Cou 680 Week Five Intervention Paper Guidelines And Rubric Bereavemen ✓ Solved

COU 680 Week Five Intervention Paper Guidelines and Rubric Bereavement and Grief Overview: Selection of appropriate resources and interventions for clients who have experienced trauma or crisis involves consideration of biological, developmental, cultural, and spiritual factors. Your success in treating these clients will depend heavily on a comprehensive assessment of these factors and on matching an appropriate intervention to the client crisis or trauma experience and to the individual needs of your client. The first final project for this course is the creation of a trauma toolbox consisting of resources selected from counseling literature that you will use to support clients who experience symptoms of crisis and trauma.

You will review different case studies throughout the course that will introduce you to how to work with different types of clients. This assignment represents the second of the case studies and involves identifying a treatment intervention that can be used when working with clients experiencing bereavement and grief. Note: You will also submit this assignment to your ePortfolio as part of your final project trauma toolbox in Week Nine. After receiving feedback, you will upload the paper, including tracked changes that show any revisions or corrections you made, for your final toolbox submission. This is required in order to receive credit for the final project.

Prompt: Review the Week Five Case Study Ilana document, and then address the following. Be sure to support your responses with research. ï‚· You should NOT use any of the provided weekly resources or the LAPC Model (except in Week Four) for your selected intervention. Instead, please use empirical research to locate an appropriate intervention specific to the case study. See the Clarification of Intervention document. You may use articles from the Mental Health Counseling Guide or from other sources, as long as the intervention is grounded in research.

Write a paper that includes the following: ï‚· Provide a brief description of the intervention including: (1) to whom it can be applied (2) under what circumstances it can be applied (3) any limitations to the intervention that should be considered ï‚· Provide rationale for choosing the selected approach for the case study. ï‚· Include an explanation for why selecting that intervention will help your work with the selected case study client, and provide appropriate support. ï‚· Describe how the intervention can be used in future work when supporting the treatment approaches for clients. ï‚· Provide a link to the intervention within the body of the paper (or upload the PDF) so your instructor can easily identify and reference it.

Ensure the link is active and accessible for review by your instructor. Note: If your selected intervention is not accessible, your submission will be returned to you. ï‚· Add the intervention to your ePortfolio. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: This short paper should follow the Intervention Paper Template. It should be 2 to 4 pages in length with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references should be cited in APA format.

Critical Elements Excellent (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Empirically Validated Selects empirically validated intervention Does not select empirically validated intervention 10 Description Meets “Proficient†criteria, and description is detailed and demonstrates exceptional insight or analysis Briefly describes intervention and includes to whom it can be applied, under what circumstances, and any limitations Briefly describes intervention, but description contains gaps or inaccuracies or lacks detail Does not describe intervention 18.75 Rationale Meets “Proficient†criteria, and rationale is detailed and demonstrates exceptional insight or analysis substantiated by learning and scholarly resources Provides rationale for selecting the intervention and reflects the appropriateness of fit to the selected case study Provides rationale for selecting the intervention, but rationale contains gaps or inaccuracies or lacks detail, or the intervention is not appropriate to the selected case study Does not provide rationale for selecting the intervention 18.75 Explanation of Support Meets “Proficient†criteria, and explanation is detailed and demonstrates exceptional insight or analysis substantiated by learning and scholarly resources Explains how the selected intervention will provide appropriate support to the case study client Explains how the selected intervention will provide appropriate support to the case study client, but explanation contains gaps or inaccuracies or lacks detail Does not explain how the selected intervention will provide appropriate support to client 18.75 Future Application Meets “Proficient†criteria, and description of future application is detailed and demonstrates exceptional insight or analysis Describes how the intervention can be used in future work when supporting the treatment approaches for clients Describes how the intervention can be used in future work when supporting the treatment approaches for clients, but description contains gaps or inaccuracies or lacks detail Does not describe how the intervention can be used in future work when supporting the treatment approaches for clients 18.75 Link to or PDF of Resource Provides an active link to or PDF of the intervention Does not provide an active link to or PDF of the intervention, or intervention is not accessible 10 Critical Elements Excellent (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has some errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization but they are minimal and do not negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 5 Total 100% COU 680 Clarification of Intervention Clarification of “Intervention†for Rubrics: Throughout the course of this term, you will be asked to research and select empirically validated counseling treatment interventions appropriate to the case studies you have been provided.

