is fundamentally based on stories and narratives, to understand how the #MeToo movement leverages personal narratives to create social change (Fisher, 1987). The power of storytelling is evident in the way the movement has unfolded; individual accounts of harassment resonate with others, fostering identification and solidarity among victims.
Key Terms and Concepts:
1. Narrative Paradigm: Provides a lens through which we can understand the effectiveness of personal stories in advocating for social issues.
2. Power Dynamics: The ability of individuals to control conversations surrounding gender, highlighting the role of victims as speakers in a traditionally male-dominated discourse.
3. Social Identity Theory: Explains how group dynamics shape an individual’s identity and experiences, with the #MeToo movement creating a shared social identity among victims (Tajfel & Turner, 1986).

Description of the Case

The #MeToo movement gained traction after various allegations against high-profile individuals illuminated the widespread nature of sexual harassment. Platforms such as Twitter and Facebook provided spaces for individuals to share their experiences using the hashtag #MeToo, creating viral discussions that elicit both support and backlash.
In November 2017, actress Alyssa Milano tweeted a call to action, which resulted in millions of responses. The phenomenon showcased not just the experiences of Hollywood insiders but also gave voice to everyday individuals who had suffered from harassment (Milano, 2017). This democratization of voice underscores the concept of "participatory culture" discussed in contemporary media studies, where content creation and consumption are shared among users (Jenkins, 2006).

Key Findings from the Case

1. Amplification of Voices: The movement has facilitated the amplification of voices that have historically been silenced, demonstrating a significant shift in gender communication.
2. Collective Empowerment: By uniting individuals under a common cause, the movement has fostered a sense of community and support, which is pivotal for social change.

Insights and Understandings

The first insight drawn from the examination of the #MeToo movement relates to the transformative power of collective narrative. When individuals come together to share their stories, they create a narrative that transcends individual experiences. This collective narrative can challenge established power structures and lead to institutional change in how sexual harassment is addressed legally and socially (Lang, 2020).
The second insight focuses on the intersectionality of the movement. The stories shared through #MeToo underline that sexual harassment does not affect all victims equally. Factors such as race, class, and sexual orientation play significant roles in shaping experiences of harassment. The movement's call for inclusivity is a critical reflection of the varied realities individuals face, which aligns with the principles of feminist theory that emphasize intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989).

Conclusion

The #MeToo movement serves as a salient case study in gender communication, facilitating a deeper understanding of how social media reshapes conversations around sexual harassment and gender dynamics. Through the application of relevant theories and insights, we see how this movement not only raises awareness but also fosters collective empowerment and challenges traditional narratives of power.
As communication scholars, analyzing such movements equips us with the tools to understand and address ongoing gender issues within society. The structural change initiated by the sessions and discussions triggered by the #MeToo narrative points towards a more inclusive and equitable communication landscape.

References

1. Burke, T. (2006). The origins of the #MeToo movement. Retrieved from [reference link].
2. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
3. Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
4. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
5. Lang, L. (2020). The #MeToo Movement: A Narrative Analysis. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5002-5021.
6. Milano, A. (2017). Alyssa Milano’s Tweet That Started #MeToo Movement. Retrieved from [reference link].
7. McRobbie, A. (2013). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture, and Social Change. London: Sage.
8. Pullen, C. (2014). The Gendered Spaces of Professional Organizations: How Masculinity and Femininity are Constructed and Resisted in Workplaces. New York: Routledge.
9. Tanenbaum, L. (2020). #MeToo: Reflections on Personal Narratives and Collective Action. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(2), 239-252.
10. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.