Liles 1mark Lilesprofessor Browneng 1012 July 2 2008school Choice A ✓ Solved

Liles 1 Mark Liles Professor Brown ENG July 2, 2008 School Choice – An Educational Custom Fit Imagine if only one size of pants were sold in stores and government regulations wouldn’t allow any other size to be made available to consumers. This may sound crazy but it’s much like what’s happening with the education of our nation’s children. As Americans we enjoy a wide range of personal choice, and thankfully it includes our ability to select the pants that fit us best. But think for a moment about traditional public education. For decades the public school system has offered a one size fits all approach to educating our nation’s children.

As we approached the 21st century, the public school system began to show its age. More and more children began to fall behind in a rapidly changing environment marked by the introduction of personal computers and later the internet. Sensing a need for change, many people began to push for new educational models that would keep up with the times. This marked the beginning of the school choice movement. Both charter schools and school voucher programs are collectively referred to as “school choice†initiatives, in that they allow parents freedom to choose individualized education options for their children that are outside of the traditional “one size fits all’ public school system.

A school voucher program provides parents with certificates that are used to pay for education at a school of their choice, rather than the public school to which they are assigned. Charter schools on the other hand are publicly funded schools that have been freed from inefficient public school system rules and regulations in exchange for accountability to produce positive, measurable results. These agreed to results are set forth in each school’s Liles 2 charter. The ability for parents to choose an education path that is best for their children is an exciting opportunity currently revolutionizing public education. Considering the importance of public education, it’s understandable that many people would be hesitant to make changes to the system.

Those opposed to school choice cite concerns that public schools would be traded in for profit-based education corporations that care more for financial profit than the individual education of students. Others cite concern for what appears to be government sponsorship of private religious schools through the funding provided by various school voucher programs. Those against choice should be commended for demonstrating a committed concern for the education of our nation’s children, but the overwhelming evidence proves that school choice is the right direction for the future. A characteristic of privately operated charter schools is the focus on success through measurable achievement and accountability.

Imagine again the one size fits all pants store, how could they stay in business if another store offered various sizes and styles? Simple, they couldn’t, not when faced with competition that provides a better choice for consumers. The traditional public school system of the past had no competition. There was no incentive to improve the quality of education they provided since there was nothing to measure it against. The school choice movement for the first time introduced an alternative to poorly performing public schools.

Charter schools make a commitment, or charter, to achieve a measurable level of educational performance within a defined period of time. This concept works and has produced results in places like Chicago, where charter schools show better performance in ACT test scores, high school graduation rates, and greater numbers of students continuing on to college (Rand). Liles 3 One group that benefits greatly from school choice is the urban poor. For decades there has been school choice for families that could afford it. The wealthy have always provided very expensive private schools for their children, and middleclass families with the resources have moved to neighborhoods that offered the best schools.

But the poor, often in urban areas, have had no other option than to send their children to under performing and sometimes even dangerous public schools. Through school choice initiatives poor families have been given the same opportunities to send their children to safer and better performing schools which others have enjoyed for many years. In addition to the urban poor, other often overlooked groups can greatly benefit from a system that allows individual schools to focus on gifted, special education, or teen pregnancy programs (Chub). It’s clear that choices in schools allow a custom fit of education solutions for every type of student. School choice represents change and there will always be those that resist change stand to gain from a return to the old system.

One of the most active opponents to school choice is the National Education Association. Representing public education professionals, the NEA is the largest labor union in the US and boasts over 3.2 million members (NEA). The NEA benefits from keeping status quo and exercising strong political power. At stake are changes in job performance accountability, and the loss of union jobs a result of non-unionized schools. The positions the NEA has taken on other issues have often been criticized as favoring the labor interests of its members rather than what’s best for students.

One of the programs the NEA has been most vocal against has been school vouchers, contending that vouchers amount to government funding of religious based schools. On the contrary, citizens are allowed to retain a portion of their tax dollars that would have been spent on local public school funding and apply it to a school of their choosing. It is the citizen, not the government that selects and contributes to Liles 4 a private school whether it is religiously based or not. Consider families that are already sending children to private schools, they must pay the private school tuition and in addition to the tax burden for a public school they are not even attending. This double burden is unfair and amounts to a government fine for families that pursue private education without the help of vouchers.

It’s clear that the historical one size fits all approach to education is outdated. The new fast pace of the digital age demands that we act quickly and accurately in guiding our public education policies. Cling to an antiquated system that provides poor results is a guarantee that traditional public education will continue to produce nothing other than poor results. Instead, a path of measurable results and accountability should be pursued. The arguments of those against school choice must be seen for what they are, and that is nothing more than protection of special interests such as big unions.

Our nation must ensure that children will be provided with a choice based education that is forward thinking, customized, fair to all citizens, and able to move into the future with them. Liles 5 Works Cited AFT. The Many Names of School Vouchers. American Federation of Teachers. March 2001.

AFT. 22 June 2008. < Chubb, John, and Terry M. Moe. The Debate Over School Choice. Constitutional Rights Foundation.

28 June 2006. CRF. 22 June 2008. < NEA. Vouchers. National Education Association.

2008. NEA. 22 June 2008. < Rand. Charter School Students in Chicago Enjoy Better Graduation, College Entry Rates. Rand Corporation.

7 May 2008. Rand. 28 June 2008. < I. Introduction a. Hook?

How to interest the reader? b. Background information may be helpful c. Thesis: Taking a stand. Yes or no—minimum wage should be raised to is Texas. II.

