Performance Enhancing Drugs: The Legal Perspective ✓ Solved

The use of performance enhancing drugs has been a major challenge among the most famous men and women from all of sports and from ancient days. Many have developed health issues or have been disqualified or suspended from the field of sports after anti-doping agencies realize performance enhancing drugs have been used. This paper is aimed at discussing the use of performance enhancing drugs from a legal perspective. My paper will first briefly explore about various sports and games, generally, the importance of sporting activities, both locally and internationally, as a form of recreational activity and as a source of income. Importantly, it will be followed by the use of performance enhancing drugs while participating in sports as well at the consequences. This paper will extremely be of help to raise awareness, change perspectives and attitude towards the use of drugs among youth, children and adolescents in sports. This study will also outline the ethical part as well as the global consequences and the impacts to personal health.

Introduction

Performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) have been a contentious issue in the realm of sports for decades, raising questions that extend well into ethical, legal, and health domains. These substances, including steroids and stimulants, are often used by athletes to gain a competitive edge, improve performance, and even aid in recovery from injuries. As sports become increasingly commercialized, the temptation to enhance performance through illegal means grows correspondingly. This paper examines performance enhancing drugs from a legal perspective, assessing the implications of their use in sports and the regulatory frameworks designed to combat doping.

Importance of Sports in Society

Sports serve as a vital element of cultural and social life globally. They promote physical health, offer recreational opportunities, and generate substantial economic revenue. From local youth leagues to professional franchises, sports create opportunities for talent development and community engagement. Moreover, athletes often serve as role models, influencing attitudes and behaviors, particularly among young people. However, the integrity of sports is threatened when competitors resort to unethical means to gain superiority. The use of PEDs not only jeopardizes fair competition but also endangers athletes’ health (Fraleigh, 1984).

Consequences of Using Performance Enhancing Drugs

When athletes choose to use performance enhancing drugs, they face a myriad of consequences. Legal repercussions can range from fines and suspensions to lifetime bans from their sport, enforced by regulatory bodies such as the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Beyond regulatory implications, there exists a significant impact on health. Long-term use of steroids and other performance enhancing substances can lead to severe medical conditions, including hormonal imbalances, heart problems, and psychiatric disorders (Gomez, 2002). The repercussions extend beyond the individual athlete, damaging the credibility of the sport itself and diminishing the value of achievements earned through fair competition.

Legal Framework Surrounding Performance Enhancing Drugs

Globally, a considerable legal framework is established to combat the use of PEDs in sports. Agencies like WADA operate under a code that outlines prohibited substances and methods. The legal environment is designed to protect the integrity of sports and ensure fairness. Violations of doping regulations can lead to penalties for both athletes and coaches. In the United States, the Anabolic Steroid Control Act categorizes steroids as illegal substances, enforcing strict penalties for distribution and possession (Emran et al., 2014). There exists an ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of these laws, as many argue that they do not sufficiently deter athletes from doping.

Ethical Considerations

Ethically, the use of performance enhancing drugs presents profound questions. Is it fair for athletes to use substances that give them an artificial advantage? What responsibilities do coaches and sponsors have in influencing or controlling athletes’ choices regarding performance enhancement? Society’s stance on PED use often fluctuates, swinging between condemnation and tacit acceptance, particularly when athletes' performances lead to extraordinary achievements (Sigman, 2008). The ethical dilemma is amplified in youth sports, where pressure to perform may lead young athletes to consider dangerous substances, often without understanding the potential consequences.

The Role of Education and Awareness

Education plays a crucial role in mitigating the use of performance enhancing drugs. It is essential for athletes, particularly young and emerging athletes, to be informed about the risks associated with PED use. Initiatives that focus on anti-doping education can empower athletes to make informed decisions and support a culture of integrity in sports. Furthermore, stakeholders such as coaches, sports organizations, and parents must work together to create environments that prioritize health and fairness over winning at all costs (Kamenju et al., 2016).

Conclusion

The legal perspective on performance enhancing drugs reveals a complex interaction between ethics, health, and sportsmanship. The consequences of using these drugs extend far beyond individual athletes, affecting entire sports communities and the essence of competition itself. Legal regulations and ethical considerations must continue to evolve to ensure the integrity of sports remains intact. Ongoing education and advocacy are pivotal in changing attitudes towards drug use in sports, fostering a culture where athlete health and genuine skill are celebrated over artificial enhancement.

References

  • Emran, M. A., Hossain, S. S., Salek, A. K. M., Khan, M. M., Ahmed, S. M., Khandaker, M. N., & Islam, M. T. (2014). Drug abuse in sports and doping. Bangladesh Medical Journal, 43(1), 46-50.

  • Fraleigh, W. P. (1984). Performance-enhancing drugs in sport: The ethical issue. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 11(1), 23-28.

  • Gomez, J. E. (2002). Performance-enhancing substances in adolescent athletes. Texas medicine, 98(2), 41-46.

  • Kamenju, J., Muli, K., Mbiriri, J., & Gathua, M. (2016). The impacts of performance-enhancing drugs on athletes. International Journal of Sports Science, 6(3), 217-222.

  • Sigman, S. M. (2008). Are We All Dopes? A Behavioral Law & (and) Economics Approach to Legal Regulation of Doping in Sports? Marq. Sports L. Rev., 19, 125.

  • World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). (2021). World Anti-Doping Code. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code

  • Neylor, J., & Pape, P. (2015). Steroid use and sports: A historical perspective. Sports History Review, 46(1), 58-74.

  • Johnson, E., & Anderson, R. G. (2019). Performance-enhancing substances in sport: A comprehensive review. Journal of Athletic Training, 54(10), 10-15.

  • Smith, L., & Wilson, C. (2016). Ethical implications of performance enhancement in sports. The Sport Journal, 19(2), 1-9.

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2020). Is drug use in sports increasing? Retrieved from https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/steroids/is-drug-use-in-sports-increasing