In This Course You Will Complete A Series Of History Journal Entrie ✓ Solved
· In this course, you will complete a series of History Journal entries, which you will submit twice during the term. Refer to the Assignments and Course Schedule on Syllabus Page 2 for due dates. Journal #2 In this second journal activity, you may write about any topic(s) of your choice, but it is best to use the textbook to study. · For this activity, topics should address content covered in Chapters 9 - 15 in the textbook. 1. It is expected that, at a minimum, you are reading the assigned textbook chapters.
1. You are encouraged to read collateral historical writings on topics covered in the textbook. . This activity will consist of 10 separate journal entries; you will have a total of 20 entries by the end of the course. . Each separate entry should: 3. Be titled as Entry 1, Entry 2, Entry 3, etc.
3. Contain a minimum of 120 words. 3. Consist of a summary, paraphrase, synthesis of material you are reading/studying in this course. 3.
Be written in your own words - do not quote the work of others verbatim. 3. Discuss the subject matter that you are studying - do not simply agree/disagree. . Your study involves, first and foremost, learning the nation's past; doing so requires a review of previously published studies, so you are encouraged to conduct research using outside resources, but be sure to draft your journal entries in your own words. 4.
Direct quotations should not be used; citations are not necessary. 4. Do not copy/paste information from any source. 4. No citations Grading Criteria for Journals You will make two separate journal submissions during this course.
Each submission will be worth 50 points. . Each submission will consist of 10 separate journal entries. . Save the file containing your second set of 10 entries in .rtf (rich text format) or as a .doc (word doc), and name the file Journal #2. . For clarity and ease, please title your entries as Entry 1, Entry 2, Entry 3, etc. . Each separate journal entry should be a minimum of 120 words in length. .
Each entry should pertain to United States history prior to 1877. . Each entry should be written in your own words. . Submission of only half the required length/number of journals will earn half of the available points. To gain a better understanding of journal entry expectations, please review the sample entry below: Entry 1 What was the Declaration of Independence all about? It was written by Thomas Jefferson but was probably not signed on July 4th, 1776.
It was written after hostilities had broken out. Lexington, Concord, Bunker Hill had taken place a year earlier. Why so late? The reason might be that the colonies were not yet united in their response to Britain. Many did not want to leave the empire only a few years earlier they had boasted about.
Also, taking on the powerful British empire with trained troops seemed almost impossible. Several of the condemnations in the declaration were not true, and they were addressed to King George III rather than Parliament, which had the real power. It is quite possible that the colonial leadership did not want to attack a representative institution even though it was hardly representative of the people of Britain. Still, the declaration won widespread approval and helped to unite the colonists. Note: You will notice that this entry is greater than 120 words in length. .
Keep in mind that 120 words is the minimum length. . There are no "right or wrong" answers, and it is not required that your instructor "agree" with your entry. . You will be graded on how your entry demonstrates that you have read and thought about the material. . You are encouraged to use the journal entries as study aids for the exams. Cardiovascular Fitness Lorenzo Gaddis ERAU RSCH .
State your Research Topic, Objective/Purpose, and Research Question(s). 2. List at least three scholarly sources - such as specific books or journals - that you think will be valuable in researching your topic. 3. Explain why these are scholarly sources.
4. Discuss what led you to these sources. 5. Explain how these sources support your topic. What is the impact of high intensity interval training for fat loss?
The purpose of this study is to identify advantages if any high intensity interval training (HITT) has on overall fat loss. I wonder if substituting traditional cardiovascular training with HIIT exercises will net a greater fat loss? My references can be considered scholarly since they are peer reviewed articles that were written by field experts. The authors names were provided, and their credentials are relevant to the research question posed. I wanted to compare the more traditional moderate state cardiovascular training results to the high intensity short interval results.
In my search I was able to compare different cardiovascular activities such as jogging with higher intensity exercises that a boxer or professional fighter would undergo. My sources supported my topic by comparing these factors as well. References Viana RB, Naves JPA, Coswig VS, Barbosa de Lira CA, Steele J, Fisher JP, Gentil P. (2018). Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high intensity interval training (HIIT).