Treatment interventions are those cognitive, affective, behavioral, and systemic counseling strategies, techniques, and methods that are specifically implemented in the context of a therapeutic relationship. They should reflect the specific needs of the client and demonstrate clinical efficacy in addressing the targeted concern. For the purposes of this course, you will need to find journal articles that specifically target crisis and trauma interventions demonstrating clinical application to each specific case study. Select interventions from journal articles published within the past five years to ensure use of the most up-to- date resources. For assistance, consider the following as an example of an appropriate and empirically validated intervention article for working with clients who have suffered from domestic violence: Binkley, E. (2013).

Creative strategies for treating victims of domestic violence. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 8(3), 305–313. COU 680 Week Five Case Study: Ilana Ilana is a 37-year-old Korean-American female. She presented to therapy four weeks after the sudden loss of her husband, Eli, and youngest child, Kai, who were killed by a drunk driver on their way home from Korean school. Ilana’s daughter, Claire, was also in the car at the time of the accident but survived.

Ilana reports that she moves back and forth between periods of shock, denial, and anger and finds herself “zoning out†many times a day, as if she is watching herself in slow motion. She struggles with feelings of hopelessness and rage and simultaneously feels the needs to cut off her emotions to protect and care for her eight-year-old daughter. She worries she is losing control and does not know how she will continue to manage life without her husband and child. History Ilana and Eli were married for 12 years. They met at the local hospital where they were both employed as nurses.

In addition to their passion for nursing, Eli and Ilana bonded over their shared Korean heritage. Eli was biracial with an Irish mother and Korean father, and Ilana’s family had immigrated to the United States from Korea when she was two years old. Although both adopted “American lifestyles,†they both felt a strong cultural connection to their Korean heritage and agreed to raise their children with an awareness of their Korean roots. After a several years of marriage, Ilana and Eli had Claire, who was later followed by their son, Kai. Ilana reported that both she and Eli had been very close to their children and saw their relationship as one of partners and co-parents.

While they preferred to do things together as a family, one of the other of them would take responsibility for the kids’ activities when the other was on call for work. On the day of the accident Ilana had been on call, so Eli took Claire and Kai to the Korean-language school they attended on Saturday mornings. She had been in the process of preparing lunch when she received a call from the local hospital where Eli still worked. She was told a drunk driver had run a red light and smashed head-on into the driver’s side of Eli’s car, killing him and Kai instantly. Claire had been taken to the hospital with a broken leg and some small lacerations.

In the month since the accident Ilana has not been working and has largely been supported by her parents and sister who live in her same town. They held a Christian funeral for Kai and Eli three days after the accident, but Ilana claims she has been “unable to do anything†since. She said she often drifts in and out of functioning and will become angry and full of rage completely out of the blue. She notes that she is hypervigilant and jumpy, and she has become increasingly protective of Claire, who is struggling with her own nightmares and distressing memories of the accident. She states that she has “no idea who [she is] anymore†and does not know how to continue to parent in the aftermath of this loss.

Developmental Considerations Ilana had no physical or cognitive delays in childhood. She immigrated to the United States when she was two years old, and although her family spoke only Korean, she quickly learned English when she started public education. She maintained average grades throughout school. Ilana was an outgoing child and made friends easily. She noted no concerns related to psychosocial development.

Relational Considerations As a child, Ilana was close to both parents and is especially fond of her younger sister, who was born when Ilana was 10-years old. As a child, Ilana was an outgoing and precocious child who often greeted others with a laugh and a smile. As she grew older, she maintained her outgoing demeanor despite the more reserved nature of her Korean-born parents. While there were some inherent conflicts with her parents about her “American†lifestyle, Ilana felt supported by her parents and remains close to them today. She also remains close to her younger sister, who moved in with Ilana and Eli when she graduated from college.

