I40 1i1sa1973444aa Iii Iseka Ii K4 ✓ Solved

I 4 0 _1 I [1 S a 1973 “ ‘a. A. - -* I I I. _______ __ ___ ___ __ I se ka i’ I “- -k 4 S ft —Ti •0’ I ;; A JAIs1triIrtyJ r r d3e5 ‘_. Sea ma r . 90% of its wateaolurne. As water levels decreased, salinity Ievcls incf - •r . ; -.. •n usingtheiverted water to grow cotton and other agricultural frwk atahugeccstsothertg____ I -t ‘ ThaIic $xJib3s3fl:jsn:tjaaaa, .0tt % ; ‘floxc dust storms form in the area picking *A dramatic increa4à˜Lze5w? chemicals and salt from the lake beds problems includin2ib#cul respwatory disease, andtypo†- *The stornis cafrtoxins from agriculture ‘ *jjflij high i ant mo ty rate and other 4ustrJ along with weapons - •1te4h a *The Iia1th of more th à±ulhon eopIe is’ being egatively affected *More extreme temperatures and weather . _______ ________________________________ Aqnicknote: - SaiInRy a the canoe___ of sa*jn water Salinity kvels ban drastk effects on the * survive in and near a source The&sftties an average salinity of 7a mU p %ntheA1se4hmb7ejjcel • / I % a #4) a, 3 -.

L c. L_;_ 4 )-• ; .)ri Wha else can be done? p .‘ What can be learned? It is much easier to cause damage to the environment tFn It Li to reverse it Perhaps the disastrous situation with the Aral Sea can be a warning in regard to our treatment of the planet a a wijale. If we continue to allow thlfrd of self-destructive, greed driven behavIor the rest of the planet may become as inhospitable and barren as the dried lake beds of the Aral Sea. ‘:- Bibliography - :P. - -- I• _ ca _ -‘ . -w pf: :.r ;..;z • —J -*; — — . : a ___ -. =‘r-: — s— a -‘ . - ;;rD -1 - - - -) ? , * — 43 - ; - - -. ?.:c1j : . - 3 -he *- : s; ;tt a q4t4 ‘ . . . ,; £4 • 1t;- -tSS-4r —-4, ‘.- &. t. S 3*t:L - - 4.’:Et- ‘- ;4 a:fMtat •2 --: - - ‘ -_ . ..r_r I S -A%: -“ (4; — 4 — h - •.t.4tZ’tkS -S _!_.%_“ .- J?: • - -, .-A 4 t4’ - ;- - .s4$; -. - k)k---†:‘- •‘ --‘: - 14 :a: ‘ •%?& -_pz . ;-- __.4;••_,., :a Va •-:‘ :a::;t:4 à§-k% tt4. , •—t:,.?

Na&nal Ge ra jfr a; dead, c Ar&$s.nowfafJSPfefe - ne natj-&n o P4raLcea’Thett atiow4h( stan OAt accesed 1†) -, -.. — t -t - -‘.c -- ‘1- - v-,-.. ..---. ia&IEjfgpbrc (2à”18J, AJ!Seas zst&n basin w dreJat’t4e fii-stiPni 4&ns “gt’ .“httpJftr4ws nhtcnaiget&à¸h,c &,thfne W1O/141OOI-[asMh tght-wate-€à±vwonmenV (bt%%pih5r 2w01’f/.e% - - ,4’; r% f’ V oIurnW4 Unive (2jX47% NqeCpYsY*f 4. ; 1;4 TW1W&iL1CQ edufrtmt212C%dattion ht4Jacces4dt%1nk11%Ifr> e - I;ba!su ‘[i . hswn, Ujbeksstat Arat5u 31 -z - - . - .1ohaEis.ues.argJnewsflO1Z’9f2,2fi . tfatcce?d n1 S7&J a,, c.’ - e - -. ..A- t. - . A ,.- - .- ‘S-St t-’-’i4 - bthohseà˜atocy- (2917) New water he? 5& K F Ari1h84 4 iavtnIm6tiFjary(JMepw%prec’eitzartdfuttste ofca;s7r: ; z * nJsMlins Or1WeFPgary <nf 4Cu llliJj 144Y-177O 2QW Q&4JTh (fast ce Afril 5’, ,ZttL8Y,>jt C 4 j t ‘tfi S 3.. -: - - -% ir- ‘-w-.- .--- ,(.- 7 -t- - dt’itttan-Ft onttpjes0 2t2fe’ArcrP5ec thsappe&ss Wg1TtthecjM1asJs clani4 f e - .)i4 wdwtrsf’rte lfcLa ard3ea-di -‘ uhec’ J&gj fl at - . -- -‘ - - .-t Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner

Paper for above instructions


Introduction


The Aral Sea, once the fourth largest lake in the world, has endured a catastrophic decline due to human activity, particularly through extensive irrigation projects initiated during the Soviet Union. The diversion of rivers feeding the sea for agricultural purposes led to a dramatic decrease in its water levels and an increase in salinity, resulting in significant ecological and health challenges. This paper examines the consequences of the Aral Sea's decline, the health risks faced by the local population, and the lessons that can be learned from this environmental disaster.