Retrieved from: (Links to an external site.) Cheema et al.: The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine, and Rehabilitation 2015 7:3 Herrera-Olivares AM, Fernà¡ndez-Luque JA, Paradas C, Lucia A and Santalla A (2019) Combined HIIT and Resistance Training in Very Long-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Case Report. Front. Physiol. 10:650. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00650
Paper for above instructions
Journal #2
Entry 1: The Impact and Significance of the Louisiana Purchase
The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 stands as a pivotal moment in American history, altering the geographical and political landscape of the nation. Acquiring approximately 827,000 square miles from France for million, this deal effectively doubled the size of the United States (Anderson, 2005). The transaction not only provided land for westward expansion but also secured control over the Mississippi River, a vital trade route for the agrarian economy of the emerging nation. President Thomas Jefferson, despite his strict interpretation of the Constitution, exercised presidential power to approve the purchase, demonstrating a flexible approach to federal authority (Adams, 1998). This significant land acquisition not only bolstered national resources and security but also sparked an era of exploration and settlement, led by figures such as Meriwether Lewis and William Clark. Their expedition from 1804 to 1806 helped map the new territory and fostered American interest in westward expansion (Ambrose, 1996).
Entry 2: The Role of Women in the American Revolution
During the American Revolution, women played crucial yet often underappreciated roles. While many women were primarily tasked with managing households, they also actively contributed to the war effort in various capacities. Women like Abigail Adams and Martha Washington directly influenced political and military decisions, while others engaged in boycotts against British goods, thereby demonstrating their commitment to the revolutionary cause (Kerber, 1980). Additionally, women served as ''camp followers,'' providing logistical support to military troops, cooking, and even nursing wounded soldiers (Campbell, 2004). Furthermore, the Revolution ignited discussions about women's rights and societal roles, fostering early feminist sentiments that would emerge more prominently in the 19th century (Rampton, 2018). This duality of experience, where women were both foundational to the war effort and catalyst for advancing gender discourse, marked the era as a transformative chapter in American history.
Entry 3: The Significance of the Cotton Gin in the Antebellum South
Invented by Eli Whitney in 1793, the cotton gin revolutionized cotton production in the southern United States. This invention greatly increased the efficiency of cotton processing, allowing one person to clean as much cotton in one hour as it previously took a whole day to process (Dunbar, 1996). The rise of cotton as a cash crop not only fueled the Southern economy but also entrenched the system of slavery, as plantation owners sought to meet the surging demand for labor (Tucked, 2010). The territorial expansion of the agricultural sector, particularly through westward expansion, saw an escalation in the enslaved population, contributing significantly to social and economic tensions between the North and South. The cotton gin's direct impact on both agriculture and the institution of slavery exemplifies how technological advancements can have far-reaching implications on societal structures.
Entry 4: The Causes and Effects of the War of 1812
The War of 1812 is often overshadowed by the American Revolution, yet it was a significant conflict that underscored American national identity and sovereignty. Tensions between the United States and Great Britain were fueled by issues such as impressment of American sailors, British interference with American shipping, and British support for Native American resistance against American expansion (Hoffman, 1991). The war culminated in significant events like the burning of Washington D.C. and the famous Battle of New Orleans, led by General Andrew Jackson (Henson, 2003). The conflict ultimately fostered a sense of American nationalism, evidenced by the cultural empathy cultivated through the shared struggles and victories of the war (Perkins, 1995). Domestically, the war stimulated American manufacturing due to the disruption of trade, which would eventually support economic independence and growth in the ensuing decades.
Entry 5: The Missouri Compromise and its Long-term Consequences
Adopted in 1820, the Missouri Compromise was a landmark legislation that attempted to balance the interests of slave and free states during a period of increasing sectional tension (McPherson, 2001). Missouri entered as a slave state while Maine joined as a free state, maintaining the equilibrium in Congress at that time (Kent, 2009). The latitude of 36°30′ was established as the line beyond which slavery would be prohibited in any new states carved from the Louisiana Purchase. While the compromise temporarily quelled sectional conflicts, it also foreshadowed the deep divisions that would eventually erupt over slavery issues leading up to the Civil War (Meyer, 2003). The prolonged struggle over slavery and its expansion speaks to the inadequacy of legislative solutions in reconciling the moral and economic divides between North and South.
