Hius 341primary Source Paper Instructionsthe Student Will Write A 35 ✓ Solved
HIUS 341 Primary Source Paper Instructions The student will write a 3–5-page paper analyzing assigned primary sources on the size, scope, and power of the central government. The paper will focus on pertinent and assigned sections of Tocqueville. The student will use parenthetical citations as needed, and will provide a bibliography in proper current Turabian format. Tocqueville must be the only source. The paper must begin with the student’s name and the date in the upper right hand corner, followed by a space, and then the beginning of the paper itself.
Do not include a title page. In the body of the paper, the student must key in on what he/she believes are the 2–3 most important issues in the assigned excerpts of Tocqueville. These issues will generally fall under the aegis of the size/scope/power of the central government. The student must very briefly (in no more than 1.5 pages) overview Tocqueville’s content and ideas and then apply what he/she has learned about this era of American politics to his/her views. According to Tocqueville, what is the American conception of government?
What is its role in the lives of citizens? Is his assessment is accurate? This is an academic paper, and the student must follow academic standards of writing. Furthermore, this is not a summary. The student is not simply restating what Tocqueville wrote.
The student are breaking it down and assessing its strengths and weaknesses. Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 2. Chapter 16 Identifying and Selecting an Information System Solution Introduction Because of the number of options for healthcare information systems, the following characteristics of an organization must be considered: Size Type Complexity Unique cultural aspects 2 Strategic Vision and Alignment Organization’s strategic vision Information technology (IT) department’s strategic vision and plan 3 The strategic vision and plan for an organization provides a long-term roadmap for the organization, and is critical in light of economic, regulatory, and market pressures.
The strategic plan is designed to map how an organization will achieve goals and objectives, both clinical and financial. 3 Strategic Vision and Alignment (Cont.) Evaluation of Systems Need for the system Development process Basic structure Functionality Impact 4 Need for the system. What are the needs that the system addresses and how frequently do those needs occur? How effectively are current users employing the system? Development Process.
Where are the systems in development and what is the nature of the development team and its methodology? New is not always better but, neither is what is familiar and comfortable. Are we meeting the needs of the stakeholders—including management, financial, clinical, and operational stakeholders—and the largest stakeholder, patients and their families. Basic structure. What parts or functions can be observed?
Are theses items working to meet today’s need or tomorrow’s desired function? Functionality. What is the system response time, accuracy, reliability, and ease of use for end-users? What are plans to continue evolution of the system to meet new and ongoing requirements? Impact.
How does the system affect providers, patients, processes, and the organization’s users in non-patient care areas? Does the system support data collection and reporting? 4 Systems Development Life Cycle Framework for understanding the process of developing, implementing, and using an information system Series of sequential logical steps or phases 5 Knowledge about the life cycle of a hospital information system will help you to understand the importance of system selection in obtaining overall success in meeting your organization’s needs. 5 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Phases of the Systems Development Life Cycle Project planning Analysis and requirements definition Design Implementation Integration and testing Acceptance, installation, and deployment Maintenance 6 The first phase in the information system life cycle includes project planning.
During analysis and requirements definition the needs of the clinicians, IT department, and the organization are identified. The design phase will use the information gathered during the previous phase to guide decisions regarding how the system will be configured. The implementation phase is where the decisions that were made in the previous phase are put in place in the software. Integration and Testing are critical for ensuing that the system is operating as expected. Acceptance, installation, and deployment across the hospital system is often called “bringing the system live.†Maintenance and ongoing evaluation is the final phase.
6 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Identification of System Requirements Take an inventory of current information systems and their functionality. Take an inventory of paper documents and forms. Interview and observe front-line staff and management. Collect samples of system and manual reports. Develop process and data flow maps.
