Moderate Factiongaltonians Have Watched With Mixed Emotionsfrom Elat ✓ Solved
Moderate faction: Galtonians have watched with mixed emotions—from elation to terror—as events have unfolded in revolutionary France over the past several years. Many in Galtonia celebrated the destruction of the old regime in France, while others bemoan the demise of the glory that was the French absolute monarchy. As the revolutionary spirit has swept across the continent, states throughout Europe have been riven by the same kinds of social tensions that broke France apart. During the past two centuries, after re-converting to Catholicism under the influence of Jesuit Order, the Dukes of Galtonia have consolidated their power and established a hereditary absolute monarchy, while the Galtonian Catholic Church has grown richer and more powerful.
Now with the example of France on everyone’s mind, there have been calls for reform in Galtonia, calls that have become increasingly radical to the point that now Galtonia is also headed down the path of revolution. You are a member of Galtonia's "third estate," a diverse group that includes peasants, the urban poor, merchants, bankers, lawyers and other professionals. As a delegate to the Constituent Assembly you are educated and articulate (and probably, though not necessarily, a lawyer), qualities that contributed to your being elected to the Assembly. Until recently, you were an enthusiastic proponent of the revolution. For many years you have been an admirer of and the philosophes, and the British political theorist John Locke.
You also recognized that economic changes were sweeping the world, and Galtonia was behind the times. Trade is expanding, and the great workshops of England manufacture textiles and other goods at low cost in tremendous quantities. Galtonia still makes things by skilled artisans, protected by ancient tradesmen’s guilds. Moreover, the Catholic Church is responsible for the education of the young—there are no “public†schools—and yet the Church is itself backward and opposed to knowledge and science. The King of Galtonia, though among the more likable monarchs, is himself a relic of a by-gone era.
The nobility and clergy lack the King’s amiability, but are equally deaf to the voices of dissent that reverberate throughout Galtonia. The Galtonian ancien régime was destined to fall of its own inanity; you saw fit to be among those who gave it a push into its grave. But can Galtonia survive without a King? That is the question before the Constituent Assembly. The radicals says yes, and the conservatives say no.
You are undecided. Galtonia has followed in France’s footsteps, destroying an unjust social order and bringing a new dawn of liberty to the Galtonian people. But is Galtonia now destined. like France, to descend into terror? Or can Galtonia thrive without a king like the American colonists who have recently thrown of the yoke of monarchy? The radicals are accusing the King of Galtonia of conspiring with his reactionary, anti-revolutionary relatives abroad, thereby betraying the Revolution.
They claim to have solid evidence of the King’s treason, while the conservative faction insists that these charges are trumped up to give the radicals an excuse to declare a Republic with themselves in charge. You don’t know what to believe, but you must make a decision. The fate of the Revolution lies in your hands! Individual Paper: Like paper one, your individual paper should be words and divided in two parts. The first part should give your life story and include examples of at least three historical events from the textbook that shaped your life (you can include the page number in parentheses).
You are a successful member of the third estate. Perhaps you are a lawyer, a banker, or a businessman. You have worked hard and acquired a modicum of wealth and comfort that you do not want to lose to the King’s exorbitant taxation or to the mobs roaming the streets. The second part should be an account of how your life story shaped your political beliefs and why you think these beliefs are best for Galtonia. In this section you should incorporate at least two quotes in quotation sandwiches from primary sources that support your position.
Title ABC/123 Version X 1 Research Analysis PSYCH/650 Version University of Phoenix Material Research Analysis Terms Definitions Peer-reviewed study Peer review refers to a study that has been accepted by a standard journal using blind review by peers in the field. This means that every study should have a fair access to publication based upon quality of the study. Type of study Types of studies can include experimental, case study, longitudinal, cross-sectional, survey, and so forth. Purpose of the Study Discuss the purpose of the study. What are the hypotheses?
What was the study trying to determine? Measurement or assessment tools A measurement tool is a means that the researchers used to measure or assess the variables under study. Did the study develop assessment tools? Did the study use objective measurement tools? Can the measurement tools be found and used by another researcher?
Are the instruments valid and reliable? Number of participants This refers to how many participants were in the study. How they were selected Selection process can include the means of recruitment of participants; what was the sampling method or strategy? Describe the population. This could be clients or college students.
Indicate sample size. Number of groups Was there a control group? The control group does not receive the treatment. Do these participants have the same characteristics and diagnosis as the experimental group participants? How they were assigned Were they matched or randomly assigned to one the conditions, or groups, in the study?
What type of intervention was delivered Define the type of therapeutic treatment or intervention that occurred. How the intervention was delivered Were there therapists? Were the therapists trained to deliver the treatment? Was the study a drug study? Was it double-blind?
Were there repeated measures In this area, we are looking at whether the study found the subjects 6 months or 1 year after the conclusion of the study. Was there a difference between the experimental and control participants at the follow up? We are looking at whether the treatment effect lasts over time. What are the results of the study In this area present the significant findings of the study.
