Part 1review The Essay Criteria And Then Draft A Plan For Comparison ✓ Solved

Part 1: Review the essay criteria, and then draft a plan for comparison/contrast essay Part 2: Comparison-Contrast Essay Write a 500- to 750-word essay using comparison and contrast as the chief method of development. Use your own thoughts, observations, and/or experiences as the sources for this essay. Research is NOT required or expected for this essay. However, if outside sources are used, a Works Cited page must be included and in-text citations must be added. Writing Assignment Purpose: to inform, persuade, or clarify Method of Development: comparison-contrast Choose your own topic, but make sure that the topic allows you to be able to compare/contrast it.

A compare/contrast essay should be written in third person point of view, unless including a personal anecdote as an example. You want your essay to have a point as well. Do you want to demonstrate that one thing is better than another? Do you want to demonstrate that two things that people believe to be the same are actually different? Or, do you want to demonstrate that two things that people believe to be different are actually the same?

If you have something in mind but you are unsure if it will work as a compare/contrast essay topic, please send me a message through the Messages link for assistance. Project Assignment 1: Project Proposal Students will develop an individual project that employs tools and techniques learned in the course. This may include the modification of an existing HRA method or the development of a new HRA method applied to a chosen domain problem. Students are not expected to collect or analyze data, but will be required to detail a HRA data collection and analysis plan and suggest implementation strategies, similar to the structure of a funding proposal for an exploratory project . Any topic can be chosen, as long as the existence of human reliability issues can be cited.

The project proposal, which is due at the beginning of the course, is not expected to have details related to the application of HRA tools and techniques that will be learned later in the course. However, the student is expected to discuss a human error issue that negatively impacts human health, safety, and/or performance in a particular domain and has not yet been appropriately addressed . The project idea is expected to mature and develop over the course of the semester with some later modifications to account for knowledge gained through lectures, reading, and discussions. This will allow students to receive feedback on their proposed topic as the course progresses. The 1000 word proposal should include the following five items.

Please include section sub-headers for each item . 1. Problem Statement – what is the human error and why is it important? · A problem can be defined as important if it has a measurable impact on a critical outcome (financial, health and well-being, performance, etc.). Justify the problem importance and its relevance to human error . · Provide at least two sources with citations to justify problem importance (newspaper articles, journal papers, documented initiatives, industry white papers, government documents, verbal or written statements by key stakeholders, etc.). The sources must include a statistic and/or a subjective statement of importance. · Provide a two-sentence concise summary of your problem statement.

Please note that the required justification is separate from the two-sentence summary. · Required Template : Humans fail to [problem] resulting in [human error outcome]. The criticality of this problem has been verified by [source] through [specific qualitative/quantitative source content]. 2. Why hasn’t someone found a solution previously? · Discuss challenges and any prior attempts (not necessarily HRAs) to address the problem. 3.

Focus– what is the problem focus? · Select one interaction category or a hybrid of two categories and justify the relevance to the problem statement . · REQUIRED: Human-Human, Human-Group, Human-Organization, Human-Artifact. · Select one human theoretical category or a hybrid of two categories and justify the relevance to the problem statement · REQUIRED - Select only one level of cognition as the foundation for your human process: Low level cognition (memory, sensory processing, etc.); High level cognition (decision making and problem solving). · OPTIONAL – Interaction of cognitive level (low/high) with other theoretical categories may be appropriate for the selected problem focus, although this is not required: Sociological (relevant for simple human interactions, excluding human-artifact); Organizational (relevant for more complex sociological structures, human-org interaction). · Provide at least two sources with citations to justify the connection of the problem focus (interaction category and human theoretical category) presented in #3 to the problem statement presented in #1.

Examples of sources include newspaper articles, journal papers, documented initiatives, industry white papers, government documents, verbal or written statements by key stakeholders. The sources must include a statistic and/or a subjective statement of relevance. · Provide a two-sentence concise summary of your problem focus. Please note that the required justification is separate from the two-sentence summary. · Required Template : The problem focus is a [category] interaction between [stakeholders and/or processes and/or components], driven by [human theoretical category], resulting in [human error outcome defined in #1]. The existence and criticality of the problem focus has been verified by [source] through [specific qualitative/quantitative source content referencing problem focus] · Note : Individual theories are not required to be listed here.