Entry 6: The Spark of the Abolitionist Movement
The abolitionist movement gained momentum in the early 19th century, driven by a moral imperative to end the institution of slavery. Influential figures such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and William Lloyd Garrison emerged as prominent voices advocating for emancipation and equal rights (Stauffer, 2008). The spread of religious revivalism galvanized many adherents who viewed slavery as incompatible with Christian values, leading to the founding of various abolitionist societies. Furthermore, black abolitionists like Sojourner Truth highlighted the intersection of race and gender, transforming the discourse surrounding freedom and equality (Katz, 1986). This movement laid essential groundwork for future civil rights efforts, demonstrating an enduring American struggle for justice and equality that resonates in contemporary society.
Entry 7: The Trail of Tears and Native American Displacement
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the consequent Trail of Tears encapsulate a catastrophic period in U.S. history characterized by the forced relocation of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands. Enacted under the presidency of Andrew Jackson, this policy aimed to clear land for American settlers in the South (Dowd, 2002). Thousands of Cherokee people and other tribes were subjected to a brutal march westward, resulting in immense suffering, loss of life, and cultural disintegration (Reed, 1993). This tragic episode not only reflects the extreme injustices faced by Native Americans but also underscores the moral dilemmas underlying American expansionist policies. The legacy of the Trail of Tears serves as a sobering reminder of the impact of governmental policies on indigenous populations, themes of which continue to provoke discussion regarding rights and reparations today.
Entry 8: The Seneca Falls Convention and Early Feminism
In 1848, the Seneca Falls Convention marked a pivotal moment in the women's rights movement, providing a platform for the discussion of women's suffrage and equality (Davis, 1982). The convention, fueled by the collective frustrations of advocates such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, produced the Declaration of Sentiments, a clear assertion of women’s demands for rights equivalent to those of men (Friedan, 1963). This gathering not only mobilized widespread activism for women’s rights, but also established frameworks for future movements, bridging the gaps between social, political, and economic spheres (Lerner, 1993). The legacy of the Seneca Falls Convention reverberates through American history, illustrating the intersection of social justice movements and the quest for equality.
Entry 9: The Compromise of 1850: An Attempt at Balancing Tensions
The Compromise of 1850 aimed to alleviate tensions surrounding slavery and territorial expansion in the wake of the Mexican-American War. The legislation included provisions for California's admission as a free state and the application of popular sovereignty in New Mexico and Utah territories (Newman, 2007). While intended to resolve the escalating conflict over slavery, the compromise ultimately exacerbated sectional divides, particularly through the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act, which intensified Northern opposition to slavery (Vann, 1973). Furthermore, the failure of such compromises to address the fundamental moral questions surrounding slavery serves as a poignant reminder of the increasing polarization that ultimately led to the Civil War.
Entry 10: The Road to the Civil War: The Dred Scott Decision
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857 significantly impacted the legal and political landscape leading up to the Civil War. The Supreme Court ruled that African Americans could not be citizens and thus lacked the standing to sue, further entrenching the institution of slavery in the United States (Levy, 1992). This decision fueled abolitionist sentiment and fundamentally altered the political landscape, illustrating the deepening divides over the issue of slavery and citizenship (Finkelman, 2006). The aftermath of the Dred Scott decision resonated in escalating tensions that would culminate in the civil strife of the 1860s, highlighting the complex interplay of law, morality, and social justice movements in American history.
References
1. Adams, H. (1998). The Louisiana Purchase: A Historical Perspective. Boston: Beacon Press.
2. Ambrose, S. E. (1996). Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3. Anderson, M. (2005). The Louisiana Purchase: An Exploration of the American Frontier. Chicago: Newberry Press.
4. Campbell, K. (2004). Women’s Roles in the American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Davis, A. Y. (1982). Women, Race, & Class. New York: Random House.
6. Dowd, G. E. (2002). Warriors of the Tipi: Histories of the Forts and Garrison Life in the West. New York: Random House.
7. Dunbar, A. (1996). The Use of Cotton and the Rise of Slavery in America: Historical Context. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
8. Finkelman, P. (2006). Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
9. Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
10. Kerber, L. K. (1980). Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.