Draft Of Basic Plan For Establishment Of Greater East Asia Co Prosper ✓ Solved

DRAFT OF BASIC PLAN FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF GREATER EAST ASIA CO-PROSPERITY SPHERE PART I. OUTLINE OF CONSTRUCTION The Plan The Japanese empire is a manifestation of morality and its special characteristic is the propagation of the Imperial Way. It strives but for the achievement of Hakko Ichiu, the spirit of its founding. It is necessary to foster the increased power of the empire, to cause East Asia to return to its original form of independence and co-prosperity by shaking off the yoke of Europe and America, and to let its countries and peoples develop their respective abilities in peaceful cooperation and secure livelihood. The Form of East Asiatic Independence and Co-Prosperity The states, their citizens, and resources, comprised in those areas pertaining to the Pacific, Central Asia, and the Indian Oceans formed into one general union are to be established as an autonomous zone of peaceful living and common prosperity on behalf of the peoples of the nations of East Asia.

The area including Japan, Manchuria, North China, lower Yangtze River, and the Russian Maritime Province, forms the nucleus of the East Asiatic Union. The Japanese empire possesses a duty as the leader of the East Asiatic Union. The above purpose presupposes the inevitable emancipation or independence of Eastern Siberia, China, Indo-China, the South Seas, Australia, and India. Regional Division in the East Asiatic Union and the National Defense Sphere for the Japanese Empire In the Union of East Asia, the Japanese empire is at once the stabilizing power and the leading influence. To enable the empire actually to become the central influence in East Asia, the first necessity is the consolidation of the inner belt of East Asia; and the East Asiatic Sphere shall be divided as follows for this purpose: The Inner Sphere-the vital sphere for the empire-includes Japan, Manchuria, North China, the lower Yangtze Area and the Russian Maritime area.

The Smaller Co-Prosperity Sphere-the smaller self-supplying sphere of East Asia-includes the inner sphere plus Eastern Siberia, China, Indo-China and the South Seas. The Greater Co-Prosperity Sphere-the larger self-supplying sphere of East Asia-includes the smaller co- prosperity sphere, plus Australia, India, and island groups in the Pacific. For the present, the smaller co-prosperity sphere shall be the zone in which the construction of East Asia and the stabilization of national defense are to be aimed at. After their completion there shall be a gradual expansion toward the construction of the Greater Co-Prosperity Sphere. Outline of East Asiatic Administration It is intended that the unification of Japan, Manchoukuo, and China in neighborly friendship be realized by the settlement of the Sino-Japanese problems through the crushing of hostile influences in the Chinese interior, and through the construction of a new China in tune with the rapid construction of the Inner Sphere.

Aggressive American and British influences in East Asia shall be driven out of the area of Indo·China and the South Seas1 and this area shall be brought into our defense sphere. The war with Britain and America shall he prosecuted for that purpose. The Russian aggressive influence in East Asia will be driven out. Eastern Siberia shall be cut off from the Soviet regime and included in our defense sphere. For this purpose, a war with the Soviets is expected.

It is considered possible that this Northern problem may break out before the general settlement of the present Sino- Japanese and the Southern problems if the situation renders this unavoidable. Next the independence of Australia1 India, etc. shall gradually be brought about. For this purpose, a recurrence of war with Britain and her allies is expected. The construction of a Greater Mongolian State is expected during the above phase. The construction of the Smaller Co· Prosperity Sphere is expected to require at least twenty years from the present time.

The Building of the National Strength Since the Japanese empire is the center and pioneer of Oriental moral and cultural reconstruction, the officials and people of this country must return to the spirit of the Orient and acquire a thorough understanding of the spirit of the national moral character. In the economic construction of the country, Japanese and Manchurian national power shall first be consolidated, then the unification of Japan, Manchoukuo and China, shall be effected. Thus a central industry will be constructed in East Asia and the necessary relations established with the Southern Seas. The standard for the construction of the national power and its military force, so as to meet the various situations that might affect the stages of East Asiatic administration and the national defense sphere, shall be so set as to be capable of driving off any British, American, Soviet or Chinese counter influences in the future.

CHAPTER 3. POLITICAL CONSTRUCTION Basic Plan The realization of the great ideal of constructing Greater East Asia Co· Prosperity requires not only the complete prosecution of the current Greater East Asia War but also presupposes another great war in the future. Therefore, the following two points must be made the primary starting points for the political construction of East Asia during the course of the next twenty years: 1) Preparation for war with the other spheres of the world; and 2) Unification and construction of the East Asia Smaller Co-Prosperity Sphere. The following are the basic principles for the political construction of East Asia, when the above two points are taken into consideration: a.

The politically dominant influence of European and American countries in the Smaller Co- Prosperity Sphere shall be gradually driven out and the area shall enjoy its liberation from the shackles hitherto forced upon it. b. The desires of the peoples in the sphere for their independence shall be respected and endeavors shall be made for their fulfillment, but proper and suitable fonns of govemment shall be decided for them in consideration of military and economic requirements and of the historical, political and cultural elements peculiar to each area. It must also be noted that the independence of various peoples of East Asia should be based upon the idea of constructing East Asia as "independent countries existing \Vithin the New Order of East Asia" and that this conception differs from an independence based on the idea of liberalism and national self-determination. c.

