Guideline For Assessment 2 Presentation 500 Words 10 Minsthe Pres ✓ Solved
Guideline for Assessment 2: Presentation (500 words + 10 mins) The presentation should include the following components: 1. Title Page 2. Presentation Objectives 3. Discuss how the ISBAR approach to handover aligns to communicating for safety national standards that govern acute and aged care 4. Conclusion and Summary 5.
Reference list (You are required to use current and relevant literature to support each strategy that you are presenting. Literature should be within 10 years) Your recorded presentation should not exceed 10 minutes.Total word counts is 500 words, including the word count of the presentation and the summary of your presentation script. Useful Information for your presentation preparation You can get more ideas for your presentation preparation from the following links: Record a presentation - PowerPoint (microsoft.com) Recording a PowerPoint Presentation with Voice-Over Narration and Saving it as a Movie File - YouTube NUR1102 Course: Assignment 2 Oral Presentation - Bing video Therapeutic Communication in Nursing - Bing video Note: The examples of powerpoint presentation are only for your reference. You should follow the guideline for the content of your presentation.
Paper for above instructions
Presentation Title: Implementing the ISBAR Approach for Safe Handover in Healthcare Settings
Presented by: [Your Name]
Date: [Presentation Date]
1. To define the ISBAR communication framework for handover in healthcare settings.
2. To explore how the ISBAR approach aligns with national safety standards in acute and aged care settings.
3. To emphasize the importance of efficient communication for patient safety.
---
ISBAR is an acronym standing for Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. This structured communication framework is pivotal in ensuring that vital patient information is accurately conveyed during handovers, which often occurs during shift changes or patient transfers (Gordon et al., 2018).
Identification involves presenting who is communicating, along with who the patient is. Situation describes the current state of the patient, followed by Background, which provides relevant historical information. Assessment articulates what the communication sender thinks is the problem, and lastly, Recommendation delivers what actions should be taken next.
Healthcare organizations face growing demands to emphasize safety in patient care processes. According to the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care's National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards, effective communication is crucial in managing patient care risks (ACSQHC, 2021).
1. Patient Identification and Safety: The Identification aspect of ISBAR addresses the first NSQHS standard, which emphasizes the importance of correctly identifing patients to reduce errors in medication administration and treatment options (ACSQHC, 2021).
2. Structured Communication: The use of the ISBAR framework aligns with the broader guideline of providing evidence-based practice. Evidence shows that structured communication tools, like ISBAR, significantly reduce the incidence of miscommunication, which can lead to adverse patient outcomes (McFadden et al., 2020).
3. Professional Accountability: The assessment of patient conditions ensures that the involved healthcare professionals are working collaboratively and are accountable for patient safety (Gordon et al., 2018). This collaboration aligns with the principles set out in the NSQHS Standards concerning teamwork and communication.
4. Impact on Aged Care: In aged care settings, where patients often present with complex medical histories, ISBAR's comprehensiveness allows for critical information to be clearly communicated, which aligns with the aged care quality standards (Australian Aged Care Quality Agency, 2019). This ensures that continuity of care is maintained and enhances the focus on person-centred care, which is crucial in aged care.
There exists a strong correlation between effective communication and patient safety. Studies highlight that employing a structured handover protocol like ISBAR reduces communication failures and consequently medical errors (Twycross & Shields, 2020). The need for clarity and conciseness cannot be overstated in enhancing patient experiences and outcomes. Additionally, with the advent of inter-professional collaboration, the ISBAR framework promotes a culture of safety in multidisciplinary teams by establishing a common language among caregivers (McFadden et al., 2020).
In a study conducted by Manser (2014), it was identified that structured communication tools lead to exchanges of clearer and more relevant information, thereby improving responsiveness to change in patient conditions and promoting proactivity in care.
In summary, the ISBAR communication framework plays a crucial role in ensuring patient safety and aligns seamlessly with the national standards for safe handover practices in healthcare settings. By delivering structured, clear information during handovers, ISBAR mitigates the risks of miscommunication, enhances teamwork, and ultimately improves patient care quality. As healthcare continues to evolve, the importance of effective communication will only grow, making frameworks like ISBAR indispensable.
---
1. ACSQHC. (2021). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.
2. Australian Aged Care Quality Agency. (2019). Aged Care Quality Standards.
3. Gordon, S., Hutzler, L., & Kent, A. (2018). Providing structured communication during handovers: A narrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 76, 81-88.
4. Manser, T. (2014). Team communication during patient handovers: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 1-11.
5. McFadden, K. L., Gail, M., & Liao, C. (2020). The impact of structured handover communication on patient outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Health Communication, 25(8), 737-749.
6. Twycross, A., & Shields, L. (2020). Handover: Theoretical and empirical perspectives on nurse-to-nurse information exchange. International Nursing Review, 67(3), 309-316.
7. Mardis, M., & Stratton, T. (2020). Clinical implications of handover communication: An integrative review of an evidence-based intervention. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 129-139.
8. Wolf, L., & Baird, E. (2018). Transforming handover communications: A quality initiative. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(6), 721-727.
9. Gollop, C., & Williams, A. (2019). Communicating for quality: The role of the nurse practitioner in managing transitions of care. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 41(3), 133-139.
10. Ben Natan, M., Mahajna, M., & Mahajna, S. (2015). The role of structured communication in reviewing the quality of nursing handover. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(3), 256-261.
This structured approach ensures a comprehensive presentation that adequately covers the essential aspects of the ISBAR tool and its relevance to healthcare safety standards.