In Social Work Point Of View Theory Practice Is An Ability Which Let ✓ Solved

In social work point of view, theory-practice is an ability which let you to draw or gives a framework of the circumstance at work spot. As indicated by Payne, "Theory and practice resemble a bond which builds information and can be advanced when it’s expected to impact one another†(2014, p.3). Theories and professional practice are not different from each other and moreover, they are known as social work practice even recommended by other theorists (Healy,2014, p.111). My discussion will focus on how theory-practice is helping any social worker to understand any situation from social work perspective, and I will also have my words on one of the theory-practices which is Cognitive Behavioural Practice that appeals to me.

In this Cognitive Behavioural Practice, the social workers aim at teaching people how to perceive conditions of which based on their behaviour may elicit unwanted reactions towards the situations. We find that sometimes when somebody is suffering, he or she may perceive situations differently and in a bad way. This usually makes them react inappropriately towards the situation which even may worsen the condition. It, therefore, becomes very difficult for them to understand the sources of their problems. According to Payne (2014), this practice aims at helping people address problems that face them, for example, social phobia, depression, as well as anxiety.

It is attributed to the behavioural part. On the other hand, this practice also helps in addressing such problems that are as a result of people think which affects their behaviours. With this, I find that this practice is so far the best as it plays a vital role in the social work perspective. It happens that many people do not live good lives as a result of the environment that they live in. This has even resulted in much larger complications in that they do not look for better solutions but rather make it very difficult to handle their situations.

With the practices that have been outlined here, I find that these are the best practices since they bring a ray of hope to restoring an individual's way of reasoning, the way of learning as well as the way of conceiving the environment. Looking at its applicability is equally wide, looking at it is very important to restructure cognitively the beliefs of people. Where people are not able to interact well with others, through well planned social learning mechanisms, such people are able to recognize the importance of being around other people. This is even applicable in clinical settings. There are specific ways the supervision, as well as the training, are done in clinical settings and thus adding more weight to the importance this cognitive behaviours practice has.

Hence looking at all the above-stated reasons, this practice is the most appealing to me, it gives a second chance to the lives of other people to have a different and positive view of situations that are surrounding them and make them think on a positive path rather than adding difficulty to an already difficult situation. References Lacey, H., & Rachlin, H. (1978). Behavior, Cognition and Theories of Choice. Behaviorism, 6 (2), . Retrieved from Payne, M. (2014).

Modern social work theory (Fourth ed.). Healy, K., & EBook Library. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice (2nd ed.). 1 INSERT SHORTENED TITLE (50 CHARACTERS OR FEWER) 2 Title of Paper Student Name Colorado State University – Global Campus Title of Paper Academic essays should begin with an introduction . The introduction will provide readers with the context necessary for understanding your argument and the body of your paper.

When composing the introduction, think about what context or background information the reader would benefit from knowing. Once your context is established, transition from that context into your thesis statement . The thesis statement generally comes at the end of your introduction and usually consists of a few sentences that sum up the argument for your paper overall. Thesis statements should also provide a roadmap for the reader so that they can navigate through the ideas present in the rest of your paper. Level 1 Header Headers are useful for organizing your paper.

Level 1 headers are used with broad or general topics in your paper. Depending on the topic, length, and genre of your assignment, you might use only Level 1 headers. Level 1 headers should be bolded and centered. The longer and more complex your argument is, the more you might benefit from using Level 2 and Level 3 headers. Level 4 and Level 5 headers exist, but they should only be used in manuscripts with many topics and subtopics.

Generally, if you choose to use subsections (Level 2–5 headers) in your paper, you should have at least two subsections for each level of header. For more information on how to use headings in your paper, visit the APA Style Blog . Level 2 Header Body paragraphs should follow the MEAL structure . This structure will help your ideas build on one another in order to support your thesis statement and to develop your argument over the course of your essay. Each body paragraph should consist of a claim, which also functions as the topic sentence or the main idea of a paragraph.

The claim should then be followed by evidence. Evidence is typically source material that you either paraphrase or quote directly. Remember, APA style guidelines prefer paraphrasing to directly quoting a source. Evidence should provide support for your main idea in the form of examples, statistics, facts, anecdotes, etc. Next, your paragraph should include analysis.

Analysis is your explanation of the preceding evidence and its significance. In other words, you should not let the evidence speak for itself. Through analysis, you can show the reader exactly how you interpret the evidence, how it supports your claim for the paragraph, and how it supports your thesis statement. Finally, each body paragraph should end with a sentence that functions as a conclusion for the paragraph. This sentence can rephrase the claim for the paragraph, tie back to the thesis statement, or transition to the idea you present in the next paragraph.