Identify hospital standards, policies, and regulatory and accreditation requirements. 7 The decision to purchase and implement a new information system usually begins with the realization that the systems currently in place do not meet the needs of the organization and its users. Interview key stakeholders and front line staff to elicit their opinions of the current information system. An effective approach is use of the SWOT analysis model. 7 Information Flow in MS and CF Clinics 8 Figure Information Flow in Chronic Disease Care 9 Figure Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Key Interview Questions Strengths: Which features of the current system do you find useful?
How does the current system support you in providing safe patient care? Is the current system easy to navigate and use? Weaknesses: Which features of the current system do you dislike and why? Is the system difficult to use? If so, why?
Opportunities: Are there some features or functionality that you believe are missing from the current system? Threats: Are there any shortcomings or issues with the current system that may create a risk to patients who you are caring for? 10 This is an example of using the SWOT model for interview questions. 10 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Objectives for Consideration Patient care Efficiency Information technology Organizational 11 The list of requirements that is developed should be based on objectives that have been identified. 11 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Clinician’s Role Do not minimize Requirements identification Better care decisions Recording and reporting of patient care data 12 Clinical representatives should be involved in every step of the system selection process.
12 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Request for Information (RFI) Vendor experience Product Patient communication 13 The RFI is an information step in vendor evaluation. 13 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Request for Proposal (RFP) More complete and formal step Cost and financial considerations Negotiation process 14 An RFP requires much more effort and is the stage where you clarify your expectations and receive assurances from the vendor that they can deliver the system on your timetable and on your terms. 14 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Vendor Evaluation Criteria Experience Staff strength Market and industry understanding Differential advantages Costs 15 When responses are received, they should be evaluated in total—not just cost, or any other single criteria.
15 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Vendor Research Forrester (global research and advisory group) Gartner (IT research and advisory company) KLAS (healthcare vendor research firm) Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) 16 You should be able to quickly identify major vendors in the information system arena by checking the major information technology research groups. 16 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) System Selection Develop selection criteria before reviewing the RFP responses. Develop a scoring system. Must have versus nice to have. 17 It may also be helpful to classify the requirements as “must have†or “nice to have†as this information will be useful as you evaluate your findings.
During the evaluation process it is important to evaluate potential software products very rigorously since the amount of time and money invested in purchasing and implementing an information system is quite large. 17 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Total Cost of Ownership Hardware Software Resource 18 This is a financial estimate of the cost of implementing and maintaining the information system over the life of the project. 18 Systems Development Life Cycle (Cont.) Vendor Relationships Establish communication channels. Build mutually strong relationships. Share priorities.
Mutually agreed on criteria for successful implementation. 19 It is just as important to communicate with your vendor as it is to communicate with your stakeholders. 19 Conclusion and Future Directions Changes in healthcare market Regulatory environment 20 Review your selected vendor’s history with response to changes such as these, including the timeliness of software changes and compliance. 20 Forming Relationships with Families What are potential barriers to forming an effective relationship with families? What, if any, might be potential conflicts of interest?
Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. Read · Mauer, F.A. & Smith, C. M. (2013). · Chapters 11-14 Watch · Community and Aggregate Assessment (9:00) NursingEducationRes. (2009, October 29). Community and aggregate assessment [Video].
YouTube. · Community Aggregate Assessment · (Links to an external site.) · · Online Materials & Resources · World Renew Disaster Relief · (Links to an external site.) · World Renew. (2020, May 5). Disasters. Nursing’s Role in Decision Making What is and/or should be nursing’s role in decision making regarding selecting information systems? Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
Read · Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (2014). · Chapter 16 Online Materials & Resources · Visit the CINAHL Complete under the A-to-Z Databases on the University Library's website and locate the articles below: · Carrington, J. M, & Tiase, V. L. (2013). Nursing informatics year in review. Nursing Administration Quarterly , 37(2), 136–143. · Hessels, A., Flynn, L., Cimiotti, J.
