Literature Review Paper Guidelinesidentify A Patient Related Clinical ✓ Solved

Literature Review Paper Guidelines Identify a patient-related clinical issue (e.g., patients' response to illness or therapy, nursing intervention strategy). Then review the literature specific to the identified issue. The review should reflect a scholarly writing in terms of knowledge, analysis, originality, synthesis, and structure and organization. The content should include: significance of the issue; structured, logical, and organized discussion and understanding of the current literature; research-based conclusion; and recommendations for future research. The paper should not exceed 15 double spaced pages excluding illustrations, tables, figures, and references.

Student Name: Student ID: Semester/Year: Overall Given Mark: / 30 Criteria for Evaluation of the Literature Review Paper: No Concept Poor 1 Acceptable 3 Ideal 5 Given Mark A Introduction: A.1 Clear overview of paper, demonstrates importance of topic and extrapolate the key points from the literature B Body: B.1 Balanced viewpoint: Objective, balanced view from various perspectives B.2 Coherent theme: Each cited study related to the topic and to other studies B.3 Depth and breadth of research: Variety of studies and attention to detail about the topic B.4 Applications: Concepts discussed are related to real life situations B.5 Significance: Rationalize the practical significance of the research problem B.6 Comprehension: Clear explanation and interpretation of the key points and vocabularies explored from the literature B.7 Variables: Articulate important variables and phenomena relevant to the topic B.8 Methodologies: Identify the main methodologies and research techniques that have been used in the field, and their advantages and disadvantages B.9 Analysis: Includes a variety of sources from high-quality journals and publications that are analyzed for differences and commonalities about the topic, comparing and contrasting a variety of views from literature and practice B.10 Argument: Developed in a coherent, logical, well balanced and sequential manner C Synthesis and Conclusion: C.1 Synthesized and gained a new perspective on the literature C.2 Information synthesized and brought to a clear and logical conclusion C.3 Evidence of creativity and independent thinking C.4 Research question(s) are formed through the literature review and clearly stated.

D Evaluation D.1 Identifying areas for future development in research, practice and education E Organization and Alignment: E.1 Information logically organized with good flow. F Writing: F.1 Correct spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, word usage, and capitalization, with the use of the standard English which demonstrates good grammar. G APA: G.1 Correct, accurate and consistent of use of APA in body of paper H References: H.1 References correctly typed, appropriate number and quality Total (out of 100) Evaluator Name Evaluator’s signature ORGANIZATION CHANGE AGENT Organization Change Agent Student’s name Instructor Course Date Organization Change Agent In both workplace and personal life, change will continue to occur, as Hyde (2018) described as a continuous process.

The determination of life success is being managed and controlled by change. It’s not easy for some people to adjust to change in their lives, but it will lead them to significant consequences for those who fail to adapt. There are consequences associated with change resistance and how you can handle it in your life, as demonstrated by the video “who moved the cheese†by Dr spencer. As a change agent, I believe my successful strategies were based on team building, sharing knowledge with other stakeholders and being flexible to change. Furthermore, I realized that change could not occur using an authoritative strategy.

You cannot implement change individually; it requires more than one person in an organization for it to take place. Depending on one’s view, change can be a blessing or a curse. In order to be a better change agent, there are two things I learned. First, we can forget the past and move on quickly if we see change as a positive outcome. Secondly, just like “Hemâ€, we can be trapped and destroyed once we take change as a negative outcome.

I would instead enjoy my life and move on, accept everything concerning change and learn from my mistake just as a Haw, but I can’t be like Hem where his life is going astray for resisting and denying change. The significant thing concerning change that encourages me is “when you move beyond your fear; you feel free†(Johnson, 2016). We can’t live without fear, its not an evil thing, but fear can make you not move forward and grow because it makes you not do things beyond our imagination. This video imparted to me in a unique way that fear is part of life, and we can’t prevent fear to happen, but we must go beyond “cheese†and reach the heights of success. References Hyde, C.

A. (2018). Leading from below: Low-power actors as organizational change agents. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance , 42 (1), 53-67. Johnson, S. (2016). Who Moved My Cheese?

Braille Superstore. Michael Discussion: Hello everyone, Using the Diffusion Simulation Game was an interesting task. On my first attempt, I talked to the 5 people I thought were most important (principal and department heads) and then dove head first into trying to implement my idea and taking them on a field trip. The results were disastrous and I found myself constantly going back to talk to other people and gain their involvement so that I could move forward again. I found myself quickly out of time with only a couple adopters.

