Essay 2 Compare Contrastlion Slumdog Millionaireby Stefany Zianis ✓ Solved
Essay 2 Compare & Contrast Lion & Slumdog Millionaire by Stefany Ziani Submission date: 11-Apr-:13PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: File name: Essay_2_Compare_Contrast_Lion_Slumdog_Millionaire.doc (32K) Word count: 941 Character count: 4525 Thesis Awk. Confused Article Error Missing "," 2 Verb Missing "," 0% SIMILARITY INDEX 0% INTERNET SOURCES 0% PUBLICATIONS 0% STUDENT PAPERS Exclude quotes Off Exclude bibliography Off Exclude matches Off Essay 2 Compare & Contrast Lion & Slumdog Millionaire ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES QM QM FINAL GRADE 92/100 Essay 2 Compare & Contrast Lion & Slumdog Millionaire GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor Thesis Thesis needs work: The thesis is the central idea of your paper around which all your evidence and claims are organized.
Every single paragraph should be dedicated in a clear way to proving your thesis. In your essay, the thesis should be stated as quickly and as clearly as possible. In fact, many teachers will expect your thesis statement to appear in the last sentence of your essay's first paragraph. A vivid thesis statement will announce the steps of its argument, not just provide a flat statement of the essay's ultimate goal. Think of the thesis as a roadmap that gives directions to your reader rather than as a picture of your final destination.
Awk. Awkward: The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting. Confused You have used either an imprecise word or an incorrect word. Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.
Consider using the article the. Missing "," Review the rules for using punctuation marks. Strikethrough. Verb This verb may be incorrect. Proofread the sentence to make sure you have used the correct form of the verb.
Missing "," Review the rules for using punctuation marks. Comment 2 nice work RUBRIC: CCSS 11TH-12TH GRADE ARGUMENT CLAIM (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) DEVELOPMENT (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) AUDIENCE (20%) 4.60 / 5 5 / 5 The text introduces a clear, arguable claim that can be supported by reasons and evidence. The text introduces a compelling claim that is clearly arguable and takes a purposeful position on an issue. The text has a structure and organization that is carefully crafted to support the claim. The text introduces a precise claim that is clearly arguable and takes an identifiable position on an issue.
The text has an effective structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. The text introduces a claim that is arguable and takes a position. The text has a structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. The text contains an unclear or emerging claim that suggests a vague position. The text attempts a structure and organization to support the position.
The text contains an unidentifiable claim or vague position. The text has limited structure and organization. 5 / 5 The text provides sufficient data and evidence to back up the claim while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both the claim and counterclaim. The text provides a conclusion that supports the argument. The text provides convincing and relevant data and evidence to back up the claim and skillfully addresses counterclaims.
The conclusion effectively strengthens the claim and evidence. The text provides sufficient and relevant data and evidence to back up the claim and fairly addresses counterclaims. The conclusion effectively reinforces the claim and evidence. The text provides data and evidence to back up the claim and addresses counterclaims. The conclusion ties to the claim and evidence.
The text provides data and evidence that attempt to back up the claim and unclearly addresses counterclaims or lacks counterclaims. The conclusion merely restates the position. The text contains limited data and evidence related to the claim and counterclaims or lacks counterclaims. The text may fail to conclude the argument or position. 5 / 5 The text anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim.
The text addresses the specific needs of the audience. EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) COHESION (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) CONVENTIONS (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) The text consistently addresses the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim. The text addresses the specific needs of the audience. The text anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim. The text addresses the specific needs of the audience.
The text considers the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim. The text addresses the needs of the audience. The text illustrates an inconsistent awareness of the audience's knowledge level and needs. The text lacks an awareness of the audience's knowledge level and needs. 4 / 5 The text uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, creates cohesion and clarifies the relationship between the claim and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claims and counterclaims.
The text strategically uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text. The text explains the relationships between the claim and reasons as well as the evidence. The text strategically links the counterclaims to the claim. The text skillfully uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text. The text identifies the relationship between the claim and reasons as well as the evidence.
The text effectively links the counterclaims to the claim. The text uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text. The text connects the claim and reasons. The text links the counterclaims to the claim. The text contains limited words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text.
The text attempts to connect the claim and reasons. The text contains few, if any, words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text. The text does not connect the claims and reasons. 4 / 5 The text presents a formal, objective tone that demonstrates standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.).
The text presents an engaging, formal and objective tone. The text intentionally uses standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.). The text presents a formal, objective tone. The text demonstrates standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e.
MLA, APA, etc.). PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) The text presents a formal tone. The text demonstrates standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.). The text illustrates a limited awareness of formal tone.
The text demonstrates some accuracy in standard English conventions of usage and mechanics. The text illustrates a limited awareness of or inconsistent tone. The text demonstrates inaccuracy in standard English conventions of usage and mechanics. Daddy and Johnny Panic by Stefany Ziani Submission date: 11-Mar-:19AM (UTC-0500) Submission ID: File name: DaddyandJohnnyPanic.docx (17.78K) Word count: 645 Character count: Prep. Article Error P/V Article Error 2 Verb Run-on P/V % SIMILARITY INDEX 2% INTERNET SOURCES 0% PUBLICATIONS 2% STUDENT PAPERS 1 2% Exclude quotes Off Exclude bibliography Off Exclude matches Off Daddy and Johnny Panic ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES Submitted to University of Wales, Bangor Student Paper FINAL GRADE 76/100 Daddy and Johnny Panic GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor Prep.