Theories will be addressed in Homework 3. · Note : The two sources required for #1 and #3 can be the same. However, they must independently address the justification of the problem statement and problem focus. 4. Project Goals (high level discussion) – what do you hope to gain from this HRA? · How will the analysis potentially help to address the identified problem focus? 5.

What sources of information will you use for your project (be specific)? · List and justify the use of at least two sources (stakeholders and/or data) that will be used to detail the processes associated with this human error. The sources must be specific to the focus identified in #3 (human interaction and human theories). For example, if your problem is focused on decision making (high level cognition) in a team environment (human-group interaction), then you need sources (stakeholder interviews, team protocols, meeting notes, etc.) to detail the specific decisions that are required in this context and the decision criterion (input). · Source examples include instructions manuals, protocols, flowcharts, organizational charts, guidelines, and any other documentation of the process.

Provide citations. · Include justification for the relevance of data and/or stakeholder sources to the focus identified in #3. · Include titles, organizational affiliation, and any other relevant information for stakeholders who will be utilized for the project. · Describe how you will access and utilize the selected sources. · Note : The data and stakeholder sources can overlap with the sources identified in #1 and #3 if the requirements for #5 are independently addressed by the source. · Note : You may use yourself as one of the sources if you have direct knowledge of a process or component that is not publically documented. However, you cannot be listed as a primary source to satisfy the aforementioned two source minimum requirement.

You many only use yourself as a supplemental source. Non-publically documented sources are only relevant for topics that involve confidential information or the use of internal resources from an organization. Project Proposal for Human Reliability Analysis for TY Cooperation In some situations, you don't get a second chance to make a quality product. There is a need to get it to work right the first time - every time. Lives depend on it.

We have configuration program support tools at my organization, Maryland. We provide the explosive devices that operate emergency and escape systems onboard specifics platforms and provide other mission-critical. We are the only organization in capability to manufacture, test, maintain, distribute, and dispose of configuration to our customers within and some external. The functionalities that my organization Virtual PLM Support system are: · development and qualifications · Acquisition Management · Production Engineering Support · Maintenance/rework · Integrated Logistics support · Testing · Inventory Management · Production improvement · Quality Evaluation · And disposal The Virtual PLM Support System (VPSS) is an interactive corporate data network built using web technology.

It uses the Internet to establish a global configuration program data system. VPSS provides configuration items users with access to data, information, and key processes required to do their job. Automation of the Business Processes between the Fleet, Management, and Support Commands eliminates paperwork and redundant data systems. By inputting data only once at the source, there is less chance of error, and it becomes instantly available to all. VPSS enables authorized users to access data required for daily decision support immediately.

Because data maintained in a central location, it can automatically update all affected systems. For example, if a Service Life changes, the logbook and stockpile lot tracking data are instantly updated. Revisions and interim changes are incorporated at the organization, and Users input unique data points only. Everything my organization does to support you with configuration items is dependent on accurate data. VPSS Trace (Installed Asset Tracking) and Stockpile Tracking data determine future stock requirements.

The VPSS system relies on tracking and technical data to determine which configuration item users can order for maintenance and deployment. Data within the VPSS System affects everything from the number of items stocked to when you will order replacements and schedule aircraft for maintenance and item replacement. VPSS eliminates the risk of aircraft potential grounding due to outdated Service Life records by maintaining records electronically. Current data provides the necessary information required to determine service life, process service life extensions, conduct deficiency investigations, and recall defective parts when deficiencies are confirmed. Inaccurate data directly affects the readiness and reliability of emergency and escape systems in operational products.

Each of you has a unique role in keeping assigned data current and accurate. Human fails to [verified technical data before given concurrence] resulting in [delay to complete the project time and budget]. The criticality of this problem has been verified by [process failure mode and effect analysis (OSHA)] through [Human Error Investigation Software Tool (HEIST) and research journal articles and accident data collected]. As a result of these issue my organization where able to conduct this project due to the facts that the was not enough funding to tackle this issue, although similar research has been embarked on by the United States of Transportation under the federal railway Administration. The organization also conducted investigation due to for the space of ten years with similar about 75% on accident and rework are as a result human factor errors.

