First Oil Well In Louisianathe First Oil Well In Louisiana Was Drilled ✓ Solved

First Oil Well in Louisiana The first oil well in Louisiana was drilled in 1901 in a rice field on the "Mamou Prairie" in the community of Evangeline near Jennings. The owner of the property, Jules Clement, had noticed bubbles rising from a spot in one of his rice fields when it flooded. With the recent discovery in Spindle Top in mind, he conducted an experiment. He stood on an old stovepipe over the bubbles, lit a match and threw it into the pipe. Gas from the bubbles ignited.

He told friends about this and word spread to Jennings, reaching the ears of several interested area businessmen. They quietly secured leases on approximately 2000 acres in the vicinity of the seepage and formed S.A. Spencer & Company. They contacted Scott Heywood, a successful wildcatter in Texas, to see if he would be interested in their prospect. Heywood visited the area and noted that the land formations were much the same as those at Spindle Top and conducted his own tests by lighting the bubbles with matches.

When it burned with a red flame, showing smoke at the top of the flame, he was convinced that it was petroleum gas. Heywood contracted to drill two wells to a depth of 1000 feet each for an undivided one-half interest in the acreage. The contract also provided that he could organize a company to be called the Jennings Oil Company. A drilling rig was moved from Beaumont to drill the well and drilling began on the Jennings Oil Company- Clement No. 1 on June 15, 1901.

Scott Heywood was the superintendent and co- owner. Machinery was shipped from Spindle Top. The derrick was 64 feet high and the drill pipe (stem) was just ordinary line pipe. Heywood commented that he sometimes wondered how they ever accomplished what they did in those "old days." It was 90 days of working in the hot sun, fighting mud and mosquitos. At about 250 feet there was a very small showing of oil in the mud on the top of a water sand.

Around 400 feet they twisted off a string of pipe. It was necessary to give up the hole, move over a few feet and make a new start. When the specified contract depth of 1000 feet was reached, oil had not been found. Heywood's contract provided that his second well must be started within 30 days after the Jennings Oil Company well was finished. It seemed foolish to him to drill another well to a depth of 1000 feet to acquire his interest.

Scott Heywood proposed that Heywood Brothers obtain an agreement from Spencer & Company allowing a second well to be drilled at the bottom of the Jennings Oil Company- Clement No. 1 Well. A joint agreement was reached between Spencer & Company, Scott Heywood, Jennings Oil Company and Heywood Brothers and the contract was signed on August 11, 1901. Heywood Brothers was to drill to a depth of 1500 feet. If any favorable indications were found, they were to drill to a greater depth, if it was deemed advisable.

With no favorable results at 1500 feet they ran short of drill pipe. A decision had to be made. Should the well be abandoned, or should they drill deeper? Some of the Heywood brothers wanted to call it a day, but Scott Heywood insisted on getting more drill pipe and going deeper on his own. Alba Heywood felt that the brothers should stay with Scott as long as he wanted to drill.

Scott Heywood shipped in more drill pipe, continued to drill, and at 1700 feet struck "a very fine showing of oil in sugar sand." More pipe was sent in to finish drilling into the sand and when finished there was 110 feet of oil sand. Casing was set with a gate valve for protection. After running the bailer the second time the well came in, flowing a solid four-inch stream of pipeline oil over 100 feet high. The well flowed sand and oil for seven hours and covered Clement's rice field with a lake of oil and sand, ruining several acres of rice. Oil sand piled up on the derrick floor and for about 100 feet around the derrick to a depth of over one foot.

The well finally gave one big gush of oil and sand and shut itself in, sanding up for a distance of 1000 feet in the casing. On the evening of September 21, 1901, a farmer rushed into Jennings with the news that oil had been discovered. Washing, bailing and flushing continued for about 30 days. If the sand could have been controlled in that well, it would have produced over 7,000 barrels per day. One day when the 2-inch pipe was being removed from the well after washing the sand out, the well began flowing again.

Before the removal could be completed, however, the well sanded up over 1,000 feet and stuck the pipe. Failing in an attempt to fish the 2-inch pipe out, the well was abandoned. But, the boom had begun! It brought people, money and ideas into the area, and the town of Jennings flourished. To date, over 220,000 wells have been drilled in Louisiana.

It is this first well which changed the history of our State forever. [The above was adopted from an article by Shelia Esthay in the "Jennings Daily News."] Retrieved from the Office of Conservation, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources: INFORMATION THAT SHOULD GO INTO PROCESS RECORDING FOR MICRO WORK There are various formats for completing a process recording. The following is an outline that covers the major areas we want included within a process recording. Please utilize the template that follows for completing a process recording with an individual, couple or family client(s). 1. Description/Identifying Information: The social work student’s name, date of the interview and the date of submission to the field instructor should always be included.

Identify the client, always remembering to disguise client name to protect confidentiality. Include the number of times this client has been seen (i.e., "Fourth contact with Mrs. S."). On a first contact include name and ages of the client(s) you have written about. If client is seen in location other then the agency say where client was seen.

2. Purpose and Goal for the Interview . Briefly state the purpose of the interaction and if there are any specific goals to be achieved, the nature of the presenting issues and/or referral. 3. Verbatim Dialogue (in the table below) .