Ilana reports strong relationships with coworkers and other parents from her kids’ school, many of whom have been bringing food and supporting Claire when Ilana felt unable to do so. Multicultural Considerations Ilana’s Korean heritage is of great importance to her. Both of her parents continue to speak predominantly Korean, so she felt this was an especially important part of raising her own children, and why she and Eli elected to send their children to Korean-language school. While Ilana was raised in the Buddhist tradition, she elected to convert to Eli’s protestant Christian religion before she and Eli married. This was initially a point of contention between Ilana and her parents, but over time they came to accept Ilana’s decision.

In the weeks since Eli and Kai passed away, Ilana notes that she has struggled with acceptance of what happened and an inability to deal with the unknown of afterlife. She notes that her parents’ belief in samsara seem to have brought comfort and peace to them, but she does not feel the same. She reports that she does not know whether to believe in the heaven of her Christian religion or the reincarnation of her Buddhist upbringing. Diagnosis Diagnostically, Ilana presents with symptoms consistent with acute stress disorder with a combination of negative mood, dissociative symptoms, and arousal symptoms (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Reference American Psychiatric Association. (2013).

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC. Author. CASE STUDY OF [TOPIC] 4 [ Note: To complete this template, replace the bracketed text with your own content. Remove this note before you submit your paper.] Intervention Paper: Case Study of [Topic] [Your Name] Southern New Hampshire University Description of Intervention [Include in this section a brief overview of the intervention you have selected, based on how it was described in the article.

Please do not copy and paste the description from the article—use your own words. Think of this like you are explaining it to your best friend. What does it do, how do you do it, and to whom would it apply? You also want to make sure you are looking for any limitations to the intervention noted in the article or important to consider. Most journal articles will have a limitations section or speak to any considerations you might want to think about before applying it.

Others may not have this concretely stated, so you will need to do some analysis and consider to whom the intervention might not be applicable and why. A couple of limitations you are likely to see are that they are relatively new and untested or that they only apply to a specific group of people. Those are great things to consider when selecting an intervention and part of what I want you to get savvy at looking for.] Rationale [This section should center on why you have chosen this intervention for the case study. Why is it appropriate to the specific client? You want to use the details of the case study to help you justify the approach based on factors like diagnosis, culture, family dynamics, developmental influences, etc.

Remember, the goal in any intervention is to choose one that will be most effective to the needs of the client. To that end, you will really want to consider and speak to the details of the case study and why they tie back to your chosen intervention in this section.] Explanation of Support [In this section you will speak to the actual application of the intervention to the case study client. What would it look like when applied to the client from the case study given the details of the article and the description above? This takes your rationale a step further and has you really think about what it would mean to put the case study client in the intervention. This step moves you from why it would be valuable (rationale) to how it would work.] Future Applications [This final section is designed to have you consider to whom or under what circumstances you might apply this intervention in the future.

How might you use this tool in your toolbox to help you in future work? Can it apply to more than one type of issue or client? This is where you should consider expansion beyond the particular case study and speak to how you think you will use this intervention to help your future practice.] References [Include any references cited in your paper in full APA format. Don’t forget to include in-text citations as well.]

Paper for above instructions

[Your Name]
Southern New Hampshire University

Description of Intervention

For Ilana, who is experiencing severe bereavement and grief following the tragic loss of her husband and child, I propose the use of Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET). NET is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to treat trauma-related disorders, including those stemming from bereavement. This approach involves helping clients construct a detailed narrative of their life experiences, particularly focusing on traumatic events. The therapy allows clients to process these memories in a structured manner, ultimately helping them integrate these experiences into their life story (Neuner et al., 2017).

Application

NET can be applied to individuals who have undergone significant trauma, particularly related to losses like the one Ilana faces. The therapy is effective for clients with acute stress disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and complicated grief (Neuner et al., 2017). It is advantageous in cases where clients experience fragmented memories and emotions, as it provides a method to help them articulate and organize their experiences.

