Porters Competitive Strategiescooperative Strategiescooperat ✓ Solved

Porter's competitive strategies involve cooperative strategies, which refer to a planning strategy in which two or more firms work together to achieve a common objective. Companies utilize these strategies to enhance their profits through collaboration rather than competition. This paper will discuss the different types of cooperative strategies, including joint ventures, equity strategic alliances, and non-equity strategic alliances, along with the concepts of core competencies and distinctive capabilities.

Types of Cooperative Strategies

Cooperative strategies can be classified into three main forms: joint ventures, equity strategic alliances, and non-equity strategic alliances. Each of these forms entails a unique method of collaboration between firms for mutual benefit.

1. Joint Venture

A joint venture is established when two parent companies create a new child company. This arrangement allows the firms to pool their resources and share in the risks and rewards associated with the new entity. For example, companies like BMW and Toyota have collaborated on research into hydrogen fuel cells and vehicle electrification through a joint venture. Such partnerships can accelerate innovation while minimizing costs.

2. Equity Strategic Alliance

An equity strategic alliance is formed when one company acquires a significant equity stake in another company. This approach solidifies their relationship and allows for deeper integration. A notable example is Panasonic's partnership with Tesla Motors. In 2009, Panasonic agreed to supply Tesla with lithium-ion battery cells, and later invested $30 million in Tesla. Over time, they expanded their collaboration to include co-manufacturing batteries, showcasing the strength of equity strategic alliances.

3. Non-equity Strategic Alliance

In contrast to the other two strategies, a non-equity strategic alliance does not involve the ownership stake. Instead, it relies on contractual agreements to pool resources and capabilities. A practical example can be seen in the partnership between Starbucks and Kroger, where Starbucks operates kiosks in Kroger locations. This agreement benefits both parties, as Kroger increases its in-store offerings while Starbucks gains access to more customers.

Core Competencies and Distinctive Capabilities

Understanding core competencies and distinctive capabilities is crucial for firms pursuing competitive strategies. Core competencies refer to essential business skills that are central to a company's performance and success. These competencies can include technical expertise, innovative capabilities, or efficient processes that provide competitive advantages.

Distinctive capabilities, on the other hand, are characteristics that set a company apart from its competitors. These may include superior customer service, brand reputation, or unique technological prowess. Identifying and enhancing these competencies is vital for companies engaging in cooperative strategies, as they allow partners to leverage their strengths effectively.

Evaluating Internal Environment

When assessing potential cooperative strategies, it is important to evaluate various internal factors, such as strengths and weaknesses. This evaluation can be structured using an Internal Factor Analysis Summary (IFAS) table, which identifies five strengths and five weaknesses of an organization. Each factor is assigned a weight (ranging from 0.00 to 1.00) based on its importance, and then rated according to its significance.

The weighted ratios of these factors are then summed to yield an overall weighted ratio, which reflects the company's internal position and strategic intent. For example, if a firm consistently achieves a weighted ratio above 2.5, it indicates a solid internal environment conducive to implementing competitive strategies.

Conclusion

Cooperative strategies can serve as a powerful means for companies to enhance their market positions by leveraging each other's strengths. Through joint ventures, equity strategic alliances, and non-equity strategic alliances, firms can achieve objectives that may be unattainable individually. Moreover, understanding core competencies and distinctive capabilities allows firms to build stronger partnerships and adapt their strategies for future success. By assessing internal strengths and weaknesses, organizations can align their cooperative strategies with their broader strategic goals, ensuring sustainable competitive advantages.

References

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

  • Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering. Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.

  • Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D Partnerships: An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns Since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477-492.

  • Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Building The Future of Competitive Advantage: The Role of Strategic Alliances. Management Science, 46(6), 863-876.

  • Kogut, B. (1988). Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319-332.

  • Oded Shenkar, & David J. Reuer (2006). A Knowledge-Based Perspective on International Joint Ventures: The Energies Resourced by the Local Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 797-809.

  • Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Review and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 27(5), 907-939.

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.

  • Whittington, R. (2001). What is Strategy and Does it Matter? Routledge.