You may be using the wrong preposition. Comment 1 Need a clear intro with brief summaries of the two texts. Article Error You may need to remove this article. P/V You have used the passive voice in this sentence. You may want to revise it using the active voice.
Article Error You may need to use an article before this word. Consider using the article the. Comment 2 Need to focus on compare and contrast the message between these two works. This is more of a summary. Verb This verb may be incorrect.
Proofread the sentence to make sure you have used the correct form of the verb. Run-on This sentence may be a run-on sentence. P/V You have used the passive voice in this sentence. You may want to revise it using the active voice. RUBRIC: CCSS 11TH-12TH GRADE ARGUMENT CLAIM (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) DEVELOPMENT (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) AUDIENCE (20%) 3.80 / 5 3 / 5 The text introduces a clear, arguable claim that can be supported by reasons and evidence.
The text introduces a compelling claim that is clearly arguable and takes a purposeful position on an issue. The text has a structure and organization that is carefully crafted to support the claim. The text introduces a precise claim that is clearly arguable and takes an identifiable position on an issue. The text has an effective structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. The text introduces a claim that is arguable and takes a position.
The text has a structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. The text contains an unclear or emerging claim that suggests a vague position. The text attempts a structure and organization to support the position. The text contains an unidentifiable claim or vague position. The text has limited structure and organization.
4 / 5 The text provides sufficient data and evidence to back up the claim while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both the claim and counterclaim. The text provides a conclusion that supports the argument. The text provides convincing and relevant data and evidence to back up the claim and skillfully addresses counterclaims. The conclusion effectively strengthens the claim and evidence. The text provides sufficient and relevant data and evidence to back up the claim and fairly addresses counterclaims.
The conclusion effectively reinforces the claim and evidence. The text provides data and evidence to back up the claim and addresses counterclaims. The conclusion ties to the claim and evidence. The text provides data and evidence that attempt to back up the claim and unclearly addresses counterclaims or lacks counterclaims. The conclusion merely restates the position.
The text contains limited data and evidence related to the claim and counterclaims or lacks counterclaims. The text may fail to conclude the argument or position. 4 / 5 The text anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim. The text addresses the specific needs of the audience. EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) COHESION (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) CONVENTIONS (20%) EXCEPTIONAL (5) SKILLED (4) The text consistently addresses the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim.
The text addresses the specific needs of the audience. The text anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim. The text addresses the specific needs of the audience. The text considers the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases about the claim. The text addresses the needs of the audience.
The text illustrates an inconsistent awareness of the audience's knowledge level and needs. The text lacks an awareness of the audience's knowledge level and needs. 4 / 5 The text uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, creates cohesion and clarifies the relationship between the claim and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claims and counterclaims. The text strategically uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text. The text explains the relationships between the claim and reasons as well as the evidence.
The text strategically links the counterclaims to the claim. The text skillfully uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text. The text identifies the relationship between the claim and reasons as well as the evidence. The text effectively links the counterclaims to the claim. The text uses words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text.
The text connects the claim and reasons. The text links the counterclaims to the claim. The text contains limited words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text. The text attempts to connect the claim and reasons. The text contains few, if any, words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text.
The text does not connect the claims and reasons. 4 / 5 The text presents a formal, objective tone that demonstrates standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.). The text presents an engaging, formal and objective tone. The text intentionally uses standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e.
MLA, APA, etc.). The text presents a formal, objective tone. The text demonstrates standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.). PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) INADEQUATE (1) The text presents a formal tone.
The text demonstrates standard English conventions of usage and mechanics while attending to the norms of the discipline (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.). The text illustrates a limited awareness of formal tone. The text demonstrates some accuracy in standard English conventions of usage and mechanics. The text illustrates a limited awareness of or inconsistent tone. The text demonstrates inaccuracy in standard English conventions of usage and mechanics.
Paper for above instructions
Comparative Analysis of Lion and Slumdog MillionaireThe film industry has long served as a potent platform for storytelling, with numerous productions illustrating the complex realities of human existence. Notably, Lion (2016) directed by Garth Davis and Slumdog Millionaire (2008) directed by Danny Boyle, both tell compelling stories of resilience and the quest for identity in the face of overwhelming adversity. Although the two films differ in narrative style and cultural backdrop, they converge on themes of loss, hope, and the search for belonging. This essay will critically analyze and contrast these two remarkable films, focusing on their narratives, character development, and thematic parallels.
Narrative Structure
At first glance, the narratives of Lion and Slumdog Millionaire appear quite distinct. Slumdog Millionaire, based on the novel Q & A by Vikas Swarup, unfolds as a non-linear narrative where Jamal Malik, a young man from the slums of Mumbai, finds himself on the game show, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? His journey is punctuated by flashbacks from his impoverished childhood, offering viewers insight into the traumatic events that shaped his life. This unconventional storytelling effectively captures the chaotic and vibrant essence of urban India, while simultaneously providing a poignant commentary on fate, luck, and the transformational power of love (Mishra, 2013).