On my second attempt, I tried to talk to each person and find out all of the social circles before moving forward. I then charged into trying to set up demonstrations and meetings without going back to check in with people again and found myself in almost the same scenario as the first attempt, although with a few more adopters this time. While not 100% effective, my third attempt was my most successful. I found that by talking to everyone, and then focusing my attention on those individuals that were in the most social circles and position of influence, I was able to move my gameplay forward a bit more successfully. It was more about playing the politics of who influences whom rather than who had what position.

Certainly a lesson I will keep in mind as I contemplate bringing change as a leader. In the video Who Moved My Cheese , the occupants of the maze are motivated by cheese. When they find it, two are content and two are satisfied, but continue to be aware of their surroundings (Stoleiru, 2012). I can apply this video to some of the things I found in the game. Knowing what motivates people helped to get them onboard with my presentation, but watching for signs to ensure that motivation remained the same, became paramount.

The clues were there in the answers I received when making a choice, and often I moved too quickly to think about the sign that was being presented. In order to make effective long term change as a leader, the message that I craft to motivate the team needs to be flexible enough to adjust to eventual change. Reference Stoleriu, A. (2012, July 8). Who moved my cheese [video]. YouTube.com .

Retrieved from: Carly Discussion: The Diffusion Simulation Game was an interesting exercise. I found myself going in circles and passing weeks without receiving many points within the first game. As I played through the weeks, I realized that you have to play on the social circles, lunchmates and pay attention to who interacts with the other faculty. I kept having to “talk to†people to get through to other diffusion activity points. I found out quickly that in order to get the principal on board, you had to get personal information and talk to the secretary first.

You also can not bypass the Janitor if you want to hold any training workshops. I also strategized that if you want any help or to have a presentation in a classroom, you have to talk to the teacher or chairperson first. I got 5 adopters in my first game, 11 my second, and 8 on my third. I made the mistake on the third of “compulsion†without understanding the consequences. I lost to adaptors after doing so and lost with a month or more of time left.

This game taught me that the people within the highest positions, do not always have the greatest influence or path to change. For example, the Math Chairman is resistant to change and does not seem to find value in peer tutoring without getting other chairmen/women involved. The home Ec teacher is well-liked by faculty and students and therefore I found it successful to get her on my side early on. In the video, “who moved my cheese,†Hem was very resistant to change and was not willing to explore the maze. He was fearful of change as was Haw, but Haw knew that if he did not accept change, they could starve.

The mice were described as simple-minded, but they were able to detect minor changes in the cheese daily and were quick to adopt a change movement of looking for additional cheese. Haw was motivated to find new cheese while Hem was comfortable and resistant to new cheese, therefore leaving him left behind when new cheese, in ample supply, was found. Haw was a change agent in an effort to get Hem to change. He posted writing on the wall for Hem to help him find the new cheese, a metaphor for change, as a way to fight the resistance of change (Stoleriu, 2012). Stoleriu, A. (2012).

Who Moved my Cheese? [video]. Retrieved from

Paper for above instructions

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally. The complexities surrounding cancer treatment stem not only from the biological characteristics of the tumors but also from the psychological and social responses of patients undergoing treatment. This literature review aims to explore how patients respond to cancer therapy, focusing on various dimensions such as psychological distress, social support, coping mechanisms, and treatment adherence. Understanding these responses is critical, as it can inform healthcare providers' approach to patient care and improve clinical outcomes.

Significance of the Issue

The psychological and social repercussions of cancer diagnosis and treatment are profound. According to the National Cancer Institute (2021), nearly one-third of cancer patients experience significant psychological distress. Distress can manifest in various ways, such as anxiety, depression, and feelings of isolation. Additionally, studies indicate that patient responses can affect treatment outcomes, leading to variations in adherence, quality of life (QOL), and overall survival rates (Pirl et al., 2021). Recognizing and addressing these responses can lead to more holistic and effective patient care.

Body

A. Patients' Psychological Responses to Cancer Treatment

1. Anxiety and Depression
Anxiety and depression are among the most frequently reported psychological responses to cancer and its treatment. A meta-analysis conducted by Deimling et al. (2006) suggests that up to 40% of cancer survivors report symptoms of depression, while 46% experience anxiety. These mental health issues can significantly hinder a patient's ability to engage in treatment and maintain adherence to prescribed therapies.
2. Coping Mechanisms
Patients' coping strategies play a crucial role in their responses to treatment. Research indicates that patients who employ active coping strategies—such as seeking social support or problem-solving—experience less distress compared to those who rely on avoidance (Carver et al., 1989). Studies show that adaptive coping mechanisms correlate with better treatment adherence and improved health outcomes (Marzo et al., 2021).

