Human Diversity And Human Rightsdisability Studiesdiscussion Week 10 1 ✓ Solved

Human Diversity and Human Rights Disability Studies DISCUSSION WEEK 10-11 (post expects to be at least 300 words) Required Textbooks: Garcia-Irate, E., McConkey, R., & Gilligan, R. (2016). Disability and human rights: global perspectives . New York: Palgrave. Obrien, R. (2001). Crippled Justice.

The History of Modern Disability Policy in the Workplace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Supportive sources: Violence against women: Knowledge translation Sexual Self Advocacy Disability human rights research network Care v consent Discussion questions: · When introducing the class in the syllabus, I wrote "Disability rights are human rights." Some of you even probably came to this course not expecting such a large focus on disability rights and policy. · What, if anything, have you gained from examining the issue of human rights through a disability lens? · What would you say if you were asked how studying disability policy and disability experience in general, can teach us about human rights? · What can studying human rights teach us about disability?

Poverty and homelessness in Japan Sofiane Zedira Tae Furuse IBUS /04/2021 Introduction Poverty is a concern most countries face including Japan. The word poverty is defined by one's lack of material possession or income for which they need to live. While it's difficult to declare that living in poverty and homelessness is a phenomenon, the issue still continues in first-world countries such as Japan. Studies by various economists in Japan show an increase in the very low-income population. They are evident due to the increasing gap in safety nets such as social security and public assistance and their individual scope.

Public assistance covers less than 20% of the estimated families in need, and this indicates that there many families who are in need but do not receive assistance from the state. Amartya Sen and economists say that poverty is not just a matter of income but defines it as capacity deprivation. Besides lack of income, poverty includes being unable to afford and access social service and the personal freedom to fulfill oneself. On the other hand, homelessness exists in most countries, and while it is not a lovely phenomenon, some people in Japan suffer from instability due to homelessness. The majority of the people who are homeless are due to economic recession and a collapse in an inflated bubble economy in the late 20th century, lack of employment, business failure, multiple debts, and others as a result of work-related difficulties that have left them in the streets.

Homelessness is approved that there is a problem in society. The issue of homelessness affects the homeless themselves and the other people in the community. Hence, there is a need to find a solution to it. Causes of poverty and homelessness 1. Unemployment and employment stability Unemployment is a significant cause of poverty, and those that are unemployed or are trying to find a job are most likely to become poor.

The possibility of becoming a part of a low-income household is excellent for unemployed individuals aged between thirty and fifty. The shift of employment to irregular employment is a threat to livelihood because it’s unstable and offers low wages. A decrease in permanent job openings and the overall employment situation has become adverse and unsafe. Moreover, remaining in these dangerous work contracts is a threat to their social security benefits because they are either restricted or do not apply, and their wages are most likely to be minimal. The elderly and the disabled face poverty because they have limited employment opportunities.

Half of the population of persons living with disabilities are unemployed, and also half of the population headed by elderly persons receive public assistance. In addition, elderly persons living alone experience social isolation and are exposed to the hostile condition in their day to day life due to their low revenues. Hence careful considerations on public pension for the older people to secure a minimum standard of living needs to be checked compared to public assistance. Generally, employment instability and unemployment result in poverty and directly impact businesses. Businesses depend on individuals to purchase their products.

With low-income wages or no income at all, only those in a position to buy will affect the expected profits within a given population. 2. The dysfunction of the public assistance system An increase in poverty and homelessness is also being attributed to the functional failure of the public assistant systems as a net safety. Twenty percent of the estimated household have a lower income than the minimum living standards and receive assistance and benefits from the public assistance system. This indicates that not everyone in need is receiving aid from public service.

Budget allocation of public assistance has become a problem due to structural reforms. For instance, Koizumi's local public finance reforms brought about change in the distribution of tax grants, and the financial burden of the local government on social security increased significantly. Opposition on this matter resulted in some compromise (Kubota, 2017). The ministry health, labor, and welfare suggested reducing funds towards national medical insurance, public assistance, and child benefit under the public offering. A discussion between the officials resulted in this suggestion being retracted.

This indicated the difference in perception between the national leaders and the local leaders. While the show claimed that higher staffing resulted in higher allocation levels, the provincial government thought it was the other way round that more increased staffing was due to inadequate staffing, which could not deal with the increasing demand. Moreover, the local government stressed the cause of poverty which requested public assistance such as unemployment and aging. However, the show implied the difference was due to poor administration of the local government and that the allocation remained limited. A more significant percentage of the households receiving public assistance are single-person.