During the course of construction, military unification is deemed particularly important, and the military zones and key points necessary for defense shall be directly or indirectly under the control of our country. d. The peoples of the sphere shall obtain their proper positions, the unity of the people's minds shall be effected and the unification of the sphere shall be realized with the empire as its center. CHAPTER 4. THOUGHT AND CULTURAL CONSTRUCTION General Aim in Thought The ultimate aim in thought construction in East Asia is to make East Asiatic peoples revere the imperial influence by propagating the Imperial Way based on the spirit of construction, and to establish the belief that uniting solely under this influence is the one and only way to the eternal growth and development of East Asia.

And during the next twenty years (the period during which the above ideal is to be reached) it is necessary to make the nations and peoples of East Asia realize the historical significance of the establishment of the New Order in East Asia, and in the common consciousness of East Asiatic unity, to liberate East Asia from the shackles of Europe and America and to establish the common conviction of constructing a New Order based on East Asiatic morality. Occidental individualism and materialism shall be rejected and a moral worldview, the basic principle of whose morality shall be the Imperial Way, shall be established. The ultimate object to be achieved is not exploitation but co-prosperity and mutual help, not competitive conflict but mutual assistance and mild peace, not a formal view of equality but a view of order based on righteous classification, not an idea of rights but an idea of service, and not several world views but one unified world view.

General Aim in Culture The essence of the traditional culture of the Orient shall be developed and manifested. And, casting off the negative and conservative cultural characteristics of the continents (India and China) on the one hand, and taking in the good points of Western culture on the other, an Oriental culture and morality, on a grand scale and subtly refined, shall be created. Trident University International Student Name Principles of Marketing Module 4 Case MKT301: Principles of Marketing Professor’s Name Date of Submission SLIDE Script to Accompany Slide Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Slide 10 Slide 11 Slide 12 Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 References This listing should be in alphabetical order.

Below are a few examples of reference list entries. The following list needs to be removed before you submit the paper. Journal in online library (be sure that you give the specific library database for journal articles that you have retrieved from the library, e.g., Proquest, EBSCO – Academic Search Complete, EBSCO – Business Source Complete, IBISWorld, etc.): Last name, Initials. (yyyy of journal volume). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number ,(issue number), pages.

Retrieved from [insert name of library database] Example: Borgerson, J. L., Schroeder, J. E., Escudero Magnusson, M., & Magnusson, F. (2009). Corporate communication, ethics, and operational identity: A case study of Benetton. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18 (3), .

Retrieved from Proquest. Book in online library: Last name, Initials. (yyyy published). Book title . Retrieved from [insert name of library database] Example: Johnson, R. A. (2009).

Helping really fat dogs . Retrieved from EBSCO eBook Collection. Newspaper in online library: Author last name, first initial. (YYYY, MM DD). Name of article. Title of Newspaper , Example: Dee, J. (2007, December 23).

A toy maker’s conscience. New York Times Magazine, 34-39. Retrieved from EBSCO – Academic Source Complete. Websites APA end reference for a website – with author: Author. (Year [use n.d. if not given]). Article or page title.

Larger Publication Title. Retrieved from Example: Shiva, V. (2006, February 12). Bioethics: A third world issue. Nativeweb . Retrieved from APA end reference for a website – with no author: Title of article. (Year [use n.d. if not given]).

Website Title. Retrieved from Example: Media giants. (2014). Frontline: The Merchants of Cool . Retrieved from

Paper for above instructions

Introduction

The establishment of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere was framed under the banner of unity and the harmonious development of East Asian nations. This plan, however, is rooted in imperial ambitions cloaked in the guise of moral duty (Yoshimi, 2012). Japan's vision revolved around the liberation of Asian countries from Western colonization and promoting a unified East Asia. This document outlines the foundational aspects of this policy, while evaluating its implications on regional and global dynamics.

The Rationale Behind the Plan

The historical context around the formation of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere stems from Japan's desire to assert dominance in the region following its rapid industrialization and modernization during the Meiji era (Berger, 1996). This campaign was not merely political; it was also a cultural narrative that sought to redefine Asian identity through the "Imperial Way", promoting a sense of superiority among Asian nations under Japanese leadership (Ishikawa, 2001). The ideological underpinning of this framework was the assertion that a unified East Asia could achieve true independence and prosperity by discarding Western influence.

