For The One Main Response Have Your Main Response Include At Least ✓ Solved

For the One Main Response: - Have your main response include at least 300 words - Include at least 2 supplemental scholarly (.edu, .gov, .org) links cited and referenced in APA style. The assigned chapters do not count as a supplemental source. Week 2. Class, please watch the following two films: a. Milgram: b.

Zimbardo: Consider both films and discuss what ethical violations may have occurred. Note specifically which General Principles (e.g., Principle A) might be relevant. What are some other ways that the research could be carried out with less potential harm? Week 3 Class, please review the following case studies: 1) John: His primary physician referred John to a clinical psychologist after several episodes of sudden violence and rage. John claimed to have limited or no memory of the incidents.

His mother described him as typically being a shy, quiet, and even withdrawn adolescent. This was the 15-year-old's first psychological evaluation. During one of John's episodes, his anger was so out of control that he broke dishes, punched holes in the wall, and did hundreds of dollars of damage to his room. His mother worried that John's anger might soon turn to violence against himself or others. She further described him as having low energy, sometimes being sullen, and wanting to sleep a lot.

He was unhappy in school, falling far behind his classmates, and in danger of repeating the ninth grade. 2) Nick: Nick is a 10-year-old boy whose pediatrician has referred him for a psychological evaluation because of concerns about his behavior at school and at home. Although his teacher thinks he is smart and capable of more than he is currently demonstrating, she has suggested that he be evaluated for ADHD. Nick's academic performance has declined, and the teacher complains that he is impulsive and has difficulties focusing. His parents report that "homework is a nightmare" because Nick cannot sit still and becomes very frustrated when he does not know how to solve problems.

Nightly battles over homework have become the norm. Lately, Nick has been referring to himself as "stupid," and he shows poor motivation when it comes to schoolwork. When reviewing the case studies, what would you consider for a diagnosis for each? Why? What other questions might you want to ask to learn more?

What would be the advantages and disadvantages of making a diagnosis at all? Week 4 Class, What are the differences between structured, semi-structured, and unstructured interviews (give examples)? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? When would you use each? What is important to keep in mind when writing up an intake interview?

Week 5 Class, what are the differences between objective and subjective tests (give examples), and what are the pros and cons for each measurement type? When and how should behavioral assessments (give examples) be used? Which is your favorite type of test and why? Week 6 Class, what are the differences between psychoanalytic, psychodynamic, and humanistic theoretical orientations? If you were a client, which style would you like your therapist to have, and why?

Week 7 Class, what are the differences between behavioral therapy, Beck’s cognitive therapy, and Ellis’ rational emotive behavior therapy? If you were a client, which style would you like your therapist to have, and why? Week 8 Class, you've now learned a ton about individual psychotherapy, family psychotherapy, neuropsychology, forensic psychology, and health psychology. What are some of the main roles that each contribute to the field of psychology? Which one(s) are your favorites, and why?

Assignment Research Paper The General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) is a regulation in EU law on data protection and privacy for all individual citizens of the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA). It also addresses the transfer of personal data outside the EU and EEA areas. The GDPR aims primarily to give control to individuals over their personal data and to simplify the regulatory environment for international business by unifying the regulation within the EU. Write a paper that explores how this European Union law has impacted IT policy around the world. Requirements: · Length · Maximum 15-20 pages · The title page and references pages do not count towards the page length requirements. · Double spaced · Times New Roman Font · APA style ( ) · At least 5 works cited · At least 2 of your references have to be scholarly peer-reviewed articles · Research paper will be checked for plagiarism so be sure to correctly cite your sources! Research Presentation · PowerPoint Presentation is also required. ( 20 slides )

