Mcmillen M 2012 I Need To Feel Your Touch Allowing Newborns And ✓ Solved

MCMILLEN, M. (2012). I NEED TO FEEL YOUR TOUCH: ALLOWING NEWBORNS AND INFANTS CONTACT VISITATION WITH JAILED PARENTS. University Of Illinois Law Review, 2012(5), . It seems this source is arguing that lack of contact visitation for young children, infants, and parents, can lead to developmental, emotional issues, and increased risk to be incarcerated as adults for the children. It also argues that lack of contact can increase risks of recidivism for the incarcerated parent.

This source is using this evidence to support that argument, other articles that are written on the topic, case law, and other studies done. I believe this source has done a good job supporting its arguments because each point that was made was supported by evidence and the article also presents why jails do not have more contact visitation. My problem is jails stoping contact visitation is harmful to an inmates mental health. This is my intended argument: That decreased contact with children is harmful to both child and parent. I think this source will be very helpful in supporting my argument because it shows how lack of contact causes mental health issues for the child.

I think this source will support my other sources because it shows the reasons why it is so harmful. Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2013). Blessed Be the Social Tie That Binds: The Effects of Prison Visitation on Offender Recidivism [article]. Criminal Justice Policy Review, (3), 271. It seems this source is arguing the link between visitation and recidivism rates.

This source is using this evidence to support that argument: a study they completed from following over 16,000 incarcerated people in Minnesota Department of Corrections. They also used statics and results from other studies that have been done. I believe the source did a good job supporting its argument. They used multiple standards to measure results, including frequency of visits and who the visitors were to the inmate. They also followed inmate for 5 years post-release.

My problem is that lack of visitation increases recidivism rates. My argument is that visitation with loved ones decreases an inmate's likelihood that he/she will re-offend upon release. I think this source will support my article because it focuses on different measures and how it affected the inmates on release. I think this source will support my other sources because it shows the different effects of family visitation on an inmates success. De Claire, K., & Dixon, L. (2017).

The Effects of Prison Visits From Family Members on Prisoners’ Well-Being, Prison Rule Breaking, and Recidivism. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 18(2), . doi:10.1177/ This source is arguing that visitation has a positive impact on inmates. This source is using studies and research from 1991 to current. I believe this source did a good job supporting its argument because it used a variety of sources and studies that all showed consistent results. My intended argument is the same as my problem, lack of visitation increases risk of recidivism rates.

The argument I will be addressing in my essay is that frequent contact visitation is beneficial to an inmate and their loved one's well-being. It decreases recidivism rates. My major is Criminal Justice with a focus on corrections. The field of work I'd like to pursue is inmate advocacy. This argument is central to that work.

A person contact with their family is critical to their success inside and outside of prison. Reduced recidivism rates also increase public safety. My first key point is that contact visitation is critical for children of incarcerated parents. This point supports my main argument because lack of contact with parents has shown increased mental health issues. My second key point is that visitation decreases recidivism rates.

Reduced recidivism also means an increase in community safety. My third key point lack of contact from loved ones can cause depression and other mental health issues. My audience will be the general public. I think my biggest challenge will be changing peoples preconceived judgments towards inmates. Many people have a belief in the old saying "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time." There is also a belief that visitation is a privilege and not a human right.

My goal with this essay to show why visits should be considered a right instead of a privilege. I would also like to show how this issues affects more than the inmate and affects the children, spouses and also the community. I think this essay will need to be supported by studies and research on the issue. I also think this essay will have to have an emotional element in order to change deeply embedded beliefs about the topic. The Effects of Prison Visits From Family Members on Prisoners’ Well-Being, Prison Rule Breaking, and Recidivism is an article that examines visitation on inmates mental health.

It also looks at visitation and recidivism. This source supports two of my key points. My second source is Blessed Be the Social Tie That Binds: The Effects of Prison Visitation on Offender Recidivism. This article focuses solely on how maintaining contact and strengthing family bonds decreases recidivism. My third source is I Need to Feel Your Touch: Allowing Newborns and Infants Contact Visitation with Jailed Parents.

This article goes into the emotional, mental and developmental effect on a child who is limited contact with their incarcerated parent. I think receiving feedback from an outside party can improve my writing because it can point strengths and weaknesses I may not notice. It can also improve my writing because it provides a different perspective about what I have written. That feedback can be used to strength parts of my paper. A different perspective can also give me different ideas to add or revise elements to better appeal to my audience.

Please read the writing plan provided and evaluate to answer the questions. Please provide the Number of the question in which the answer belongs to. Thank you Review the Writing Plans your peers posted on the Discussion Forum. Copy and paste their Writing Plan and annotations to another document for reference, then workshop them in the space below. 1.

In your own words, identify the argument of your peer's persuasive essay. What is he or she aiming to prove? 2. Has your peer adequately addressed opposing viewpoints? 3.

Which of the summaries (or which sections of the summaries) could use more clarification? How could your peer's summaries be improved? Please paste an example and, if appropriate, offer your own edits. 4. Has your peer provided adequate credentialing information?

If so, how can you tell the source is credible? If not, what could your peer add to establish the reliability of the source? 5. Do the sources your peer describes in the annotated bibliography connect to his/her argument in a clear and easy-to-understand manner? If so, how so?