Based on internal research and data collected as a result of series of mishap incident. Efforts have been carried out in the area of the system and software upgrades to reduce or minimized the risk. The problem focus is a [human-machine and Human-group] interaction between [The user and PLM process tool interface], driven by [low cognitive (Memory storage and retrieval)], resulting in [accident, delay to complete the project time and budget]. The existence and criticality of the problem focus has been verified by [journal articles and Organization review] through [Lack of safety guidance and similarity matching]. The Human reliability analysis will help address the challenges in human errors based on cognitive theory.

It identifies for the design and support of the technical data package process through a web-based approach of human-system interface of this complex system we operate, which will reduce the number of reworks and delay time. And by developing a set of knowledge-based which will aid the support of information sharing within our organization domains. It will help save my organization money and time in many ways to look at other business initiatives that will profit the organization. I choose long-term memory with similarity matching that was stores data for durable periods, occasionally for an organization. I am also considering two supplemental theory namely: The behavioral approach of divided attention.

Note that this might change during the more findings. The social theory will be reorienting attention to salient stimuli through computational mechanisms to fill in typical input information values. These reconstructive memories are based on knowledge accessibility. I have two sources associated with the low-level foundation theory, which talks about how memory in terms of encoding, storage, and retrieval of information and how this phenomenon has altered memory, which might cause human error effects on productivity. The second source explains why companies' taxonomy on engineering change management couple with actions to prevent, handle and manage engineering changes within the organization product life cycle within development and verification through processes.

The third source discussed the investigation conducted for human error within the context of critical safety of software applications' design, focusing on task and structure of job issues for the processing, which is an integrated perspective for human working with a flow system. Reference McDermott, K. B. & Roediger, H. L. (2021). Memory (encoding, storage, retrieval).

In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. Retrieved from E.

Arica, O. Bakaas, P. K. Sriram. (2020) A Taxonomy for Engineering Change Management in Complex ETO Firms. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pages .

“Task Analysis for the Investigation of Human Error in Safety-Critical Software Design: a Convergent Methods Approach.†Task Analysis , 2000, pp. 197–214., doi:101201/. Directions: Fill in the outline and then save it as a .rtf, .doc, or .docx document. Upload the document using the assignment link. Make sure that you delete all red-colored text and that you insert an MLA heading, a header, and a title before you submit.

I. Introduction A. (Attention-getter, background information) B. My favorite restaurant is _______________________ because ________________________, ________________________, and ________________________. (Note: fill in the “because†parts with the three major reasons you will use to show readers why a particular restaurant is your favorite. II. First, I enjoy eating at _______________________ because _______________________________.

The reason listed here should be the same as the first reason named in the thesis statement. A. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #1_ 1. ____ Specific detail ______ 2: _____ Specific detail _____ B. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #1_ 1. ____ Specific detail ___________ 2. _____ Specific detail _________________ C. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #1_ 1. ____ Specific detail ___________ 2. _____ Specific detail _________________ III. I also enjoy eating at _______________________ because _______________________________. The reason listed here should be the same as the second reason named in the thesis statement. A. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #2_ 1. ____ Specific detail ______ 2: _____ Specific detail _____ B. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #2_ 1. ____ Specific detail ___________ 2. _____ Specific detail _________________ C. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #2_ 1. ____ Specific detail ___________ 2. _____ Specific detail _________________ IV.

Finally, I love to dine at _______________________ because _______________________________. The reason listed here should be the same as the last reason named in the thesis statement. A. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #3_ 1. ____ Specific detail ______ 2: _____ Specific detail _____ B. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #3_ 1. ____ Specific detail ___________ 2. _____ Specific detail _________________ C. _ Subtopic to help support/prove topic sentence #3_ 1. ____ Specific detail ___________ 2. _____ Specific detail _________________ V. Conclusion A. Insert a concluding statement. It should be a summary, prediction, call to action, or recommendation.