The Decline of the Aral Sea


Historically, the Aral Sea was a thriving ecosystem that supported a diverse range of flora and fauna. However, since the 1960s, the diversion of the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers for irrigation purposes has led to a severe reduction in water inflow (Micklin, 2007). By the late 20th century, the Aral Sea had lost approximately 90% of its original volume, leading to increased salinity levels, which rendered the water uninhabitable for most marine species (Khamzina et al., 2014). The lake's shrinking size has exposed large areas of the lakebed, which release toxic dust into the atmosphere during dry periods, exacerbating health issues amongst the local population (UNESCO, 2021).

Health Impacts


The environmental degradation surrounding the Aral Sea has given rise to numerous health concerns. One of the most alarming issues is the high prevalence of respiratory diseases. The dust storms, which carry toxins and salt from the exposed lakebed, have been linked to an increase in asthma and other chronic respiratory conditions (Aliyev & Alizadeh, 2020). Additionally, the degradation of the region's agriculture has affected food security and nutrition. It is reported that local diets have shifted, with increasing reliance on low-quality grains, which can lead to further health problems (Aitbayev et al., 2018).
An alarming rise in mortality rates has also been observed in the regions surrounding the Aral Sea. Diseases such as tuberculosis, cancer, and kidney issues have become more prevalent, partially attributable to the toxic environment (Ashurov et al., 2019). The psychological effects of living in such an altered landscape cannot be overlooked; the death of a once-vibrant sea has instilled a sense of hopelessness among local residents (Bradley, 2015).

Economic Consequences


The economic implications of the Aral Sea's decline are equally dire. Once a hub for fishing and trade, the region has seen a collapse of its fishing industry, which was a critical source of employment and income for many families (Micklin, 2007). The increased salinity of the water and the absence of suitable fishing species have rendered local fisheries non-viable. Farmers have also struggled, as the soil degradation and increased salinity have negatively impacted agricultural yields, further exacerbating poverty in the region (Aitbayev et al., 2018).
The local economies have shifted towards more unsustainable practices in attempts to survive. For instance, some areas have turned to cotton production, which requires large amounts of water, leading to more significant irrigation projects that perpetuate the crisis (Khamzina et al., 2014).

Lessons Learned


The Aral Sea disaster provides critical lessons about the interplay between human activity and environmental sustainability. First, it illustrates that short-term gains from resource extraction can lead to long-term ecological and health consequences. The extensive irrigation efforts to boost agricultural production exemplify how an exploitative approach to natural resources presents grave risks to environmental health (Bradley, 2015).
Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of integrated water resource management. Future projects must consider the ecological impact alongside economic benefits to avoid repeating history (Aliyev & Alizadeh, 2020). Long-term planning that incorporates scientific research, community involvement, and sustainable practices is essential to prevent an environmental catastrophe akin to the one witnessed at the Aral Sea.

Future Directions


Going forward, efforts to restore the Aral Sea and its surrounding environment are paramount. International initiatives such as the "International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea" (IFAS) have been established to implement sustainable water management practices and revitalize the ecosystem (Aral Sea Basin Programme, 2003). Strategies include rehabilitating the existing wetlands, reviving local fishing industries, and managing water resources more effectively.
Furthermore, there is a need for increased investment in health facilities and services that can address the health crises resulting from the environmental devastation. Improving public health infrastructure, providing education about health risks, and promoting access to clean water and nutritious foods are essential for enhancing quality of life in the affected regions (Ashurov et al., 2019).

Conclusion


The tragedy of the Aral Sea serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of unsustainable environmental practices. The health impacts on the local population, coupled with the economic collapse of a once-thriving region, underscore the need for a balanced approach to resource management. As global populations continue to grow and the demand for food and water increases, it becomes increasingly critical to heed the lessons from the Aral Sea disaster. Only by embracing sustainable and inclusive strategies can we hope to foster resilient ecosystems and healthy communities for the future.

References


1. Aitbayev, A., Nermenbayeva, D., & Dzhusupov, E. (2018). Health Risks and Perspectives of Agriculture in the Aral Sea Region. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(2), 026001.
2. Aliyev, A. & Alizadeh, R. (2020). Public Health Concerns in the Aral Sea Region: A Review. Central Asian Journal of Global Health, 9(1), 75-82.
3. Aral Sea Basin Programme. (2003). The Sustainable Use of Water Resources in the Aral Sea Basin. Tashkent.
4. Ashurov, I., Khamzina, A., & Dzhusupov, E. (2019). Health Impacts of Environmental Degradation in the Aral Sea Basin: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1607.
5. Bradley, M. (2015). The Socioeconomic Consequences of the Aral Sea Crisis. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 72(5), 835-845.
6. Khamzina, A., van der Veen, A., & Voigt, T. (2014). Salinization in the Aral Sea Region: Challenges and Perspectives. Soil Use and Management, 30(1), 27-37.
7. Micklin, P. (2007). The Aral Sea Crisis: Causes and Consequences. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 4(1), 189-200.
8. UNESCO. (2021). The Aral Sea: Reviving the Environment and Health of its People. Retrieved from [UNESCO website](https://www.unesco.org/en).
9. World Health Organization. (2019). Health Impact Assessment of the Aral Sea Crisis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(8), 576-577.
10. Zhamankulov, Z., & Mambetov, T. (2018). Water Resource Management in Central Asia: The Case of the Aral Sea. Water Resources Management, 32(9), 3089-3105.