Issues Analysispart One1please Choose An Issue From The List Athttps ✓ Solved

ISSUES ANALYSIS PART ONE: 1. Please choose an issue from the list at 2. Complete the organizer below 3. Analyse the rubric before you complete your ‘good copy’ below. 4.

You will need at least TWO NEWS articles for your research. 5. You may choose to work with a partner for this assignment. If you choose this option, you must complete ROW H: Spatial Analysis . Sections in the chart must be equally shared by the partners.

A. ISSUE: Clearly and concisely state the problem/conflict with important reference to where it is taking place. Include specific details. State the problem/conflict precisely. Include who/what the conflict is between, where it is taking place and what is causing the issue.

List and explain 2-3 causes of the issue you have identified. 1. 2. 3. B.

STAKEHOLDER Perspectives - use different stakeholders for each S.E.E.P. category. (individuals, groups, organizations - S.E.E.P.) List 1-2 stakeholders in each box below: 1. State whether the stakeholder benefits OR suffers and why 2. Explain how the stakeholder views the issue 1. SOCIAL 2. ECONOMIC 3.

ENVIRONMENTAL 4. POLITICAL C. INTERRELATIONSHIPS: 1. Circle 1 of these: human-human, human-natural, natural-human 2. How do these systems impact one another in this issue?

D. FUTURES THINKING: PROBABLE FUTURES (if we stay on this current path) Briefly explain what will happen to each stakeholder group? SOCIAL: ECONOMIC: ENVIRONMENTAL: POLITICAL: E. FUTURES THINKING: POSSIBLE FUTURES Propose a solution to match each of the different levels 1.What can you/peers do as individuals living where you do? 2.Why do you think you should do this as a global citizen?

Consider governments on a national and global level. 1.What should politicians and people in positions of power do? 2.Justify why this is the best action at this level for each one. 1. National 2.

Global Summarize the Sustainability connection to these solutions Summarize the Globalization connection to these solutions F. CONCLUSION Assess each of the solutions you proposed and conclude the solution that is most effective to begin implementing how the national and global communities can best participate in taking action. G. Source List (MLA or APA) H. PARTNERED PROJECTS ONLY Complete a spatial analysis of your issue in ONE COUNTRY. You will use the results of this analysis as the example in your presentation.

