Objectivesthis Study Aims To Identify The Barriers To Social Integra ✓ Solved

Objectives This study aims to identify the barriers to social integration for children with autism in Saudi Arabia. This study also aims to determine the similarities and differences between the barriers to social integration for those mothers with high level of education and those with low level of education. Methodology Qualitative research methods, specifically interpretative phenomenological analysis, will be used to explore the barriers to social integration for children with autism. Four mothers who are Saudi nationals, age 25 to 45 and have autistic children will be recruited through private Schools co in Saudi Arabia for this study. Data will be gathered through recorded semi-structured interviews investigating the barriers to social integration experienced by each mother individually; comparisons and differences will then be considered between individual stories and within the two groups.

The interview recordings in Arabic will be transcribed and categorised and themes established; to assure transparency all information will be translated to English by two translators. Potential Outcomes This study may result in the identification of barriers to social integration experienced by 25 to 45- year-old mothers of ASD children, including those high level of education and low level of education. A descriptive account of the similarities and the differences between the opinions of Highly educated mothers and those with low level of education with regards to the constituents of barriers to social integration will be presented. This may help to devise appropriate interventions, programmes, and policies to minimise the adverse effects that a lack of social integration can have on children with autism and their families in KSA.

Aims 1. To determine the barriers to social integration for children with autism in KSA. 2. To capture the perceptions of mothers with high level of education regarding the constituents of barriers to social integration in Saudi Arabia. 3.

To capture the perceptions of mothers with low level of education regarding the constituents of barriers to social integration in Saudi Arabia. 4. To identify the similarities and differences between the perceptions of mothers with high and low level of education regarding the constituents of barriers to social integration in Saudi Arabia. Research Question Are there any differences between the perceptions of mothers of autistic children with high and low level of education regarding the constituents of barriers to social integration in Saudi Arabia for their autistic children? This study will use a qualitative research method, specifically interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), to explore the barriers to social integration of children with autism in Saudi Arabia.

Qualitative methods will be used to answer questions about experience, meaning, and perspective, from the standpoint of the study participant Recruitment strategy The study population will comprise of four mothers, age 25 to 45, who have children with ASD. The age bracket of 25 and 45 years represent the productive years and therefore, the most effective age for the study. Two mothers with high level of education( Bachelor degree up to the advanced level) and two mothers with low level of education ( primary, intermediate and secondary) . Only females who are Saudi nationals, age 25 to 45 years and have professionally diagnosed autistic children will be recruited for this study. Those who are not female, are below age 25 years or above age 45, are not Saudi Arabian, or do not have autistic children will be excluded from the study.

Potential participants who cannot consent under Saudi Arabian laws will also be excluded from the study. These people include mothers with mental disorders, under the legal age. All participants will be women because mothers are most likely to be the caretakers of their children and, therefore, more likely to have first-hand experience of the barriers to social integration. Procedure The participant information sheets, interview questions, transcripts and consent forms will be translated into Arabic to enable the participants to engage in the study. Potential study participants, who meet the inclusion criteria above, will be approached by their care coordinator from Schools co in Saudi.

This coordinator will be the identified contact person that the lead researcher will approach first for the identification of potential study participants. The coordinator will give the participants a brief introduction about the research and whether they will be interested in participating. The identified contact person will then introduce potential study participants to the lead researcher. On the first meeting with the participants, the lead researcher will introduce herself to provide a written information sheet and a brief description of the research study, its purpose and benefits, and why the participant has been approached. They will be given an additional 48 hours after filling them in with all the information and answering any questions and inquiries they have, so they can have enough time to think and decide whether they would like to be interviewed.

After they approve, they will be given a written consent for them to sign. The researcher will need to establish the credibility and transferability of the findings. Since the results are obtained from the direct word of the participants, they are both accurate and true. The obtained information will be in Arabic and will need to be transcribed to English. The entire process will require the value of honesty to make sure that data is translated correctly.

The issue calls for consistency an issue that may make the two translators do it in utmost honesty. The researcher will approach two translators to maintain the credibility of the participants’ stories given that they will be transcribed from Arabic to English. Ethics and approvals Ethical, research, and development approvals will be obtained in line with what is required in Saudi and will conform with University’s research and development guidelines. Relevant contact information to direct any concerns about the study will be provided at the end of the participant information sheets. Confidentiality All information received about study participants will be protected in accordance with the Data Protection Act (2018) and University’s Records Management (2015) guidelines will be complied with.