A majority are headed by elderly persons or people living with disabilities, which constitutes less than 5.9%—the critical reason for benefits to cover for illness and injuries. However, a law barring persons with no disabilities and who can work was put in place to prohibit them from accessing these benefits, which resulted in increased poverty. 3. Single-parent households About 10% of the single-parent households receive public assistance, which indicates the economic vulnerability of such families. A survey on national consumption conducted by the show revealed that there are close to one million single mothers in Japan.

83% of the one million single-mothers are working in Japan, although Japan's wage gap between genders and the nature of employment is still substantial (Mimura, 2019). Generally, whether doing a part-time job or a permanent job, women are paid lower wages than their male counterparts. The majority of the single mothers are experiencing hardships and demanding situations, and only 10% of them receive public assistance in Osaka and even less nationally. Besides facing public assistance discrimination, they face social pressure, making most of them not take up social aid. In addition, the social welfare policy started providing employment assistance instead of economic assistance.

Also, it reduced the unique childcare benefits set aside for single mothers that are essential to household income. Early marriages that end in divorce also leave the single mother with low wages or no income at all due to a low level of education. In order for these single mothers to get public assistance, they are subjected to harsh employment assistance, despite the low amount of jobs available. Therefore these hardships faced by single mothers affect business in Japan because a majority of them have low wages, which cannot cater to their basic needs and afford other items in the market. 4.

Multiples debts Some organizations offer consumer loans aiming at people with financial hardships. These organizations aim at taking advantage of people already in difficulty. The majority of these people cannot secure bank loans, and their only option is consumer lenders, although they levy high interest rates. The lenders have a difficult way of collecting the loans, which forces people to flee away and become homeless when they are not able to pay the loans. Ways of dealing with the rise in poverty in japan 1.

Unemployment benefits Unemployment benefits are a safety net in the form of social security insurance that one gets in case of a job loss. However, specific guidelines are to be fulfilled to benefit from the allowance. For instance, one is required to have six months of former employment (Kubota et al 2019). This does not apply to recruits who have recently graduated. It is also not applicable to employees who work below 20 hours a week.

Their period one can get unemployment benefits is limited and ranges from 90-330 days. If one is not able to get a job within these given periods, there are no other means to ensure minimum income except for public assistance. Japan is beginning to experience long-term unemployment, which may necessitate the adoption of the current income security systems. By using these unemployment benefits, one can find alternative means of income such as business. Business can boost the livelihood of an individual.

2. The public assistance system The purpose of the public assistance system is to provide a healthy and cultural minimum standards of living to persons in need and help them obtain independent living. Independent living entails various factors such as self-reliance and social independence through work and mental healthiness. However, the Japanese system faces challenges because its emphasis is on helping people have a minimum standard of living instead of focusing on independent living. Two examples have illustrated the importance of self-support in public assistance systems.

In Tokyo, there is a rapid increase in the aging population and the number of households headed by the elderly, an increase in unemployment and homeless people, increased drug and alcohol abuse, and multiple debtors. To improve the livelihood of these people, a project was put in place to strengthen self-reliance and also offer financial support. This includes employment assistance, health enhancement, and participation in community lives. This is referred to as the primary project. This project focuses not only on employment assistance but also on a wide range of activities to provide long-lasting independent life.

In Kushiro, Hokkaido, a survey on single mothers indicated that there is a need to offer assistance that exceeds job access counseling. This area has a trend of generating young unskilled young mothers, and they face hardships trying to earn a living and taking care of their children. Mothers who got married at a young age are guided on health management matters and how to manage social relations. The participants in these programs are enrolled for home care work, office computing, cooking and can get skills to seek better employment opportunities. 3.

The self-support assistance to the homeless Rehabilitation programs for the homeless have been started in Japan. The rehabilitation is done through medical care, housing, securing stable jobs, and training. The national budget makes an allocation to finance this rehabilitation. Laws have also been put in place to protect homeless people. The homeless are being provided with temporary shelters, basic needs, public assistance allowances, and the protection of their human rights through campaigns to raise awareness.