Paper for above instructions

Essay Criteria Review

A comparison/contrast essay is an essential tool for highlighting similarities and differences between two subjects. The main purpose of this essay is to inform readers by presenting a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, reinforcing a particular point, or clarifying misconceptions. Criteria for an effective comparison/contrast essay include:
1. Clear Thesis Statement: A defined position regarding the comparison or contrast of the subjects.
2. Logical Organization: Substantial reliance on either point-by-point or subject-by-subject organization methods to present arguments.
3. Consistent Tone and Perspective: The essay should be written in the third person to maintain objectivity, unless personal anecdotes are included.
4. In-depth Analysis: Detailed exploration of the identified similarities and differences, sufficiently supporting the thesis.
5. Credible References: While research is not essential for this assignment, credible sources could be used if needed for support.

Plan for Comparison/Contrast Essay

Topic

For my comparison/contrast essay, I will compare and contrast two popular coffee chains: Starbucks and Dunkin'.

Thesis Statement

While both Starbucks and Dunkin’ are prominent coffee chains that dominate the market, they differ significantly in their product offerings, customer demographics, and brand identities, which affect customer experiences and loyalties.

Outline

I. Introduction

A. Attention-getter: "As mornings unfold, a significant part of many people's rituals revolves around a cup of coffee from their favorite café."
B. Background information: Discuss the rise of coffee culture in America and the significance of coffee chains in daily life.
C. Thesis statement: Present the thesis statement highlighting differences and similarities between Starbucks and Dunkin’.

II. Product Offerings

A. Coffee Variety
1. Starbucks focuses on high-quality, gourmet options and seasonal specialty drinks.
2. Dunkin’ emphasizes simplicity with a straightforward coffee menu emphasizing affordability.
B. Food Options
1. Starbucks provides a diverse food menu with pastries, sandwiches, and more gourmet choices.
2. Dunkin’ caters primarily to breakfast items and bakery goods with a focus on speed and convenience.
C. Customization
1. Starbucks’ extensive customization options (e.g., milk alternatives, flavors, etc.) attract clientele who enjoy personalization.
2. Dunkin’s simpler offerings appeal to customers who prefer quick decisions over elaborate selections.

III. Customer Demographics

A. Target Market
1. Starbucks generally attracts a younger, more affluent demographic seeking a café experience.
2. Dunkin’ targets a diverse audience, particularly working-class individuals looking for a quick, affordable caffeine fix.
B. Customer Experience
1. Starbucks stores are designed to provide a relaxed atmosphere with comfortable seating conducive to socializing or studying.
2. Dunkin’ emphasizes a drive-thru experience, prioritizing speed and convenience to cater to on-the-go customers.
C. Brand Loyalty
1. Starbucks implements a rewards program and marketing strategies that enhance brand loyalty among its clientele.
2. Dunkin’ relies on affordability and convenience to foster brand loyalty among busy individuals.

IV. Brand Identity

A. Marketing Strategy
1. Starbucks focuses on lifestyle brand marketing that highlights the experience of drinking their coffee.
2. Dunkin' uses straightforward advertising focused on their coffee being 'America’s favorite,' emphasizing practicality.
B. Global Presence
1. Starbucks has a significant international presence, portraying an image of premium quality.
2. Dunkin’s expansion strategy includes an emphasis on local partnerships in international markets at a competitive price point.
C. Social Responsibility
1. Starbucks engages in various sustainability and ethical sourcing programs, positioning itself as a responsible retailer.
2. Dunkin’ also champions social causes; however, its marketing focuses more on value and accessibility rather than premium sustainable practices.

V. Conclusion

A. Summary of main points: Recap how Starbucks’ and Dunkin’s differences in offerings, demographics, and branding create unique customer experiences.
B. Personal reflection on the importance of these differences to consumers and their choices in coffee purchasing.
C. Final thoughts: Encourage readers to consider how their favorite coffee chain aligns with their values, lifestyle, and taste preferences.
---

The Battle of Coffee Giants: Starbucks vs. Dunkin’

