From the perspective of people's job directions, Howell ✓ Solved

From the perspective of people's job directions, Howell and Mendez (2008) recommended that there are three dynamic functions of followership: interactive, independent, and shifting. Every perspective mirrors a fairly unique job direction concerning the follower. We accept that the three perspectives offer an incentive to specialists and organizational experts severally. To begin with, they may help put together the slowly expanding research writing on followership by explaining the various jobs followers play in organizations.

Followers may work intently or good ways off from their leaders, with fluctuating measures of cooperation and freedom in deciding their activities. The perspectives portrayed here reflect distinctive leader-follower relationships found in the writing and organizations. Second, the three perspectives portrayed here may explain why a few followers experience difficulty acclimating to new leaders and may assist followers with planning for their jobs opposite, explicit leaders (Hoption, 2014).

A personality trait is a trademark example of reasoning, feeling, or carrying on that will in general be predictable over the long haul and across applicable circumstances. The Big Five (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience) are a bunch of five expansive, bipolar trait measurements that comprise the most broadly utilized model of personality structure. Every one of the Big Five speaks to a wide arrangement of related social characteristics.

For instance, Extraversion speaks to singular contrasts in social commitment, self-assuredness, and energy level. Profoundly extraverted people appreciate associating with others, are open to communicating in gathering circumstances, and regularly experience positive feelings, for example, eagerness and fervor; interestingly, withdrawn people will, in general, be socially and sincerely saved. Agreeableness catches contrasts in sympathy, consciousness, and acknowledgment of others. Agreeable people experience enthusiastic worry for others' prosperity, treat others with respect for their privileges and inclinations, and hold commonly certain convictions about others; disagreeable people will, in general, have less respect for others and accepted practices of neighborliness (Soto, 2018).

Conscientiousness speaks to contrasts in organization, productiveness, and duty. Exceptionally honest people lean toward request and structure, work diligently to seek after their objectives, and are focused on satisfying their obligations and commitments, while unconscientious people are alright with the issue and less spurred to finish assignments. Neuroticism (in some cases alluded to by its socially attractive post, Emotional Stability) catches contrasts in the recurrence and force of negative feelings. Profoundly hypochondriac people are inclined to encountering uneasiness, trouble, and emotional episodes, while genuinely stable people will in general keep quiet and tough, even in troublesome conditions.

At long last, Openness to Experience (once in a while alluded to as Intellect) speaks to contrasts in scholarly interest, esthetic sensitivity, and creative mind (Soto, 2018). Our personality assumes an essential part in influencing our professional decision, relationships, choices, and life itself. As people, a considerable lot of us contemplate what makes us not quite the same as the individual close to us. Isabel Myers, the creator of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), was worried for our general public's acknowledgment with human potential that everybody is equipped for contributing something to the world.

Myers likewise needed everybody to discover some reasoning for the numerous personality contrasts that we experience in our day by day lives. Along these lines, the motivation behind the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is to reveal insight into the excellence and unlimited potential outcomes of the human personality.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the realm of organizational behavior, the dynamics of followership, personality traits, and individual differences significantly impact workplace outcomes. Howell and Mendez (2008) propose three vital perspectives of followership: interactive, independent, and shifting, each representing distinct relationships and roles that followers exhibit in organizational contexts. Understanding these perspectives is crucial for both organizational specialists and practitioners as they offer insights into how followers contribute to collective productivity and leadership effectiveness.

Three Perspectives on Followership

Firstly, the interactive perspective posits that followers and leaders engage in a continuous dialogue, fostering cooperation and mutual influence. This active interchange leads to enhanced work productivity, as followers are not merely passive receptors of direction but engage actively in shaping outcomes. For instance, a follower who is communicative and open can propose ideas, voice concerns, and support innovation, ultimately creating a more dynamic and responsive organization.

Secondly, the independent perspective allows followers to exercise autonomy in their roles. This is particularly important in modern organizational structures where hierarchy may be less rigid. Followers may exercise their judgment and contribute independently, which often leads to higher job satisfaction and improved performance as employees feel empowered and valued. The ability to work independently also promotes creativity, which is essential in competitive markets.

Lastly, the shifting perspective reflects the adaptability of followers in response to varying leadership styles and circumstances. This flexibility enables followers to re-evaluate their roles within the organization as situations evolve, which is critical during transitions, such as organizational change or adaptation to new leadership. A follower who can shift between supporting and challenging their leader appropriately can aid in navigating complexities within an organization (Hoption, 2014).

The Big Five Personality Traits

The Big Five personality model—comprising Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience—has been instrumental in understanding individual differences in organizational behavior (Soto, 2018). Extraversion is linked to sociability and assertiveness, traits that benefit teamwork and leadership. Agreeableness fosters collaborative environments through empathy and concern for others, enhancing interpersonal dynamics at work.

Conscientiousness is a predictor of job performance as it relates to dependability and organizational skills, which drive productivity. Neuroticism, contrastingly, can hinder performance, as individuals high in this trait may struggle with stress or negative emotions, affecting their decision-making and interactions at work. Lastly, Openness to Experience encourages creativity and adaptability, attributes crucial for thriving in fast-paced environments.

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) offers a different approach by categorizing personality types based on preferences in four dichotomies: Extraversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving. Unlike the Big Five, which measures traits on a continuum, the MBTI assumes that individuals fall into distinct categories (Isabel Briggs Myers, 1980). This typology allows individuals to gain insights into their personal strengths and potential areas for growth, promoting self-awareness and acceptance of interpersonal differences.

Both the MBTI and Big Five models assist individuals in understanding their roles and interactions within organizations. For instance, an Extravert might thrive in leadership roles that require frequent collaboration, while an Introvert may excel in roles requiring focused analysis. In conclusion, although both models offer valuable insights into personality, they do so from different perspectives—one through a dimensional lens and the other through typology (McCrae & Costa, 2008).

Conclusion

In sum, comprehending followership dynamics through Howell and Mendez's perspectives, along with insights from the Big Five and Myers-Briggs models, can provide organizational leaders and followers alike with a framework for improving workplace relationships and productivity. Awareness of these elements enables individuals to navigate their professional environments effectively and adapt their behaviors to enhance both personal growth and organizational effectiveness.

References

• Briggs Myers, I. (1980). Introduction to Type: A guide to understanding your results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Hoption, C. (2014). Learning and Developing Followership. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(11).
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 159-181). Guilford Press.
• Soto, C. J. (2018). Big Five personality traits. ResearchGate.
• Uhl-Bien, M., & Pillai, R. (2007). The complex adaptive leadership framework: Industrial and organizational psychology. In The Leadership Quarterly (Vol. 14, pp. 367-372).
• Northouse, P.G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
• Robinson, S., & Judge, T.A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
• Brouer, R.L., Douglas, C., Treadway, D.C., & Ferris, G.R. (2013). Leader political skill, relationship quality, and leadership effectiveness: a two-study model test and constructive replication. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 185–198.
• Forrester, G. (2011). Performance management in education: milestone or millstone? Management in Education, 25(1), 5–9.
• Bratton, J. (2015). Organizational Leadership. SAGE Publications.