Mhw 512 Family Dynamics And Systems Worksheet 1scoring Guidegrading C ✓ Solved

MHW-512: Family Dynamics and Systems Worksheet 1 Scoring Guide Grading Category Points Comments The worksheet fully explains the family systems theory of Gilbert's family in the film What's Eating Gilbert Grape . 0/20 The worksheet fully explains each individual (Gilbert, Amy, Arnie, Bonnie, and Ellen) in the film What's Eating Gilbert Grape within the context of their family system. 0/20 The worksheet fully explains the family system’s function within the greater social context of the Gilbert's family in the film What's Eating Gilbert Grape , which includes the following: · Culture and subculture of the family · Social influences on the family 0/30 The worksheet fully explains whether Gilbert’s family in the film What's Eating Gilbert Grape is an open or closed system.

0/20 Total 0/90 ©2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Responding Example Examples of interactive discussion with classmates Hypothetical Scenario: Review the memorandum, “International vs. Domestic Hiring and Recruitment†that discusses Company A’s new international hiring and recruitment policy that replaces its domestic hiring and recruitment policy.

Do you believe the new international hiring and recruitment policy is beneficial or detrimental to Company A? Why or why not? Superior Example: Substantive, comprehensive, justified Interactive response that promotes further discussion: Hi, Susie and Classmates: You clearly explained why you believe Company A's international hiring and recruitment policy is detrimental to the company. However, I disagree with this position. Yes, A's new hiring policy is more costly in the short term, but I believe it is positive for the company and, in the long term, financially efficient.

The company I work for is not an international one, but 5 years ago it changed from a regional recruitment policy to a national one. This enabled the company to cast the net more widely to hire more qualified, experienced personnel which saved on training costs. Also, according to a 2016 internal study, employee retention in my company increased 25% under the new national hiring policy as my company was able to hire employees who were a better fit in skills, expertise, professional goals and work style. Hiring and training are costly for any company, so increasing employee retention is inevitably a cost savings for businesses. I believe similar beneficial changes in reduced training costs and savings resulting from employee retention could apply to A’s new international hiring policy.

What do you think? Classmate 1 (Name: Lynnette) Question) Applying the concept of personal jurisdiction to the scenario facts, discuss why you agree or disagree that the Virginia court has personal jurisdiction over Clean. HINT: Discuss all the factors (there are more than one) that would determine whether Virginia has/has not jurisdiction. · I agree that Virginia has personal jurisdiction over Clean. Section 1.03 (a)(2) of the Interstate and International Procedure Act is clear that the court can exercise jurisdiction over a company that has contracted with a business in the state if the action is based on conduct represented by 1.03 (a) (1-4) of the Act. Secondly, Clean’s target audience is the Mid-Atlantic region.

The forum state can decide whether to apply personal jurisdiction based on the activity or target audience. Clean advertises “aggressively†in the region, therefore, Virginia can exercise personal jurisdiction over Clean. Question) Applying the concept of personal jurisdiction to the scenario facts, discuss whether the Maryland court has personal jurisdiction over Clean. · Yes, Maryland has jurisdiction over Clean. In the Interstate and International Procedure Act, Section 1.02 simply states that Maryland has an enduring relationship with Clean because Clean is domiciled in the state. Classmate 2 (Name: Belinda) Question) Applying the concept of personal jurisdiction to the scenario facts, discuss why you agree or disagree that the Virginia court has personal jurisdiction over Clean.

HINT: Discuss all the factors (there are more than one) that would determine whether Virginia has/has not jurisdiction. · I would agree that ABC Cleaning could sue in Virginia. A state would have personal jurisdiction over a case if the defendant is conducting business in the state, and if the defendant was contracting to supply or do things in the state (Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act, 13 U.L.A. ) . Another factor would be because Clean caused tortious injury by act or omission in Virginia. Clean was contracted to clean in Virginia, so that would make it possible for them to be sued in the Virginia Court system. Question) Applying the concept of personal jurisdiction to the scenario facts, discuss whether the Maryland court has personal jurisdiction over Clean. · I would Agree that Clean could also be sued in Maryland.

Maryland court would have jurisdiction because the business is domiciled in Maryland, organized under the laws of Maryland, or maintaining his or its principal place of business in Maryland (Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act, 13 U.L.A. ). In conclusion, I would agree that Clean could be sued in either state. Maryland or Virginia could have jurisdiction over the case. MHW-512 Family Dynamics and Systems Worksheet 1 As a mental health worker, it is essential to understand the family systems: Individuals and their roles and boundaries. This assignments will help you understand how to analyze a family system.

Cite two to four sources (in addition to the textbook) to support your answers. Be sure to view the film at the beginning of Topic 1. After viewing the What’s Eating Gilbert Grape film and reading the “ What’s Eating Gilbert Grape Case Study,†answer the following prompts: Explain the family systems theory (75-100 words) Explain the following individuals within the context of their family system (50-75 words each): Gilbert Amy Arnie Bonnie Ellen Explain the family system’s function within the greater social context (75-100 words): · Culture and subculture of the family · Social influences on the family After viewing the film, explain if Gilbert’s family is an open or closed system? Provide examples to support your claims. (75-100 words) © 2016.

Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Paper for above instructions

Introduction to Family Systems Theory

Family systems theory, developed by Murray Bowen, posits that individuals cannot be understood in isolation but rather as part of their family system. Each member influences and is influenced by the others, creating patterns of interaction that can perpetuate emotional and behavioral issues (Bowen, 1978). Central to this theory is the idea that families operate as a cohesive unit, where the behavior of one member affects the entire family's dynamics. This approach emphasizes the importance of understanding relationships, communication patterns, and emotional responses within the family context, which is essential for addressing mental health issues (Nichols & Schwartz, 2004).

Individual Analysis

Gilbert Grape

Gilbert, played by Johnny Depp, is the eldest son and primary caretaker in his dysfunctional family. He often bears the emotional and physical burden of his family's challenges, particularly concerning his morbidly obese mother and his mentally challenged brother (Arnie). Gilbert's role exemplifies the "hero" or "caretaker" archetype, which frequently emerges in family systems where one member takes on excess responsibility in the face of chaos (Kerr & Bowen, 1988). His internal conflict reflects the tension between his familial duties and personal desires, illustrating how family dynamics can impede individual growth.

Amy

Amy, portrayed as Gilbert’s love interest, represents a potential exit from his family’s challenges. Her character underscores the theme of external relationships serving as a lifeline for individuals within a dysfunctional family (Lerner, 1996). However, Gilbert's inability to fully engage with Amy due to his obligations at home illustrates how family responsibilities can obstruct emotional intimacy. Amy symbolizes hope and normalcy, yet she also highlights Gilbert's internal struggle: balancing his yearning for a life beyond family obligations against his deep-seated sense of duty.

Arnie

Arnie, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, embodies innocence and vulnerability. His character also serves as a source of stress for the family, dealing with autism spectrum disorder alongside the family’s emotional burdens (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Arnie's behaviors often compel Gilbert to intervene and protect him, enforcing Gilbert's role as the "responsible child." Furthermore, the dynamic between Arnie and Gilbert illustrates how familial roles can pigeonhole members, complicating their development and relationships with one another and outside society.

Bonnie

Bonnie, the mother, is a central figure within the family system, symbolizing the emotional weight carried by her children. Her obesity and depression stem from unresolved emotional trauma, manifesting a system where her inability to function contributes substantially to the family’s dysfunction (Seligman, 2006). Bonnie's character represents the "victim" role that often emerges in family systems, affecting the emotional climate and creating a codependency where Gilbert feels trapped in his caregiving role.

Ellen

Ellen, the younger sister, bears the lesser weight of family expectations compared to Gilbert and Arnie. However, her role highlights the subtle tension of neglect within the family system. By having less responsibility, she appears more carefree; however, her emotional development remains impacted by the overarching dysfunction. Ellen's character underscores how the family system's strain can differentiate roles among siblings, leading to varied emotional development and coping mechanisms (Papero, 1990).

Family System’s Function within the Greater Social Context

The Gilbert family operates within a specific cultural and socioeconomic context that profoundly influences its dynamics. The small-town setting signifies a particular familial subculture, where societal expectations and norms shape behavior. The family's challenges reflect broader themes of economic hardship, stigmatization of disabilities, and the pressure of societal obligations (Fiese, 2006). The Gilbert family, dealing with mental illness and obesity, represents a microcosm of societal dysfunction, highlighting how external social influences can exacerbate internal family struggles. Ultimately, the family's challenges illuminate the intersection of personal and societal issues, emphasizing the importance of context in understanding family dynamics.

Open vs. Closed System

Gilbert’s family can be characterized as a closed system. A closed system resists outside influences, operating with rigid boundaries and limited interactions with the outside world (Minuchin, 1974). Gilbert and his family largely isolate themselves from societal norms, demonstrating an unwillingness to seek help or develop external relationships, which can be detrimental to their emotional health. Instances in the film show Gilbert's reluctance to break away from family duties, indicating how the family's insularity hampers growth and healing. For example, the family's refusal to confront Bonnie's health issues signifies a closed-loop system where no external perspective is embraced. While Gilbert daydreams of escape with Amy, the family's embedded patterns prevent substantial change, further demonstrating the insular nature of their dynamics.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the Gilbert family's dynamics through family systems theory provides valuable insights into how individual roles, emotional burdens, and social contexts intertwine within familial interactions. Each member embodies different roles that collectively shape their experiences, impacting their emotional well-being and personal growth. Recognizing these patterns is crucial for mental health professionals when addressing family-related concerns, emphasizing that interventions need to consider the family as an interconnected unit rather than isolated individuals.

References

- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
- Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
- Fiese, B. H. (2006). Understanding family routines and rituals: Opportunities for developing family interventions. Family Relations, 55, 112-124.
- Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family Evaluation: An Approach Based on Bowen Theory. New York, NY: Norton.
- Lerner, H. (1996). The Dance of Anger: A Woman's Guide to Changing the Patterns of Intimate Relationships. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
- Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (2004). The Essentials of Family Therapy. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Papero, D. V. (1990). Bowen Family Systems Theory and Practice: Illustration and Critique. Journal of Family Therapy, 12(3), 219-230.
- Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.