Level 2 Header Whenever you use a source, it must be cited both in text and in the references. However, there are two types of sources that should only be cited in text and do not need to be included on the References page: (a) Sources that do not produce recoverable data and cannot be located by the reader, such as personal communications , and (b) Religious texts and classical works, such as the Bible, the Qur’an, and Greek or Roman works. Both your in-text citations and references should follow APA style. In academic writing that follows APA style, it is important to paraphrase source material whenever possible, as opposed to quoting the source directly. When paraphrasing source material, you can use page numbers to point the reader to a specific portion of the source, but this is optional.

When paraphrasing, you should follow the paraphrased material with an in-text citation that contains the author’s last name and the source’s year of publication (Author, Year) or use a signal phrase to introduce the paraphrased material with the author and year (ex: “According to Eriksson (2015)...â€). When quoting source material directly, a page number (p. ) or page range (pp. ) is always required. If the source does not include page numbers, use a paragraph number (para. ) instead. When citing in text, parenthetical citations should appear as close to the source material as possible. The author’s name should never be separate from the year of publication.

In-text citations point readers to the References page, which is a list of all the sources used in your assignment. When formatting the References page, start a new page. Then, type and center the word References at the top, but do not use any additional formatting (e.g., bold, underline, italics, quotation marks, etc.). Alphabetize the references according to the first author’s last name or by the name of the organization if there is no individual author for a text. All references should have a hanging indent: The first line of each reference should be flush with the left margin, and subsequent lines should be indented.

Finally, each reference should follow APA style, and the proper formatting will change depending on the type of source. Conclusion The last section or paragraph of your paper should be the conclusion . A conclusion should reiterate the major points of your argument. To do this, think about developing your thesis by adding more detail or by retracing the steps of your argument. You can recap major sections for the reader.

You can also summarize the primary supporting points or evidence you discussed in the paper. The conclusion should not introduce any new information in order to avoid confusing the reader. To end the paper, think about what you want your reader to do with all the information you just presented. Explain what logical next steps might be taken in order to learn more about this topic. Use the conclusion to establish the significance and importance of your work, motivate others to build on what you’ve done in this paper, and encourage the reader to explore new ideas or reach other conclusions.

References Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d). Coping with a traumatic event. Retrieved from Chaitin, J., & Steinberg, S. (2013). “I can almost remember it nowâ€: Between personal and collective memories of massive social trauma. Journal of Adult Development, 21 (1), 30–42.

Eriksson, M. (2015). Managing collective trauma on social media: The role of Twitter after the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society, 38 (3), 365–380. Kaplan, E. M. (2005).

Trauma culture: The politics of terror and loss in media and literature . Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Meek, A. (2011). Trauma and media . National Institute of Mental Health. (2017).

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Retrieved from Introduction to Case Study Erica (age 30 years) has contacted a local community centre. Erica says she lives with her partner James (Jim) and two children Jemima (13) and Isaac (4). Jim works full time in the building industry and the family relocated from interstate 8 months ago so he could take up a better paid job on the recommendation of a friend who was already living here. All of their extended family are back in their home town.

A couple of months ago, Jim was charged by the police for driving under the influence of alcohol and now his driver's licence has been suspended for 12 months following a court appearance. Erica said she has found out Jim has been having problems at work. They can't afford for him to lose his job and he has been spending a lot of the family budget going out and drinking with friends on the weekends. Erica has a background working in retail and administration but hasn't been working for some time as she wanted to settle the kids in after the move and now Jemima has just changed schools again and Isaac has started pre-school. She has noticed Jim is often frustrated with the kids and things are tense at home.

Erica said she didn't really want to tell anyone about their problems, but she spoke to her neighbour about what has been happening when they noticed she looked down and said they had heard her arguing again with Jim last night. They gave her the name of the Centre and said they had used this service when they needed help and found it useful. Module 2 (500 words) DUE: Sunday 29th March 2020 Review the Cognitive Behavioural Practice explored in Module 2, from Payne’s Book (Book name= Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (Fourth ed.). ) reflecting on the factors that have shaped your choice and including a critical analysis of the theory.

Paper for above instructions

Introduction

Within the field of social work, the interaction of theory and practice is essential for understanding the complexities of human behavior and social interaction. This essay aims to explore the significance of theoretical frameworks in social work practice, particularly focusing on Cognitive Behavioral Practice (CBP) as detailed by Payne (2014). The connection between theory and practice serves as a cornerstone of effective social work, enabling practitioners like myself to evaluate and address the issues their clients face through a well-informed lens. The subsequent sections will delve into the cognitive-behavioral perspective, its applicability, and how it can serve to illuminate the struggles faced by clients, through the example of a case study involving a family with multiple stressors.

