Draft Essayscore 16how Did The United States Overcome And Rise Up Fr ✓ Solved
Draft Essay Score: 1/6 How did the United States overcome and rise up from being a once backwards country, to being one of the one of the most influential nations the world has witnessed? The United States pioneered countless types of industries that required the best of innovators’ knowledge on science and technological advancements. Therefore, science has a fundamental part in America’s ever so rapid advancement in comparison to the rest of the world. For instance, most high rises across Southern California were built using the welded steel moment-frame construction (WSMF) method which was believed to be earthquake-proof as steel is considered strong and ductile. In 1994 however, Northridge was hit with a devastating earthquake which led to the fall of many WSMF structures.
Despite the Northridge earthquake being a disastrous event, it encouraged innovators to move past the WSMF method of construction to eventually develop a seismic base isolation system which then became one of the most common methods used to protect structures from seismic activities. Compared to most countries that experience high frequencies of seismic activities, the United States remains more well equipped to safely get by earthquakes of greater scales. Haiti is a country located on an Island within close proximity of the United States’ East Coast and is prone to getting frequent earthquakes. Many buildings in Haiti are still built on fixed bases, meaning that they are built directly on the ground and are therefore more likely to collapse even at an event of a smaller scale earthquake.
Science is a deeply vast topic that has a great impact on the advancement of many professions, particularly innovative practices. Today, science has become an integral part of our everyday lives as the whole world has unanimously experienced what it was like to live in a time of uncertainty which caused the yearning for people to become scientifically literate. At HMT Architects, we acknowledge the variety of scientific issues that our world is facing and our role is to stay up to date with scientific innovation that relates to overall structure, building and user efficiency. -HMT Architects Team ******************************************************************************************************* FEEDBACK FROM DRAFT Below are some comments based on the draft which was not successful.
Please refer to the feedback and instructions to write a successful essay Pain Competency Self-Assessment Name: Competency outcome 1: The student appropriately performs and documents pain screenings, assessments, and reassessments. Competency outcome 2: The student teaches the patient and family about pain control. Competency outcome 3: The student collaborates with the patient, the family, and the healthcare team to develop a pain management plan and define pain relief goals. Competencies 1–3 Competent Y or N Asks all patients, in initial evaluation and routinely as part of a health assessment, about the presence of pain If pain is present, assesses critical characteristics, including location, quality, intensity, temporal characteristics, alleviating and aggravating factors, impact of pain, past interventions, and responses Utilizes simple and reliable pain intensity scales appropriate to age and cognitive status Teaches patients how and when to report pain, including side effects or adverse effects of pain treatment, roles in helping to manage pain, realistic pain relief goals, and how to utilize pain interventions Discusses realistic goals with patients Communicates and collaborates appropriately with physician, team members, unit pain resource nurse, inpatient pain consult services, acute pain service, anesthesiology, and others Competency outcome 4: The student safely and effectively administers a pain treatment plan (including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions).
Competency 4 Competent Y or N Administers prescribed analgesics as appropriate (combinations of analgesics, scheduled versus prn, and titration to meet individual needs) Assesses patients’ responses to interventions and documents reassessments within the time frame indicated by the unit’s pain procedures Proactively manages side effects of opioid analgesics Utilizes a variety of nonpharmacologic strategies to promote pain relief, including distraction, relaxation, imagery, massage, heat, cold, and positioning Competency outcome 5: The student accurately programs and utilizes a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Competency 5 Competent Y or N Demonstrates setup and use of designated IV pump Follows policy and procedure when caring for patients with IV PCA, including appropriate documentation on pain infusion flow sheet Defines and recognizes opioid-induced respiratory depression and implements appropriate interventions 1 Dear HMT Architects: The University of Oregon (the “Ownerâ€) is soliciting qualifications from integrated or full service design teams for architectural services related to the Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact - Phase 2 (the "Project").
This letter contains the information required to respond to this RFQ (Request for Qualification). I know how much work is involved in developing a submittal of this type, and I would like to thank you in advance for taking time to respond. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact – Phase 2 is the second phase of the initiative to expand the University of Oregon’s strengths in bioengineering and applied scientific research and training, with a specific focus on facilitating innovation and accelerating the pace of societal benefit and impact of this research. The focus on bioengineering and applied science will change the profile of the University of Oregon in perpetuity.
This effort therefore needs to be supported by physical infrastructure that similarly elevates the university to new heights. Having recently completed Building 1 of the Knight Campus vision, the University is embarking on the process to further carry out its vision. This RFQ will launch the Phase 2 process that will: continue refining the programming and master plan for the three-building Knight Campus; will develop the program and design for Building 2 through construction, and may incorporate the design and construction of Building 3 on the north side of Franklin Blvd. The current project has a primary focus on the design and construction of Building 2, which will be located just across the Millrace to the north of Building 1 and the bridge across Franklin Blvd. and that has established an iconic gateway to the northern entrance to the university and the rest of the city.