Limitations

While NET can be beneficial, certain limitations must be acknowledged. The intervention might not be suitable for individuals who are currently experiencing severe dissociation or psychotic symptoms, as the process of reliving traumatic events could overwhelm them (Roush et al., 2019). Additionally, there can be cultural considerations; clients from cultures that may see grief or trauma differently might require adaptations to ensure that the therapy aligns with their values and beliefs (Aldridge et al., 2017).

Rationale

Choosing NET for Ilana was based on several factors related to her case. First, her symptoms of acute stress disorder are closely linked to trauma that NET specifically addresses. The sudden and violent loss of both her husband and child has left her grappling with significant emotional upheaval, including shock, denial, and anger (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). NET’s framework allows for the exploration and narration of her experiences, which could help her make sense of these intense emotions and begin to process her grief more effectively.
Culturally, Ilana's background as a Korean-American can also influence her responses to grief. NET is adaptable and can be modified to fit cultural contexts, making it a potentially effective choice (Hwang, 2018). This intervention also aligns with Ilana’s desire to manage her emotions, as it encourages structured processing while still maintaining focus on her role as a mother, allowing her to prioritize her eight-year-old daughter Claire’s emotional needs alongside her own.

Explanation of Support

In practice, implementing NET with Ilana would involve a series of structured sessions where she would be encouraged to narrate her life story, with a specific emphasis on the traumatic event that caused her current distress. The therapist would guide Ilana to explore her memories, feelings, and thoughts about the events surrounding her husband and child’s death. This structured approach might help Ilana to contextualize her feelings of hopelessness, rage, and dissociation.
During sessions, specific techniques employed in NET could include the use of timelines to chronologically arrange her life events and highlight significant moments that trigger her grief (Neuner et al., 2017). By mapping out these events visually, Ilana may find it easier to articulate her feelings and engage in a dialogue about her experience with grief and loss, thereby allowing her to face her trauma in a supportive environment.
Furthermore, NET's emphasis on story-telling facilitates emotional processing, which is crucial for Ilana, who struggles with “zoning out” and losing her sense of identity (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). By creating a coherent narrative that encompasses her past, including joyful memories of her family and the recent trauma, Ilana can work towards reconstructing her identity amidst the loss, enhancing her route to recovery.

Future Applications

In future clinical practice, NET can serve as a valuable tool when working with clients dealing with grief and trauma. This intervention can be applied not only to bereavement cases like Ilana’s but also to clients who have experienced various forms of trauma, including domestic violence, childhood abuse, and other significant losses. Given its flexibility and adaptability, NET can cater to a variety of cultural contexts and client backgrounds, making it a versatile addition to any trauma toolbox (Hwang, 2018; Neuner et al., 2017).
Moreover, understanding NET can deepen a therapist’s ability to facilitate conversations about grief in a culturally sensitive manner. In multicultural settings, incorporating clients’ cultural beliefs about death and grieving will be crucial. The structured nature of NET allows for the therapist’s exploration of cultural narratives surrounding death and loss, helping clients process their grief through a lens that honors their cultural background (Aldridge et al., 2017).
In summary, the use of NET when working with clients experiencing bereavement constitutes a promising approach to address severe trauma, assisting clients in narrating their experiences and facilitating emotional healing.

References

Aldridge, D. A., Sabin, K. A., & Ramos, N. M. (2017). Culturally effective interventions with diverse populations in the treatment of trauma. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(3), 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017710282
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Hwang, W. C. (2018). Using cultural concepts of distress in psychotherapy: A model with implications for culturally informed practice. American Psychologist, 73(5), 658-670. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000247
Neuner, F., Schauer, M., Klasen, F., & Elbert, T. (2017). Cognitive and emotional processing in narrative exposure therapy (NET). Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(S1), S5-S12. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000078
Roush, S. E., Gross, K. Z., & Blazek, M. (2019). Limitations of narrative exposure therapy in children: A case study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 87, 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.017
This concise paper uses narrative exposure therapy as the core intervention for processing grief and trauma. It highlights how structured storytelling can help clients like Ilana address their pain and move forward in their healing journey.