Individual participant records will be given an identification number; this is the only number that will appear in stored information. Each selected study participant’s personal and contact details will be kept separately in a locked cabinet. Only the lead researcher and staff members of University involved in this research project will have access to this information. No information provided by study participants will be forwarded to their clinical teams or social workers unless participants indicate otherwise, or circumstances warrant such action. This may occur if a failure to pass on information places the study participant or others at risk; in this situation, relevant information will be passed to the appropriate persons.

BUSI 201 BUSI 201 Article Review Instructions Rationale: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the ethical implications of the use of data as it related to this course. You must also demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively in writing with your audience. Requirements: 1. Submit a 3-page analysis of an article that cites an example of unethical behavior as related to corporate or an individual’s behavior in the use of technology/data or unethical manipulation of such. Your analysis should include a summary of the article, your analysis of the ethical problem presented in the article, and how the topic relates to a biblical world view.

The ethical problem should be clearly stated. Do not assume that your summary makes the ethical problem self-evident. 2. Article Selection: It is recommended that you choose a topic that is related to your major; however, the topic must incorporate technology. This should be a specific event, not an article such as “Five Ways Companies are Unethical with Dataâ€.

Such an article may be a good starting place but will not be sufficient for this assignment. The article will be current - from within the past 3 years. You can likely find an example from as recent as this week/month. As this may be a news article, be sure that you are using a valid source of news. You should find multiple sources reporting the same information to ensure that your assessment of the reporting is accurate.

Feel free to cite from these additional sources as well as your main article. 3. Biblical Worldview: You will include at least two biblical references in your analysis. 4. Use APA format, including in-text citations and a reference page.

Submit your Article Review by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8. BUSI 201 Article Review Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present Summary (15 points) 15 to 14 points Student has included a well-constructed summary of an article citing an example of unethical behavior. 13 to 11 points Student has submitted an adequate summary of an article citing an example of unethical behavior; however, this summary is lacking appropriate organization or completeness. 10 to 1 points Student has not effectively summarized the article. 0 points Analysis (30 points) 30 to 27 points Student has effectively analyzed the ethical problem presented in the article.

26 to 21 points Student has attempted to analyze the problem, but this analysis is shallow in its development. 20 to 1 Student has minimally analyzed the ethical problem presented in the article. 0 points Biblical Worldview (25 points) 25 to 23 points Student has effectively considered how the topic presented in the article relates to a biblical worldview, including at least two biblical references. 22 to 18 points Student has attempted to consider how the topic presented in the article relates to a biblical worldview, but this analysis is not complete in its development. Fewer than two biblical references have been included.

17 to 1 points Student has minimally considered the relation of the article to a biblical worldview or has not included biblical references supporting their writing. 0 points Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present Mechanics (20 points) 20 to 18 points Spelling and grammar are correct. 17 to 14 points Spelling and grammar are mostly correct, but additional editing is needed. 13 to 1 points Spelling and grammar errors distract. 0 points APA Format (10 points) 10 to 9 points Chosen reference is a strong, legitimate academic source and correctly formatted per APA.

8 to 7 points Chosen reference is a legitimate academic source, however minor errors exist regarding APA formatting of citations. 6 to 1 points Chosen reference is not a legitimate academic source or a correctly formatted APA citation has not been included. 0 points BUSI 201 BUSI 201 Article Review Instructions Rationale: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the ethical implications of the use of data as it related to this course. You must also demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively in writing with your audience. Requirements: 1.

Submit a 3-page analysis of an article that cites an example of unethical behavior as related to corporate or an individual’s behavior in the use of technology/data or unethical manipulation of such. Your analysis should include a summary of the article, your analysis of the ethical problem presented in the article, and how the topic relates to a biblical world view. The ethical problem should be clearly stated. Do not assume that your summary makes the ethical problem self-evident. 2.

Article Selection: It is recommended that you choose a topic that is related to your major; however, the topic must incorporate technology. This should be a specific event, not an article such as “Five Ways Companies are Unethical with Dataâ€. Such an article may be a good starting place but will not be sufficient for this assignment. The article will be current - from within the past 3 years. You can likely find an example from as recent as this week/month.

As this may be a news article, be sure that you are using a valid source of news. You should find multiple sources reporting the same information to ensure that your assessment of the reporting is accurate. Feel free to cite from these additional sources as well as your main article. 3. Biblical Worldview: You will include at least two biblical references in your analysis.

4. Use APA format, including in-text citations and a reference page. Submit your Article Review by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8.

