Mgmt 3304 Course Presentation Guidelinesoverviewthe Final Project For ✓ Solved

MGMT 3304: Course Presentation Guidelines Overview The final project for this course is a presentation analyzing an organization that has been in the news for what is perceived to be questionably legal and possibly unethical conduct. The final product represents an authentic demonstration of competency, as students will present their analysis of the legal and ethical issues involved as well as evaluate and make recommendations that should be put into place to stop such activities. Main Elements Choose a company brought into the news for some questionable activity (within the past 8 years). Try browsing Google using key words such as “corporate scandal†or “corporate fraud†for possible companies.

Please write a one or two page introduction about the company you choose and a one-page summary of the incident in question. Provide a 4-6 page written analysis, in addition to the summary, of the legal and ethical issues that are involved. Based on the findings, you will evaluate what these legal and ethical implications may be and what types of laws or regulations you would recommend be put into place in order for this not to happen again in the future. (For example, some activities may be legal but not ethical; if this is the case, what regulations and laws would you put into place to stop this from happening again in the future?) As part of the discussion, include how business leaders can encourage their companies to act ethically, and how duty-based ethical standards differ from outcome-based ethical standards and the applicability of either to your chosen company.

At this point, the paper should include the revised introduction and your analysis and conclusion for submission (a maximum of 10 pages). DO NOT PLAGIARIZE! Final Presentation In the final days, you will submit your final presentation to the discussion board. It should be a complete, polished artifact that has been built upon your summary and analyses. Develop the slide presentation based on the representations in your paper.

There is a maximum of 12 slides Slide Presentations Principles of an Effective Presentation • You may utilize a product such as Microsoft’s PowerPoint or Google Presentation to create your presentations. • There are various template designs that you can find on the web for your presentation. Consider your presentation from the perspective of your audience prior to selecting a specific style. • Each slide should include your key point(s). Do not place large blocks of text on the visual. Your presentation is not a means of presenting a short paper. In an actual presentation you would not “read†from your slides but rather use them as prompts. • Any notes or narration you would use in delivering this presentation to a group should be listed in the “notes†section of the slide. • References should be listed at the bottom of the slide in slightly smaller text, or on a final reference page. Be sure to include all! • Use clip art, AutoShapes, pictures, charts, tables, and diagrams to enhance but not overwhelm your content.

Paper for above instructions

Analysis of the Boeing 737 MAX Crashes: Legal and Ethical Implications

Introduction to Boeing

The Boeing Company, one of the largest aerospace companies globally, has been a pivotal player in the aviation industry since its founding in 1916. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Boeing operates through several business units, including Commercial Airplanes, Defense, Space & Security, and Global Services, and employs over 150,000 people worldwide (Boeing, 2023). The company is renowned for its innovative aircraft designs and is a leader in both commercial and military aviation sectors. However, Boeing found itself embroiled in controversy following two tragic accidents involving its 737 MAX aircraft in 2018 and 2019, leading to the deaths of 346 individuals. The incidents raised significant questions regarding the company's ethical practices, transparency, and adherence to aviation regulations and safety protocols (Gelles & Kessler, 2019). This analysis aims to explore the legal and ethical issues surrounding Boeing's conduct, the implications of these issues, and to recommend measures that could prevent similar incidents in the future.

Summary of the Incident

The Boeing 737 MAX accidents were precipitated by faults in the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), designed to enhance the aircraft's stability and control. The first crash occurred on October 29, 2018, when Lion Air Flight 610 plunged into the Java Sea shortly after takeoff from Jakarta, Indonesia. Five months later, on March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed shortly after lift-off from Addis Ababa, claiming the lives of all 157 aboard. Investigations revealed that the MCAS erroneously activated, forcing the aircraft into a nose-dive, despite pilots’ efforts to regain control (Laris, 2019).
In the aftermath, it was discovered that Boeing had not fully disclosed critical information about the MCAS system to airlines and pilots, and regulatory authorities had not adequately scrutinized its safety features. The FAA, which is responsible for the certification of new aircraft, received criticism for its reliance on Boeing’s internal assessments, raising questions about regulatory oversight and the adequacy of safety protocols (O’Connell, 2019). The 737 MAX was grounded globally in March 2019, leading to an extended crisis for Boeing, including financial losses and reputational damage.