If not, what are some ways in which your peer could strengthen those connections? 6. Does your peer acknowledge a counterargument in one of the annotations? If a counterargument is presented, does he/she provide a persuasive rebuttal? If no counterargument is presented, can you anticipate some of the objections your peer should take into consideration?

7. Evaluate the sources your peer has selected. Which sources do you find to be the strongest? Why do you think they are strong, and how do they support your peer's key points? Are there ways the sources could support those key points that your peer has overlooked? Be specific.

Paper for above instructions

Assignment Response: Evaluating the Argument on Contact Visitation for Incarcerated Parents

Introduction

The topic of contact visitation for incarcerated parents and its implications on their children and recidivism rates is both significant and complex. The argument presented in the writing plan revolves around the assertion that decreased contact with children is detrimental to both the incarcerated parent and the child, optimizing opportunities for negative emotional and mental health outcomes. This essay dissects the main argument and evaluates the supporting points while providing recommendations for improvement based on a detailed analysis of the writing plan.

1. Argument Identification

The author of the writing plan aims to argue that the lack of contact visitation for incarcerated parents negatively affects both the emotional and developmental well-being of their children and the mental health of the parents. The argument posits that enhancing opportunities for contact visitation can lower recidivism rates, resulting in broader benefits for public safety and community cohesion.

2. Addressing Opposing Viewpoints

The writing plan does not adequately address opposing viewpoints that may contest the necessity of contact visitation. This aspect is crucial given the prevalent public sentiment that views visitation as a privilege or an earned right rather than a fundamental need. By not recognizing these opposing perspectives, the argument may seem one-sided and less persuasive. To strengthen the argument, the author could incorporate counterarguments that suggest concerns related to security, disciplinary issues in prisons, or the belief that visitation can unduly privilege inmates compared to individuals who are law-abiding citizens.

3. Clarification of Summaries

Some sections of the summaries could use more clarity, particularly in explaining how each source contributes to the main argument. For instance, the summary of McMillen's work could more explicitly detail what specific mental health issues arise from enforced separation, offering quantitative studies where possible to provide a clearer understanding of the stakes involved (McMillen, 2012). The writing could benefit from integrating clearer transitions between summaries and offering context on how these sources collectively advocate for reform in visitation policies.

4. Credentialing of Information

The writing plan includes references to credible studies and articles from peer-reviewed journals which strengthens the credentialing of the argument. McMillen (2012), De Claire and Dixon (2017), and Duwe and Clark (2013) present significant findings that are likely useful. The credibility can be established through their use of statistics, empirical studies, and an extensive review of literature on the subject matter. However, to further bolster the argument, the writing plan could indicate the qualifications of the researchers and their affiliations, which would add weight to the presented claims.

5. Connection of Sources to Argument

The sources listed do connect to the argument in a clear manner, primarily bearing on the detrimental effects of limited contact visitation on both inmates and their families. McMillen (2012) focuses specifically on the developmental issues faced by children, thus serving as a foundational argument for the essay. Meanwhile, De Claire and Dixon (2017) support the assertion that visitation impacts inmates' well-being significantly, reiterating the connection to improved mental health and reduced recidivism rates. Enhanced linking phrases can be utilized to connect these sources more fluidly to the main argument, demonstrating a cohesive narrative.

6. Counterargument Acknowledgment

The writing plan does not include an acknowledgment of counterarguments, which is crucial in strengthening its persuasiveness. As the essay develops, the author must anticipate and respond to potential objections — for example, concerns regarding security within prison environments or arguments asserting that visitation may distract from rehabilitation. Addressing these concerns directly can provide a more balanced view, thus reinforcing the validity of the primary argument.

7. Evaluation of Selected Sources

The sources selected by the author are robust and align well with the principal argument concerning the importance of visitation. Notably, McMillen (2012) effectively highlights developmental risks to children, while De Claire and Dixon (2017) provide a nuanced perspective on overall inmate well-being and institutional behavior. These sources reinforce the argument that maintaining family ties is essential and presents empirical evidence linking it to lower odds of recidivism (Duwe & Clark, 2013). However, the writing plan could additionally benefit from including perspectives on economic and social costs associated with incarceration to create a fuller picture of the repercussions surrounding visitation policies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the writing plan presents a compelling argument regarding the importance of contact visitation, there are avenues for improvement that could enhance its persuasiveness. By addressing opposing viewpoints, enriching the summaries with clearer connections to the main argument, acknowledging counterarguments, and reinforcing the sources employed, the author can present a more comprehensive and robust analysis of the subject. The overarching goal to advocate for reform in visitation policies is commendable, and the writing plan has the potential to contribute significantly to discussions around inmate reform and family integrity.

References

- De Claire, K., & Dixon, L. (2017). The Effects of Prison Visits From Family Members on Prisoners’ Well-Being, Prison Rule Breaking, and Recidivism. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 18(2).
- Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2013). Blessed Be the Social Tie That Binds: The Effects of Prison Visitation on Offender Recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review.
- McMillen, M. (2012). I Need to Feel Your Touch: Allowing Newborns and Infants Contact Visitation with Jailed Parents. University Of Illinois Law Review.
Note: The in-text citations correspond to the references listed.