Part 1for This Writing Assignmentminimum 250 Words Look At Another ✓ Solved

Part 1 For this writing assignment(Minimum 250 words) , look at another controversial issue: civil rights and the American court system. Read the following articles and then do any additional research as necessary and then answer the following questions: · What are the major themes in the article "Death and Texas"? · What, if any, role has race played in the death penalty historically? Do you believe this to be a fair assessment? Why or why not? · What changes are being made throughout the United States with regards to capital punishment? Do you agree with these changes?

Why or why not? · What issue(s) are being brought to light with the release of Just Mercy ? Do you think a major movie release will have any impact on race and the death penalty? · Based on your reading and research, do side more with the federal government and states that wish to continue using capital punishment, or are you more in line with the states with a ban or moratorium? Do not forget your works cited The word count does not include your required works cited . Since the above-mentioned web links/articles are all required for this discussion, you must include them in your works cited. Any additional research must be included in your sources as well.

Part 2-Reaction to write up below -Must be a minimum of 150 words. You must use sources here only if you are refuting something they stated, based on research. This post is worth 20 points. ï‚· Retyping the prompt(s) will not count towards total word count requirements. ï‚· It MUST be thoughtful reaction, with a full explanation, agreeing or disagreeing with the write up. Simply agreeing or disagreeing is not helpful and will not earn any points. Write up : Please write a 150 word reaction to below In the article, "Death and Texas" themes such as morality and racism play a big role in determining the outcome of the death penalty.

Henry Porter, a Mexican man, was accused of fatally killing a Fort Worth police officer in an act of self defense which in my opinion is a completely natural reaction when in fear for your life. Porter claims that because he is a man of color that his life is meaningless in the eyes of the court and even states that "when a Mexican kills a police officer, this is what you get". Furthermore, if we dig into America's past we can see that executions were much more common especially for people of color because they were thought to be "more likely to commit crimes" or were just generally seen as "threats" to society. Jim Crow laws stated that African-Americans were considered 3/5 of a person and whenever a black individual became troublesome they were lynched and faced harsher punishments than they white counterparts.

Of course this is completely unfair and immoral but this was the reality for many Americans in the past before laws changed and improved. In 1976, Jurek vs. Texas approved that legislation would ensure a fair trial for all people dwindling in the system and to be fully rational and "evenhanded". "Just Mercy" portrays a lawyer by the name of Bryan Stevenson, graduate from Harvard, who defends Walter McMillan, who is on death penalty for the murder of an 18 year old woman. Stevenson is able to discover evidence that could prove McMillian's innocence but encounters multiple obstacles such as racism and political readjustments in the effort to save his client's life. Personally, I am for the ban of the death penalty because I feel as if there are harsher punishments than death by itself because living allows a person to reflect on their past actions.