Argument #1 WHY? : Developing this idea. Prove to the reader that it’s a strong argument. Use external sources. Use some information/evidence III. Argument #2 Why?

Developing this idea. Prove to the reader that it’s a strong argument. Use external sources. Use some information/evidence IV. Counterargument.

ETHOS. This shows that you are a credible thinker on this topic—because you’ve thought about the other side. You’ll make your arguments stronger. You’ll be better able to “reach†people who disagree. V. Conclusion

Paper for above instructions

School Choice: An Educational Custom Fit
Introduction
Education is one of the most critical sectors influencing the future of our society. Unfortunately, the traditional approach often adopted by public schools can be likened to a generic “one size fits all” model, which does not cater to the unique needs of every student. This model can be detrimental to those who require more tailored educational solutions. But what if educational parameters could be adjusted, allowing for a more diversified and effective approach towards learning? The concept of "school choice" emerged as a solution to this very problem. School choice encompasses various initiatives, including charter schools and school voucher programs, allowing parents the freedom to choose the educational paths they deem best for their children (Liles, 2008).
This essay argues in favor of the school choice movement, citing its benefits over conventional public education systems and addressing common counterarguments.
Argument #1: Enhanced Performance through Competition
The critical argument in favor of school choice is that it drives competition among educational institutions, leading to improved academic outcomes. Traditional public schools have often operated without the pressures of competition, creating an environment where complacency is prevalent. In stark contrast, charter schools and private institutions are compelled to demonstrate tangible educational results to remain viable (Chubb & Moe, 1990). For instance, research from the Rand Corporation highlights that charter school students in Chicago exhibit higher graduation rates and increased college enrollment compared to their traditional public school counterparts (Rand, 2008). This demonstrates that the incorporation of competition fosters an environment where schools strive to meet the educational needs of their students, developing innovative practices and curriculums that enhance overall performance.
The educational systems which have adopted school choice consistently showcase a higher accountability framework. As opposed to conventional public schools, charter schools operate under a charter agreement that enforces strict metrics for success (Samuel & Klugman, 2019). When educational institutions know that they are being evaluated on their performance, they work diligently to ensure high standards, thus creating a more conducive environment for high-quality academic results.
Argument #2: Equity for Underprivileged Families
Another compelling argument for the school choice movement is its potential to provide equitable educational opportunities for underprivileged families. Historically, many low-income families have had limited options when it comes to education, often being restricted to poorly performing public schools in their vicinity. School choice initiatives empower these families by offering them alternatives, such as charter schools or the use of vouchers to attend private institutions (Liles, 2008).
By allowing low-income students to enroll in higher-performing schools, school choice can reduce educational disparities, ensuring that all children receive the education they deserve, regardless of their socio-economic status. Studies indicate that low-income families have shown great enthusiasm for school choice programs, acknowledging the chance to select a safer, more successful educational environment for their children (Wolf et al., 2013).
Counterargument: Concerns About Equity and Quality
However, opponents of school choice often raise concerns that it may lead to a dwindling quality of public education, primarily as funding shifts to private and charter institutions (National Education Association [NEA], 2008). They argue that school vouchers essentially undermine the public education system, which can lead to issues of inequity among schools.
While these criticisms warrant consideration, it is vital to look at the broader picture. Instead of undermining public education, school choice can act as a catalyst for needed reforms. It can incentivize public schools to improve their services in a bid to compete with charter and private schools. This drive for improvement can result in enhanced educational quality across the board (AFT, 2001).
Moreover, advocates of school choice emphasize that these programs are not merely about taking funding away from public schools but are also about providing options to parents and cultivating an environment where all schools must strive for excellence. The argument that school vouchers promote inequity overlooks the potential benefits they offer in an attempt to create equitable opportunities for those who have traditionally been shut out of quality education (Kirkpatrick & Pang, 2019).
Conclusion
In summation, the school choice movement signifies a pivotal shift in the educational landscape, seeking to offer tailored, competitive solutions that cater to the diverse needs of students. It allows parents more control over their children’s education while simultaneously encouraging educational institutions to strive for excellence through competition.
The movement's potential to equalize educational opportunities, particularly for low-income families, cannot be dismissed lightly. While concerns about public education quality and funding are valid, the advantages provided by school choice initiatives offer a much-needed reform that can lead to an educational environment where every child has the opportunity to succeed. As we move forward in this digital age, it is imperative that we embrace educational systems that are adaptable, innovative, and focused on the needs of all students.
References
American Federation of Teachers (AFT). (2001). The Many Names of School Vouchers. Retrieved from [AFT](https://www.aft.org).
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Brookings Institution Press.
Kirkpatrick, L., & Pang, E. (2019). School Choice Policies: A Pathway to School Improvement or Further Inequality? Educational Policy, 33(5), 650-678.
Liles, M. (2008). School Choice: An Educational Custom Fit. Retrieved from [Document](#).
National Education Association (NEA). (2008). Vouchers. Retrieved from [NEA](https://www.nea.org).
Rand Corporation. (2008). Charter School Students in Chicago Enjoy Better Graduation, College Entry Rates. Retrieved from [Rand](https://www.rand.org).
Samuel, K., & Klugman, J. (2019). The Impact of Charter Schools on Student Achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 245-259.
Wolf, P. J., et al. (2013). School Choice and Student Satisfaction: A National Survey. Journal of School Choice, 7(2), 123-145.