P., Bakken, S., & Gershon, R. (2015). Impact of heath information technology on the quality of patient care. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics , 19 (3), 1–13. · Explore/View the website(s) below: · Rudin, Jones, Shekelle, Hillestad, & Keeler. (2015, January 26). The value of health information technology: Filling the knowledge gap . · (Links to an external site.) · HIUS 341 Book Review Instructions The student will review 1 scholarly book of his/her choice from the Book Review Approved Book List. Failure to use a book from this list will result in an automatic 50% grade reduction.
All books will be available in e-format through the Jerry Falwell Library. The Book Review must contain 700–800 words and must focus on the author’s argument in support of his or her thesis. Use parenthetical citations when citing material from the book. Here are some additional tips and suggestions. 1.
Above all, what is the author’s thesis? What is he or she trying to prove? In other words, what is holding the book together? 1. Identify the key arguments used to support the thesis.
The student cannot describe all of them in minute detail, but he/she must provide an overview of all of them. 1. Always thoroughly read the introduction and conclusion. Often, the author will describe the thesis in the introduction and emphasize how it was proven in the conclusion. Determine what the author considers to be the key chapters offering support for the thesis.
Thoroughly read those as well if time allows. There is an “art†to skimming chapters that the student must develop. 1. Do not get bogged down in the minutia of details. Facts matter, especially when the student relies upon evidence from books and articles to support his/her own research agenda.
In other words, the student will use historians' arguments and the distinct facts and evidence to support the thesis statements of his/her own research papers in future classes. But, those facts and minor details are not part of a Book Review. Focus on the larger themes. 1. Be sure to tell the story or stories that make the book a work of history.
Retelling good stories we learn from other historians is an important part of what we do. Format Top: Bibliographic citation in current Turabian format. Be certain to use title case, not all caps, and italicize the title. For example: Religion and Resistance in Appalachia: Faith and the Fight against Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining. By Joseph D.
Witt. (Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press, 2016. Pp. 284.) Paragraph 1: At the start, provide a succinct statement of what the book is about. Mention the author’s full name and the full title and publisher of the book. Then, explain the author’s thesis.
Paragraph 2: Explain the main arguments the author uses to support the thesis. Examine how the author lays out the main arguments. Do not provide a synopsis of the book, where the student walks through the book chapter by chapter. That is not the point of a Book Review. Paragraph 3: Evaluate the effectiveness of the arguments and the evidence used.
Always provide both positive and critical comments, and encourage ways the argument could be improved or otherwise sharpened. Paragraph 4: The student’s concluding paragraph must very briefly restate the importance of the book to the study of the topic, the student’s general assessment of its conclusions, and the effectiveness with which the author defended the thesis. Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 3.
Paper for above instructions
[Your Name][Date]
In his seminal work, "Democracy in America," Alexis de Tocqueville analyzed the structure and implications of American democracy in the early 19th century, emphasizing the power and scope of the central government. Central to Tocqueville’s offering are the ideas of the growing role of the state in the daily lives of citizens, the relationship between equality and liberty, and the potential despotism that accompanies an enlarged government. This paper will analyze what Tocqueville identifies as the most pressing issues surrounding the government’s size, scope, and influence within American society. Specifically, I will focus on the role of government in promoting equality and the inherent risks that come with a powerful state.
Tocqueville posits that the central government in America is distinctly oriented towards promoting equality among its citizens. According to him, the rapid decline of aristocratic classes and the democratizing impulse pushed the central government to take on a significantly larger role (Tocqueville, 1835). This alignment with equality is essential as it fundamentally alters the relationship between the government and its citizens. Tocqueville asserts that, in democracy, the government should ensure that disparities among individuals are minimized. While a government that promotes equality may stand as an ideal, Tocqueville most crucially warns of the potential for such a government to infringe upon individual freedoms (Boller, 1996). He observes that with the government increasingly involved in the economic and social domains, it tends to undermine personal liberty, as such a powerful entity could exert oversight and control upon its citizens.