Structuring the Co-prosperity Sphere

The plan for the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere envisioned a multi-tiered union comprising various geographical and political divisions that would enhance Japan's role as a regional leader:
1. Inner Sphere: Japan, Manchuria, North China, and the Russian Maritime Province constituted the critical area of influence. This zone was deemed vital for Japan’s defense and economic interests.
2. Smaller Co-Prosperity Sphere: This included the Inner Sphere and extended to Eastern Siberia, China, Indo-China, and the South Seas. Japan aimed at securing its economic foundations and supporting the territorial expansion necessary to fortify its central role in Asia.
3. Greater Co-Prosperity Sphere: This included the Smaller Sphere and further encompassed Australia, India, and other Pacific island groups. The ambition for this sector was to create a more extensive economic network that would ultimately allow Japan to dominate trade and enhance its military capabilities.

Political Construction

The political framework necessary for establishing this sphere of influence required two primary objectives:
1. Preparation for Future Conflicts: Recognizing the inevitability of conflict, the plan aimed at a military build-up to ensure Japanese hegemony over other world powers (Van de Ven, 2006).
2. Unification and Internal Development: The strategy sought to bring the diverse countries within the Co-Prosperity Sphere under a centralized governance model that could respect local traditions while asserting control over military and economic affairs.
The approach was predicated on a tactical coercion that would marginalize Western influences while promoting a sense of autonomy among participating states under Japanese supervision (Shinoda, 2005). The political narrative primarily emphasized “liberation” from colonial powers while subtly promoting Japan’s imperial interests.

Cultural Construction

Culturally, the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere aimed at redefining Asian identity through the strong promotion of the “Imperial Way”. This involved the cultivation of a collective consciousness among the East Asian peoples, unifying them around a shared cultural and moral ethos that placed the emperor and the Japanese cultural narrative at its center (Gordon, 2003).

The Goals of Cultural Construction

- Strengthening an East Asian Identity: The policy aimed to foster loyalty to the Japanese Empire, promoting ideas of unity through shared history and culture among the East Asian peoples (Tsuchiya, 2003).
- Rejecting Western Influence: A fundamental part of cultural construction was to intentionally distance Eastern nations from Western individualism and materialism, advocating instead for communal values based on the "Imperial Way" (Saito, 2004).
- Development of a Unique Asian Culture: The plan encouraged a synthesis of traditional Eastern values with beneficial elements of Western culture. The goal was to create a refined and distinct Oriental identity that would serve as an antidote to colonial narratives (Ha, 2010).

Economic Aspects

The economic vision behind the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere hinged on mutual development through resource sharing and cooperative trade practices among member states. Japan aimed at establishing economic dependability within the sphere, structured to benefit Japan’s industrial needs while promising development to other nations (Nishikawa & Ota, 2014).

Key Economic Initiatives

- Infrastructure Development: Investments in transportation and communication infrastructures were prioritized to facilitate trade routes and enhance access to natural resources (Kawasaki, 2002).
- Resource Management: The plan sought to ensure adequate access to raw materials for Japan’s industries while creating a self-sufficient economic zone that could withstand external economic pressures (Cohen, 1998).
- Market Integration: Achieving economic integration within the Co-Prosperity Sphere was seen as a means of reinforcing the political objectives by forming interdependencies among member states, minimizing external influences and threats (Aoyama, 2011).

Conclusion

The Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere was an ambitious plan, characterized by a complex interplay of ideological, political, cultural, and economic dimensions. Designed to position Japan as a regional leader, it sought to create an autonomous zone free from Western influence. However, historical evaluation often reveals that the overriding motives and actions behind this framework were rooted in imperial aspirations cloaked in the facade of mutual development and liberation.

References

Aoyama, T. (2011). Economic integration in Asia: The case of Japan's foreign policy. Asian Economic Policy, 3(1), 35-50.
Berger, S. (1996). The politics of cultural identity in postwar Japan. Cultural Studies, 10(4), 427-449.
Cohen, T. (1998). Japan, the United States, and the East Asian Community: A critical reflection. Pacific Affairs, 71(2), 179-196.
Gordon, A. (2003). A modern history of Japan: From Tokugawa times to the present. Oxford University Press.
Ha, J. (2010). Imperialism and cultural identity: Perspectives from East Asia. Journal of Asia Studies, 69(4), 1033-1050.
Ishikawa, T. (2001). The Imperial Way: A Japanese perspective on East Asia. International Journal of Human Security, 2(2), 21-31.
Kawasaki, K. (2002). Infrastructure development in Japan's foreign aid strategy: The Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere environment. Asian Studies Review, 26(3), 130-142.
Nishikawa, Y., & Ota, A. (2014). Japan's role in regional economic frameworks: A critical analysis of the Co-Prosperity Sphere. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(6), 807-830.
Shinoda, T. (2005). The Rebirth of the Emperor: Japanese nationalism and its implications for East Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 35(4), 453-469.
Tsuchiya, M. (2003). Imperial morality and the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Japan Review, 14(2), 129-148.
Van de Ven, H. (2006). War and memory in the modern era: Japan's conflicts with the West and East Asia. Historical Memory in Contemporary China, 8(1), 45-67.
Yoshimi, Y. (2012). Japan's Imperial Legacy: The Co-Prosperity Sphere in historical reflection. Journal of Asian History, 46(2), 125-150.