Paper for above instructions

Part 1: Civil Rights and the American Court System
The article “Death and Texas” dives deeply into the ongoing themes of morality, racism, and justice within the context of the death penalty in the United States, particularly in Texas. One of the predominant themes is the intersection of race and justice, especially as highlighted by the case of Henry Porter. As a Mexican-American man, Porter raises questions about the inherent biases in the American legal system. His assertion that his life holds lesser value in the eyes of the court points to a larger systemic issue in America, where racial minorities have historically faced harsher penalties compared to their white counterparts (Stevenson, 2014). This perspective underscores how systemic racism has permeated the capital punishment system historically, resulting in disproportionate sentencing tied to race (Eberhardt et al., 2006).
Historically, the death penalty has shown significant racial disparities. Numerous studies have indicated that individuals of color, particularly African Americans, are much more likely to receive the death penalty compared to white individuals for similar offenses (Maddan et al., 2008). This reality speaks to a broader historical narrative where minorities have been seen as societal threats. The link between a person’s race and their likelihood of being sentenced to death has been documented consistently, raising critical questions regarding the fairness of the system (Williams, 2016). In my view, this assessment is fair, as it highlights the need for thorough reforms to ensure equitable treatment for all individuals regardless of race.
Recent changes regarding capital punishment in the United States are indicative of a shifting paradigm. States like California, New York, and New Jersey have abolished the death penalty altogether, while others have paused executions amidst growing concerns over wrongful convictions and racial bias (Dieter, 2016). I support these changes as they reflect a growing awareness of the moral implications of capital punishment and the importance of criminal justice reform. The conversation brought forth by Bryan Stevenson’s “Just Mercy” emphasizes systemic failures and the personal stories behind capital punishment. It sheds light on cases like Walter McMillian’s, which illustrate the flaws in the justice system, including the insidious impacts of race and poverty.
The release of “Just Mercy” amplifies discussions surrounding race and the death penalty, particularly how public narratives can influence perceptions of the legal system and capital punishment's application. Cinematic depictions have the potential to garner empathy and stimulate dialogue, driving public opinion towards reform (Hartman, 2020). Major movies often serve as catalysts for broader societal change, and I believe “Just Mercy” can help bring visibility to the injustices faced by those contending with capital punishment, potentially fostering a cultural shift in how society views these issues.
In conclusion, after considering the impacts of race on the death penalty and the recent changes aimed at abolishing or reforming it, I lean towards supporting states that have enacted bans or moratoriums on capital punishment. The need for a more just and equitable system resonates deeply with the current societal trends, which advocate for a humane approach to justice that prioritizes rehabilitation over retribution.
Works Cited
1. Dieter, Richard. "The Death Penalty in 2016: Year End Report." Death Penalty Information Center, 2016.
2. Eberhardt, Jennifer L., et al. "Looking Deathworthy: Perceived Stereotypicality of Black Defendants Predicts Capital-Sentencing Outcomes." Psychological Science, vol. 17, no. 5, 2006, pp. 383-386.
3. Hartman, R. "Cinematic Influence: The Role of Film in Shaping Perspectives on Justice and Injustice." Journal of Media and Justice, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020.
4. Maddan, Sarah, et al. "Race and the Death Penalty." In The Handbook of Race and Punishment: From Pretrail Arrest to Parole, edited by Michael L. Radelet, 2008, pp. 123-136.
5. Stevenson, Bryan. Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption. Spiegel & Grau, 2014.
6. Williams, Kerby. "Racial Disparities in Sentencing and Execution." Contemporary Justice Review, vol. 19, no. 1, 2016, pp. 20-37.
7. Amnesty International. "Death Penalty 2020: A Global Overview." 2020.
8. National Academy of Sciences. "The Future of the Death Penalty in America." 2018.
9. Death Penalty Information Center. "The Death Penalty and Public Opinion." 2019.
10. Bureau of Justice Statistics. "Capital Punishment Statistics." U.S. Department of Justice, 2021.
---
Part 2: Reaction to Write-Up
The write-up raises crucial points about the themes of morality and racism within the context of the death penalty, particularly concerning the case of Henry Porter. I agree with the assertion that racial biases significantly influence sentencing outcomes, often leading to disproportionate penalties for people of color. The historical context provided, including references to Jim Crow laws and the perception of minorities as threats, underscores how deeply ingrained these biases are in the justice system.
Moreover, the connection to Bryan Stevenson’s work in "Just Mercy" highlights how individual narratives can illustrate systemic issues. Stevenson’s perseverance in uncovering evidence for Walter McMillian emphasizes the necessity for a just legal system that transcends racial and socioeconomic barriers. However, while the write-up rightly claims that there are various punishments that can serve justice more effectively than the death penalty, it's essential to also consider the experiences of victims’ families who may seek closure through these legal proceedings.
The call for a ban on the death penalty is indeed compelling, especially in light of the errors and biases documented within capital cases. However, it can be beneficial to engage in broader discussions that explore alternatives to capital punishment and focus on rehabilitation rather than mere retribution. Changing the public's perception as catalyzed by films like "Just Mercy" is a positive step, but ongoing societal dialogue remains imperative to drive comprehensive reforms in the legal system.
In summary, while I support many of the positions presented in the write-up, including the call for reform in the face of systemic racism, I believe that discussions around justice should continue to evolve and include a multitude of perspectives to foster a fairer and more just society.