Part I Diagnostic Summary And Mseprovide A Diagnostic Summary Of The ✓ Solved

Part I: Diagnostic Summary and MSE Provide a diagnostic summary of the client, Carl. Within this summary include: · Identifying Data/Client demographics · Chief complaint/Presenting Problem · Present illness · Past psychiatric illness · Substance use history · Past medical history · Family history · Mental Status Exam (Be professional and concise for all nine areas) · Appearance · Behavior or psychomotor activity · Attitudes toward the interviewer or examiner · Affect and mood · Speech and thought · Perceptual disturbances · Orientation and consciousness · Memory and intelligence · Reliability, judgment, and insight Part II: Analysis of MSE After completing Part I of the Assignment, provide an analysis and demonstrate critical thought (supported by references) in your response to the following: · Identify any areas in your MSE that require follow-up data collection. · Explain how using the cross-cutting measure would add to the information gathered. · Do Carl’s answers add to your ability to diagnose him in any specific way?

Why or why not? · Would you discuss a possible diagnosis with Carl at this point in time? Why? Support Part II with citations/references. The DSM 5 and case study do not need to be cited. Utilize the other course readings to support your response.

Literature Evaluation Table Student Name: Summary of Clinical Issue ( words): PICOT Question: Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) Purpose Statement Research Question Outcome Setting (Where did the study take place?) Sample Method Key Findings of the Study Recommendations of the Researcher Criteria Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) Purpose Statement Research Question Outcome Setting (Where did the study take place?) Sample Method Key Findings of the Study Recommendations of the Researcher © 2019.

Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Paper for above instructions

Identifying Data/Client Demographics

Carl is a 32-year-old Caucasian male residing in an urban environment. He is currently unemployed and has a high school education. Carl has no significant medical history and lives alone. He reports minimal social interaction aside from his engagement with family members, which he describes as aloof.

Chief Complaint/Presenting Problem

Carl's chief complaint is persistent depression, which he describes as a “heavy sadness” that has plagued him for over six months. He states that he feels hopeless and often contemplates the value of his life. Additionally, he has reported profound fatigue and a lack of motivation to engage in activities he once enjoyed.

Present Illness

Carl's depressive symptoms began six months ago, following a romantic breakup that he viewed as a significant loss. He reports a significant decline in both mood and social functioning since the breakup. Notably, he experiences sleep disturbances, profound tiredness, and decreased appetite. He also notes feelings of worthlessness and diminished ability to concentrate at work, exacerbating his unemployment status.

Past Psychiatric Illness

Carl has no documented history of psychiatric disorders prior to this episode of major depression. However, he experienced occasional low moods during his teenage years but did not pursue mental health treatment at that time.

Substance Use History

Carl reports occasional alcohol use, primarily during social gatherings, with no history of substance abuse or dependence. He denies the use of illicit drugs and prescription medications, stating that he prefers to cope with his problems independently.

Past Medical History

Carl has no significant past medical history. He has not experienced any major illnesses or surgeries and reports no chronic conditions, which could contribute to his current mental health difficulties.

Family History

Carl’s family psychiatric history includes a mother who suffered from severe depression and an uncle who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. He reports that these family members sought treatment sporadically but did not have long-term management plans or ongoing support.

Mental Status Exam (MSE)

- Appearance: Carl is casually dressed but presents as disheveled. His grooming and hygiene appear neglected.
- Behavior or Psychomotor Activity: He exhibits psychomotor retardation, sitting with slumped posture and showing limited spontaneous movement.
- Attitudes Toward the Interviewer or Examiner: He is cooperative but appears guarded and hesitant to discuss personal feelings.
- Affect and Mood: Carl’s mood is consistently reported as “down.” His affect is flat with limited facial expression, indicating potential emotional numbness.
- Speech and Thought: His speech is slow and low in volume, and he often struggles to find words. His thought processes appear coherent but significantly pessimistic regarding his life situation.
- Perceptual Disturbances: Carl denies any hallucinations or delusions at this time but describes pervasive thoughts of hopelessness.
- Orientation and Consciousness: He is alert and oriented to person, place, and time, with no cognitive impairments noted.
- Memory and Intelligence: During the interview, his memory is intact; he recalls past events accurately but reveals concentration issues.
- Reliability, Judgment, and Insight: Carl shows poor judgment, particularly relating to his safety, expressing thoughts that his life isn’t worth living. His insight is limited as he struggles to connect his emotional state with potential solutions.
---

Follow-up Data Collection Areas

Several areas of the MSE warrant further evaluation. First, a comprehensive substance use evaluation is essential to rule out any underlying substance use disorders, particularly since his alcohol consumption, although described as occasional, can significantly affect mental health (Giancola, 2000). A more in-depth exploration of Carl’s familial history could also provide insight into inherited psychological patterns, which can aid in understanding his condition (Kendler et al., 2006). Lastly, an assessment of any previous therapy or treatment responses is important to guide future interventions.

Cross-Cutting Measures

Incorporating the DSM-5’s cross-cutting measures will enhance the data collection by exploring symptoms across different disorders. For instance, evaluating Carl’s anxiety levels or any impulsivity-related symptoms could reveal co-morbid conditions that might necessitate a more nuanced treatment approach (Kelleher et al., 2018). This holistic perspective can aid in achieving a comprehensive understanding of Carl's psychological state.

Diagnostic Ability

Carl’s responses during the assessment provide notable insights for diagnosis. His comprehensive emotional desolation, self-deprecating views, and common depressive symptoms strongly suggest a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, it is essential to exercise caution and proceed with thorough validation and criteria matching, given the complexities associated with diagnostic categorizations (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

Discussion of Possible Diagnosis with Carl

At this juncture, it may be premature to discuss a diagnosis with Carl. This decision is informed by an evident need for further evaluation and the development of rapport necessary for effective therapeutic alliance. Providing a premature diagnosis could provoke anxiety or resistance, adversely affecting therapeutic engagement. Instead, initial discussions might center on potential treatment avenues, emphasizing the objective of alleviating his distress rather than labeling his condition (McHugh & Barlow, 2010). Engaging Carl in a dialogue about his experiences fosters a supportive environment conducive to exploration and treatment planning.

Conclusion

The diagnostic summary and analysis provided a structured assessment of Carl’s current mental state, emphasizing the importance of a methodical approach in evaluating complex presentations. It is imperative that subsequent follow-up assessments are conducted to ensure Carl receives the optimal intervention that addresses both his immediate needs and underlying concerns.
---

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
Giancola, P. R. (2000). Alcohol-related aggression during the college years: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.14.2.113
Kelleher, I., Murtagh, M., & O’Reilly, A. (2018). Cross-cutting measures: A case for their implementation in child and adolescent mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(5), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12876
Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., & Eaves, L. J. (2006). A population-based twin study of major depression in women: The importance of social support and life stress. Psychological Medicine, 22(2), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700014489
McHugh, R. K., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: A review of the current state of the literature. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x