Psy 328 Project One Milestone Templateto Begin Your Milestone First S ✓ Solved

PSY 328 Project One Milestone Template To begin your milestone, first select two personality theories from the left column of the following table that you think contrast in meaningful ways. Next, from the right column of the table, select three topics that you will use to contrast your theories. Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Personality Theories and Approaches Topics · Humanistic psychology · Psychoanalytic theory · Neo-Freudian/object relations theory · Trait approach · Biological perspective · Motivation A. Scientific nature B.

Nature versus nurture C. Origin of problems D. Pathology E. Free will F. Environmental influences G.

Internal versus external stimuli Identify which two theories or approaches you will compare and contrast and explain why you chose them. Your response should be about 2 to 4 sentences. [Insert text] Describe how your two chosen theories differ on 3 topics. See the details for topics A through G in the assignment guidelines and rubric document. Your response for each topic should be about 3 to 5 sentences. Topic 1 [Insert text] Topic 2 [Insert text] Topic 3 [Insert text] Describe at least one similarity between your two selected theories.

Your response should be about 3 to 5 sentences. [Insert text] References [Insert text if needed] 1 This assignment is intended to enhance your ability to make connections between the course readings and “real-life†situations and the everyday occurrence of cognitive processes as depicted in popular media and professional research sources. This is your opportunity to express your thoughts succinctly and coherently. Be creative, but ensure that the reader is able to discern that you can critique the article/media source in a scholarly way that is related to course material. This is a great launching point as you begin brainstorming for the Week 7 Creative Project. Assignment Instructions For this assignment, you are tasked with identifying a research article or reliable, popular media source (news segment, blog article, etc.) that focuses on a topic related to cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, of a specific process or function we have addressed in the first three weeks of the course.

Upon identifying your select media option, you will draft a 5 to 6-page reflection paper, summarizing the media sources’ topic, and its relevance to our understanding of cognition and learning. Any topic discussed in our readings is fair game but needs to be clearly depicted in the source you chose. In your submission, please be sure to clearly address the following topics: · Briefly describe the article/media source you selected (e.g. its plot, characters, themes, etc.). · This description does not need to be lengthy (the entire plot or process explained does not need to be explained; hit the high points). · Rather, the summary should be sufficient to demonstrate that you reviewed the article/media source and can convey the most relevant aspects as they relate to cognitive psychology. · Describe the cognitive psychology concept. · What does it mean in relation to your article/media source? · How do you see it displayed in the article/media source you chose? · What new information have you learned about cognitive psychology and how it is portrayed in the public eye? · Does the information portrayed in the article have broader implications for the field of cognitive psychology as it is presented? .

Paper for above instructions

Personality Theories and Approaches

Selected Theories

For this project, the two contrasting personality theories chosen for comparison are the Psychoanalytic Theory and the Humanistic Psychology. Psychoanalytic theory, founded by Sigmund Freud, emphasizes unconscious motives and conflicts as the main forces behind human behavior. Conversely, humanistic psychology, championed by figures like Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow, focuses on conscious awareness and the inherent potential for personal growth. The stark differences between their views on human behavior, motivation, and the nature of psychological health make them a compelling contrast for analysis.

Topic 1: Scientific Nature

Psychoanalytic theory is often criticized for its lack of scientific rigor. Freud’s foundational concepts, such as the id, ego, and superego, are largely based on case studies rather than empirical evidence, leading to challenges regarding replicability and falsifiability (Freud, 1923). This characteristic raises skepticism about its validity in the scientific community. In contrast, humanistic psychology prides itself on being more holistic and client-centered, using qualitative and quantitative research methods to explore the human experience, emphasizing well-being over pathology (Rogers, 1961). Humanistic approaches advocate for a more experiential understanding of behavior rather than relying heavily on interpretable unconscious processes.

Topic 2: Nature Versus Nurture

The contrasting perspectives of psychoanalytic theory and humanistic psychology also extend to the nature versus nurture debate. Psychoanalytic theory leans heavily towards the belief that human behavior is primarily shaped by innate drives, particularly those centered around sexuality and aggression (Freud, 1905). Freud posited that familial interactions during early life were critical in forming personality. In stark contrast, humanistic psychology emphasizes the role of environmental factors in personal development, highlighting that individual experiences and societal influences can significantly impact self-concept and personal growth (Maslow, 1943). This championing of the nurture aspect reinforces the belief that individuals have the power to shape their own destinies through choices and experiences.

Topic 3: Internal versus External Stimuli

In examining how these two theories interpret the sources of motivation, we find different focuses on internal versus external stimuli. Psychoanalytic theory posits that much of human behavior is driven by internal conflicts and unexpressed desires stemming from childhood experiences (Freud, 1923). This focus on unconscious motivation suggests that individuals are often oblivious to the true sources of their actions. Conversely, humanistic psychology advocates for the influence of external stimuli, particularly in fostering a positive self-image and personal development. Important concepts like self-actualization and unconditional positive regard emphasize how positive feedback from the environment and relationships enhance personal growth and fulfillment (Rogers, 1961). This highlights an important contrast since one theory emphasizes internal struggles while the other promotes external supports.

Similarity Between the Theories

Despite their considerable differences, both psychoanalytic theory and humanistic psychology share a fundamental belief in the complexity of human experience. Each theory conveys the importance of understanding deeper psychological processes to improve mental health. Both schools of thought emphasize the multifaceted nature of human beings and acknowledge that understanding behavior requires a more profound exploration beyond observable actions (Maslow, 1943; Freud, 1923).

References

1. Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Basic Books.
2. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. Hogarth Press.
3. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
4. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
5. Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 197-221.
6. Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality: Theory and Research. John Wiley & Sons.
7. McAdams, D. P. (1995). The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. Guilford Press.
8. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrated theory of personality and social development. In D. Funder (Ed.), Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–130). Wiley.
9. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Four Ways Five Factors Are Not Basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(8), 773–790.
10. Schunk, D. H. (2009). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
This comparison effectively highlights how psychoanalytic theory and humanistic psychology diverge significantly while sharing a common ground in understanding the complexities of the human experience.