Please explain what was the prevailing attitude of the U.S. ✓ Solved
The prevailing attitude of the U.S. military in the immediate post-World War I period was characterized by a strong inclination towards demobilization and a reevaluation of military needs. Following the end of the war in 1918, there was a significant push within the military establishment to reduce the size of the armed forces. This was influenced by a desire to cut military expenditures and redirect resources towards domestic issues, as the nation had faced the challenges of transitioning from a wartime economy to a peacetime one. The widespread belief was that the war had been a significant enough exertion, warranting a reduction in military capabilities and personnel. Military leaders, influenced by public sentiment, recognized that there was little appetite among the American population for continued military engagement overseas.
In addition to demobilization, there was a growing sentiment within the U.S. military that emphasized the importance of air power and technological advancement. The lessons from World War I showed that aerial warfare had become a significant component of military strategy. Military leaders began to advocate for the development of an Air Service to ensure that the U.S. took its place as a leader in aviation technology. This attitude was reinforced by the establishment of airmail services and the recognition of the need for effective air transportation, which showcased the potential military applications of aviation. Consequently, there was a shift in focus from ground and naval forces to incorporating air power, reflecting changing perceptions of warfare in a post-war context.
Finally, the post-war attitude of the U.S. military also involved reassessing its global role and international policies. The concept of isolationism became prominent as many military leaders and politicians believed that the sacrifices made during the war should not lead to further entanglements in international conflicts. This resulted in a cautious approach to military engagements, where military leaders were keen on preserving peace rather than pursuing aggressive expansion. The military's role was then seen as one of defense rather than intervention, resonating with a wider national sentiment that favored isolationism in the years following World War I. The prevailing attitude, therefore, was one of reflection and caution, emphasizing the importance of national stability over international military commitments.
Paper For Above Instructions
The prevailing attitude of the U.S. military in the immediate post-World War I period was characterized by a strong inclination towards demobilization and a reevaluation of military needs. Following the end of the war in 1918, there was a significant push within the military establishment to reduce the size of the armed forces. This was influenced by a desire to cut military expenditures and redirect resources towards domestic issues, as the nation had faced the challenges of transitioning from a wartime economy to a peacetime one. The widespread belief was that the war had been a significant enough exertion, warranting a reduction in military capabilities and personnel. Military leaders, influenced by public sentiment, recognized that there was little appetite among the American population for continued military engagement overseas.
In addition to demobilization, there was a growing sentiment within the U.S. military that emphasized the importance of air power and technological advancement. The lessons from World War I showed that aerial warfare had become a significant component of military strategy. Military leaders began to advocate for the development of an Air Service to ensure that the U.S. took its place as a leader in aviation technology. This attitude was reinforced by the establishment of airmail services and the recognition of the need for effective air transportation, which showcased the potential military applications of aviation. Consequently, there was a shift in focus from ground and naval forces to incorporating air power, reflecting changing perceptions of warfare in a post-war context.
Finally, the post-war attitude of the U.S. military also involved reassessing its global role and international policies. The concept of isolationism became prominent as many military leaders and politicians believed that the sacrifices made during the war should not lead to further entanglements in international conflicts. This resulted in a cautious approach to military engagements, where military leaders were keen on preserving peace rather than pursuing aggressive expansion. The military's role was then seen as one of defense rather than intervention, resonating with a wider national sentiment that favored isolationism in the years following World War I. The prevailing attitude, therefore, was one of reflection and caution, emphasizing the importance of national stability over international military commitments.
References
- Bailey, T. A., & Kennedy, D. M. (2009). The American Military: A History. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Cook, R. (2011). World War I: The American Experience. London: Routledge.
- D'Este, C. (1995). World War I: The War to End All Wars. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
- Gilbert, M. (1994). The First World War: A Complete History. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Hoffman, P. (2013). WWI and the Birth of Modern Us Military Policy. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History.
- Keegan, J. (1998). The First World War. New York: Knopf.
- Schneider, C. (2006). The United States Air Service. Washington, D.C.: Air Force History and Museums Program.
- Theoharis, A. (2011). The Military and Public Policy After the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Tuchman, B. W. (1962). The Guns of August. New York: Macmillan.
- Weigley, R. F. (1993). A History of the United States Army. New York: Simon & Schuster.