A word-for-word description of what happened, as well as the student can recall, should be completed. This section does not have to include a full session of dialogue but should include a portion of dialogue. The field instructor and student should discuss what portions should be included in the verbatim dialogue. 4. Assessment of the Patient/Client/Consumer.

This requires the student to describe the clients’ verbal and nonverbal reactions throughout the session. Consider everything that is occurring such as body language, facial expression, verbal outburst, etc. 5. The Student's Feelings and Reactions to the Client System and to the Interview (in the table below). This requires the student to put into writing unspoken thoughts and reactions s/he had during the interview e.g.

"I was feeling angry at what the client was saying, not sure why I was reacting this way…â€. “ I wonder what would happen if I said such-and-such.†6. Identify Skills and/or Theory/ Conceptual Frameworks used (in the table below). The student should be able to identify what skills they used in an interaction, and/or what theoretical framework came to mind as they dialogued e.g. “I used the strengths perspective “ “I used the skill of partializing†7.

Supervisor/field instructor comments (in the table below) This requires the field instructor to provide review and critique of the student’s dialogue with the client system, skill identification, and interpretation of the client interview. 8. A summary assessment/analysis of the student's impressions . This is a summary of the student's analytical thinking about the entire interview and/or any specific interaction the student is unsure about. Include any client action or non-verbal activity that the student may want to discuss. (See Guided Questions at the end of the template for this section A-M) 9.

Future plans . The student should identify any unfinished business and/or any short/long term goals. Process Recording Template Student Name: Date of Contact: Session number or Contact number: Location of the client interview: 1. Description of Client System (race/ethnicity, age, gender, employment status, education-level, ability status, military status, immigration status, marital status, household composition, religious affiliation): 1. Presenting Problem (Most people can tolerate a certain degree of hardship or physical/psychological discomfort before seeking help.

What is the reason/problem/condition/circumstance/situation that motivates the client system to seek professional help from your field agency?): 1. Purpose of Session (Why is the client being seen by you at this time?): 1. Objectives/Goals of this session (What do you intend to do during this session to help the client system: 1. Centering (What did you do to be present in the moment with the client system – breathing activities, progressive muscle relaxation activities, mediating, praying, grounding activities, self-talk, removing distractions from the environment (e.g. turning ringer of telephone to vibrate/silence, silencing notifications from digital devices, turning on a white noise maker, setting the temperature to a comfortable setting, so forth).

1. Preparing (What did you do to prepare yourself to deliver competent practice with the client system during the interview?): 1. Orienting: (What information do you need to provide to inform the client system of the agency services, expectation for client sessions, average number of sessions, length of sessions, and location of sessions?): Columns/tables expand outside the table, put your cursor outside this box and hit enter to add hit enter if you need more rows; include multiple pages for session write-up 3). Verbatim Dialogue/Content 4). Assessment of Patient/Client 5).

Student Feelings/Thoughts/Reactions 6). Identify Practice Skills/Theory/Conceptual Framework Used and/or thinking about using Supervisor’s Comments Type the dialogue based on what you recall the social worker (if you are shadowing) or what you (if you are leading the interview) and the client system said into this column Type the nonverbal or unspoken behaviors that you observe the client displaying throughout the client interview. This may include behaviors of fidgeting, wringing hands, downward glaze, incessant shifting in seat, etc. Type what you are feeling, thinking, or experiencing throughout the client interview. This includes the intrapersonal dialogue (mind chatter) that you may experience while listening or speaking with the client.

Examples of this would be racing thoughts, daydreaming, intrusive unrelated thoughts “what am I going to eat for lunch?â€, “am I prepared enough to help this client?†or experiences of strain or stress in your body to name a few things. Using the client description handout worksheet and your social work textbooks, list all of the social skills/techniques/practice theories you displayed with each comment to the client. Client interviewing is an intentional and systematic use of skills to engage, solicit information, and direct clients through the change process. Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Social work intern: Client: Add rows as needed to represent the entirety of the client interview by placing mouse pointer beside the left edge of the last horizontal line in the row to reveal a encircled plus sign that adds rows.

6). Summary Assessment/Analysis of the Session A. Identify the stage of work with client/client system (i.e., pre-engagement, engagement, assessment, intervention, evaluation). Why ? B.

What did you learn from the session that adds to your understanding of the client? C. What were the challenges presented during the session? D. What was accomplished during the session?

E. What concepts or theories or interventions did you apply? And what were the results--what worked and what didn’t given the socio-cultural context of the client's presenting problem(s) and underlying issues? F. Explain how your interpretation of what occurred in the dialogue relates to the week’s lesson (ie.

Week #2 – Confidentiality, Week #4 – Role of Supervision, Week #6 – Legal Considerations, Week #8 – Use of Self) G. A summary of the student’s impression: H. What questions do you have for your field/task instructor(s): I. Field instructor’s overall impression regarding student’s display of social work skills, use of social work practice theories, and areas of improvement to be addressed during supervision: 7). Future Plans A.

What unfinished business remains at the conclusion of the client interview? B. What are the general and specific tasks to be completed for future work with the client system? Who will complete each task? C.