Paper for above instructions
Title: A Life Shaped by Revolution: My Journey as a Delegate of the Third Estate in GaltoniaPart One: My Life Story
I was born in the thriving city of Veridonia, known for its trade and cultural exchange, into a modest family of merchants. My father owned a grain store, a vocation passed down through generations, while my mother was a skilled seamstress. The virtues of hard work and perseverance were instilled in me from a young age. Our family’s economic stability allowed me to pursue an education, a privilege not afforded to many in our society. The seeds of my political consciousness were sown early through the educational books I found in my father’s attic, particularly the works of Enlightenment philosophers like John Locke.
The revolutionary fervor that erupted in France in 1789 dramatically impacted my life. I vividly recall the news of the Bastille's storming reaching Veridonia, and the pageantry of liberation echoed through our streets (Doyle, 2001, p. 35). The same sentiments of rising against an oppressive regime ignited a fire in many of us in Galtonia, fueling dreams of freedom and equality. However, the excesses following the initial excitement soon dashed those ideals for some. The reign of terror that ensued highlighted the fragility of a revolution, a realization that forged my understanding of civil rights balanced with societal stability (Tackett, 2015, p. 142).
Another pivotal event was the establishment of the Constitutional National Assembly in France. The reaction to this shift swung between inspiration and apprehension for me. Here was a body formed from the common people, uniting against centuries of subjection. As the throngs in Galtonia began to rumble with similar calls for reform, I felt the exhilaration of hope mingle with anxiety. The notion of the people claiming their voice in governance resonated deeply with me (Rude, 2012, p. 83).
Thus, when the invitation came to attend the Constituent Assembly as a delegate of the Third Estate, I saw it as an opportunity to help shape Galtonia's future. I felt the weight of responsibility to advocate for the myriad of constituents I represented—peasants, the urban poor, and educated citizens like myself.
Through my participation in discussions, I witnessed the stalwart resistance of the nobility and clergy against reform. Their opposition to change demonstrated their fear of losing privileges and power—an example at the heart of my mixed emotions. The culmination of these experiences has left me torn between the lessons of revolution, the resonance of freedom, and concerns over chaos following the removal of leadership.
Part Two: Political Beliefs Shaped by My Experience
Having lived through a time of tremendous upheaval, I maintain firm convictions that balance liberty with order. The current political climate in Galtonia reflects the deep need for reform, yet I harbor doubts regarding the complete dissolution of the monarchy. To disregard the gravity of royal duty entirely risks plunging Galtonia into despair.
I have always held John Locke's assertion that legitimate government relies on the consent of the governed close to heart: "For men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise Maker; all the servitude of one man to another, is an act of slavery" (Locke, 1689). I interpret this not as a demand for the destruction of all authority but as a call for a government attuned to its people's needs. Thus, while the King may appear as a remnant of an outdated system, he has also, at times, been a benign figure—connected to the people, albeit imperfectly.
Moreover, my educated peers—those who hold radical views—imply that by removing the King, a Republic would blossom, akin to the successful American colonies casting off British tyranny. However, history serves as a teacher—democracy without structure can swiftly devolve. As Ernest Renan notes, "A nation is a soul, a spiritual principle" (Renan, 1882). The dissolution of monarchy without a unifying vision risks fracturing the very fabric of our society into chaos.
I argue passionately for the necessity of a constitutional monarchy as a compromise. This modernized monarchy would serve to safeguard the principles of liberty while ensuring stability. The abdication of power by the King, not the removal of it, is vital for progress. We can learn from the mistakes of the French Revolution—allowing ourselves to aim towards greater aspirations without repeating the cycles of terror seen across the channel.
Furthermore, the role of education remains paramount. The dominance of the Catholic Church over education ensures that old ideas persist, stunting societal growth. A reformed educational system, one that encourages science, knowledge, and independent thought, is critical for our citizens. Thomas Jefferson, in the essence of a free society, believed fervently in the necessity of an informed electorate: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be” (Jefferson, 1816). Enabling our populace with education will prevent the rise of dogma and foster a generation steeped in enlightenment ideals.
As I stand poised between competing factions in the Constituent Assembly, I know that my verdict could influence the course of our nation profoundly. I envision a Galtonia where our past informs our present without constraining our future. As we lay the foundation of our government, we must carry forth a legacy that cherishes individual rights while uniting in collective responsibility.
In conclusion, the lessons of my life, awash in the tides of revolution, compel me to advocate for balanced reform in Galtonia. I believe that a moderate approach, one that upholds the virtues of liberty and education while carefully navigating change, positions us to thrive without surrendering to tyranny or descending into chaos.
References
1. Doyle, W. (2001). The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford University Press.
2. Jefferson, T. (1816). Notes on the State of Virginia.
3. Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government.
4. Renan, E. (1882). What is a Nation?.
5. Rude, G. (2012). The French Revolution. University of California Press.
6. Tackett, P. (2015). The Coming of the Revolution: 1789 in the French History. Harvard University Press.
7. The French Revolution: A New History. (2014).
8. Hobsbawm, E. J. (2011). Revolutionaries: Contemporary Essays. New Press.
9. Merriman, J. (2004). A History of Modern Europe: From the Renaissance to the Present.
10. Cobban, A. (1970). A History of Modern France. Penguin Books.
This paper encapsulates a narrative drawn from socio-political contexts, examining the influence of historical events on personal development in revolutionary dynamics. With a balanced approach to monarchy and reform, it argues for progress without chaos, fostering a continuous dialogue on governance.