It is envisioned that Building 2 will relate to but not mimic Building 1, as it extends along Riverfront Parkway to the north and starts to develop the vision of a quad on the campus north of Franklin Blvd. This second building in the Knight Campus complex will further bioengineering and applied science research activities with the goal of supporting at least another 15-20 individual research programs and shared research equipment and service facilities. The second building will be a major expansion in the research capacity of the university. As a heavily lab-dominated building, the focus will be maximizing highly efficient and effective lab spaces in a well-organized building that promotes collaboration and innovative research.
In the continued effort to bring several dozen new researchers to the university, this building will expand both core research facilities as well as flexible lab spaces that support bioengineering research endeavors. As collaborative research will be a consistent theme within Knight Campus, Building 2 will continue to prioritize flexibility in terms of allocation and reconfiguration of space that provides a supportive environment for a high degree of interactions among research groups. To this end, conference and seminar rooms will be an important feature of the buildings. In addition to research spaces for individual bioengineering and applied science researchers,Building 2 will provide additional core facilities for the support of initiatives.
These spaces will likely include a vivarium, surgical facilities for animal subjects, imaging equipment, fabrication and engineering. While the functionality of the research and training spaces within Building 2 are of primary importance, we also seek to continue forward in constructing a set of buildings that are architecturally significant, that inspire those working within them, that inspire the entire university and Eugene/Springfield community, and that successfully convey a university that is at the forefront of innovation and excitement for the future. We seek design teams that share our enthusiasm in continuing forward with this transformational work. The program recommendations include the following: • Building 2: ¨ 150,000 sf building, 4 stories above grade with a basement. ¨ Conceptual/Schematic planning for an addition of 75,000 to Building 2 in the future. ¨ Development of approximately 2 acres of property ¨ Possible pedestrian bridge linking to Building 1, which would cross over the Millrace. ¨ Extend university central utility infrastructure from the tunnel under the Riverwalk Axis to Building 2. ¨ Potential Improvements to Public Ways including Riverfront Parkway and Millrace Drive. ¨ Protection of the Millrace (waterway) bordering the south edge of the site. • Building 3: (Potential Scope that may be added) ¨ Additional 50-60,000 sf academic building, 4 stories in height ¨ Development of approximately 1.2 acres of property Location: The Project will be located North of Franklin Blvd. and west of Riverfront Parkway.
The North side of the property will be bound by the Millrace Drive. Funding: Building 2 total project funding is targeting 5,000,000. Funding is anticipated to come from gift funds. The Project will consist of a two-staged contracting approach. Initial work including Programming and Conceptual Design will utilize the Programming and Conceptual Design Contract included as Attachment A.
Work will start as soon as this Contract is executed, anticipated to be late April 2022.The selected firm will work collaboratively with a Programming Team to develop Programmatic requirements and a Conceptual Design as defined in the Contract. The selected firm must be ready to commit key personnel to the Project immediately following selection and must be able to perform the work within the projected schedule, included as Attachment C. Upon conclusion of the Programmatic and Conceptual Design Phase of work, it is the intent of the Owner to execute an Architect Agreement (Attachment B) for the remaining work required to develop the project from Schematic Design through Closeout. The Programming and Conceptual Design Phase shall conform to the defined period as described in the schedule attached to this RFQ (Attachment C).
It MAY include two multi- day (2-3 day) site visits to locations yet to be defined. These will likely include one west coast trip and one to the midwest or east coast trip. Programming and Design work completed under this contract will include; space programming for Building 2 (and its potential future addition) and Building 3 while incorporating the space usage of the existing building, to develop an overall space program for the Knight Campus; space/adjacency programming and conceptual design for Building 2; as well as Conceptual Design work to define the opportunities for the future expansion of Building 2, as well as the development of pedestrian and traffic flow needs for the site, landscaping and hardscape concepts for the continued development of Knight Campus and the connection of this building in the context of the north campus development plan.
The University has contracted Hoffman Construction as the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) for this Project. It is anticipated that the CM/GC will participate with the Owner and the Design Team in as an integrated design team throughout the design process. LICENSING REQUIREMENTS Firms must be licensed or have an application in process to practice architecture in Oregon. Additionally, the firm identified as the Architect of Record must maintain an office within Oregon and perform the work within Oregon. This firm will have primary responsibility for the work.
Essay instructions You are a small architecture firm known as “HMT Architectsâ€. In the RFQ submission, you are required to write 1 one page essay. The essay instructions are below. Refer to the memorandum for more context about the RFQ project to help you write the essay. SECTION B6 Include in the submittal, a one-page essay describing your reflections on the impact of science on the world today as you look toward the future.
The Impacts of COVID have brought the science community to the forefront of media. Include a reflection of science in American versus other countries in the world (be specific). Provide a lens on equity and inclusion in the process of sharing treatment methods. Why is this important to your organization when designing a facility for science? Why is local/ global collaboration between scientists w/flexible infrastructure an important consideration? ******************************************************************************************************* FEEDBACK FROM DRAFT Below are some comments based on the draft which was not successful. Please refer to the feedback and instructions to write a successful essay
Paper for above instructions
Essay: The Impact of Science on the World Today and the Importance of Collaborations in Scientific EndeavorsThe 21st century has been marked by rapid advancements in science and technology, fundamentally altering virtually every aspect of our lives. This global movement is especially pronounced in the United States, where the confluence of innovative research and practical application has propelled the nation into a position of significant global influence. As we reflect on the role of science today, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that science not only shapes public health outcomes but also serves as a catalyst for social change, promoting equity and inclusion for diverse populations. This essay explores the significance of scientific advancement, the importance of global collaborations, and HMT Architects’ commitment to creating a facility that supports and fosters these essential principles.