Legal and Ethical Analysis

The incidents involving the Boeing 737 MAX highlight serious legal and ethical dimensions that merit thorough examination.
Legal Implications
1. Regulatory Compliance: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is tasked with ensuring that all aircraft meet stringent safety standards before entering service. Boeing’s failure to disclose essential information about the MCAS raises legal questions surrounding compliance with aviation regulations and oversight protocols. The blurred boundaries of regulatory authorities with commercial interests necessitate reform to ensure enforcement of safety standards (Richardson, 2020).
2. Liability and Accountability: The lawsuits filed against Boeing by victims’ families have shattered the company’s reputation and financial stability. Legal actions indicate that Boeing faces significant accountability issues in its negligence towards safety practices. The assertion of criminal negligence in some lawsuits indicates the potential for corporate prosecution, highlighting lapses in accountability for corporate executives (Ewing, 2021).
3. International Regulations: The grounding of the 737 MAX led to international scrutiny of aviation safety practices and regulations worldwide. Countries began to reassess their regulatory frameworks to enhance oversight capabilities, indicating a potential ripple effect in international aviation standards and compliance (Harrison, 2019).
Ethical Implications
1. Corporate Responsibility: Ethical practices require companies to prioritize safety above profit. Boeing’s decision-making processes, which undervalued pilot safety and aircraft reliability in favor of rapid market deployment, raise ethical concerns about the organization’s values (Grabell, 2020). The board's emphasis on growth over safety reflects a failure to uphold corporate responsibility.
2. Transparency and Honesty: Boeing’s failure to communicate the MCAS’s flaws and potential risks to airlines and pilots constitutes a significant breach of ethical standards related to transparency. Ethical practices dictate that companies disclose critical safety information, ensuring that operators can make informed decisions (Stobbe, 2019).
3. Culture of Compliance: The corporate culture at Boeing has been criticized for fostering an environment where whistleblowers were discouraged, further implicating ethical leadership failures. Ethical leadership is crucial in cultivating a culture of accountability and safety, and Boeing’s leadership must evolve to support such a paradigm (Robinson, 2021).

Recommendations

To prevent similar occurrences, several recommendations can be proposed:
1. Strengthen Regulatory Oversight: Reforms should focus on enhancing FAA oversight and ensuring that regulatory bodies operate independently of corporate interests to prevent conflicts of interest. Increased resources for thorough inspections and assessments can prevent similar incidents (Baker, 2020).
2. Establish Ethical Compliance Programs: Companies like Boeing should implement robust ethical compliance programs, emphasizing safety and accountability. Training programs for management and staff on ethical decision-making could foster a culture that prioritizes integrity and safety over profits.
3. Transparent Communication Policies: Encourage a culture of transparency where potential safety issues are communicated promptly and openly to involved parties. Developing policies to protect whistleblowers can further enhance transparency and accountability within the organization.
4. Promote Ethical Leadership: Leadership should champion ethical standards and create an environment that encourages employees to report concerns about safety without fear of retribution. Ethical leadership promotes values that prioritize the well-being of employees and clients alike (Kaplan, 2021).
5. Adopt Comprehensive Risk Assessments: Establish and maintain rigorous risk assessment protocols that account for all potential safety issues. Continuous assessments can aid in identifying vulnerabilities and instilling accountability throughout the organization to maintain safety as a priority (McNulty & Dyer, 2021).

Conclusion

The Boeing 737 MAX tragedies illustrate the critical importance of ethical practices and robust regulatory frameworks within the aviation industry. Legal repercussions and ethical breaches from these incidents have reshaped public perception of Boeing, highlighting the need for accountability and transparency. By implementing reforms in regulatory oversight, fostering ethical leadership, and adopting comprehensive risk assessment protocols, Boeing can address the factors that led to these devastating accidents and work towards rebuilding trust in its operations.

References

Baker, L. (2020). Federal Aviation Regulations: The Need for Reform. Aviation Safety Journal.
Boeing. (2023). Company Overview. Retrieved from https://www.boeing.com/company/
Ewing, J. (2021). Boeing’s Legal Battle: Seeking Accountability. The New York Times.
Gelles, D., & Kessler, S. (2019). Boeing’s Secret: Why the 737 Max Crashed in The New York Times.
Grabell, M. (2020). The Ethics of Airline Safety. The Atlantic.
Harrison, P. (2019). Global Aviation Regulation Following Boeing 737 MAX. Air Transport Management.
Kaplan, P. (2021). Ethical Leadership and Corporate Responsibility. Harvard Business Review.
Laris, M. (2019). What Went Wrong with the 737 MAX? Washington Post.
McNulty, J., & Dyer, S. (2021). Risk Management in Aviation Safety. Journal of Aviation Safety.
Richardson, J. (2020). Legal Compliance in Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics.
Stobbe, M. (2019). Transparency in Aviation Regulation: Lessons from Boeing. AP News.
This comprehensive analytical framework can be further explored for a presentation summarizing key points with supporting visuals, to connect with the audience dynamically and emphasize the importance of ethical and legal accountability in corporate practices.