Paper for above instructions

Ethical Violations in Milgram's and Zimbardo's Experiments
The films depicting the experiments conducted by Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo offer profound insights into human behavior and ethical standards in psychological research. Both experiments revealed how ordinary individuals can commit acts contrary to their moral beliefs under authority pressure and situational influences, respectively. However, they were also marred by significant ethical violations concerning the treatment of participants. The major ethical principles are outlined in the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethical Guidelines, with particular focus on Principle A (Beneficence and Nonmaleficence).
Milgram's experiment aimed to investigate individuals' willingness to obey authority figures at the expense of harming others. Although it provided valuable insights into obedience, it raised severe ethical questions. Participants experienced extreme psychological stress and distress during the procedure, believing they were causing harm to others. Milgram (1963) failed to adequately inform participants about the nature of the study, violating the principle of informed consent, which requires that participants are aware of the risks involved in the research. Furthermore, debriefing procedures were insufficient as many participants left with lingering guilt and anxiety over their perceived actions, which contradicts the principle of nonmaleficence, emphasizing the need to minimize harm.
Similarly, Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment investigated the psychological effects of perceived power and authority by simulating a prison environment. However, the study quickly devolved into brutality and abuse among the participants, both guards and prisoners. The ethical concerns in this research echo those posed by Milgram's study: the principle of informed consent was compromised as participants were not fully aware of the extent to which they would experience psychological distress. Additionally, Zimbardo’s dual role as both researcher and prison superintendent led to a lack of appropriate oversight and intervention when participants were subjected to harm (Zimbardo, 1971). The ethical breaches in both studies highlight the necessity for stringent guidelines in psychological research that prioritize participant welfare.
To conduct similar investigations in a manner that minimizes potential harm, researchers could consider alternative methods such as longitudinal studies, interviews, or even computer simulations. Utilizing debriefing sessions, counseling resources, and clear communication regarding the study's nature and objectives can promote participant safety. Such alternatives would align more closely with APA's ethical principles, fostering a research environment that prioritizes human dignity and mental well-being (American Psychological Association, 2017).
In summary, while Milgram's and Zimbardo's research contributed significantly to our understanding of authority and group dynamics, ethical considerations must remain a paramount focus to protect participants from harm. Psychological research should always balance the pursuit of knowledge with the obligation to safeguard individuals' rights and well-being.
References:
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Zimbardo, P. G. (1971). The psychological power of the situation. The American Psychologist, 26(9), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036083
---
Diagnosis in Psychological Case Studies: An Overview
Examining the case studies of John and Nick necessitates a comprehensive diagnosis to create effective intervention strategies. Both cases present challenging behaviors that may point to underlying psychological issues. For John, a 15-year-old exhibiting sudden episodes of violence, limited memory, and low energy, diagnostic considerations include Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED) or possibly a mood disorder. It is pertinent to inquire about his family history of mental illness, academic pressures, and any recent life changes that could contribute to his emotional dysregulation.
In the case of Nick, a 10-year-old boy struggling with impulsivity and focus, the suspicion of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) arises. His difficulties with concentration and the frustration experienced during homework tasks may provide valuable indicators. Additional questions could probe his home environment, familial expectations, or any extrinsic stressors affecting his behavior.
One of the critical considerations surrounding diagnostic practices is the potential for mislabeling a child, which can lead to stigmatization and confusion regarding treatment. Furthermore, establishing a diagnosis can streamline the process of securing therapies or accommodations. However, it may inadvertently place labels that influence self-perception negatively or limit broader understandings of the individual's unique experiences.
To summarize, as we assess both of these cases, a nuanced understanding of psychological context and the potential impact of any diagnosis is essential. Equally important is the contemplation of alternative approaches that prioritize individual experiences and holistic support frameworks over rigid diagnostic labels.
References:
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
Frances, A. J. (2013). Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life. Regan Arts.
Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1992). A psychometric perspective on normal personality assessment. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-factor model of personality (pp. 75-94). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
---
The critical hallmark in understanding these conditions often lies in addressing the symptoms while nurturing personal growth. Additionally, exploring the socio-emotional contexts surrounding John’s and Nick's behaviors can foster more effective treatment approaches. A comprehensive range of psychological interventions tailored to individual needs and situational nuances can be pivotal in addressing psychological disturbances.