Death Penalty Analysis The death penalty remains one of the ✓ Solved

Death Penalty Analysis The death penalty remains one of the most contentious issues in the criminal justice system. What do you consider to be the most persuasive argument in favor of the death penalty? Conversely, what is the most compelling argument against it? Analyze how the courts attempt to balance these opposing viewpoints when making decisions about capital punishment. Discuss the ethical, legal, and practical considerations that influence court rulings, as well as the broader social and political context that shapes the debate over the death penalty.

Be sure to include examples from the textbook in your answer. Three (03) Paragraphs Textbook Resource Siegel;, Larry.2018.Corrections Today.Boston, MA:Cengage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Great Advances For Victims One of the great advances for victims connected to our criminal justice system involves attempts to make people victimized “whole†again to the best extent that we can. Provide a summary of things you find most important from your readings. Afterwards, consider the links below. The first takes you to a video that briefly discusses victim compensation programs.

Using the video and any relevant information from your readings, what is good about such programs? What is bad? The second link takes you to information regarding Arkansas. What does it tell us about services Arkansas provides to victims? Compensation Securing Restitutions for Victims Source: Securing Restitution for Victims of Human Trafficking1 Brandy Wagstaff Legal Counsel for Litigation Criminal Section, Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit Civil Rights Division Three (03) Paragraphs

Paper for above instructions

The debate over the death penalty continues to divide courts, policymakers, and the public, largely because each side presents deeply compelling arguments rooted in ethics, justice, and constitutional interpretation. One of the most persuasive arguments in favor of capital punishment is deterrence—particularly the belief that the death penalty may prevent the most violent offenders from committing future crimes. Siegel (2018) explains that many supporters also argue retribution plays a legitimate and ethical role in sentencing, especially for crimes marked by extreme brutality, where society demands proportional punishment. Conversely, the most compelling argument against capital punishment is the possibility of wrongful convictions. Siegel (2018) notes that exonerations made possible by DNA evidence expose systemic flaws that cannot be morally justified when a person’s life is at stake. Courts attempt to balance these viewpoints by enforcing strict constitutional protections, especially through the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Judicial rulings often emphasize procedural safeguards to minimize arbitrary sentencing and racial or socioeconomic disparities.

Ethical, legal, and practical considerations all influence court rulings on capital punishment. Courts must weigh society’s desire for justice against constitutional rights, and Siegel (2018) explains that higher courts frequently intervene when sentencing procedures appear biased or when the defendant’s competency, background, or mitigating circumstances were not properly considered. Practical issues—including high costs associated with trials, appeals, and long-term incarceration on death row—also shape judicial decision-making. Societal and political forces exert additional pressure, as shifts in public opinion, advocacy movements, and legislative reforms all influence how courts interpret the constitutionality and effectiveness of the death penalty. These factors collectively form the legal landscape in which capital punishment decisions occur, requiring judges to constantly navigate moral boundaries while upholding legal precedent.

One of the most important advances discussed by Siegel (2018) in relation to victims is the expansion of services designed to make individuals “whole” again through compensation, restitution, and victim advocacy programs. These programs acknowledge the trauma victims endure and aim to provide financial, emotional, and legal support. According to the victim compensation video, such programs are beneficial because they assist victims with essential needs such as medical bills, counseling, relocation, and lost wages. However, limitations exist, including strict eligibility requirements, delays in processing claims, and caps on compensation amounts. The Arkansas resources indicate that the state provides a wide range of victim services, including crisis intervention, emergency shelter, forensic exams, compensation, and legal assistance. While these services are invaluable, not all victims receive full restitution—particularly in cases like human trafficking, as highlighted in the “Securing Restitution for Victims” resource, where victims often face difficulties collecting court-ordered payments. Ultimately, although compensation programs represent a major step forward, gaps remain that must be addressed to ensure victims receive comprehensive support.