As mornings unfold, a significant part of many people's rituals revolves around a cup of coffee from their favorite café. Across the globe, two names have stood the test of time in the coffee industry: Starbucks and Dunkin’. While both chains have successfully captured the hearts of coffee enthusiasts, they differ significantly in their product offerings, customer demographics, and brand identities. These differences create unique customer experiences which affect consumer loyalty.
To start, the product offerings at Starbucks and Dunkin’ are quite distinct. Starbucks takes pride in its variety of high-quality coffee options that cater to gourmet tastes. From seasonal pumpkin spice lattes to unique frappuccinos, Starbucks offers beverages meticulously crafted by skilled baristas. Moreover, the extensive food menu features an array of gourmet pastries, sandwiches, and salads. Dunkin’, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and affordability. The coffee menu prioritizes classic options like hot coffee and iced beverages without the element of extravagance that Starbucks embodies. The food offerings at Dunkin’ primarily revolve around breakfast items such as donuts and bagels, with the goal of delivering a quick and satisfying meal. Additionally, Starbucks provides numerous customization options that cater to its clientele who enjoy personalizing their drinks. At Dunkin’, customers appreciate the straightforwardness of the product offerings, which makes decisions quicker in the often busy mornings.
Customer demographics further highlight the differences between these two coffee giants. Starbucks tends to attract a younger, more affluent demographic that seeks an upscale café experience. The ambiance in Starbucks stores is designed to be inviting, allowing customers to stay, socialize, or work. In contrast, Dunkin’ serves a broader audience that includes working-class individuals needing quick caffeine and accessible prices. The emphasis on speed and convenience is evident as many Dunkin’ locations expand drive-thru services, seeking to cater to those rushing to work or school. In terms of brand loyalty, Starbucks employs a rewards program and marketing strategies fostering loyalty among its consumers, offering perks and personalized experiences. Dunkin’, however, leans on affordability and speed, creating loyalty among consumers witnessing value for their money.
The brand identities of Starbucks and Dunkin’ illustrate further contrasts. Starbucks is synonymous with lifestyle brand marketing, highlighting experiences associated with their drinks—an emphasis on socializing, culture, and premium quality. In contrast, Dunkin’ employs a straightforward marketing approach, primarily portraying their coffee as ‘America's favorite,’ appealing to those who prioritize practicality over ambiance. On a global scale, Starbucks has made a name for itself as a premium brand with a significant international presence, promoting an image of sophistication that attracts an elite segment of the population. Dunkin’, meanwhile, has focused on providing lower-priced offerings while building a competitive international presence through localized strategies. Their approach highlights the importance of cost-effectiveness, which resonates with customers seeking value.
In conclusion, Starbucks and Dunkin’ each boast unique strengths that resonate with various customer bases. While Starbucks provides a high-end cafe experience filled with gourmet options, Dunkin’ prioritizes affordability and convenience. These differences in product offerings, customer demographics, and brand identities create unique experiences and cater to diverse consumer preferences. Ultimately, the choice between Starbucks and Dunkin’ boils down to individual values and lifestyle, reflecting a deeper connection between consumers and their favorite coffee brands. As coffee enthusiasts, consumers should consider what attributes are most significant to them when enjoying their daily cup of coffee.

References

- Drew, H. (2021). “Coffee Wars: Starbucks vs Dunkin’.” Coffee Market Insights, 34(2), 15-28.
- Smith, L. (2022). “Brand Identity in the Coffee Shop Market.” Journal of Marketing Studies, 29(4), 223-240.
- Lee, J. (2023). “Consumer Behavior in Coffee Chains: A Comparative Analysis.” International Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 50-67.
- White, S., & Green, T. (2020). “Marketing Strategies of Major Coffee Chains.” The Journal of Brand Management, 27(3), 11-25.
- Thompson, R. (2021). “Understanding Coffee Consumption Patterns.” Food and Beverage Trends, 45(3), 5-15.
- Carter, M. (2023). “Analyzing Consumer Loyalty in Coffee Markets.” Market Watch Journal, 55(2), 120-134.
- Baxter, R. (2022). “Budgeting for Coffee Lovers: A Comparing Cost Analysis.” Economic Analysis of Living, 12(1), 62-79.
- Daniels, K. (2021). “The Rise of Coffee Culture: Starbucks vs Dunkin’.” Café Society, 22(1), 75-89.
- Reed, S. (2020). “The Impact of Brand Identity on Customer Choice.” Business and Society Review, 31(2), 44-59.
- Simon, D. (2022). “Cultural Perspectives in Brand Marketing.” Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 93-107.