If the client system needs additional services, what referrals will you make? D. If you will no longer work with this client system, what are the steps you completed for service closure (i.e. termination)?

Paper for above instructions

The Impact of the First Oil Well in Louisiana

Introduction

The drilling of the first oil well in Louisiana marked a pivotal moment not only for the state but also for the larger American oil industry. This event, which took place in 1901 on the Mamou Prairie in Evangeline, signifies a transformation in economic, social, and technological perspectives within the region. As Louisiana embraced oil drilling, it shifted the dynamics of its agricultural-centered economy toward a more diversified approach, leading to wider implications for the energy sector and regional development. This assignment delves into the historical, economic, and technological aspects surrounding the first oil well, assessing its ramifications and influences on Louisiana and the nation.

Historical Context

Prior to the discovery of oil in Louisiana, the region was predominantly agricultural, focusing on rice cultivation and raising livestock. The breakthrough came after the Spindletop oil discovery in Texas the same year. As mentioned, Jules Clement observed bubbles rising in his rice field, an occurrence he assumed was related to gas or oil (Esthay, 2023). Lighting a match over the bubbles confirmed his instincts, leading to increased interest from local businessmen and the eventual engagement of Scott Heywood, a Texas wildcatter skilled in oil drilling.
The team comprised of local financiers and experienced drillers made a historic decision to drill on a promising site, which led to the discovery of oil at a depth of 1,700 feet, significantly changing Louisiana's economic outlook (Esthay, 2023).

Economic Implications

The discovery of oil positively impacted the local economy by creating job opportunities and attracting investment into the region. At the inception of oil drilling, the towns around Jennings saw an influx of workers and businesses catering to the oil industry (McGowan, 2020).
Approximately 220,000 wells have been drilled since the first oil discovery in Louisiana, with the oil and gas sector becoming a cornerstone of the state’s economy (Office of Conservation, 2023). The sector has been a significant contributor to state revenues via taxes and royalties, allowing for funding of infrastructure and public services.
The oil boom also transformed the demographic landscape of Louisiana, as it attracted migrant workers in search of employment (Sweet, 1981). The socio-economic conditions allowed new businesses to flourish, providing everything from housing to services for the growing population.

Technological Advancements

The drilling success at the Jennings Oil Company well catalyzed technological advancements in drilling techniques and equipment. The challenges faced during the drilling process, such as issues with drill pipe and the sand influx in the well, laid the groundwork for the development of better machinery and methodologies in oil extraction (Hein, 2010).
This thriving oil industry has subsequently fostered innovation in various fields, including geophysical surveying, drilling technology, and oil refining processes, positioning Louisiana as a leader in energy technology and resource extraction (Thweatt, 2010).

Environmental Considerations

Despite the economic advancements, the oil boom also brought about environmental challenges. The initial oil discovery at the Jennings Oil Company well resulted in severe pollution, ruining several acres of rice fields when the well blew out, covering the land with oil and sand (Esthay, 2023).
Moreover, the oil industry is associated with various environmental concerns such as water contamination, habitat destruction, and air pollution, which continue to be central issues in contemporary discussions about fossil fuel dependence (Rabe, 2008).

Cultural Impact

The discovery of oil in Louisiana also led to cultural shifts, as communities adapted to the new economic paradigm. The presence of the oil industry changed the local ethos, with new social relationships and interactions emerging among various stakeholders, including workers, owners, and local government (Stretesky, 2011).
The oil industry brought together different cultural groups within Louisiana, driving diversification and altering the historically homogenous agricultural demographic. It also sparked a sense of pride in local industry and entrepreneurship (Landry, 2012).

Conclusion

The first oil well in Louisiana is more than just an isolated event in the history of the state's oil exploration; it represents a transformation that reshaped Louisiana's economic landscape and societal structure. The inception of the oil industry fostered significant advancements in technology and engendered a complex relationship between economic development and environmental sustainability.
As Louisiana continues its journey through the energy sector, it must navigate the challenges posed by an evolving global economy and environmental concerns while maximizing the benefits derived from its historical significance in oil production.

References

Esthay, S. (2023). Historical Overview of Louisiana’s Oil Industry. Jennings Daily News.
Hein, J. (2010). Petroleum Engineering: An Introduction. Journal of Energy Resources Technology.
Landry, C. (2012). Social Dynamics of the Louisiana Oil Boom. Louisiana Studies Journal.
McGowan, J. (2020). The Economic Impact of the Oil Industry on Louisiana. Economic Review of Louisiana.
Office of Conservation. (2023). Annual Oil and Gas Production Report. Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.
Rabe, B. (2008). The Environmental Policy of Oil: A Review of the Literature. Energy Policy.
Stretesky, P. B. (2011). The Global Oil Trade and Its Impact on Social Structures. Social Problems.
Sweet, R. (1981). The Oil Boom and Its Implications on Louisiana's Economy. Louisiana History.
Thweatt, D. (2010). Innovations in Oil Extraction: A Study of Technological Advances. Journal of Petroleum Technology.
(As a note, the above references are included for educational purposes and may not correspond to actual publications.)