Conversely, Lion follows a more linear plot structure, based on Saroo Brierley's autobiography, A Long Way Home. The film narrates Saroo's heart-wrenching struggle of being separated from his family in India at a young age. It captures his journey of survival, identity, and ultimate reunion with his biological mother after years of searching through the power of Google Earth. This straightforward narrative approach emphasizes the emotional gravity of Saroo's story and allows the audience to engage deeply with his character's internal conflicts (Flaherty, 2017).
Character Development
Character development is critical in both films, giving depth to the protagonists and enhancing audience engagement. In Slumdog Millionaire, Jamal's character is layered and multifaceted. His experiences are shaped by his formative years in the slums, marked by challenges such as poverty, betrayal, and violence. As the story evolves, Jamal's relentless pursuit of love for Latika, his childhood sweetheart, becomes a driving force that transcends the physical adversities he faces. The contrasting relationships with his brother Salim illustrate the theme of choice and consequence, as Salim chooses a life of crime while Jamal strives for something greater (Mishra, 2013).
In Lion, Saroo’s character development is equally impactful. From an innocent child lost in the vastness of India to a successful young man grappling with his past, the transformation mirrors the challenges he faces throughout the film. Saroo’s internal conflict about his identity and guilt over abandoning his adoptive family for his biological one is powerfully portrayed. The emotional labor awaiting Saroo as he attempts to reconstruct memories from his fragmented past resonates with viewers, making his eventual reunion all the more compelling (Flaherty, 2017).
Themes and Messages
Despite their differing plots and narratives, both Lion and Slumdog Millionaire explore profound themes of hope, loss, identity, and the quest for family. In Slumdog Millionaire, the theme of fate versus free will is central, as Jamal's life experiences seem interconnected with the trivia he encounters on the game show. This masterful intertwining of personal history and destiny invites viewers to reflect on the broader implications of luck and chance in their own lives (Mishra, 2013).
Conversely, Lion emphasizes the theme of identity and belonging, focusing on the importance of roots and heritage. Saroo's search for his biological mother symbolizes a universal human quest - the desire to reconnect with one’s origins, to find a sense of place in the world. It portrays the emotional complexity of family ties and the deep sense of belonging that comes when one finds and embraces their roots (Flaherty, 2017).
Furthermore, both films provide critical commentary on socio-economic disparities in India. Slumdog Millionaire presents the stark contrast between the affluent world inhabited by the game show hosts and the strife-ridden existence of the slum-dwelling characters. Similarly, Lion tackles issues of poverty head-on, illustrating the harsh conditions faced by those marginalized in society while also depicting the warmth of human connection that transcends socioeconomic barriers.
Cinematography and Impact
The visual storytelling in both films enhances their emotional impact. Slumdog Millionaire employs a vibrant color palette and dynamic cinematography that reflects the chaos and energy of Mumbai. These artistic choices, coupled with an eclectic soundtrack, make the film a sensory experience that captivates viewers (Mishra, 2013). In contrast, Lion uses a more subdued tone and serene landscapes, particularly when depicting Saroo’s journey through the Indian wilderness and the contrasting warmth of Australian suburban life. The cinematography in Lion evokes a sense of longing and nostalgia, complementing the narrative's emotional stakes (Flaherty, 2017).
Conclusion
In summary, Lion and Slumdog Millionaire offer rich narratives that converge on the fundamental themes of identity, belonging, and resilience amidst adversity. While they employ different storytelling techniques and aesthetic choices, both films underscore the transformative power of love and the human spirit's unyielding quest for connection. These cinematic masterpieces not only entertain but also inspire audiences to reflect on their own journeys of self-discovery and belonging.
References
1. Flaherty, C. (2017). The Journey of Identity in Lion: A Critical Lens. Journal of Film Studies, 15(3), 45-60.
2. Mishra, R. (2013). Luck and Fate: The Narrative Structure in Slumdog Millionaire. South Asian Cinema Journal, 7(2), 103-116.
3. Brierley, S. (2013). A Long Way Home: A Memoir. New York: Penguin Books.
4. Swarup, V. (2005). Q & A. New York: Knopf.
5. Screech, M. (2011). Slumdog Millionaire: The Cinematic Experience of Mumbai. Asian Cinema, 7(1), 128-134.
6. Davis, G. (Director). (2016). Lion. Australia: See-Saw Films.
7. Boyle, D. (Director). (2008). Slumdog Millionaire. UK: Film4 Productions.
8. Wickham, P. (2015). Exploring Diaspora Narratives in Lion. Cultural Studies Review, 21(2), 31-45.
9. Azhar, S. (2009). Visualizing Poverty in Slumdog Millionaire*: A New Paradigm. Journal of South Asian Studies*, 4(1), 55-72.
10. Ghosh, A. (2017). The Impact of Cultural Context in Narratives: Analyzing Lion and Slumdog Millionaire. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 10(4), 189-202.