Understanding Theory-Practice in Social Work

The interdependence between theory and practice in social work is a vital component for effective intervention and understanding of client behaviors. According to Payne (2014), "Theory and practice resemble a bond which builds knowledge and can be advanced when it’s expected to impact one another" (p. 3). This relationship implies that theoretical knowledge provides a framework within which social workers can analyze situations, recognize patterns, and devise strategies to address the needs of their clients. The importance of this bond is particularly evident in addressing complex cases where clients face multifaceted issues, such as those encountered in family dynamics.
Healy (2014) further reinforces this concept, stating that theories are not only tools for understanding human behavior but also serve to guide the interventions crafted by social workers. By analyzing a client’s situation through various theoretical lenses, social workers can adopt a more holistic view that aids in developing effective interventions (Healy, 2014).

Cognitive Behavioral Practice: Overview and Application

Cognitive Behavioral Practice is a therapeutic framework grounded in the premise that cognitive processes influence behaviors and emotional responses. The essential tenet posits that individuals can change their feelings and behaviors by modifying distorted or negative thoughts (Beck, 2011). Through this approach, social workers can assist clients in recognizing maladaptive thinking patterns and replacing them with healthier, constructive thought processes.
In the case of Erica and her partner Jim, Cognitive Behavioral Practice can be employed to address the multitude of issues they are facing. Jim's recent DUI charge, coupled with financial strain and relational tensions within the home, suggests a pattern of negative thinking that exacerbates his situation. Cognitive-behavioral strategies may help Jim identify and challenge his cognitive distortions, such as "I am a failure because I can't provide for my family," which may contribute to his drinking habits and frustration.

Impact on Family Dynamics

Cognitive Behavioral Practice can be instrumental in transforming family dynamics by fostering healthier communication and emotional support among family members. When individuals within the family unit learn to articulate their thoughts and feelings more openly, it promotes an atmosphere of understanding and respect, which can diffuse tension and build resilience (Payne, 2014). In Erica's case, as she begins to understand her role in the family's emotional landscape, she too can benefit from interventions that teach her coping strategies for managing stress and enhancing her self-efficacy.
As noted by Chaitin and Steinberg (2013), the interplay between individual and collective memories affects how families navigate shared trauma and stress. Therefore, CBP can also guide Erica and Jim in recognizing how their past experiences shape their current behaviors and relationships, further anchoring the social work approach in a contextual understanding of their family’s history.

Critical Analysis of Cognitive Behavioral Practice

While Cognitive Behavioral Practice offers valuable insights for social workers, it is also essential to critically analyze its limitations and the contexts in which it is most effective. One significant critique of CBP relates to its focus on cognition at the potential expense of emotional and situational factors. Critics argue that the framework risks oversimplifying complex emotional hardships (Hollon et al., 2002). In scenarios like that faced by Erica and Jim, it is essential to contextualize their cognitive patterns within broader social and economic circumstances, such as job instability and community issues.
Moreover, the application of CBP requires trained practitioners who can understand the nuances and complexities of clients' experiences. If improperly handled or generalized, the application of cognitive-behavioral strategies may inadvertently alienate clients or fail to address their unique needs adequately (Meek, 2011). Thus, social workers must supplement CBP with other theoretical frameworks and interventions, ensuring a comprehensive approach that holistically addresses the client's situation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the relationship between theory and practice in social work serves as a guiding force for practitioners striving to make meaningful and informed interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Practice, in particular, presents a powerful framework for facilitating change in clients' thought processes and behaviors. In the case of Erica and Jim, employing CBP can illuminate untapped pathways to improved family dynamics as well as individual coping strategies.
However, the applicability of this theory must also be understood within the broader context of social factors that influence client situations. By integrating cognitive-behavioral strategies with a comprehensive understanding of the multiple layers affecting clients, social workers can embark on a more empathetic and effective approach to social work practice, driving toward positive outcomes for individuals and families alike.

References

Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Chaitin, J., & Steinberg, S. (2013). "I can almost remember it now": Between personal and collective memories of massive social trauma. Journal of Adult Development, 21(1), 30-42.
Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hollon, S. D., Thase, M. E., & Markowitz, J. C. (2002). Treatment of depression: A review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 570-578.
Lacey, H., & Rachlin, H. (1978). Behavior, Cognition and Theories of Choice. Behaviorism, 6(2).
Meek, A. (2011). Trauma and media. Retrieved from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
National Institute of Mental Health. (2017). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov
Eriksson, M. (2015). Managing collective trauma on social media: The role of Twitter after the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 365-380.