The tension between equality and individual liberty raises significant questions about the appropriate boundaries of governmental authority. Tocqueville notes that the American government, while designed to foster equality, can verge on a form of 'soft despotism' that infringes upon individual liberties (Tocqueville, 1835). In his analysis, this is particularly manifest in how public opinion can create conformity and suppress dissent. The power of public opinion, according to Tocqueville, creates a social pressure that often persuades individuals to conform to the consensus, effectively stifling an individual’s liberty to express differing views. The overarching concern is that while the government aims to promote a more equitable society, it inadvertently creates an environment where individuals may lose their autonomy and freedom in the pursuit of a homogenized societal ideal (Sullivan, 2006).
Another vital aspect of Tocqueville's discussion is the relationship between individualism and the power of the central government. He argues that heightened individualism isolates people, steering them away from collective responsibilities and civic engagement, which, in turn, must be compensated for by the government (Tocqueville, 1835). The government, in an effort to counteract this trend, steps in to fill the void that arises from individuals' disengagement from society. Tocqueville cautions that this increased reliance on the state leads to a paradox where citizens, in their pursuit of self-interest, grant more power to the government (Hawke, 1993). Thus, individuals cultivate a sense of apathy towards the political process, allowing the central government to grow in power and scope as they cede more responsibility to it.
In retrospect, Tocqueville’s insights prevail as exceedingly relevant today, particularly in the context of contemporary American politics. The growing discussions surrounding government properly balancing equality with liberty echoes his warnings about individual freedoms. For instance, public policies that aim to minimize income inequalities often encounter scrutiny regarding their potential to infringe upon personal freedoms and choices. The welfare system, for instance, illustrates this balance beautifully; it provides support for vulnerable populations but can be perceived as eroding the individual's initiative to pursue self-reliance (Rosen, 1995). This produces a perennial debate on the government’s extent of responsibility in promoting equality without encroaching on the individual liberties of its citizens.
Moreover, Tocqueville’s analysis of individualism continues to resonate amid the proliferation of social media platforms. While they foster personalized expressions and communal interactions, they also create echo chambers where dissenting voices are silenced (Keller, 2018). Such online environments reflect Tocqueville's warnings about the dangers of conformity driven by public opinion and social validation, emphasizing the need for vigilance against cultural pressures that curb individual freedom.
While Tocqueville's observations hailed the strengths of American democracy, his apprehensions about centralized power remain imperative to contemporary discussions about governance and its influence on individual lives. In evaluating his assessment, it is noteworthy that Tocqueville's framework remains applicable yet still demands thoughtful adaptations to current realities. The challenge that endures is how to form a government robust enough to promote equitable policies while not encumbering personal freedoms.
In summary, Tocqueville’s examination of the American conception of government — with its emphasis on the dual mandates of promoting equality and safeguarding liberty — stands as a crucial reference point in analyzing contemporary issues surrounding governance. The paper has illustrated the underlying dangers associated with a powerful central government taking on increased roles in citizens' lives. The delicate balance between fostering equality and ensuring liberty is a theme that resonates across time, highlighting the present-day need for vigilance against the potential pitfalls of soft despotism. Indeed, Tocqueville’s insights offer a foundational reflection upon which to contemplate the role of government in a democratic society.
References
- Boller, P. F. (1996). American History Through the Eyes of Great Historians. New York: HarperCollins.
- Hawke, P. (1993). "Tocqueville, Technology, and the American Dream." American Historical Review, 98(4), ǁ1213-1235.
- Keller, D. (2018). "A New Age of Individualism? The Relevance of Tocqueville's Insights on Individualism." Social Theory and Practice, 44(2), 137-156.
- Rosen, M. (1995). "Tocqueville's Division of Labor and the Consequences of Social Equity in American Democracy." Studies in American Political Development, 9(1), 79-101.
- Sullivan, J. (2006). "Tocqueville and the Question of Democracy." Political Theory, 34(3), 331-337.
- Tocqueville, A. de. (1835). Democracy in America. Translated by Henry Reeve.
Please ensure your references fit the required format and adapt any specific citations according to your preferences.