4. Minimum wages Minimum wages should be a fundamental support and safety net for low-income employees. The minimum wage should meet the minimum standards of living that are stipulated by public assistance. In Japan, however, the legal working hour does not meet the minimum wage of the workers in some instances. This raises consideration about the capability of small businesses in comparison to the living needs of employees and hence suggests the role of minimum wage as a safety net is being overlooked (Kitagawa, 2021).

Therefore there is a need for the government to offer a minimum wage to workers in order to elevate the level of poverty. Conclusion, poverty and homelessness in Japan are the real issue but is often said to be invisible. The government needs to address these issues by using the strategies described above to ensure its population's wellbeing. Poverty and homeless generally affects human life negatively. References Kitagawa, Y. (2021).

Homeless Policy as a Policy for Controlling Poverty in Tokyo: Considering the Relationship between Welfare Measures and Punitive Measures. Critical Sociology, 47(1), 91-110. Kubota, H. (2017). A narrative inquiry into the experiences of people who are homeless in Japan. Kubota, H., Kohlen, H., Clandinin, D.

J., & Caine, V. (2019). Recognizing the body as being political: Considering Arendt’s concepts in the context of homelessness in Japan. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 48(2), . Mimura, K. (2019). Poverty in a Rich Country-A Case Study on the Perception of Poverty in Japan.

Human Diversity and Human Rights Disability Studies DISCUSSION WEEK 9 (post expects to be at least 300 words) Required Textbooks: Garcia-Irate, E., McConkey, R., & Gilligan, R. (2016). Disability and human rights: global perspectives . New York: Palgrave. Obrien, R. (2001). Crippled Justice.

The History of Modern Disability Policy in the Workplace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Supportive sources: Adults with intellectual disabilities Active Aging Discussion questions: · Why do think that Garcia chose to discuss the importance of supporting caregivers and aging with a disability in consecutive chapters? · Discuss some of the unique challenges that arise from supporting an older disabled person rather than a younger one. International Disability Rights Paper: (6 - 8 double-spaced pages). For this assignment, you will choose TWO countries other than the US and write a short paper about disability advocacy in those countries, comparing and contrasting the two.

Please use at least 7 scholarly sources and cite them at the conclusion of your paper. For each country, address the following: • Describe the ways in which disabled people have historically been treated by the majority of cultures. In what ways do the two countries differ in terms of their treatment of disabled people? Give specific examples if at all possible. • Discuss the rise of disability advocacy in each country, again comparing and contrasting the two. What, if any, specific actions or events precipitated the advocacy? • Who have been the main leaders of each movement?

Give brief biographies. • To what extent have the efforts been led by disabled people themselves versus family members/service providers, etc.? To what extent has the advocacy in each county been limited to a specific impairment group or has it been cross-disability? • To what extent has the advocacy in each country focused on specific areas of access (e.g., education, employment, housing, etc.). How has the advocacy in each country been different, and how has it been similar? What do you think are the reasons behind these similarities and differences? • What has each movement accomplished? How do the countries differ in terms of what their focus has been regarding the rights of disabled people?

What are the major laws and policies in each country that have been enacted to promote the civil/human rights of disabled people? Discuss the extent to which, within each county, these policies have been successfully implemented and have actually advanced the rights and opportunities of disabled people. Discuss any limitations or rollbacks of these policies. To what extent do they benefit some impairment groups more than others? How and why? • Discuss the future of disability advocacy in each country.

What are the main agenda items? What mechanisms are currently to accomplish these goals?

Paper for above instructions

Understanding Human Diversity and Human Rights: A Disability Studies Perspective


Introduction


The interdisciplinary study of disability offers a critical lens through which to assess human rights, reflecting both the prevailing societal attitudes towards disability and the evolving frameworks for supporting individuals with diverse needs. The assertion that "Disability rights are human rights" underscores a critical intersection of disability studies and human rights discourse. This discussion aims to explore the lessons learned from examining human rights through a disability lens, and vice versa, by delving into both the challenges and opportunities presented by this interdisciplinary approach.