One notable example of the transformative power of science in the U.S. is its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The swift development and distribution of vaccines, driven by the combined efforts of pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and government agencies, underscored the United States' capability to harness scientific innovation for public health. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the mRNA technology used in the vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna was a game-changer ("COVID-19 Vaccines Work", 2021). This pioneering work and the ensuing deployment exemplify how American science can rapidly adapt to prevailing challenges, contrasting sharply with countries where bureaucratic hurdles and inefficiencies hindered timely responses (Khan, 2020).
However, the pandemic also unmasked disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. Many marginalized communities suffered disproportionately during the crisis, often due to systemic inequities exacerbated by a lack of access to scientific knowledge and treatment options (Ranscombe, 2020). HMT Architects recognizes the importance of addressing these disparities in our designs, which support scientific research and public health initiatives. By designing flexible and inclusive facilities, we can enable a broader range of populations to access scientific advancements, ensuring equitable treatment methods and fostering a more inclusive scientific community.
Globally, the need for collaboration among scientists has never been more crucial, particularly in the face of transnational challenges such as pandemics and climate change. The interconnectedness of our modern world demands a concerted effort to pool expertise and resources. For instance, the international collaboration between researchers highlighted in the global response to COVID-19 has been vital in sharing treatment methods, best practices, and vaccination strategies ("Global Health Collaboration", 2022). The success of initiatives like COVAX, which aims to provide equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for all countries, exemplifies how collective scientific efforts can overcome barriers that individual nations face (Gavi, 2022).
Local infrastructure plays a crucial role in facilitating these collaborations. Facilities that promote flexibility in lab design and an open, collaborative environment can foster innovative solutions and expedite scientific discovery. HMT Architects aims to ensure that our designs for the Phil and Penny Knight Campus consider these elements. By creating adaptable spaces that can be reconfigured as research priorities evolve, we empower scientists to collaborate effectively, share knowledge, and respond to emerging challenges dynamically.
In considering the future of science and its place within the architectural landscape, it is imperative to prioritize equity and inclusion. Architectural design must reflect the values of diversity and accessibility, creating spaces where underrepresented voices can partake in scientific inquiry. By fostering environments where collaboration is the norm, we can break down the silos that have historically separated disciplines and communities.
Looking ahead, the tasks before us extend beyond merely constructing buildings. HMT Architects recognizes our responsibility in shaping an architectural paradigm that upholds the principles of scientific collaboration, equity, and accessibility. We are committed to creating environments that amplify scientific progress, regardless of socio-economic background, ensuring that every community has access to cutting-edge knowledge and treatment methodologies. As we engage in design for the Knight Campus, our focus remains on how architecture can drive scientific advancement while prioritizing the inclusion of diverse populations impacted by these advancements.
In conclusion, the impact of science on contemporary society is profound and multifaceted. The responsiveness of American science in times of crisis, coupled with the opportunity for global collaboration, presents a path toward a more equitable future. HMT Architects is poised to champion this vision through our facilities, fostering an environment that not only nurtures scientific inquiry but also champions the diverse voices essential to this endeavor. As we reflect on our role in the architectural landscape, we remain committed to building a more equitable and inclusive future, serving as a bridge between innovative scientific practice and the communities we serve.
References
1. COVID-19 Vaccines Work. (2021). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/work.html
2. Khan, A. (2020). How Different Countries Became Leaders in COVID-19 Vaccine Development. _World Report_. Retrieved from https://www.worldreport.com/news/covid19-vaccine-leaders
3. Ranscombe, P. (2020). Rural areas in the USA face disparities in COVID-19 testing. _The Lancet_, 395(10231), 1536. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31006-X.
4. Global Health Collaboration: A Call to Act. (2022). _Global Health Weekly_. Retrieved from https://www.globalhealthweekly.com/articles/global-health-collaboration
5. Gavi. (2022). COVAX: Ensuring equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines. Retrieved from https://www.gavi.org/covax
6. Biden, J. & Harris, K. (2021). The American Rescue Plan: A Plan for Our Nation’s Recovery. _The White House_. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/american-rescue-plan
7. National Institutes of Health. (2021). Scientific Collaboration and Team Science: Addressing Complex Problems in Research. Retrieved from https://www.nih.gov/scientific-collaboration
8. Tatem, A. J. et al. (2020). Integrating data on social determinants of health in public health. _International Journal of Public Health_, 65(7), 901-903. doi:10.1007/s00038-020-01411-x.
9. Orenstein, W. A. et al. (2021). Improving Access to Vaccines Through Local Community Engagement. _Vaccine_, 39(16), 2260–2265. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.024.
10. Menzies, R. et al. (2020). Inequities in health care systems globally. _British Medical Journal_, 368, m679. doi:10.1136/bmj.m679.