Paper for above instructions

Issues Analysis: Climate Change and Its Global Implications


A. ISSUE:
The issue addressed in this analysis is climate change, a significant global conflict affecting the entire planet but with particular emphasis on coastal regions, such as the city of Miami, Florida, and areas of Southeast Asia. Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns, primarily driven by human activities such as burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes. These shifts lead to severe weather phenomena, sea-level rise, and disruptions to natural ecosystems.
Causes of Climate Change:
1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The burning of fossil fuels for energy leads to the release of carbon dioxide and methane, the primary contributors to climate change (IPCC, 2021).
2. Deforestation: The clearing of forests for agriculture and urban development reduces carbon absorption, exacerbating atmospheric carbon levels (World Wildlife Fund, 2022).
3. Industrial Processes: Various industrial activities, including cement production and chemical manufacturing, contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation (EPA, 2020).
B. STAKEHOLDER Perspectives
1. Social:
Stakeholders: Coastal Communities and Indigenous Groups
- Benefit/Suffer: These groups suffer due to increased flooding, loss of habitat, and displacement as a result of rising sea levels.
- Perspective: Coastal communities advocate for resiliency and climate adaptation measures to safeguard their homes and lifestyles.
2. Economic:
Stakeholders: Corporations in the Energy Sector (Fossil Fuel Industry vs. Renewable Energy)
- Benefit/Suffer: Traditional fossil fuel companies may face losses due to regulatory changes and a shift toward renewable energy, while renewable energy companies could prosper.
- Perspective: Fossil fuel industries often oppose stringent regulations, arguing that these hurt economic growth, while renewable companies promote their innovations as solutions for sustainable development.
3. Environmental:
Stakeholders: Environmental NGOs (e.g., Greenpeace)
- Benefit/Suffer: Environmental NGOs often suffer due to the ongoing degradation of ecosystems but benefit from increased public awareness and activism opportunities.
- Perspective: These organizations view climate change as an urgent global crisis requiring immediate and coordinated international efforts to protect biodiversity and ecosystems.
4. Political:
Stakeholders: National Governments (e.g., the United States, European Union)
- Benefit/Suffer: Governments face political and social unrest if they fail to address climate change, while those that lead significant initiatives may gain international prestige and political capital.
- Perspective: Governments are divided on climate policies; some advocate for aggressive action to meet Paris Agreement goals, while others call for slower, more economically considerate approaches.
C. INTERRELATIONSHIPS
For this issue, I will circle human-natural interrelationships. Human activities, primarily industrialization and urbanization, are leading to significant alterations within natural ecosystems, thereby affecting climate, weather patterns, and biodiversity. Conversely, these climatic changes, including extreme weather events and rising sea levels, significantly impact human life, particularly in vulnerable communities.
D. FUTURES THINKING: PROBABLE FUTURES
- Social: If current patterns persist, vulnerable social groups will face increased displacement and heightened health risks from climate-related events.
- Economic: The continued reliance on fossil fuels may lead to short-term economic growth, but long-term damage from climate disasters could devastate global economies.
- Environmental: Ecosystems will suffer more extensive damage, leading to biodiversity loss, making it increasingly challenging for nature to recover.
- Political: Political instability and tensions will likely rise as nations struggle to manage the widespread consequences of climate change, resulting in conflict over resources.
E. FUTURES THINKING: POSSIBLE FUTURES
1. Individual-level Action: Individuals can reduce their carbon footprints, promote sustainable practices, and advocate for renewable energy use within their communities.
- Justification: As global citizens, recognizing that personal choices contribute to collective impact promotes social responsibility towards combating climate change.
2. National-level Action: Governments should implement robust policies that promote renewable energy, provide incentives for green technologies, and enforce regulations on emissions.
- Justification: These measures are essential at the national level to align with international climate agreements while transitioning away from fossil dependency, thus ensuring a sustainable future.
3. Global-level Action: Politicians and world leaders should prioritize international collaboration on climate policies, establishing frameworks for accountability and shared goals in emissions reduction.
- Justification: The interconnected nature of climate change necessitates a unified global approach, similar to initiatives like the Paris Agreement, which underscores the importance of cooperative efforts for effective solutions.
Summarizing the Sustainability connection to these solutions underscores the need for an equitable balance between economic development and environmental protection. The Globalization connection emphasizes how interconnected economies and societies can foster collaboration on sustainable innovations that combat climate change effectively.
F. CONCLUSION
In assessing the solutions proposed, it is clear that proactive individual actions, combined with robust national policies and collaborative international efforts, offer the most effective strategy for driving systemic change. A concerted effort towards education, policy-making, and international cooperation will amplify our collective response to climate change and better equip humanity for a sustainable future.
G. Source List
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). "Sixth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2021." Retrieved from [IPCC website].
2. World Wildlife Fund. (2022). "Deforestation: The Significant Impact." Retrieved from [WWF website].
3. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2020). "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions." Retrieved from [EPA website].
4. United Nations. (2020). "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." Retrieved from [UN website].
5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2022). "Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change." Retrieved from [NASA website].
6. Oxfam International. (2017). "Extreme Weather: Climate Change is Here." Retrieved from [Oxfam website].
7. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). "Global Energy Review: CO2 Emissions in 2021." Retrieved from [IEA website].
8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2021). "Climate Change Impacts: Hotter, Wetter, and Wilder." Retrieved from [NOAA website].
9. Earthjustice. (2019). "Climate Change and Public Health." Retrieved from [Earthjustice website].
10. The World Bank. (2020). "Climate Change Action." Retrieved from [World Bank website].
This comprehensive analysis highlights the multifaceted nature of climate change, illustrating the necessary perspectives, relationships, and proactive solutions required to tackle this pressing global issue effectively.