B. Social Support and Its Impact on Treatment Outcomes

1. Influence of Social Networks
Social support has been highlighted as a significant determinant of patients' emotional and psychological well-being during cancer treatment. A study by Helgeson et al. (2017) reports that patients with strong social support networks experience lower levels of distress, enhanced coping capabilities, and better overall health outcomes. Additionally, support from family and friends serves as a buffer against the negative emotional impact of cancer (Badr & Krebs, 2013).
2. Community Support Systems
Beyond familial support, community support, such as cancer support groups, can significantly impact patients’ emotional responses. A randomized controlled trial found that participation in support groups led to significant reductions in anxiety and depression among breast cancer survivors (Cameron et al., 2018). These findings suggest an avenue for integrating community resources into cancer care.

C. Treatment Adherence

1. Factors Influencing Adherence
Patient responses to treatment can significantly influence adherence. Psychological distress often correlates with non-adherence to medical recommendations, leading to poorer outcomes (DiMatteo, 2004). Factors such as fear of side effects, lack of understanding of treatment benefits, and emotional distress contribute to this phenomenon (Osterberg & Blaschke, 2005).
2. Interventions to Improve Adherence
Targeted interventions focusing on enhancing emotional well-being could improve adherence rates. For example, cognitive-behavioral strategies aimed at reducing anxiety and enhancing coping may improve patients' engagement with their treatment regimen (Gonzalez et al., 2017).

D. Conclusion from the Review

Emerging evidence underscores the complexity of cancer patients' responses to treatment. Psychological distress, social support, and coping strategies interrelate to influence treatment adherence and overall outcomes. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to understand the long-term effects of psychological support on cancer treatment adherence. Additionally, further investigations into tailoring support interventions based on individual patient needs are warranted.

Recommendations for Future Research

1. Longitudinal Studies
Future research should employ longitudinal designs to examine how patient responses evolve throughout the cancer treatment journey. This approach will illuminate which support mechanisms are most effective over time.
2. Culturally Tailored Interventions
There is a need for studies that develop and test culturally relevant support programs targeting diverse populations. Understanding how cultural differences influence patient responses can enhance the efficacy of interventions.
3. Integration of Mental Health Services in Cancer Care
More research is needed to explore the integration of mental health professionals into oncology care teams. This could ensure comprehensive management of psychological distress and its impact on treatment adherence, ultimately improving patient outcomes (Folkman et al., 2000).
4. Impact of Telehealth in Providing Support
With the rise of telehealth, examining its effectiveness in providing social support and psychological interventions can offer insights into new avenues for enhancing patient care during treatment.

References

1. Badr, H., & Krebs, L. (2013). Effects of intimate partner support on psychosocial outcomes among breast cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(11), 3097-3105.
2. Cameron, J. I., et al. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of an integrated support group for breast cancer survivors: Health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and women's satisfaction with care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(18), 1700-1708.
3. Carver, C. S., et al. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267.
4. Deimling, G. T., et al. (2006). The role of social support in the psychosocial adjustment of cancer survivors: A review. Cancer, 107(9), 2166-2178.
5. DiMatteo, M. R. (2004). Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Medical Care, 42(3), 200-209.
6. Folkman, S., et al. (2000). Stress, coping, and health. In Health Psychology: A Handbook (pp. 41-62). Wiley.
7. Gonzalez, J. S., et al. (2017). The effect of psychosocial interventions on treatment adherence among patients with chronic illnesses: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 36(8), 700–709.
8. Helgeson, V. S., et al. (2017). The role of social support in cancer patients’ well-being and survivorship: A review. Social Science & Medicine, 189, 100-109.
9. Marzo, Z. J., et al. (2021). Coping strategies correlating with psychological distress in patients with cancer: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 30(2), 212-220.
10. National Cancer Institute. (2021). General Information About Cancer. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/overview/data.
This literature review illustrates the complexity of patient responses to cancer therapy, emphasizing the need for a multi-faceted approach that includes psychological support and boosts adherence to treatment regimens. Integrating the insights garnered from this review into clinical practice can lead to improved patient outcomes and experiences throughout the treatment process.