Paper for above instructions

Summary

A recent article published in The Guardian on April 5, 2023, reported the unethical practices surrounding data manipulation by several prominent social media companies, specifically focusing on Facebook and its parent company Meta. The investigation highlights how these firms have employed algorithms to manipulate user engagement, often favoring sensationalist content over accurate information (Smith, 2023). This manipulation fosters a toxic digital environment that not only misinforms the public but also harms societal discourse.
The article details how Facebook's algorithm prioritizes posts that are sensational or emotionally charged, regardless of their truthfulness or accuracy. Such strategies have been shown to increase user engagement significantly, but at the cost of ethical considerations. As a result, misinformation and divisive content proliferate, affecting public opinion and political polarization (Smith, 2023).
Moreover, internal documents and whistleblower testimony reveal that the company's executives are aware of these negative impacts yet choose to prioritize profit and user engagement metrics over ethical considerations (Johnson, 2023). The effect on society includes an increase in conspiracy theories and a decline in trust in institutions, raising questions about the role of technology in shaping public perception and behavior.

Analysis of the Ethical Problem

The principal ethical issue illustrated in this article is the deliberate manipulation of data and algorithms to prioritize profit over societal wellbeing. This raises several questions regarding corporate responsibility and the ethical implications of technology on society. The ethical dilemma consists of balancing the financial objectives of a corporation against their duty to provide accurate and responsible content to users (Jones & Taylor, 2021).
The problem escalates due to the vast influence social media companies have on public discourse. By prioritizing engagement over accuracy, these firms contribute to the widespread dissemination of misinformation. This behavior violates ethical principles such as honesty, integrity, and respect for individuals' rights to truthful information (Kahneman, 2016). The manipulation of data not only misinforms users but also creates a polarized environment that harms democratic processes (Gonzalez, 2022).
Furthermore, by failing to regulate their algorithms and ignoring the negative consequences of their policies, corporations like Meta have shown a lack of accountability. They prioritize short-term profits over long-term social and ethical considerations (O’Connor, 2023). This opens a broader discussion regarding the responsibilities of tech companies in an increasingly digital world. It challenges the notion of autonomy, as users are systematically influenced by algorithms they do not understand or control (Brey, 2021).

Biblical Worldview

The ethical implications of data manipulation in the context of technology can also be illuminated through a biblical worldview. The scriptures offer timeless wisdom about the value of truth, accountability, and the responsibilities we bear towards one another. One pertinent biblical reference comes from Proverbs 12:22: “The Lord detests lying lips, but he delights in people who are trustworthy” (New International Version). This verse emphasizes the importance of honesty and integrity, both at a personal and corporate level.
Similarly, Philippians 2:3-4 calls for individuals to “do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.” This passage implores companies to prioritize the wellbeing of users over profits, highlighting the ethical responsibilities that come with influence and power (Barnes, 2022).
Moreover, the concept of stewardship in the Bible stresses the responsibilities individuals have over the resources entrusted to them (Matthew 25:14-30). In this context, tech companies have a moral obligation to manage the influence their platforms exert in a manner that reflects ethical standards and social responsibility. They are stewards of not only their business but of the public discourse and social fabric of society (Pearce, 2022).

Conclusion

The exploitation of data and algorithms for engagement-driven profits by companies like Facebook raises significant ethical concerns. The conscious choice to prioritize sensationalism over truth harms collective understanding and trust within society. An analysis of this unethical behavior illustrates the deeper implications of corporate practices on public discourse and democratic processes.
The insights provided through a biblical worldview reinforce the need for honesty and accountability among corporations, aligning moral responsibilities with corporate practices. As technology continues to evolve, it is essential for individuals and corporations alike to reflect on the ethical implications of their actions in shaping society.

References

1. Barnes, R. (2022). Ethics in Technology: Biblical Insights. Christian Worldview Journal.
2. Brey, P. (2021). Technology and the Ethics of Data Manipulation. Journal of Information Ethics, 30(2), 75-89.
3. Gonzalez, A. (2022). Misinformation and Public Discourse: Ethical Responsibilities of Tech Companies. Media Ethics Journal, 19(3), 111-123.
4. Johnson, L. (2023). Inside Meta: Whistleblower Reveals Secrets of Data Manipulation. The New York Times.
5. Jones, T., & Taylor, K. (2021). Corporate Responsibility and the Ethics of Information Technology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(1), 45-67.
6. Kahneman, D. (2016). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
7. O’Connor, S. (2023). The Price of Engagement: Ethical Dilemmas in Social Media. The Guardian.
8. Pearce, J. (2022). Christian Perspectives on Corporate Responsibility and Ethical Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(4), 56-73.
9. Smith, J. (2023). Facebook's Algorithm Crisis: How Data Manipulation Affects Society. The Guardian.
10. New International Version. (2011). Holy Bible. Biblica.
In summary, this article embodies significant ethical implications in the realm of technology and data manipulation, reminding us of the crucial need for ethical practices in corporate sectors and the responsibility to prioritize truth and integrity in all dealings.