D1in The Textbook Two Main Views Of Human Resource Development Are Ex ✓ Solved

D1 In the textbook, two main views of human resource development are examined. Discuss the similarities and differences between the views of performance-based and developmental HRD. Answer the questions: Which view do you believe is more relevant to your organization. Why? D2 There are three types of knowledge discussed in the textbook: explicit, implicit, and tacit.

Describe the three types of knowledge. Give an example of each of the three types of knowledge based on your position in your organization. Which of the three types of knowledge is the most difficult for a trainer to teach?

Paper for above instructions

Discussion on Human Resource Development and Knowledge Types

D1: Performance-Based vs. Developmental HRD

Human Resource Development (HRD) is critical in enhancing organizational performance and employee satisfaction. The two main views of HRD that are widely discussed are performance-based HRD and developmental HRD. Understanding these two approaches helps organizations tailor their HR strategies effectively.

Similarities

Both performance-based and developmental HRD share a common goal: to enhance employee capabilities. Both methods focus on improving skills and knowledge to ensure that employees can meet organizational goals and requirements. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of training and learning as ongoing processes, rather than one-time events. Both views also recognize that effective HRD can lead to improved job performance, heightened employee morale, and enhanced overall organizational effectiveness (Gonzalez, 2020).

Differences

While the two views align in certain aspects, they diverge significantly in their focus and methodology.
1. Focus:
- Performance-based HRD concentrates on improving current job performance. It is task-oriented, emphasizing training that aligns closely with role-specific requirements and measurable outcomes (Fletcher, 2021). The primary goal is to address specific performance gaps by providing employees with the skills they need to enhance their output.
- Conversely, developmental HRD adopts a broader and more long-term perspective. This approach aims not just at immediate performance improvements but also at the overall growth and development of employees (Armstrong, 2021). It encompasses career development, personal growth, and promoting lifelong learning, focusing on enhancing the employability and professional growth of staff members.
2. Methodology:
- Performance-based HRD utilizes structured training programs, benchmarks, and assessments to measure effectiveness. Employees often engage in workshops, on-the-job training, and evaluations tailored to current job tasks (Bailey & Book, 2018).
- Developmental HRD employs a more holistic approach, often encouraging self-directed learning, mentorship, and coaching. This may involve developmental plans which not only focus on current performance but also map out potential career advancements and skills development that could be beneficial in the future (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016).
3. Outcomes:
- The outcomes from performance-based HRD are usually immediate and quantifiable improvements in performance metrics. Organizations may see a direct correlation between training and productivity (Kraiger, Ford, & Salas, 2020).
- In the case of developmental HRD, the outcomes may take time to manifest. The results include increased employee engagement, higher retention rates, and a workforce that is well-prepared for future challenges, which may not be immediately measurable (Noe, 2017).

Relevance to the Organization

In my organization, I believe that the developmental HRD view is more relevant. The landscape of our industry is ever-changing, characterized by rapid technological advancements and evolving job roles. As such, focusing solely on performance-based HRD will not support the long-term growth objectives that we are aiming to achieve.
Developmental HRD fits better with our organizational culture, which values continuous learning and personal development. By fostering an environment that prioritizes employee growth, we are enabling our workforce to adapt to change and innovate, which is essential for sustaining competitiveness in today's marketplace (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016).

D2: Types of Knowledge

Knowledge is a vital component of HRD and is categorized into three types: explicit, implicit, and tacit knowledge. Understanding these types enhances training design to align with organizational needs.
1. Explicit Knowledge:
This type is easily articulated, documented, and shared. It often resides in formal formats such as manuals, databases, and guidelines. An example in my organization is the employee handbook that provides clear protocols for various tasks and expectations. This knowledge can be readily taught through training sessions focusing on policies and procedures (Polanyi, 1966).
2. Implicit Knowledge:
Implicit knowledge is a blend of explicit and tacit knowledge. It refers to knowledge that has not yet been fully articulated or codified but can be inferred or reasoned out. An example could be the understanding of how to navigate workplace culture or informal hierarchies in team dynamics, which is usually shared through observation and participation (Artelt et al., 2003).
3. Tacit Knowledge:
Tacit knowledge is deeply ingrained, difficult to transfer or communicate, and often personal to the individual. It includes intuitions, insights, and hunches gained through experience. For instance, an experienced employee may have developed an instinct for customer interactions that is not easily conveyed through formal training workshops but can be demonstrated in real-time situations or learned through apprenticeship models (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).

Challenges for Trainers

Of these three types of knowledge, tacit knowledge is the most difficult for trainers to teach. Its inherently personal nature makes it challenging to codify, and it often requires hands-on experience or mentorship to truly grasp. Trainers can facilitate environments where tacit knowledge can be shared (such as through apprenticeships) but cannot directly teach it as they can with explicit knowledge. Developing strategies that encourage knowledge sharing within teams where experienced employees can guide newer hires can help bridge this gap, fostering informal learning that complements formal training (Schön, 1983).

Conclusion

In conclusion, recognizing the differences between performance-based and developmental HRD ultimately enables organizations to create tailored strategies that reflect their culture and long-term goals. Additionally, understanding the various types of knowledge within an organization can significantly impact the effectiveness of training and development programs. As organizations adapt to the ever-changing business landscape, striking a balance between performance and personal development becomes crucial for success.

References

1. Armstrong, M. (2021). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
2. Artelt, C., et al. (2003). Comparative Research on Learning: Knowledge and Skills in the Knowledge Society. European Commission.
3. Bailey, T. R., & Book, W. (2018). Performance-Based Training in Work Organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 82-92.
4. Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). Management Practice and Research: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Human Capital. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 1-16.
5. Fletcher, C. (2021). Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines. London: Hodder Education.
6. Gonzalez, J. (2020). Understanding Human Resource Development: Perspectives and Practices. Business Expert Press.
7. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (2020). Applying Adult Learning Principles to Training: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for HRD Practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(1), 5-29.
8. Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee Training and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.
9. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
10. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.