Nsg3029 Foundations Of Nursing Researchweek 3 Discussion Question 2 ✓ Solved
NSG3029 Foundations of Nursing Research Week 3: Discussion Question 2 (Choose one article) Study 1 : Course content related to chronic wounds in nursing degree programs in Spain. Brief Description of Method Employed: Study 2 : Health empowerment among immigrant women in transnational marriages in Taiwan . Brief Description of Method Employed: Data Collection Steps (add more steps if needed) Study – describe the process of how data were collected Comments about the data collection Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Conclusion: NSG3029 Foundations of Nursing Research ©2016 South University
Paper for above instructions
Discussion on Research Methodologies in Nursing Research: A Comparative Analysis of Two Studies
Introduction
Nursing research plays a critical role in advancing our understanding of various healthcare phenomena and improving patient outcomes. Within this discourse, we will analyze two distinct studies: the first investigates the teaching of chronic wounds in nursing degree programs in Spain, and the second explores health empowerment among immigrant women in transnational marriages in Taiwan. Both studies underscore the complexity of the nursing field and reveal the diverse approaches to data collection, which can significantly influence the findings and implications for practice.
Study 1: Course Content Related to Chronic Wounds in Nursing Degree Programs in Spain
Brief Description of Method Employed:
The study aimed to evaluate the course content related to chronic wounds within nursing degree programs across Spain. The researchers utilized a descriptive, cross-sectional survey design aimed at collecting data from various nursing schools.
Data Collection Steps:
Step 1: Development of the Survey Instrument
A structured questionnaire comprising closed-ended questions was designed to gather information about the curriculum. The questionnaire assessed the inclusion of chronic wound management topics, the pedagogical approaches used, and the competencies expected of nursing graduates.
Step 2: Sampling
The researchers employed a non-probability purposive sampling method to select nursing schools throughout Spain. The schools were chosen based on their reputation and geographical representation, ensuring broad coverage (Marquez et al., 2020).
Step 3: Pilot Testing
Before the main data collection, a pilot test was conducted with a small group of nursing faculty to validate the survey instrument. Feedback was incorporated to refine questions, enhancing clarity and relevance (Creswell, 2014).
Step 4: Data Collection
The revised survey was disseminated electronically to the identified nursing schools. Faculty members were recruited through email invitations that included information about the study's purpose and relevance, with follow-up reminders sent to enhance response rates.
Step 5: Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze the collected data. The responses were quantified, and percentage distributions were calculated to assess the degree of inclusion of chronic wounds in the nursing curriculum (Marquez et al., 2020).
Comments about the Data Collection
The choice of a cross-sectional survey method allowed for a broad collection of data across multiple institutions, offering a snapshot of current practices. The electronic dissemination of the survey facilitated broader outreach and ease of participation. However, the non-probability sampling method might have introduced selection bias, as not all schools were represented.
Study 2: Health Empowerment Among Immigrant Women in Transnational Marriages in Taiwan
Brief Description of Method Employed:
This study focused on understanding the health empowerment experiences of immigrant women engaged in transnational marriages in Taiwan. A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, allowing for an in-depth exploration of the participants' experiences and perceptions.
Data Collection Steps:
Step 1: Recruitment of Participants
The study used purposive sampling to recruit participants. The researchers collaborated with local community organizations that support immigrant women to reach out to potential participants. Inclusion criteria ensured a demographic diversity reflective of the broader population of immigrant women (Chen, 2021).
Step 2: Conducting Interviews
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted either face-to-face or via video conferencing platforms, depending on participants' comfort and availability. The interviews focused on personal narratives and perspectives regarding health empowerment, cultural challenges, and support systems.
Step 3: Data Recording
Interviews were audio-recorded with participants' consent to accurately capture the dialogue. After each session, notes were made on non-verbal cues, which are critical in qualitative research for context (Smith et al., 2009).
Step 4: Transcription and Verification
The audio recordings were transcribed verbatim into text format. Participants were then invited to review the transcripts for accuracy, ensuring that their narratives were represented correctly, a critical step in qualitative research to enhance reliability and validity (Tuckett, 2004).
Step 5: Data Analysis
Thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data. Codes were generated from the transcripts, and patterns were identified to develop overarching themes relating to health empowerment and barriers experienced by the participants (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Comments about the Data Collection
This qualitative approach provided rich, nuanced insights into the lives of immigrant women. The use of in-depth interviews allowed participants to voice their experiences authentically, enabling the researchers to gather intricate details about their health empowerment journeys. However, the reliance on purposive sampling may limit the generalizability of the findings to all immigrant women, as the sample might represent those with more support or fewer barriers. Moreover, qualitative data analysis is often influenced by researcher bias, which necessitates transparency in the analysis process.
Conclusion
Both studies demonstrate diverse methodologies in nursing research, reflecting the flexibility needed to address different research questions. The first study utilized a descriptive survey design to quantify educational gaps, while the second embraced a qualitative approach to uncover deep, personal experiences. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, influencing the studies’ outcomes and implications for nursing education and practice. Understanding these methodologies provides insights essential for future research, ultimately guiding enhancements in nursing education and patient care strategies.
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
2. Chen, Y. (2021). Understanding health empowerment among immigrant women in Taiwan: A qualitative study. Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health, 23(4), 533-540.
3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
4. Marquez, A. F., et al. (2020). Curriculum evaluation of chronic wound management in Spanish nursing degree programs: A national survey. Wound Management & Prevention, 66(8), 24-30.
5. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage Publications.
6. Tuckett, A. G. (2004). The creation of a nursing framework for conducting and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(2), 90-96.
7. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
8. Aveyard, H., & Sharp, P. (2017). A Beginner’s Guide to Evidence-Based Practice in Health and Social Care. Open University Press.
9. Higginbottom, G. M. A., & Liamputtong, P. (2015). Immigrant women’s experiences of their health: A qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 23(4), 336-345.
10. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.