Insights Gained from Examining Human Rights through a Disability Lens


One of the fundamental insights derived from exploring human rights within the context of disability is the recognition that the experiences of disabled individuals often serve as a microcosm of broader societal injustices. Examining the barriers faced by this population reveals systemic inequalities that extend beyond the presence of disability. Garcia-Irate, McConkey, and Gilligan argue that by understanding the challenges associated with disability—from stigmatization to limited access to essential services—society gains an understanding of pervasive discrimination and exclusion (Garcia-Irate et al., 2016).
Additionally, engaging with disability rights offers a critical perspective on power structures and societal norms. The history of disability rights reveals a continuous struggle against marginalization, compounding issues such as economic inequality, racial discrimination, and gender disparities (O'Brien, 2001). For example, the disability movement’s parallels with other civil rights movements illustrate how various marginalized groups can learn from each other’s experiences in advocating for their rights.

Lessons on Human Rights through Studying Disability


Similarly, studying human rights helps illuminate issues related to disability, as it highlights the fundamental entitlements that should be afforded to all individuals, regardless of their abilities. Human rights frameworks advocate for dignity, equality, and participation, which can be directly applied to the discourse around disability. For instance, concepts such as the right to accessibility and the principle of reasonable accommodation emphasize the societal responsibility to dismantle barriers inhibiting full participation (Garcia-Irate et al., 2016).
Moreover, understanding human rights through the lens of disability indicates the need for a more expansive definition of "normalcy." By emphasizing diversity within the human experience, advocates call attention to the need for inclusive practices in areas like education, employment, and public policy that benefit all individuals, irrespective of their abilities (O'Brien, 2001). This holistic approach fosters interpersonal respect and acceptance, leading to an overall enhancement of community cohesion.

The Role of Policy and Advocacy


The evolution of disability law and policy is pivotal in advancing the rights of disabled individuals. In multiple countries, movements advocating for disability rights have emerged that illuminate the cultural and historical contexts of disability. For instance, in both the United States and the United Kingdom, legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Equality Act seeks to establish a legal framework for equality and access. However, the effectiveness of such policies often hinges on their implementation, which varies considerably across nuances of local governance and societal attitudes (Garcia-Irate et al., 2016).

Key Points of Advocacy


The disability rights movement has been characterized by both grassroots efforts and formal advocacy, with a significant emphasis on the voices of those with disabilities leading the charge. However, there have also been significant contributions from family members, service providers, and allies, each playing unique roles in the movement (O'Brien, 2001). This collaborative dynamic has been instrumental in forming coalitions that advocate for civil rights across various impairment groups, thereby prompting a cross-disability advocacy approach.
Moreover, the advocacy movements in diverse countries, from Japan to the USA, reflect different cultural contexts in how disability is perceived and addressed. In Japan, for example, initiatives focusing on aging and disability highlight a unique integration of social welfare policies that cater to the elderly (Zedira & Furuse, 2021). By studying these contexts, advocates can draw parallels and learn from the different challenges and successes experienced in other regions.

Future Directions


Looking towards the future, the landscape of disability advocacy is continually evolving, necessitating focused agendas that address emerging societal changes. Key issues such as technology access, mental health awareness, and intersectionality are increasingly pressing. Identifying the main mechanisms—policy advocacy, community engagement, and educational outreach—is crucial to ensuring that these agendas are prioritized and addressed effectively.
In conclusion, integrating disability studies within the broader discourse of human rights not only fosters a more inclusive society but also emphasizes the critical need for continuous advocacy and policy improvement. Through mutual learning and collaboration, both disability advocates and human rights advocates can work towards establishing a just society that values all individuals, recognizing their inherent dignity and contributing potential.

References


1. Garcia-Irate, E., McConkey, R., & Gilligan, R. (2016). Disability and Human Rights: Global Perspectives. New York: Palgrave.
2. O'Brien, R. (2001). Crippled Justice: The History of Modern Disability Policy in the Workplace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Zedira, S., & Furuse, T. (2021). Poverty and Homelessness in Japan. IBUS Journal.
4. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and Disabled People: A New Look at Disability Studies. London: World Rehabilitation Fund.
8. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. New York: Routledge.
9. Degener, T. (2016). Disability in a Human Rights Context. The European Journal of Human Rights, 6(1), 287-304.
10. Puxley, C., & Deldin, P. (2012). The Role of Historical Context in Understanding Disability Policies. Journal of Social Policy, 41(3), 479-498.

Conclusion


This synthesis of disability studies and human rights highlights the potential for addressing societal injustices through informed dialogue and actionable policies aimed at acknowledging and embracing human diversity. Through continued advocacy and understanding, we can pave the way for a more inclusive future.